Visit www.benjamins.com

Language Ideology and Semiotic Negotiation in Mongolian Use

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.
Abstract

As Owen Lattimore points out, the right to move and the right to settle mark anecological-cum-ideological division between nomadism and agriculturalism inInner Asia. Though marketization has brought the Chinese Mongols and the Hanever closer, the need for ideological negotiation remains, which is best reflected inthe discourse of Mongolian language use in Inner Mongolia and beyond.Language ideology is more about “reason” while semiotic negotiation takesplace along the three dimensions of sign (representaman), object, and interpretant,a Peircean triadic division I adopt in this chapter. Language use involvesreasoning as much as materiality.

References

/content/books/9789027268112-06bil
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address