Interaction and Second Language Development

References

1. Agar, M
   (1994) Culture shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York, NY: Morrow.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aljaafreh, A. , & Lantolf, J.P
   (1994) Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1994.tb02064.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x [Google Scholar]
3. Antón, M. , & DiCamilla, F.J
   (1998) Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314–353. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.54.3.314
   https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.3.314 [Google Scholar]
4. Atkinson, D
   (2011) Introduction: Cognitivism and second language acquisition. In D.Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.1–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Atkinson, D
   (2011) A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition: How mind, body, and world work together in learning additional languages. In D.Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.143–166). New York, NY: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bucholtz, M
   (2007) Variation in transcription. Discourse Studies, 9, 784–808. doi: 10.1177/1461445607082580
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082580 [Google Scholar]
7. Budoff, M
   (1987) The validity of learning potential assessment. In C.S.Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp.53–81). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Canale, M. , & Swain, M
   (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47. doi: 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
9. Cazden, C
   (1981) Performance before competence: Assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3(1), 5–8.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cekaite, A
    (2009) Soliciting teacher attention in an L2 classroom: Affect displays, classroom artefacts, and embodied action. Applied Linguistics, 30, 26–48. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm057
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm057 [Google Scholar]
11. Centeno-Cortés, B. , & Jiménez Jiménez, A.F
    (2004) Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language: The importance of L1 in private verbal thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 7–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2004.00052.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00052.x [Google Scholar]
12. Chaiklin, S
    (2003) The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky‘s analysis of learning and instruction. In A.Kozulin , B.Gindis , V.Ageyev , & S.Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp.39–64). Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004 [Google Scholar]
13. Cole, M
    (2009) The perils of translation: A first step in reconsidering Vygotsky’s theory of development in relation to formal education. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 16, 291–295. doi: 10.1080/10749030902795568
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030902795568 [Google Scholar]
14. Davin, K.J
    (2013) Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 303–322. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482934
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482934 [Google Scholar]
15. Davydov, V.V
    (2004) Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study (Trans. P.Moxay ). Moscow: Akademyia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. DeKeyser, R
    (1993) The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1993.tb01999.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01999.x [Google Scholar]
17. Dewaele, J.-M. , & Li, W
    (2014) Intra- and inter-individual variation in self-reported code-switching patterns of adult multilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11(2), 225–246. doi: 10.1080/14790718.2013.878347
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2013.878347 [Google Scholar]
18. DiCamilla, F.J. , & Antón, M
    (2004) Private speech: A study of language for thought in collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 36–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2004.00053.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00053.x [Google Scholar]
19. Di Pietro, R.J
    (1987) Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Donato, R
    (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P.Lantolf & G.Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dunn, W. , & Lantolf, J.P
    (1998) Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and Krashen’s i + 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 411–442. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00048
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00048 [Google Scholar]
22. Ellis, N.C
    (2009) The psycholinguistics of the Interaction Hypothesis. In A.Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction in SLA: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass. (pp.11–40). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ellis, R
    (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ellis, R
    (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172. doi: 10.1017/S0272263105050096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
25. Eskildsen, S
    (2012) L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62, 335–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00698.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00698.x [Google Scholar]
26. Ferreira, M
    (2005) A concept-based approach to writing instruction: From the abstract concept to the concrete performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Feuerstein, R. , Rand, Y. , & Hoffman, M
    (1979) The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device (LPAD). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Firth, A. , & Wagner, J
    (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Research, 81, 285–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
29. Firth, A. , & Wagner, J
    (2007) Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00670.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00670.x [Google Scholar]
30. Frawley, W
    (1997) Vygotsky and cognitive science. Language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674332324
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674332324 [Google Scholar]
31. Gal’perin, P.I
    (1989) Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology, 27(3).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gal’perin, P.I
    (1992) Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30(4).
