1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Lexical Input Processing and Vocabulary Learning

Lexical Input Processing and Vocabulary Learning

image of Lexical Input Processing and Vocabulary Learning
GBP
Buy:£28.00 + Taxes
(Purchase for institutional use at £80.00 + taxes by logging in as an institutional administrator)
  • Author(s): Joe Barcroft 1
  • View Affiliations Hide Affiliations
    Affiliations:
    1 Washington University in St. Louis
  • Format: PDF
  • Publication Date December 2015
  • e-Book ISBN: 9789027268051
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.43

This book focuses on theory, research, and practice related to lexical input processing (lex-IP), an exciting field exploring how learners allocate their limited processing resources when exposed to words and lexical phrases in the input. Unit 1 specifies parameters of lex-IP research among other levels of input processing as well as key components (form, meaning, mapping) and contexts (incidental/intentional) of vocabulary learning. Unit 2 highlights theoretical advances, such as the type of processing – resource allocation (TOPRA) model, consistent with research on tasks (sentence writing, word copying, word retrieval) that learners may perform during vocabulary learning. Unit 3 highlights patterns in partial word form learning and input-based effects, including the value of increased exposure, drawbacks of presenting vocabulary in semantic sets, and advantages of input enhancement, particularly with regard to increasing talker, speaking-style, and speaking-rate variability in spoken input. The book unifies a range of research pertinent to lex-IP, summarizes theoretical and instructional implications, and proposes intriguing new directions for future research.

References

  1. Abbs, B. , Gupta, P. , & Khetarpal, N
    (2008) Is overt repetition critical to expressive word learning? The role of overt repetition in word learning with and without semantics. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 627–667. doi: 10.1017/S0142716408080272
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080272 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abercrombie, D
    (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed, M.O
    (1989) Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words. London: British Association for Applied Linguistics in association with Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aitchison, J
    (1994) Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Aitchison, J. & Straf, M
    (1982) Lexical storage and retrieval: A developing skill?In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp.197–241). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110828306.197
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110828306.197 [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Seghayer, K
    (2001) The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202–232.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Amer, A.A
    (1986) Semantic field theory and vocabulary teaching. English Teaching Forum, 24(1), 30–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderson, J.R
    (2000) Learning and memory: An integrated approach, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Assmann, P.F. , Nearey, T.M. , & Hogan, J
    (1982) Vowel identification: Orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects, Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 71, 975–989. doi: 10.1121/1.387579
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387579 [Google Scholar]
  10. Atkinson, R.C. , & Raugh, M.R
    (1975) An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 126–133. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.1.2.126
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.1.2.126 [Google Scholar]
  11. Azari, F
    (2012) Review of effects of textual glosses on incidental vocabulary learning. International Journal of Innovative Ideas, 12(2), 13–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Baese-Berk, M.M. , & Samuel, A.G
    . (in press). Listeners beware: Speech production may be bad for learning speech sounds. Journal of Memory and Language.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bahrick, H.P
    (1979) Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108|(3), 296–308. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.108.3.296
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.296 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bahrick, H.P. , Bahrick, L.E. , Bahrick, A.S. , & Bahrick, P.E
    (1993) Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4, 316–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1993.tb00571.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00571.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Barcroft, J
    (1998a, October) L2 vocabulary learning: Do sentence writing and oral repetition help?Poster presentation at theSecond Language Research Forum, Honolulu, Hawai’i.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (1998b, April). The Effects of Three Processing Conditions on L2 Vocabulary Learning. Applied Linguistics Colloquium, Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (2000a) The effects of sentence writing as semantic elaboration on the allocation of processing resources and second language lexical acquisition. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (2000b) The nature of partial word form learning. Presentation onNovember 18, 2000atFourth Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Bloomington, IN.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (2002a) Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52(2), 323–363. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00186
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00186 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2002b) Strategies and performance on an immediate lexical learning task. Poster presented at theSecond Language Research Forum, Toronto, Canada, October.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (2003a) Distinctiveness and bidirectional effects in input enhancement for vocabulary learning. Applied Language Learning, 13, 133–159.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2003b) Effects of questions about word meaning during L2 lexical learning. The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 546–561. doi: 10.1111/1540‑4781.00207
