1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. A Sociophonetic Approach to Scottish Standard English

A Sociophonetic Approach to Scottish Standard English

image of A Sociophonetic Approach to Scottish Standard English
GBP
Buy:£80.00 + Taxes

Applying a sociophonetic research paradigm, this volume presents an investigation of variation and change in the Scottish Standard English accent. Based on original audio recordings made in Edinburgh, it provides detailed acoustic and auditory analyses of selected accent features. In contrast to other studies of English in Scotland, the focus is on the extent to which certain characteristics of middle-class speech are susceptible (or immune) to the influence of Southern Standard British English, or vary in ways unrelated to that influence. Beyond the fine-grained patterns of variation that are revealed, the study highlights innovative methodological approaches to sociophonetic variation and contributes to a better general understanding of the status and function of Scottish Standard English. The book will be of general interest to sociolinguists and sociophoneticians, and of particular interest to researchers or students concerned with phonetic or phonological aspects of Scottish English.

References

  1. Abercrombie, D
    1979 The accents of Standard English in Scotland. InLanguages of Scotland, A.J. Aitken & T. McArthur (eds), 68–84. Edinburgh: Chambers.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 1991 RP today: Its position and prospects. InDavid Abercrombie. Fifty Years in Phonetics. Selected Papers, 48–53. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Adank, P.M. , Smits, R. & van Hout, R
    2004 A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America116(5): 3099–3107. doi: 10.1121/1.1795335
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1795335 [Google Scholar]
  4. Agresti, A. & Finlay, B
    2009 Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Agutter, A
    1988 The not-so-Scottish Vowel Length Rule. InEdinburgh Studies in the English Language, J. Anderson & N. Macleod (eds), 120–132. Edinburgh: John Donald.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Aitchison, J
    2001 Language Change: Progress or Decay?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Aitken, A.J
    1979 Scottish speech: A historical view with special reference to the Standard English of Scotland. InLanguages of Scotland, A.J. Aitken & T. McArthur (eds), 85–118. Edinburgh: Chambers.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 1981a The Scottish Vowel Length Rule. InSo Meny People Longages and Tonges. Philological Essays in Scots and Mediaeval English Presented to Angus McIntosh, M. Benskin & M.L. Samuels (eds), 131–157. Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 1981b The good old Scots tongue. InMinority Languages Today, E. Haugen , J.D. McClure & D. Thomson (eds), 72–90. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 1985 Is Scots a language?English Today1(3): 41–45. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400001292
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400001292 [Google Scholar]
  11. Aitken, A.J. & McArthur, T
    (eds) 1979 Languages of Scotland. Edinburgh: Chambers.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Akaike, H
    1987 Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika52(3): 317–332. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359 [Google Scholar]
  13. Allerton, D.J
    2000 Articulatory inertia vs. Systemzwang: Changes in liaison phenomena in recent British English. English Studies81(6): 574–581. doi: 10.1076/enst.81.6.574.9183
     https://doi.org/10.1076/enst.81.6.574.9183 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ash, S
    2002 Social class. InThe Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers , P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds), 402–422. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Asprey, E
    2007 Investigating residual rhoticity in a non-rhotic accent. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics12: 78–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Audacity Development Team
    2010 Audacity: A Free Digital Audio Editor [Computer program]. Version 1.2.6, retrieved25 October 2010from audacity.sourceforge.net/
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Auer, P. & Hinskens, F
    2005 The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. InDialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, P. Auer , F. Hinskens & P. Kerswill (eds), 335–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486623.015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486623.015 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bähr, D
    1974 Standard English und seine Geographischen Varianten. München: Wilhelm Fink.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bailey, G
    2002 Real and apparent time. InThe Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers , P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds), 312–332. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bailey, G. , Wikle, T. , Tillery, J. & Sand, L
    1991 The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change3(3): 241–264. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500000569
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000569 [Google Scholar]
  21. Barry, W.J
    1997 Another R-tickle. Journal of the International Phonetic Society27: 35–45. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300005405
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300005405 [Google Scholar]
  22. Batchelor, T
    1974 [1809] An Orthoëpical Analysis of the English Language. Repr. in A. Zettersten. 1974. A Critical Facsimile Edition of Thomas Batchelor: ‘An Orthoëpical Analysis of the English Language’ and ‘An Orthoëpical Analysis of the Dialect of Bedfordshire’ (1809). Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Bauer, L
    1984 Linking /r/ in RP: Some facts. Journal of the International Phonetic Society14(2): 74–79. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300002802
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300002802 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2002 An Introduction to International Varieties of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Beal, J.C