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gardner, J
    (Ed.) (2012) Assessment and learning (2nd edn). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gass, S. , & Mackey, A
    (2006) Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3–17. doi: 10.1075/aila.19.03gas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.03gas [Google Scholar]
35. Gass, S.M. , & Varonis, E.M
    (1985) Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37–58. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100005143
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005143 [Google Scholar]
36. Gass, S.M. , & Varonis, E.M
    (1994) Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283–302. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100013097
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100013097 [Google Scholar]
37. Goffman, E
    (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Goodwin, C
    (2007) Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53–73. doi: 10.1177/0957926507069457
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457 [Google Scholar]
39. Guk, I. , & Kellogg, D
    (2007) The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11, 281–299. doi: 10.1177/1362168807077561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807077561 [Google Scholar]
40. Hall, J.K
    (1993) The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14, 145–166. doi: 10.1093/applin/14.2.145
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.145 [Google Scholar]
41. Hall, J.K
    (2001) Methods for teaching foreign languages: Creating a community of learners in the classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hall, J.K. , & Pekarek Doehler, S
    (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. In J.K. Hall , J.Hellermann , & S.Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp.1–15). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hall, J.K. , Hellermann, J. , & Pekarek Doehler, S
    (Eds.) (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hatch, E
    (1978) Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E.Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp.401–435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Haywood, H.C. , & Lidz, C.S
    (2007) Dynamic Assessment in practice. Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hellermann, J
    (2011) Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In J.K.Hall , J. Hellermann , & S.Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp.147–172). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hellermann, J. , & Doehler, S
    (2010) On the contingent nature of language-learning tasks. Classroom Discourse, 1, 25–45. doi: 10.1080/19463011003750657
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463011003750657 [Google Scholar]
48. Hopper, P
    (1987) Emergent grammar [Electronic version]. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157. Available from: home.eserver.org/hopper/emergence.html doi: 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834 [Google Scholar]
49. Hopper, P.J
    (1998) Emergent grammar. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp.155–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hulstijn, J.H
    (2003) Incidental and intentional learning. In C.J.Doughty & M.H.Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch12 [Google Scholar]
51. John-Steiner, V.P
    (2007) Vygotsky on thinking and speaking. In H.Daniels , M.Cole , & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp.136–152). Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521831040.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.006 [Google Scholar]
52. Johnson, K.E
    (2009) Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Kasper, G. , & Wagner, J
    (2011) Conversation analysis as an approach to second language acquisition. In D.Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.117–142). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Kendon, A
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
55. Kozulin, A
    (2003) Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A.Kozulin , B.Gindis , V.S. Ageyev , & S.M.Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural contexts (pp.15–38). Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511840975.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.003 [Google Scholar]
56. Kramsch, C
    (1986) From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal, 70, 366–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05291.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05291.x [Google Scholar]
57. Kramsch, C. , & Whiteside, A
    (2008) Language ecology in multilingual setting. Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29, 645–671. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn022 [Google Scholar]
58. Krashen, S
    (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Krashen, S
    (1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lado, R
    (1957) Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Lantolf, J.P
    (2003) Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the second language classroom. In A.Kozulin , B.Gindis , V.S.Ageyev , & S.M.Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp.349–370). Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511840975.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.018 [Google Scholar]
62. Lantolf, J.P
    (2006) Sociocultural theory and L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67–109. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037 [Google Scholar]
63. Lantolf, J.P
    (2011a) The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition and L2 development. In D.Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.24–47). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Lantolf, J.P
    (2011b) Integrating sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics in the second language classroom. In E.Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol.2; pp.303–318). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Lantolf, J.P. , & Poehner, M.E
    (2004) Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49–74. doi: 10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872 [Google Scholar]
66. Lantolf, J.P. , & Poehner, M.E
    (2011) Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15, 11–33. doi: 10.1177/1362168810383328
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328 [Google Scholar]
67. Lantolf, J.P. , & Poehner, M.E
    (2014) Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lantolf, J.P. , & Thorne, S.L