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00207 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2004a) Effects of sentence writing in L2 lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 20(4), 303–334. doi: 10.1191/0267658304sr233oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658304sr233oa [Google Scholar]
  24. (2004b) Second language vocabulary acquisition: A lexical input processing approach. Foreign Language Annals, 37(2), 200–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2004.tb02193.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02193.x [Google Scholar]
  25. (2004c) Theoretical and methodological issues in research on semantic and structural elaboration in lexical acquisition. In B. VanPatten , J. Williams , S. Rott , & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp.219–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (2005) La enseñanza del vocabulario en español como segunda lengua [Vocabulary instruction in Spanish as a second language]. Hispania, 88(3), 568–583. doi: 10.2307/20063160
     https://doi.org/10.2307/20063160 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2006) Can writing a new word detract from learning it? More negative effects of forced output during vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 22(4), 487–497. doi: 10.1191/0267658306sr276oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr276oa [Google Scholar]
  28. (2007a) Effects of opportunities for word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 57(1), 35–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00398.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00398.x [Google Scholar]
  29. (2007b) Effects of word and fragment writing during L2 vocabulary learning. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 713–726. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2007.tb02889.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02889.x [Google Scholar]
  30. (2008) Second language partial word form learning in the written mode. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 47, 53–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. (2009) Effects of synonym generation in incidental and intentional vocabulary learning during second language reading. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 79–103. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2009.tb00228.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00228.x [Google Scholar]
  32. (2012) Input-based incremental vocabulary instruction. Arlington, VA: TESOL International.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2013) Four input retrieval patterns and incidentally oriented vocabulary learning during reading. Presentation onDecember 20, 2013atVocab@Vic ConferenceatVictoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. . (2015). Can Retrieval Opportunities Increase Vocabulary Learning During Reading?Foreign Language Annals, 48(2), 236–249. doi: 10.1111/flan.12139
     https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12139 [Google Scholar]
  35. Barcroft, J. , & Rott, S
    (2010) Partial word form learning in the written mode in L2 German and Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 623–650. doi: 10.1093/applin/amq017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq017 [Google Scholar]
  36. Barcroft, J. , & Sommers, M.S
    (2005) Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 387–414. doi: 10.1017/S0272263105050175
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050175 [Google Scholar]
  37. Barcroft, J. , & Sommers. M
    (2014a) A theoretical account of the effects of acoustic variability on word learning and speech processing. In V. Torrens & L. Escobar (Eds.), The processing of lexicon and morphosyntax (pp.7–24). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Barcroft, J. , & Sommers, M
    (2014b) Effects of variability in fundamental frequency on L2 vocabulary learning: A comparison between learners who do and do not speak a tone language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 423–449. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000582
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000582 [Google Scholar]
  39. Barcroft, J. , Sommers, M. , & Sunderman, G
    (2011) Some costs of fooling Mother Nature: A priming study on the keyword method and the quality of developing L2 lexical representation. In P. Trofimovic & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming research to L2 learning and teaching: Insights from psycholinguistics (pp.49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.30.07bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.30.07bar [Google Scholar]
  40. Basi, R.K. , Thomas, M.H. , & Wang, A.Y
    (1997) Bilingual generation effect: Variations in participant type and list type. Journal of General Psychology, 124(2), 216–222. doi: 10.1080/00221309709595519
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309709595519 [Google Scholar]
  41. Begg, I. , & Snider, A
    (1987) The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 553–563. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.13.4.553
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.553 [Google Scholar]
  42. Bogaards, P
    (2001) Lexical units and the learning of foreign language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 321–343. doi: 10.1017/S0272263101003011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003011 [Google Scholar]
  43. Bjork, R.R
    (1975) Retrieval as a memory modifier. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp.123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Bloom, K.C. , & Shuell, T.J
    (1981) Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 245–248. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1981.10885317
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1981.10885317 [Google Scholar]
  45. Bradlow, A.R. , Pisoni, D.B , Akahane-Yamada, R. , & Tohkura, Y
    (1997) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299–2310. doi: 10.1121/1.418276
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418276 [Google Scholar]
  46. Brown, R. , & McNeill, D
