1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Discursive Strategies and Political Hegemony

Discursive Strategies and Political Hegemony

The Turkish case

image of Discursive Strategies and Political Hegemony
GBP
Buy:£83.00 + Taxes

With the help of critical discourse analysis (CDA), this book approaches Turkish politics from an interdisciplinary perspective in order to deepen our understanding of political power and discourse. This study re-conceptualizes discursive strategies as hegemonic projects and thirteen governmental speeches are analyzed accordingly. It also provides readers with a theoretical discussion on the nature of political discourse through references to deliberative, agonistic and critical realistic approaches.

References

  1. Adams, Ian
    2001 Political Ideology Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad, Feroz
    1993 The Making of Modern Turkey. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203418048
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203418048 [Google Scholar]
  3. Akdağ, Yusuf
    2007 Sermaye Medyası ve Emekçi Basını. Özgürlük Dünyası, 181(1). Retrieved fromwww.ozgurlukdunyasi.org/arsiv/210-sayi-181/480-sermaye-medyasi-
ve-emekci-basini
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Akdoğan, Yalçın
    2004 Muhafazakar-Demokrat Siyasal Kimliğin Önemi ve Siyasal İslamcılıktan Farkı. In H. Yavuz (Ed.), AK Parti: Toplumsal Değişimin Yeni Aktörleri, 59–96. Istanbul: Kitap Yayınevi.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. AKP
    2002 Party Programme. RetrievedNovember 8, 2011, fromwww.akparti.org.tr/english/akparti/parti-programme#bolum1
  6. Aktar, Ayhan
    2010 Varlık Vergisi ve ‘’Türkleştirme’’ Politikaları. Istanbul: İletişim.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Alpman, Nazım
    2010 Baykal Gitmez. RetrievedNovember 19, 2011, 2010, fromwww.internethaber.com/baykal-gitmez-9870y.htm
  8. Arat, Yeşim
    2005 Rethinking Islam and Liberal Democracy: Islamist Women in Turkish Politics. New York: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Arditi, Benjamin
    2007 Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Archer, Margaret , Bhaskar, Roy , Collier, Andrew , Lawson, Tony , and Norrie, Alan
    (Eds.) 1998 Critical Realism: Essential Readings. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Arınç, Bülent
    2011 Lafla peynir gemisi yürümez. Retrieved fromwww.akparti.org.tr/site/haberler/lafla-peynir-gemisi-yurumez/8341#1
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Atacan, Fulya
    2005 Explaining Religious Politics at the Crossroad: AKP‐SP. Turkish Studies, 6(2), 187199. doi: 10.1080/14683840500119510
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840500119510 [Google Scholar]
  13. Atasoy, Yıldız
    2009 Islam’s Marriage with Neo-liberalism: State Transformation in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. doi: 10.1057/9780230246669
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246669 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ayan, Pelin
    2010 Authoritarian Party Structures in Turkey: A Comparison of the Republican People’s Party and the Justice and Development Party. Turkish Studies, 11(2), 197215. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2010.483859
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2010.483859 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ayata, Ayşe G
    1995 Türkiye’nin Demokratikleşme Sürecinde Ortanın Solu Hareketi. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Fakültesi, 50(3), 7988.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Babacan, Ali
    2012 Ekonomik Büyüme Yüzde 8’i Aşarak Havaya Girdi. RetrievedFebruary 18, 2012, 2012, fromwww.gazete5.com/haber/ekonomik-buyume-yuzde-8i-asti-187563.htm
  17. Badiou, Alain
    2005 Metapolitics. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bali, Rıfat
    2013 Anti-semitism and Conspiracy Theories in Turkey. İstanbul: Libra Kitap.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Barlas, Mehmet
    2011 Derin CHP için rejim esastır ve demokrasi teferruattır. Sabah. Retrieved fromwww.sabah.com.tr/Yazarlar/barlas/2011/08/01/derin-chp-icin-rejim-esastir-
ve-demokrasi-teferruattir
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bayramoğlu, Ali
    2010 İşte CHP’nin Mirası ve Kılıçdaroğlu’nun İş Listesi. Yeni Şafak. Retrieved fromyenisafak.com.tr/Gundem/?t=21.05.2010&i=258430
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Benhabib, Seyla
    1996 Toward a Deliberative Model of Democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, 6795. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bhaskar, Roy
    1975 A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 1993 Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Blass, Regina
    2005 Manipulation in the speeches and writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a relevance theoretic point of view. In L. de Saussure & P. Shulz (Eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twenteeth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.17.09bla
