1887

Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics

Introduction

This volume includes 13 papers dealing with Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. The introduction provides an overview of three of the main approaches dealing with multimodality – Cognitive Linguistics and multimodal metaphors (Forceville & Urios-Aparisi, 2009), social semiotics and systemic functional linguistics, and multimodal interactional analysis (Jewitt, 2009, p. 29). The paper summarizes the contributions to the volume, highlighting the main objectives and conclusions of each of the papers.

References

  1. Attardo, S. , Pickering, L. , & Baker, A
    (2011) Prosodic and multimodal markers of humor in conversation. Pragmatics and Cognition, 19(2), 224–247. doi: 10.1075/pc.19.2.03att
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.2.03att [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateman, J
    (2011) Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Böck, M. , & Pachler, N
    (2013) Multimodality and social semiosis: Communication, meaning making, and learning in the work of Gunther Kress. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll, N
    (1996) A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 809–822. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00021‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00021-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Forceville, C
    (1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London/New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203272305
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2010) Why and how study metaphor, metonymy, and other tropes in multimodal discourse?In R. Caballero & M.J. Pinar (Eds.), Ways and modes of human communication (pp. 57–76). Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Forceville, C. , & Urios-Aparisi, E
    (Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibbons, A
    (2011) Multimodality, cognition, and experimental literature. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. El Refaie, E
    (2003) Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–96. doi: 10.1177/1470357203002001755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755 [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, M.A.K. , & Matthiessen, C
    (2004) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jewitt, C
    (Ed.) (2009) The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones, C. , & Ventola, E
    (Eds.) (2008) From language to multimodality. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Knight, D
    (2013) Multimodality and active listenership: A corpus approach. London: T. & T. Clark Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kress, G. , & van Leeuwen, T
    (2001) Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin, J
    (1992) English text: Systems and structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  18. Norris, S
    (2004) Analysing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2011) Identity in interaction: Introducing (Inter)action Multimodal Analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781934078280
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078280 [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Halloran, K
    (2011) Multimodal representation and knowledge. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sindoni, M.G
    (2013) Spoken and written discourse in online interactions: A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ventola, E. , & Moya, J
    (Eds.) (2009) The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave. doi: 10.1057/9780230245341
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245341 [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Attardo, S. , Pickering, L. , & Baker, A
    (2011) Prosodic and multimodal markers of humor in conversation. Pragmatics and Cognition, 19(2), 224–247. doi: 10.1075/pc.19.2.03att
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.2.03att [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateman, J
    (2011) Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Böck, M. , & Pachler, N
    (2013) Multimodality and social semiosis: Communication, meaning making, and learning in the work of Gunther Kress. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll, N
    (1996) A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 809–822. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00021‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00021-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Forceville, C
    (1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London/New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203272305
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2010) Why and how study metaphor, metonymy, and other tropes in multimodal discourse?In R. Caballero & M.J. Pinar (Eds.), Ways and modes of human communication (pp. 57–76). Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Forceville, C. , & Urios-Aparisi, E
    (Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibbons, A
    (2011) Multimodality, cognition, and experimental literature. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. El Refaie, E
    (2003) Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–96. doi: 10.1177/1470357203002001755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755 [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, M.A.K. , & Matthiessen, C
    (2004) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jewitt, C
    (Ed.) (2009) The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones, C. , & Ventola, E
    (Eds.) (2008) From language to multimodality. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Knight, D
    (2013) Multimodality and active listenership: A corpus approach. London: T. & T. Clark Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kress, G. , & van Leeuwen, T
    (2001) Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin, J
    (1992) English text: Systems and structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  18. Norris, S
    (2004) Analysing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2011) Identity in interaction: Introducing (Inter)action Multimodal Analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781934078280
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078280 [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Halloran, K
    (2011) Multimodal representation and knowledge. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sindoni, M.G
    (2013) Spoken and written discourse in online interactions: A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ventola, E. , & Moya, J
    (Eds.) (2009) The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave. doi: 10.1057/9780230245341
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245341 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027268013-bct.78.01pin
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027268013
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error