    (1966) The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 325–337. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(66)80040‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80040-3 [Google Scholar]
  47. Brown, T. , & Perry, F. Jr
    (1991) A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 655–670. doi: 10.2307/3587081
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587081 [Google Scholar]
  48. Burfoot, S
    (2010) Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentionalL2 vocabulary learning during reading: A replication of Barcroft (2009). Academia.edu: www.academia.edu/669738/The_Effects_of_Synonym_Generation_on_L2_Vocabulary_Recall
  49. Cassagne, J.M
    (1995) 101 Spanish idioms. Understanding Spanish language and culture through popular phrases. Lincolnwood, IL: Passport Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Channell, J
    (1988) Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.83–96). London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Chen-Chun, C.L
    (2013) Partial word knowledge: Insights from an analysis of word learnability. Poster presentation at theVocab@Vic ConferenceinWellington, New Zealand, December.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Chun, D. , & Plass, J.L
    (2011) Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 183–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1996.tb01159.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Coady, J
    (1997) L2 vocabulary acquisition: A synthesis of research. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.273–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139524643.020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524643.020 [Google Scholar]
  54. Coomber, J.E. , Ramstad, D.A. , & Sheets, D.R
    (1986) Elaboration in vocabulary learning: A comparison of three rehearsal methods. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 281–293.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Craik, F.I.M. , & Lockhart, R.S
    (1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(72)80001‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X [Google Scholar]
  56. Craik, F.I.M. , & Tulving, E
    (1975) Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.104.3.268
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 [Google Scholar]
  57. Crutcher, R.J. , & Healy, A.F
    (1989) Cognitive operations and the generation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 15, 669–675. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.15.4.669
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.669 [Google Scholar]
  58. DeKeyser R. , Salaberry, R. , Robinson, P. , & Harrington, M
    (2002) What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten’s “processing instruction: An update”. Language Learning, 52, 805–823. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00204
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00204 [Google Scholar]
  59. Dempster, F.N
    (1987) Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Education Psychology, 79, 162–170. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.79.2.162
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.162 [Google Scholar]
  60. Doughty, C. , & Williams, J
    (1998) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.197–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Dunbar, S
    (1992) Developing vocabulary by integrating language and context. TESL Canada Journal, 9(2), 73–79. doi: 10.18806/tesl.v9i2.604
     https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v9i2.604 [Google Scholar]
  62. Ebbinghaus, H
    (1885) Über das Gedächtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie [Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology] (in German). Trans. Henry A. Ruger & Clara E. Bussenius . Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot. See also English version online: psychclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/index.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Ellis, N
    (1994) Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Ellis, N. , & Beaton, A
    (1993) Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 533–558. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401062
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401062 [Google Scholar]
  65. (1995) Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. In B. Harley (Ed.), Lexical issues in language learning (pp.107–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1993.tb00627.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00627.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Erten, I.H. , & Tekin, M
    (2008) Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 407–422. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2008.02.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  67. Eysenck, M.W
    (1979) Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness. In S. Laird , I. Cermak , & M. Fergus (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp.189–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Finkbeiner, M. , & Nicol, J
    (2003) Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 369–383. doi: 10.1017/S0142716403000195
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000195 [Google Scholar]
  69. Fitzpatrick, T. , Barfield, A
    (Eds.) (2009) Lexical processing in second language learners: Papers and perspectives in honour of Paul Meara. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Folse, K
    (2006) The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 273–293. doi: 10.2307/40264523
     https://doi.org/10.2307/40264523 [Google Scholar]
  71. Folse, K. , & Chien, Y
    (2003) Using L2 research on multimedia annotations to evaluate CALL vocabulary materials. Sunshine State TESOL Journal, 2, 25–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Gass, S
    (1997) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. (1999) Discussion: Incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 319–333. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199002090
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002090 [Google Scholar]
  74. Gates, A.I
    (1917) Recitation as a factor in memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6(40).