    (2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development: Vygotskian praxis and the research/praxis divide. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Larsen-Freeman, D
    (2007) Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 773–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00668.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00668.x [Google Scholar]
70. Lave, J. , & Wenger, E
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
71. Levine, G.S
    (2011) Code choice in the language classroom. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Levinson, S
    (1988) Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In P.Drew & A.Wooton (Eds.), Erving Goffman (pp.161–227). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Long, M
    (1981) Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1981.tb42014.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x [Google Scholar]
74. Long, M
    (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K.Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.413–454). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Lyster, R. , & Ranta, L
    (2013) The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 (1), 167–184. doi: 10.1017/S027226311200071X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200071X [Google Scholar]
76. Macaro, E
    (2001) Analysing Student Teachers’ Codeswitching in Foreign Language classrooms: Theories and decision making. Modern Language Journal, 85 (4), 531–548. doi: 10.1111/0026‑7902.00124
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00124 [Google Scholar]
77. Macaro, E
    (2009) Teacher use of code-switching in the L2 classroom: Exploring ‘optimal’ use. In M.Turnbull & J.Dailey-O’Cain (Eds.), First language use in second and foreign language learning (pp.35–49). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Mackey, A. , & Polio, C
    (2009a) Introduction. In A.Mackey & C.Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp.1–10). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Markee, N
    (2008) Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404–427. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm052
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052 [Google Scholar]
80. McCafferty, S.G
    (1998) Nonverbal expression and L2 private speech. Applied Linguistics, 19, 73–96. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.1.73
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.73 [Google Scholar]
81. McCafferty, S.G
    (2004) Space for cognition: Gesture and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 148–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2004.0057m.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.0057m.x [Google Scholar]
82. McCafferty, M. , & Stam, G
    (Eds.) (2009) Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
83. McNeill, D
    (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
84. Mehan, H
    (1982) The structure of classroom events and their consequences for student performance. In P.Gilmore & A.A.Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education (pp.59–87). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Meltzoff, A.N
    (2002) Elements of a developmental theory of imitation. In A.N.Meltzoff & W.Prinz (Eds), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp.19–41). Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511489969.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489969.002 [Google Scholar]
86. Meltzoff, A.N. , & Gopnik, A
    (1989) On linking nonverbal imitation, representation, and language learning in the first two years of life. In G.E.Speidel & K.E.Nelson (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp.23–52). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑1011‑5_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1011-5_2 [Google Scholar]
87. Mondada, L
    (2007) Commentary: Transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices. Discourse Studies, 9, 809–821. doi: 10.1177/1461445607082581
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082581 [Google Scholar]
88. Mondada, L. , & Doehler, S
    (2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501–518. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑15‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x [Google Scholar]
89. Murphey, T
    (2001) Exploring conversational shadowing. Language Teaching Research, 5, 128–155. doi: 10.1177/136216880100500203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500203 [Google Scholar]
90. Negueruela, E
    (2003) A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second language: Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development. Unpublished PhD thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Ochs, E. , Schegloff, E. , & Thompson, S
    (Eds.) (1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874 [Google Scholar]
92. Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B
    (1984) Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories. In R.Shweder & R.LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Ohta, A.S
    (2000) Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J.P.Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp.51–78). Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Ohta, A.S
    (2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Ortega, L
    (2010) The bilingual turn in SLA. Plenary address delivered at the AAAL (American Association for Applied Linguistics) Conference, Atlanta, GA, March 6–9.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Paradis, M
    (2009) Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.40
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.40 [Google Scholar]
97. Pekarek Doehler, S
    (2010) Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P.Seedhouse , S.Walsh , & C.Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp.105–127). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230289772_7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289772_7 [Google Scholar]
98. Pica, T
    (1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes and outcomes?Language Learning, 44, 493–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x [Google Scholar]
99. Pike, K.L
    (1954) Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior, part 1. Glendale, Calif.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Poehner, M.E
     (2005) Dynamic assessment among advanced L2 learners of French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Poehner, M.E
     (2007) Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal, 91, 323–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00583.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00583.x [Google Scholar]