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.09bla [Google Scholar]
  25. Boas, Taylor, C. , and Gans-Morse, Jordan
    2009 Neoliberalism: From New Liberal Philosophy to Anti-Liberal Slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 137161. doi: 10.1007/s12116‑009‑9040‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-009-9040-5 [Google Scholar]
  26. Boratav, Korkut
    2009 AKP’li Yıllarda Türkiye Ekonomisi. In l. Uzgel & B. Duru (Eds.), AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu, 2 ed., 463472. Ankara: Phoneix Yayınevi.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Boyraz, Cemil
    2011 The Justice and Development Party in Turkish Politics: Islam, Democracy and State, Turkish Studies, 12:1, 149164. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2011.564053
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.564053 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bulut, Sedef
    2009 27 Mayıs 1960’tan Günümüze Paylaşılamayan Demokrat Parti Mirası. SDÜ Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 7390.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Can, Burhanettin
    2011 Vaad Edilmiş Topraklar, Ortak Pazar(AB) ve Siyonizm. Milli Gazete. Retrieved fromwww.milligazete.com.tr/makale/insanligi-ifsad-hareketi-siyonizm-4-
218373.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Cap, Piotr
    2008 Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 1741. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2002 Explorations in Political Discourse: Methodological and Critical Perspectives. Berlin: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Carroll, William
    2006 Hegemony, Counter-hegemony, Anti-hegemony. Socialist Studies, 2(2), 943.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Chandler, Daniel
    2002 Semiotics: the basics. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203166277
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166277 [Google Scholar]
  34. Cohen, Joshua
    1997 Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, 67–91. MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Collier, Andrew
    1994 Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Crozier, Michael , and Little, Adrian
    2007 Disagreeable democracy: Deliberation, conflict and communication in contemporary democratic practice. Paper presented at theAustralasion Political Studies Association Annual Conference.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Çarkoğlu, Ali , and Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin
    2007 Turkish Democracy Today: Elections, Protest and Stability in an Islamic Society. London: Tauris.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Çulhaoğlu, Metin
    2009 AKP’nin Yürüdüğü Yer: Bir Model ve Açıklama Denemesi. In Ç. Sümer & F. Yaşlı (Eds.), Hegemonyadan Diktatoryaya: AKP ve Liberal-Muhafazakar İttifak, 225235. Ankara: Tan Kitabevi Yayınları.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Davutoğlu, Ahmet
    2012 Gücümüz arttıkça iddiamız da artacak. Retrieved fromwww.akparti.org.tr/site/haberler/lafla-peynir-gemisi-yurumez/8341#1
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Dumenil, Gerard and Levy, Dominique
    2007 Neoliberal Dynamics-Imperial Dynamics. Paper presented at theThe annual meeting of the International Studies Association. Retrieved fromwww.allacademic.com/meta/p73381_index.html.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Duru, Bülent
    2009 AKP’nin Çevre Politikalarına Bir Bakış. In l. Uzgel & B. Duru (Eds.), AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu. Ankara: Phoenix.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ekinci, Aykut
    2011 Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Büyüme ve İstihdama Etkisi: Türkiye Uygulaması (1980–2010). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(2), 7196.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Erdemol, Mustafa K
    2013 Gezi Parkı Direnişi: Küçük Bahçede Büyük Kıyamet. İstanbul: Yazılama.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Erdoğan, Recep Tayyip
    2011 The election rally speech in Samsun. Retrieved fromwww.akparti.org.tr/site/haberler/3-haziran-samsun-mitingi-konusmasinin-tam-metni/8270#1
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 2012 The party group speech. Retrieved fromwww.akparti.org.tr/site/haberler/basbakan-erdoganin-3-ocak-tarihli-grup-toplantisi-konusmasinin-tam-metni/18332#1
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ertuğrul, N. İlter
    2009 AKP ve Özelleştirme. In Uzgel & B. Duru (Eds.), AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu, 2 ed., 522556. Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Esmer, M. Ercan
    2012 The Rise of Political Islam in Turkey: The Case of the Welfare Party, Turkish Studies, 13:3, 363378. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2012.717449
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2012.717449 [Google Scholar]
  48. Fairclough, Norman