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Gardiner, J.M. , Craik, F.I. , & Bleasdale, F.A
    (1973) Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Memory & Cognition, 1(3), 213–216. doi: 10.3758/BF03198098
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198098 [Google Scholar]
  76. Gardiner, J.M. , & Rowley, J.M
    (1984) A generation effect with numbers rather than words. Memory & Cognition, 12, 443–445. doi: 10.3758/BF03198305
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198305 [Google Scholar]
  77. Gholami, J. , & Khezrlou, S
    (2013/2014) Semantic and thematic list learning of Second language vocabulary. The CATESOL Journal, 25(1), 151–162
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Glover, J.A
    (1989) The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392–399. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.81.3.392
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.392 [Google Scholar]
  79. Goudarzi, Z. , & Moini, M.R
    (2012) The effect of input enhancement of collocations in reading on collocation learning and retention of EFL learners. International Education Studies, 5(3), 247–258. doi:10.5539/ies.v5n3p247 DOI: 10.5539/ies.v5n3p247
     https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n3p247 [Google Scholar]
  80. Greene, R.L
    (1988) Generation effects in frequency judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 298–304. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.14.2.298
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.298 [Google Scholar]
  81. (1989) Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a two-process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 371–377. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.15.3.371
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  82. (1992) Human memory. Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Griffith, D
    (1976) The attentional demands of mnemonic control processes. Memory & Cognition, 4, 103–108. doi: 10.3758/BF03213261
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213261 [Google Scholar]
  84. Gupta, P
    (2012) Word learning as the confluence of memory mechanisms: Computational and neural evidence. In M. Faust (Ed.), The handbook of the neuropsychology of language, Volume 1 (pp.146–163). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118432501.ch8
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118432501.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  85. Hardison, D.M
    (2003) Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 495–522. doi: 10.1017/S0142716403000250
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000250 [Google Scholar]
  86. Harrington, M. & Jiang, W
    (2013) Focus on the forms: From recognition practice in Chinese vocabulary learning. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 132–145. doi: 10.1075/aral.36.2.01har
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.36.2.01har [Google Scholar]
  87. Hatch, E. , & Brown, C
    (1995) Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Haynes, M
    (1998, March). Word form, attention and vocabulary development through reading. Paper presented at theAmerican Association for Applied Linguistics conference. Seattle, WA.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Hintzman, D.L
    (1974) Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in Cognitive Psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp.77–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Hintzman, D.L. , & Block, R.A
    (1971) Repetition and memory: Evidence for a multiple-trace hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 297–306. doi: 10.1037/h0030907
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030907 [Google Scholar]
  91. Hippner-Page, T
    (2000), Semantic clustering versus thematic clustering of English vocabulary words for second language instruction: Which method is more effective? files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED445550.pdf (23 October, 2014).
  92. Hirshman, E. , & Bjork, R.R
    (1988) The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 14, 484–494. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.14.3.484
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.484 [Google Scholar]
  93. Hogan, R.M. , & Kintsch, W
    (1971) Different effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 562–567. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(71)80029‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80029-4 [Google Scholar]
  94. Hudson, G
    (2000) Essential introductory linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Hulstijn, J.H
    (1992) Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental learning. In P.J.L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp.113–125). London: Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑12396‑4_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_11 [Google Scholar]
  96. Hulstijn, J.H. , Hollander, M. , & Greidanus, T
    (1996) Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and recurrence of unknown words. Modern Language Journal, 80, 327–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1996.tb01614.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01614.x [Google Scholar]
  97. Hulstijn, J.H. , & Laufer, B
    (2001) Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–558. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00164
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00164 [Google Scholar]
  98. Hyde, T.S. , & Jenkins, J.J
    (1969) The differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 472–481. doi: 10.1037/h0028372
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028372 [Google Scholar]
  99. Johns, E.E. , & Swanson, L.G
    (1988) The generation effect with nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 180–190. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.14.1.180
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.180 [Google Scholar]
  100. Johnson-Laird, P.N. , Gibbs, G. , & de Mowbray, J
    (1978) Meaning, amount of processing, and memory for words. Memory and Cognition, 6, 372–375. doi: 10.3758/BF03197468
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197468 [Google Scholar]
  101. Johnson, D.D. , & Pearson, P.D