102. Poehner, M.E
     (2008) Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑75775‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9 [Google Scholar]
103. Poehner, M.E
     (2009) Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471–491. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2009.tb00245.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x [Google Scholar]
104. Poehner, M.E. , & Lantolf, J.P
     (2013) Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17, 323–342. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482935
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935 [Google Scholar]
105. Poehner, M.E. , & van Compernolle, R.A
     (2011) Frames of interaction in dynamic assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. In M.E.Poehner & P.Rae-Dickens (Eds.), Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through dynamic assessment [Special issue]. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(2), 183–198.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Poehner, M.E. , & van Compernolle, R.A
     (2012, March). Diagnosis and instruction in dynamic assessment interactions. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Boston, MA.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Poehner, M.E. , & van Compernolle, R.A
     (2013) L2 development around tests: Response processes and dynamic assessment. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 51, 353–377. doi: 10.1515/iral‑2013‑0015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2013-0015 [Google Scholar]
108. Rea-Dickins, P
     (2008) Classroom-based language assessment. In E.Shohamy & N.Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment (pp.257–271). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_180
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_180 [Google Scholar]
109. Rine, E.F
     (2009) Development in dialogic teaching skills: A micro-analytic case study of a pre-service ITA.Unpublished dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Rogoff, B
     (1995) Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J.V.Wertsch , P.del Rio , & A.Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp.139–164). Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008 [Google Scholar]
111. Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E. , & Jefferson, G
     (1974) A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
112. Savignon, S.J
     (1997) Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice (2nd edn). New York, NY: McGraw Hill
     [Google Scholar]
113. Schegloff, E.A
     (1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–545. doi: 10.1080/01638539709545001
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001 [Google Scholar]
114. Schegloff, E. , Jefferson, G. , & Sacks, H
     (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
115. Schmidt, R. , & Frota, S
     (1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R.R.Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp.237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
116. Slobin, D.I
     (1991) Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–26. doi: 10.1075/prag.1.1.01slo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.1.1.01slo [Google Scholar]
117. Smit, U. , & Dafouz, E
     (Eds.) (2012)  Integrating content and language in higher education: Gaining insights into English-medium instruction at European universities . AILA Review, 25. doi: 10.1075/aila.25.01smi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.25.01smi [Google Scholar]
118. Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M
     (2009) Interaction research in second/foreign language classrooms. In C.Polio & A.Mackey (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass. (pp.157–175). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Steinbach-Koehler, F. , & Thorne, S.L
     (2011) The social life of self-directed talk: A sequential phenomenon?In J.Hall , J.Hellermann , S.Pekarek Doehler , & D.Olsher (eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp.66–92). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
120. Sternberg, R.J. , & Grigorenko, E.L
     (2002).
121. Swain, M
     (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S.Gass & C.Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235–253), Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
122. Swain, M
     (2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J.P.Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (97–114). Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Swain, M
     (2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H.Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp.95–108). London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
124. Swain, M. , & Lapkin, S
     (1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersionstudents working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01209.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [Google Scholar]
125. Swain, S. , & Lapkin, S
     (2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304. doi: 10.1016/S0883‑0355(03)00006‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5 [Google Scholar]
126. Swain, M. , Lapkin, S. , Knouzi, I. , Suzuki, W. , & Brooks, L
     (2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 93, 5–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00825.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00825.x [Google Scholar]
127. Ten Have, P
     (2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208895
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
128. Tharp, R. , & Gallimore, R
     (1988) Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
129. Thorne, S.L. , & Lantolf, J.P
     (2007) A linguistics of communicative activity. In S.Makoni & A.Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp.170–195). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
130. Tomasello, M
     (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
131. Tomasello, M
     (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Tomasello, M. , & Carpenter, M
     (2007) Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10, 121–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00573.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x [Google Scholar]
133. Turnbull, M. , & Dailey-O’Cain, J
     (Eds.) (2009) First language use in second and foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
134. Tyler, A
     (2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