    1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 1995 Critical Discourse Analysis (2 ed.). London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 2000 New Labour, new Language?London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 2005 Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915939. doi: 10.1177/0170840605054610
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2006 Language and Globalization. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Fairclough, Norman , Jessop, Bob and Sayer, Andrew
    2002 Critical Realism and Semiosis. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 19.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Fishkin, James
    2011 When the People Speak. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199604432.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199604432.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Geray, Cevat
    2009 AKP ve Konut: Toplumsal Konut Yöneltisi Açısından TOKİ Uygulamaları. In l. Uzgel & B. Duru (Eds.), AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu, 745750. Ankara: Phoenix.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Gramsci, Antonio
    1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Gökten, Yeliz. S
    2013 Hegemonya İlişkilerinin Dünü, Bugünü ve Geleceği: Neo-Gramsci’ci Bir Bakış. Ankara: NotaBene.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Günay, Ertuğrul
    2011 İzmir’i dünya markası yapacağız. Retrieved from:www.akparti.org.tr/site/haberler/izmiri-dunya-markasi-yapacagiz/588#1
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Habermas, Jürgen
    1984 Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Harvey, David
    2009 A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Hür, Ayşe
    2009 Münferit(!) antisemitizm vak’aları. Taraf. Retrieved fromwww.taraf.com.tr/ayse-hur/makale-munferit-antisemitizm-vakalari.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Ilıcak, Nazlı
    2010 Kılıçdaroğlu’nun Zincirleri. November 19, 2011, fromwww.sonhaberler.gen.tr/kilicdaroglunun-zincirleri-makale,640.html
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Ives, Peter
    2004 Language and Hegemony in Gramsci. London: Pluto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Jacoby, Tim
    2004 Social Power and The Turkish State. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Jessop, Bob
    2004 Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 15974. doi: 10.1080/17405900410001674506
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900410001674506 [Google Scholar]
  67. Joseph, Jonathan
    2000 A Realist Theory of Hegemony. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 179–202.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 2002 Hegemony: A realist analysis. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203166529
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166529 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2008 Hegemony and structure-agency problem in International Relations: a scientific realist contribution. Review of International Studies, 34, 109128. doi: 10.1017/S0260210508007936
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508007936 [Google Scholar]
  70. Joseph Jonathan and Roberts, John, M
    2005 Derrida, Foucault and Žižek: Being Realistic about Social Theory. New Formations, 56(1), 109120.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Kahraman, Hasan B
    2011 CHP Dönüşmeyi Düşünüyor mu. Sabah. Retrieved fromwww.sabah.com.tr/Yazarlar/kahraman/2011/11/18/chp-donusmeyi-dusunuyor-mu
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin
    2005 Turkish Dynamics: Bridged Across Troubled Lands. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781403978660
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978660 [Google Scholar]
  73. Karpat, Kemal
    2004 The Studies on Turkish Politics on Society: Selected Articles and Essays (Vol. 94). Boston: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Kaya, İbrahim
    2004 Social Theory and Later Modernities: The Turkish Experience. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. doi: 10.5949/UPO9781846314094
     https://doi.org/10.5949/UPO9781846314094 [Google Scholar]
  75. Kaya, Ayhan
    2015 Islamisation of Turkey under the AKP Rule: Empowering Family, Faith and Charity. South European Society and Politics, 20:1, 4769. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2014.979031
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.979031 [Google Scholar]
  76. KESK
    2012 Kamu Emekçilerinin Alım Gücü Düşüyor. RetrievedOctober 24, 2013, fromwww.kesk.org.tr/content/kamu-emek%C3%A7ilerinin-al%C4%B1m-g%C3%BCc%
C3%BC-d%C3%BC%C5%9F%C3%BCyor
  77. Kienpointner, Manfred
    1996 Vernünftig Argumentieren. Regeln und Techniken der Diskussion. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Kılıçdaroğlu, Kemal
    2010 Kılıçdaroğlu: Değişim Eski İnsanlarla Olmaz, Gençler Siyasete Girmeli. RetrievedNovember 21, 2011, fromwww.haberler.com/kilicdaroglu-degisim-eski-
insanlarla-olmaz-2419380-haberi/