    (1978) Teaching reading vocabulary. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. (1984) Teaching reading vocabulary, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Kida, S
    (2010a) The role of processing-resource allocation in incidental L2 vocabulary learning through reading. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 21, 171–180. ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110008512407
     [Google Scholar]
  104. (2010) The role of quality and quantity of vocabulary processing in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Paper presented onMarch 7, 2010at theAnnual Conference of the American Association of Applied LinguisticsinAtlanta, GA.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Kida, S. , & Barcroft, J
    (2014) Effects of increased semantic and structural processing on mapping meanings onto homographs in L2. Presentation onAugust 12, 2014atInternational Association of Applied Linguistics World CongressatBrisbane, Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Kim, Y
    (2006) Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition through reading by Korean learners of English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 341–373. doi: 10.2307/40264526
     https://doi.org/10.2307/40264526 [Google Scholar]
  107. Kole, J.A
    (2007) The retrieval process in mediated learning: Using priming effects to test the direct access and covert mediation models. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Kondo, H
    (2007) The effects of semantic elaboration on L2 vocabulary learning. Research Journal of Jin-Ai University, 6, 71–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Krashen, S
    (1981) Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York NY: Pergamon.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. (1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York NY: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. (1989) We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1989.tb05325.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x [Google Scholar]
  113. (2008) The comprehension hypothesis extended. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp.81–94). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Kroll, J.F. , Michael, E. , Tokowicz, N. , & Dufour, R
    (2002) The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18, 137–171. doi: 10.1191/0267658302sr201oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr201oa [Google Scholar]
  115. Kroll, J.F. , & Sunderman, G
    (2003) Cognitive proceses in second language learners and bilinguals: The development of lexical and conceptual representations. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.104–129). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch5
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  116. Lakoff, G
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  117. Landauer, T.K. , & Bjork, R.A
    (1978) Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In Gruneberg, M.M. , Morris, P.E. , & Sykes, R.N . (Eds.). Practical aspects of memory (pp.625–632). London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Laufer, B
    (1997) The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.20–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139524643.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524643.004 [Google Scholar]
  119. Laufer, B. , & Hulstijn, J.H
    (2001) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1093/applin/22.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  120. Leach, L. , & Samuel, A.G
    (2007) Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words. Cognitive Psychology, 55(4), 306–353. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  121. Lee, J. , & Van Patten, B
    (2003) Making communicative language happen. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Lively, S.E. , Logan, J.S. , & Pisoni, D.B
    (1993) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: II. The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242–1255. doi: 10.1121/1.408177
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408177 [Google Scholar]
  123. Lively, S.E. , Pisoni, D.B. , Yamada, R.A. , & Tohkura , et al.
    (1994) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2076–2087. doi: 10.1121/1.410149
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410149 [Google Scholar]
  124. Liu, N. , & Nation, I.S.P
    (1985) Factors affecting guessing in context. RELC Journal, 16, 33–42. doi: 10.1177/003368828501600103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828501600103 [Google Scholar]
  125. Logan, J.S. , Lively, S.E. , & Pisoni, D.B
    (1991) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874–886. doi: 10.1121/1.1894649
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649 [Google Scholar]
  126. Marton, W
    (1977) Foreign vocabulary learning as problem number one of foreign language teaching at the advanced level. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 2, 33–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Mastin, L
    (2010) Declarative (Explicit) & Procedural (Implicit) Memory. Online:www.human-memory.net/types_declarative.html
  128. McCarthy, M
    (1990) Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. McDaniel, M.A
    (1984) The role of elaborative and schema processing in story memory. Memory and Cognition, 12, 46–51. doi: 10.3758/BF03196996
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196996 [Google Scholar]
  130. McDaniel, M.A. , Waddill, P.J. , & Einstein, G.O
    (1988) A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 521–536. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(88)90023‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90023-X [Google Scholar]
  131. McElroy, L.A. , & Slamecka, N.J
    (1982) Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 249–259. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(82)90593‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90593-X [Google Scholar]
  132. McNamara, D.S. , & Healy, A.F
    (1995a) A procedural explanation of the generation effect: The use of an operand retrieval strategy for multiplication and addition problems. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 652–679. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2720
