1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change
  4. Chapter

On multiple source constructions in language change

image of On multiple source constructions in language change
  • Affiliations: 1: University of Leuven; 2: Research Foundation Flanders

References

  1. Allan, Kathryn
    2010 A dull paper: An example of proportional analogy in semantic change?Paper presented at the16th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics(ICEHL) at the University of Pécs, 23–27 August 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg
    2011 Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in “a”-adjective production. Language87(1). 1–29. doi: 10.1353/lan.2011.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0012 [Google Scholar]
  3. Burridge, Kate
    1992 Creating grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario. In: Kate Burridge & Werner Enninger (eds.), Diachronic studies on the languages of the Anabaptists (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 17), 199–241. Bochum: N. Brockmeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bybee, Joan
    2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In: Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2007 Diachronic linguistics. In: Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The handbook of cognitive linguistics, 945–987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan , Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bynon, Theodora
    1983 Historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, Gerald L
    1987 Syntactic blends in English parole. Frankfurt: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, William
    2000 Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fortson, Benjamin W
    2010 Indo-European language and culture: An introduction, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Geeraerts, Dirk
    1997 Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2003 On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language27(3). 529–572. doi: 10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei [Google Scholar]
  13. 2005 Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614132
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614132 [Google Scholar]
  14. Himmelmann, Nikolaus.P
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticization: opposite or orthogonal?In: Walter Bisang , Nikolaus Himmelmann , Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197440
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440 [Google Scholar]
  15. Israël, Michael
    1996 The way constructions grow. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Joseph, Brian D
    2004 Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization“theory”. In Olga Fischer , Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline –the nature of grammaticalization, 44–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.59
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.59 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lass, Roger
    1990 How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics26. 79–102. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700014432
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014432 [Google Scholar]
  18. Menard, Philippe
    1978 Manuel du français du moyen âge, vol. 1, Syntaxe de l’ancien français.Bordeaux: SOBODI.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Menge, Hermann
    2000 Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Mondorf, Britta
    2011 Variation and change in English resultatives. Language Variation and Change22. 397–421. doi: 10.1017/S0954394510000165
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000165 [Google Scholar]
  21. OED: Murray, James A.H. , Henry Brodly , W.A. Craigie & C.T. Onions 1993 The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online atwww.oed.com
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Philippa, Marlies , Frans Debrabandere , Arend Quak , Tanneke Schoonheim & Nicoline van der Sijs
    2003–2009 Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Prokosch, Eduard
    1939 A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ringe, Don
    2006 From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Traugott, Elizabeth.C
    2007 The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization’. Cognitive Linguistics18. 523–557. doi: 10.1515/COG.2007.027
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.027 [Google Scholar]
  26. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Bree, Cor
    1996 Historische taalkunde, 2nd edn. Leuven: Acco.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Coetsem, Frans
    1982 The development of the Germanic reduplicating class: Reanalysis and competition in morphological change. In Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds.), Language change, 39–88. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Van der Horst, Johannes M. & Freek Van de Velde
    2003 Zo vreemd een groep. Taal & TongvalThematic issue 15/16. 237–250.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Van de Velde, Freek & Johannes M. van der Horst
    2013 Homoplasy in diachronic grammar. Language Sciences36. 66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.020
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.020 [Google Scholar]
  31. . Manuscript. The diachrony of so odd a noun phrase.
  32. Wischer, Ilse
    2010 Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik. In Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, 29–40. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Allan, Kathryn
    2010 A dull paper: An example of proportional analogy in semantic change?Paper presented at the16th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics(ICEHL) at the University of Pécs, 23–27 August 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg
    2011 Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in “a”-adjective production. Language87(1). 1–29. doi: 10.1353/lan.2011.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0012 [Google Scholar]
  3. Burridge, Kate
    1992 Creating grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario. In: Kate Burridge & Werner Enninger (eds.), Diachronic studies on the languages of the Anabaptists (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 17), 199–241. Bochum: N. Brockmeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bybee, Joan
    2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In: Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2007 Diachronic linguistics. In: Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The handbook of cognitive linguistics, 945–987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan , Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bynon, Theodora
    1983 Historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, Gerald L
    1987 Syntactic blends in English parole. Frankfurt: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, William
    2000 Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fortson, Benjamin W
    2010 Indo-European language and culture: An introduction, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Geeraerts, Dirk
    1997 Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2003 On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language27(3). 529–572. doi: 10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei [Google Scholar]
  13. 2005 Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614132
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614132 [Google Scholar]
  14. Himmelmann, Nikolaus.P
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticization: opposite or orthogonal?In: Walter Bisang , Nikolaus Himmelmann , Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197440
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440 [Google Scholar]
  15. Israël, Michael
    1996 The way constructions grow. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Joseph, Brian D
    2004 Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization“theory”. In Olga Fischer , Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline –the nature of grammaticalization, 44–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.59
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.59 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lass, Roger
    1990 How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics26. 79–102. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700014432
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014432 [Google Scholar]
  18. Menard, Philippe
    1978 Manuel du français du moyen âge, vol. 1, Syntaxe de l’ancien français.Bordeaux: SOBODI.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Menge, Hermann
    2000 Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Mondorf, Britta
    2011 Variation and change in English resultatives. Language Variation and Change22. 397–421. doi: 10.1017/S0954394510000165
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000165 [Google Scholar]
  21. OED: Murray, James A.H. , Henry Brodly , W.A. Craigie & C.T. Onions 1993 The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online atwww.oed.com
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Philippa, Marlies , Frans Debrabandere , Arend Quak , Tanneke Schoonheim & Nicoline van der Sijs
    2003–2009 Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Prokosch, Eduard
    1939 A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ringe, Don
    2006 From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Traugott, Elizabeth.C
    2007 The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization’. Cognitive Linguistics18. 523–557. doi: 10.1515/COG.2007.027
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.027 [Google Scholar]
  26. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Bree, Cor
    1996 Historische taalkunde, 2nd edn. Leuven: Acco.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Coetsem, Frans
    1982 The development of the Germanic reduplicating class: Reanalysis and competition in morphological change. In Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds.), Language change, 39–88. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Van der Horst, Johannes M. & Freek Van de Velde
    2003 Zo vreemd een groep. Taal & TongvalThematic issue 15/16. 237–250.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Van de Velde, Freek & Johannes M. van der Horst
    2013 Homoplasy in diachronic grammar. Language Sciences36. 66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.020
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.020 [Google Scholar]
  31. . Manuscript. The diachrony of so odd a noun phrase.
  32. Wischer, Ilse
    2010 Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik. In Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, 29–40. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027268006-bct.79.01int
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027268006-bct.79.01int
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027268006
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error