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Kircher, Christoph
    2009 Hegemony and Discourse Theory: Democracy As Empty Signifier in International Relations. Available fromwww.grin.com/en/e-book/147452/hegemony-and-discourse-theory#inside
  80. Koçak, Cemil
    1997 Siyasal Tarih: 1923–1950. In S. Akşin (Ed.), Türkiye Tarihi 4: Çağdaş Türkiye 1908–1980, Vol. 4, 85154. Istanbul: Cem.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Köker, Levent
    2007 Modernleşme, Kemalizm ve Demokrasi (10 ed.). Istanbul: Iletişim.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Küçükali, Can
    2014 Discursive strategies of instrumentalizing history in mainstream Turkish political discourse: The case of the negative other presentation of the CHP. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(1), 98119. doi: 10.1075/jlp.13.1.05kuc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.1.05kuc [Google Scholar]
  83. Lakoff, George
    2004 Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Lukes, Steven
    2005 Power: A Radical View (2 ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑80257‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5 [Google Scholar]
  85. Marchart, Oliver
    2007 Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Boston: Boston University Press. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624973.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624973.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  86. Mardin, Şerif
    1975 Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?in Engin D. Akarlı and Gabriel Ben-Dor (Eds.), Political Participation in Turkey: Historical Background and Present Problems, 732. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Martínez-Lorente, Angel R. and Dewhurst, Frank
    1998 The Total Quality Management: Origins and Evolution of the Term. The TQM Magazine. doi: 10.1108/09544789810231261
     https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789810231261 [Google Scholar]
  88. Matouschek, Bernd , Wodak, Ruth and Januschek, Franz
    1995 Notwendige Massnahmen gegen Fremde? Genese und Formen von rassistischen Diskursen der Differenz. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Meeker, Michael. E
    2001 A Nation of Empire: The Ottoman Legacy of Turkish Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Montessori, N. Montesano
    2011 The design of a theoretical, methodological, analytical framework to analyse hegemony in discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(3), 169181. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2011.586221
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.586221 [Google Scholar]
  91. Mouffe, Chantal
    1999 Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?Social Research, 66(3), 745758.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 2000 The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Musolff, Andreas
    2004 Metaphor and Political Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230504516
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  94. Newman, Saul
    2005 Power and Politics in Poststructuralist Thought: New theories of the political. London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Okçabol, Rıfat
    2013 AKP iktidarında Eğitim: Eğitimin Piyasalaşması ve Gericileşmesi. Ankara: Ütopya.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Onaran, Özlem
    2013 The Political Economy of Inequality, Redistribution, and the Protests in Turkey. RetrievedOctober 2, 2014, fromresearchturkey.org/the-political-economy-
of-inequality-redistribution-and-the-protests-in-turkey/
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Öniş, Ziya and Grigoriadis, Ioannis. N
    2010 Europe and The Impasse of Center-Left Politics in Turkey: Lessons from the Greek Experience. Journal of Balkan & Near Eastern Studies, 12(3), 259274. doi: 10.1080/19448953.2010.506823
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2010.506823 [Google Scholar]
  98. Phillips, Christopher
    2012 Turkey’s Syria Problem. Public Policy Research, 19(2), 137140. doi: 10.1111/j.1744‑540X.2012.00698.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-540X.2012.00698.x [Google Scholar]
  99. Ranciere, Jacques
    1998 Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 2010 Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Rawls, John
    1971 A Theory of Justice. United States: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 1996 Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Reisigl, Martin
    2008 Rhetoric of Political Speeches. In R. Wodak & V. Koller (Eds.), Communication in the Public Sphere: Handbook of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, 243271. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth
    2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 2009 The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Wodak, R. , & Meyer, M . (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, 87121. London: Sage (2nd revised edition).