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2720 [Google Scholar]
  133. (1995b) A generation advantage for multiplication skill training and nonword vocabulary acquisition. In A.F. Healy & L.E. Bourne, Jr . (Eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity (pp.132–169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483326887.n5
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326887.n5 [Google Scholar]
  134. Melka, F
    (1997) Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp.84–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Meyer, A. , & Bock, K
    (1992) The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation?Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 715–726. doi: 10.3758/BF03202721
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202721 [Google Scholar]
  136. Machalias, R
    (1991) Semantic networks in vocabulary teaching and their application in the foreign language classroom. Journal of the Australian Modern Language Teachers’ Association, 26(3), 19–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Michnick Golinkoff, R. , & Hirsh-Pasek, K
    (2000) Word learning: Icon, index, or symbol?In R. Michnick Golinkoff , K. Hirsh-Pasek , L. Bloom , L.B. Smith , A.L. Woodward , N. Akhtar , M. Tomasello , & G. Hollich , Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130324.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130324.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  138. Miozzo, M. , Costa, A. , Hernandez, M. , & Rapp, B
    (2010), Lexical processing in the bilingual brain: Evidence from grammatical/morphological deficits. Aphasiology, 24(2), 262–287. doi: 10.1080/02687030902958381
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902958381 [Google Scholar]
  139. Morris, C.D. , Bransford, J.D. , & Franks, J.J
    (1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(77)80016‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9 [Google Scholar]
  140. Mullennix, J.W. , Pisoni, D.B. , & Martin, C.S
    (1989) Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365–378. doi: 10.1121/1.397688
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397688 [Google Scholar]
  141. Nagy, W
    (1997) On the role of context in first- and second-language vocabulary learning. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp.64–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Nagy, W. , Anderson, R. , & Herman, P
    (1987) Learning words from context during normal reading. American Research Journal, 24, 237–270.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Nagy, W. , Herman, P. , & Anderson, R
    (1985) Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253. doi: 10.2307/747758
     https://doi.org/10.2307/747758 [Google Scholar]
  144. Nairne, J.S. , & Widner, R.L. Jr
    (1988) Familiarity and lexicality as determinants of the generation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 14, 694–699. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.14.4.694
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.694 [Google Scholar]
  145. Nation, I.S.P
    (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524759
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 [Google Scholar]
  146. Nation, I.S.P. , & Waring
    (1997) Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp.238–254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Neumann, O
    (1996) Theories of attention. In O. Neumann , & A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (pp.389 – 446). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  148. O’Neill, W. , Roy, L. , & Tremblay, R
    (1993) A translation-based generation effect in bilingual recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 21(4), 488–495. doi: 10.3758/BF03197180
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197180 [Google Scholar]
  149. Paribakht, T.S. , & Wesche, M
    (1997) Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.174–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139524643.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524643.013 [Google Scholar]
  150. (1999) Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195–24. doi: 10.1017/S027226319900203X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319900203X [Google Scholar]
  151. Payne, D.G. , Neely, J.H. , & Burns, D.J
    (1986) The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 14, 246–252. doi: 10.3758/BF03197700
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197700 [Google Scholar]
  152. Peters, A.M
    (1985) Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D.I. Slobin , The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp.1029–1067). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Poeppel, D. , & Embick, D
    (2005) Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Cultler, A . (Ed.). Twenty-first century psychologinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp.103–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Potter, M. , So, K. , Von Eckardt, B. , & Feldman, L
    (1984) Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23–38. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(84)90489‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90489-4 [Google Scholar]
  155. Prince, P
    (1996) Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 478–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1996.tb05468.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05468.x [Google Scholar]
  156. Pulido, D
    (2003) Modeling of the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53, 233–284. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00217
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00217 [Google Scholar]
  157. Robinson, P
    (2008) Attention and Memory during SLA. In C.J. Doughty , & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Roediger, R
    (2009) The critical role of retrieval in enhancing long-term memory: From the laboratory to the classroom. Keynote Address onNovember 19, 2009at the50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA. www.psychonomic.org/meetingvids.html
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Roediger, H.L. , & Guynn, M.J
    (1996) Retrieval processes. In E.L. Bjork & R.A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp.197–236). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑012102570‑0/50009‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012102570-0/50009-4 [Google Scholar]