135. Valsiner, J. , & Van der Veer, R
     (2000) The social mind: Development of the idea. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
136. van Compernolle, R.A
     (2009) What do women want? Linguistic equality and the feminization of job titles in contemporary France. Gender and Language, 3(1), 33–52. doi: 10.1558/genl.v3i1.33
     https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v3i1.33 [Google Scholar]
137. van Compernolle, R.A
     (2010) Incidental microgenetic development in second-language teacher-learner talk-in-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 1, 66–81. doi: 10.1080/19463011003750608
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463011003750608 [Google Scholar]
138. van Compernolle, R.A
     (2011) Responding to questions and L2 learner interactional competence during language proficiency interviews: A microanalytic study with pedagogical implications. In J.K.Hall , J.Hellermann , & S.Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp.117–144). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
139. van Compernolle, R.A
     (2013) Interactional competence and the dynamic assessment of L2 pragmatic abilities. In S.Ross & G.Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp.327–353). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137003522.0021
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522.0021 [Google Scholar]
140. van Compernolle, R.A
     (2014a) Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
141. van Compernolle, R.A
     (2014) Profiling second language sociolinguistic development through dynamically administered strategic interaction scenarios. Language and Communication, 37, 86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.01.003 [Google Scholar]
142. van Compernolle, R.A. , & Henery, A
     (2014) Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64, 549–578. doi: 10.1111/lang.12054
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12054 [Google Scholar]
143. van Compernolle, R.A. , & Henery, A
     (2015) Learning to do concept-based pragmatics instruction: Teacher development and L2 pedagogical content knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19, 351–372. doi: 10.1177/1362168814541719
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541719 [Google Scholar]
144. van Compernolle, R.A. , & Smotrova, T
     (2014) Corrective feedback, gesture, and mediation in classroom language learning. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 1, 25–47. doi: 10.1558/71056194384
     https://doi.org/10.1558/71056194384 [Google Scholar]
145. van Compernolle, R.A. , & Williams, L
     (2011) Thinking with your hands: Speech-gesture activity during an L2 awareness-raising task. Language Awareness, 20(3), 203–219. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2011.559244
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.559244 [Google Scholar]
146. van Compernolle, R.A. , & Williams, L
     (2013) Group dynamics in the language classroom: Embodied participation as active reception in the collective ZPD. Classroom Discourse, 4(1), 42–62. doi: 10.1080/19463014.2013.779284
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2013.779284 [Google Scholar]
147. Van der Veer, R. , & Valsiner, J
     (1991) Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
148. Van Lier, L
     (2000) From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp.155–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
149. van Lier, L
     (2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/1‑4020‑7912‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5 [Google Scholar]
150. Villamil, O. , & DeGuerrero, M
     (1996) Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51–75. doi: 10.1016/S1060‑3743(96)90015‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6 [Google Scholar]
151. Vygotsky, L.S
     (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
152. Vygotsky, L.S
     (1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
153. Walsh, S
     (2006) Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
154. Walsh, S
     (2011) Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
155. Walter, D. , & van Compernolle, R.A
     . (in press). Concept-based instruction of L2 German declension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching.
     [Google Scholar]
156. Wertsch, J.V
     (1985) Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
157. Wertsch, J.V
     (1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
158. Wertsch, J.V
     (1994) The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 1, 202–208.
     [Google Scholar]
159. Wertsch, J
     (2007) Mediation. In H.Daniels , M.Cole , & J.Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp.178–192). Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521831040.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.008 [Google Scholar]
160. Williams, L
     (2006) Web-based machine translation as a tool for promoting electronic literacy and language awareness. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 565–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2006.tb02276.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02276.x [Google Scholar]
161. Wong, J. , & Waring, H.Z
     (2010) Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
162. Wood, D. , Bruner, J.S. , & Ross, G
     (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‑7610.1976.tb00381.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar]
163. Young, R.F
     (2000) Interactional competence: Challenges for validity. Paper presented at ajoint symposium on 'Interdisciplinary Interfaces with Language Testing' held at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics and the Language Testing Research Colloquium, March 11, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
164. Young, R.F
     (2011) Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp.426–443). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
165. Young, R.F
     (2013) Learning to talk the talk and walk: Interactional competence in academic spoken English. Ibérica, 25, 15–38.
     [Google Scholar]
166. Zhang, H. , & van Compernolle, R.A
     . (in preparation). Learning potential and the dynamic assessment of Chinese grammar through elicited imitation. doi: 10.1558/lst.v3i1.27549
     https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.v3i1.27549
167. Zinchenko, V.P
     (2002) From classical to organic psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 39, 32–77. doi: 10.2753/RPO1061‑0405390132
     https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405390132 [Google Scholar]