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse and Society, 22(6), 781806. doi: 10.1177/0957926511419927
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  107. Robins, Philip
    2013 Turkey’s ‘double gravity’ predicament: The foreign policy of a newly activist power. International Affairs, 89(2), 381397. doi: 10.1111/1468‑2346.12023
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12023 [Google Scholar]
  108. Sarıgil, Ziya
    2010 Bargaining in institutional settings: The case of Turkish reforms. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 463483. doi: 10.1177/1354066109344009
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109344009 [Google Scholar]
  109. Sayer, Andrew
    1992 Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (2 ed.). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Schröter, Melanie
    2013 Silence and concealment in political discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.48
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.48 [Google Scholar]
  111. Şen, Mustafa
    2010 Transformation of Turkish Islamism and the Rise of the Justice and Development Party. Turkish Studies, 11(1), 5984. doi: 10.1080/14683841003747047
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14683841003747047 [Google Scholar]
  112. Tsakona, Villy and Popa, D. Elena
    (Eds.) 2011 Studies in Political Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.46
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.46 [Google Scholar]
  113. Uzgel, İlhan and Duru Bülent
    (Eds.) 2009 AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu. Ankara: Phoenix.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Van Dijk, Teun
    1993 Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  115. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 Legitimation in Discourse and Communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91112. doi: 10.1177/1750481307071986
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  116. 2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  117. Van Leeuwen, Theo and Wodak, Ruth
    1999 Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse Historical Analysis. Discourse and Society, 1(1), 83118. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001001005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  118. Ward, Kevin and England, Kim
    2007 Introduction: Reading Neoliberalization. In K. England & K. Ward (Eds.), Neoliberalization: States, networks, peoples, 122. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470712801.ch1
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712801.ch1 [Google Scholar]
  119. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 6394. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 2002 Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis. Redaktion der Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 3, 531.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. 2007 Language and Ideology-Language in Ideology. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), 16.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 2009 The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230233683
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233683 [Google Scholar]
  123. (Ed.) 1989 Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ct.7
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7 [Google Scholar]
  124. Wodak, Ruth , Peter Nowak , Jiirgen Pelikan , Helmut Gruber , Rudolf de Cillia and Richard Mitten
    1990 “Wir sind alle unschuldige Tater’’. Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael
    2001 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9780857028020
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020 [Google Scholar]
  126. Wodak, Ruth , Khosravinik, Majid and Mral, Brigitte
    (Eds.) 2013 Right-wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Wodak, Ruth , de Cillia, Rudolf , Reisigl, Martin and Liebhart, Karin
    2009 The Discursive Construction of National Identity (Vol. 2). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Yaka, Özge
    2010 Çözülen Ne: Otoritarizm mi Demokrasi mi?In Ç. d. Sümer & F. Yaşlı (Eds.), Hegemonyadan Diktatoryaya: AKP ve Liberal-Muhafazakar İttifak, 238261. Ankara: Tan.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Yalman, Galip
    2002 Tarihsel Bir Perspektiften Türkiye’de Devlet ve Burjuvazi: Rölativist Bir Paradigma mı Hegemonya Stratejisi mi?Praksis, 5, 723.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Yavuz, Hakan
    2003 Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 2009 Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815089
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815089 [Google Scholar]
  132. Yaşlı, Fatih
    2012 AKP ve Yeni Rejim. Ankara: Tan.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Yetkin, Çetin
    1983 Türkiye’de Tek Parti Yönetimi: 1930–1945. Istanbul: Altın Kitaplar Yayınevi.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Zürcher, Erik. J
    2004 Turkey: A Modern History (3 ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027267962
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027267962
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027267962
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027267962
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error