  160. Rott, S
    (1999) The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589–619. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199004039
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004039 [Google Scholar]
  161. (2007) The effect of frequency of input-enhancements on word learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57(2), 165–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00406.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00406.x [Google Scholar]
  162. Rott, S. , Williams, J. , & Cameron, R
    (2002) The effect of multiple-choice L1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention. Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 183–222. doi: 10.1191/1362168802lr108oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr108oa [Google Scholar]
  163. Royer, J.M
    (1973) Memory effects for test-like events during acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Psychological Reports, 32, 195–198. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1973.32.1.195
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1973.32.1.195 [Google Scholar]
  164. Ryalls, B.O. , & Pisoni, D.B
    (1997) The effect of talker variability on word recognition in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 441–452. doi: 10.1037/0012‑1649.33.3.441
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.441 [Google Scholar]
  165. Sagarra, N. , & Alba, M
    (2006) The key is in the keyword: L2 vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 90, 228–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2006.00394.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00394.x [Google Scholar]
  166. San Mateo Valdehíta, A
    (2013) El efecto de tres actividades centradas en las formas [Focus on forms, fonfs]: La selección de definiciones, la selección de ejemplos y la escritura de oraciones, en el aprendizaje de vocabulario de segundas lenguas. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 12, 17–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Schulman, A.I
    (1971) Recognition memory for targets from a scanned word list. British Journal of Psychology, 62, 335–346. doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1971.tb02044.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1971.tb02044.x [Google Scholar]
  168. Schmidt, S.R
    (1985) Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 11, 565–578. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.11.3.565
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.3.565 [Google Scholar]
  169. (1990) A test of resource-allocation explanations of the generation effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 2, 93–96. doi: 10.3758/BF03337658
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337658 [Google Scholar]
  170. Schmidt, S.R. , & Cherry, K
    (1989) The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Memory & Cognition, 17, 359–369. doi: 10.3758/BF03198475
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198475 [Google Scholar]
  171. Schmitt, N
    (1997) Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp.199–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Seal, B.D
    (1991) Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.296–311). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. Seibert, L
    (1927) An experiment in learning French vocabulary. The Journal of Educational Psychology. 18, 5, 294–309. doi: 10.1037/h0074206
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074206 [Google Scholar]
  174. Siegel, M. , & Misselt, A
    (1984) Adaptive feedback and review paradigm for computer-based drills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 310–317. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.76.2.310
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.2.310 [Google Scholar]
  175. Slamecka, N.J. , & Fevreiski, J
    (1983) The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 153–163. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(83)90112‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90112-3 [Google Scholar]
  176. Slamecka, N.J. , & Graf, P
    (1978) The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(6), 592–604.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. Slamecka, N.J. , & Katsaiti, L.T
    (1987) The generation as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 589–607. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(87)90104‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90104-5 [Google Scholar]
  178. Smith, R.W. , & Healy, A.F
    (1998) The time-course of the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 135–142. doi: 10.3758/BF03211376
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211376 [Google Scholar]
  179. Sommers, M.S. , & Barcroft, J
    (2006) Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: Effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification. Journal of the American Acoustical Society119(4), 2406–2416. doi: 10.1121/1.2171836
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2171836 [Google Scholar]
  180. Sommers, M. , & Barcroft, J
    (2007) An integrated account of the effects of acoustic variability in L1 and L2: Evidence from amplitude, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 231–249. doi: 10.1017/S0142716407070129
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070129 [Google Scholar]
  181. (2011) Indexical information. Encoding difficulty, and second language vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), 417–434. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000469
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000469 [Google Scholar]
  182. (2013) Effects of referent token variability on L2 vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 63(2), 186–210.10.1111/lang.12007
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12007 [Google Scholar]
  183. Sommers, M.S. , Barcroft, J. , & Mulqueeny, K
    (2008) Further studies of acoustic variability and vocabulary. Paper presented at the49th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, November. doi: 10.1037/e527312012‑049
     https://doi.org/10.1037/e527312012-049 [Google Scholar]
  184. Sommers, M.S. , Nygaard, L.C. , & Pisoni, D.B
    (1994) Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. I. Effects of variability in speaking rate and overall amplitude. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 1314–1324. doi: 10.1121/1.411453
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411453 [Google Scholar]
  185. Stahl, S. , & Fairbanks, M
    (1986) The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110. doi: 10.3102/00346543056001072
     https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056001072 [Google Scholar]
  186. Stevenson, R.J
    (1981) Depth of comprehension, effective elaboration, and memory for sentences. Memory & Cognition, 9, 169–176. doi: 10.3758/BF03202332
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202332 [Google Scholar]
  187. Tagashira, K. , Kida, S. , & Hoshino, Y
    (2010) Hot or gelid? The influence of L1 translation familiarity on the interference effects in foreign language vocabulary learning. System, 38(3), 412–421. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.03.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  188. Thomas, M. , & Dieter
    JN (1987) The positive effects of writing practice on integration of foreign words in memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 249–253. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.79.3.249
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.249 [Google Scholar]
  189. Thompson, C.P. , & Barnett, C
    (1981) Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18(5), 241–243. doi: 10.3758/BF03333615
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333615 [Google Scholar]
  190. Tinkham, T
    (1993) The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. System, 21(3), 371–380. doi: 10.1016/0346‑251X(93)90027‑E
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90027-E [Google Scholar]
  191. (1997) The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 13(2), 138–163. doi: 10.1191/026765897672376469
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897672376469 [Google Scholar]
  192. Tresselt, M.E. , & Mayzner, M.S
    (1960) A study of incidental learning. Journal of Psychology, 50, 339–347. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1960.9916451
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1960.9916451 [Google Scholar]
  193. Tulving, E
    (1967) The effects of presentation and recall in free recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 175–184. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(67)80092‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80092-6 [Google Scholar]
  194. van Hell, J.G. , & Mahn, A.C
    (1997) Keyword mnemonics versus rote rehearsal: Learning concrete and abstract foreign words by experienced and inexperienced learners. Language Learning, 47, 3, 507–546. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00018
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00018 [Google Scholar]
  195. Ullman, M.T
    (2001) A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Review Neuroscience, 2, 717–726. doi: 10.1038/35094573
     https://doi.org/10.1038/35094573 [Google Scholar]
  196. (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  197. (2005) A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (ed), Mind in context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp.141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. VanPatten, B
    (1996) Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. (2003) From input to output: A teacher’s guide to second language acquisition. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. Wajnryb, R
    (1987) Vocabulary – consolidation through clusters. English Teachers Journal, 35, 67–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. Wang, A. & Thomas, M
    (1995) The effect of imagery-based mnemonics on the long-term retention of Chinese characters. In B. Harley (Ed.), Lexical issues in language learning (pp.167–183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. Waring, Robert
    (1997)  The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication . System, 25(2), 261–274. doi: 10.1016/S0346‑251X(97)00013‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00013-4 [Google Scholar]
  203. Webb, S. , & Boers, F
    (2013) Do textual enhancement techniques increase incidental learning of collocation?Presentation onDecember 19, 2013atVocab@Vic ConferenceatVictoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
     [Google Scholar]
  204. Wesche, M. , & Paribakht, T.S
    (1999) Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 175–180. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199002016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002016 [Google Scholar]
  205. West, M
    (1988) Catenizing. ELT Journal, 6, 147–151.
     [Google Scholar]
  206. Wheeler, M.A. , & Roediger, H.L
    (1992) Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1992.tb00036.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00036.x [Google Scholar]
  207. Wickens, C.D
    (1984) Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention (pp.63–102). New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. (1989) Attention and skilled performance. In D. Holding (Ed.), Human Skills (pp.71–105). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. Wong. W
    (2005) Input enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Wong, W. & Barcroft, J
    (2012) Repetez s’il vous plait, or not?: Choral repetition and L2 vocabulary learning. Presentation at onJuly 12, 2012at11th International Conference of the Association for Language AwarenessatConcordia University, Montreal.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. Wong, W. , & Pyun, D.O
    (2012) The effects of sentence writing on L2 French and Korean lexical acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 164–189. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.68.2.164
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.68.2.164 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027268051
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027268051
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027268051
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027268051
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error