    2004a English in Modern Times. 1700–1945. London: Edward Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 2004b English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. InA Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, E.W. Schneider , K. Burridge , B. Kortmann , R. Mesthrie & C. Upton (eds), 113–133. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Bell, A
    1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society13(2): 145–204. doi: 10.1017/S004740450001037X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
  28. 2001 Back in style: Reworking audience design. InStyle and Sociolinguistic Variation, P. Eckert & J.R. Rickford (eds), 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2009 Language style as audience design. InThe New Sociolinguistics Reader, N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (eds), 265–275. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Blevins, J
    2004 Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486357
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486357 [Google Scholar]
  31. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D
    2010 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 5.1.44. www.praat.org/ (October 2010).
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Borden, G.J. , Harris, K.S. & Raphael, L.J
    1994 Speech Science Primer. Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception of Speech. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Brato, T
    2007 Accent variation in adolescents in Aberdeen: First results for (hw) and (th). Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences . 1489–1492.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 2012 A Sociophonetic Study of Aberdeen English: Innovation and Conservatism. PhD dissertation, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Bright, W
    1997 Social factors in language change. InThe Handbook of Sociolinguistics, F. Coulmas (ed.), 81–90. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Britain, D. & Trudgill, P
    2000 Migration, dialect contact, new-dialect formation and reallocation. InDialect and Migration in a Changing Europe, K. Mattheier (ed.), 73–78. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. British National Corpus (BNC) 1995 Version 1.0. BNC Consortium / Oxford University Computing Services.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. British National Corpus (BNCweb, CQP-Edition). Version 4.3. Based on The BNC (XML Edition) 2007 Version 3. BNC Consortium / Oxford University Computing Services.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Brown, A
    1988 Linking, intrusive, and rhotic /r/ in pronunciation models, Journal of the International Phonetic Society18(2): 144–151. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300003765
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300003765 [Google Scholar]
  40. Burchfield, R
    1994 Introduction. InThe Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. V: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development, R. Burchfield (ed.), 1–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Bybee, J
    2001 Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2002 Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically motivated sound change. Language Variation and Change14(3): 261–290. doi: 10.1017/S0954394502143018
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394502143018 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  44. Cameron, D
    2009 Demythologizing sociolinguistics. InThe New Sociolinguistics Reader, N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (eds), 106–118. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Carr, P
    1999 English Phonetics and Phonology: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Carr, P. & Brulard, I
    2006 Anglo-English influences on Scottish Standard English speakers: trap/bath/palm/start and lot/cloth/ thought/north/force. Scottish Language25: 31–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Catford, J.C
    1977 Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Chambers, J.K
    2002 Patterns of variation including change. InThe Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers , P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds), 349–372. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Cheshire, J
    2002 Sex and gender in variationist research. InThe Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers , P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds), 423–443. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Chirrey, D
    1999 Edinburgh: Descriptive material. InUrban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, P. Foulkes & G.J. Docherty (eds), 223–229. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Cieri, C
    2011 Making a field recording. InSociophonetics. A Student’s Guide, M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (eds), 24–35. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Clark, J. , Yallop, C. & Fletcher, J
    2007 An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. Malden MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Clark, L
    2008 Variation, Change and the Usage-based Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Clark, L. & Trousdale, G
    2009 Exploring the role of token frequency in phonological change: Evidence from TH-Fronting in east-central Scotland. English Language and Linguistics13(1): 33–55. doi: 10.1017/S1360674308002852
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002852 [Google Scholar]
  55. Corbett, J. , McClure, J.D. & Stuart-Smith, J
    (eds) 2003 The Edinburgh Companion to Scots. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 2003 A brief history of Scots. InThe Edinburgh Companion to Scots, J. Corbett , J.D. McClure & J. Stuart-Smith (eds), 1–16. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Coupland, N. & Bishop, H
    2007 Ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(1): 74–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00311.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00311.x [Google Scholar]
  58. Cruttenden, A
    2008 Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. London: Hodder Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Deterding, D
    1990 Speaker Normalisation for Automatic Speech Recognition. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 1997 The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Society27: 47–55. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300005417
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300005417 [Google Scholar]
  61. Di Paolo, M. & Yaeger-Dror, M
    2011 Field methods. InSociophonetics. A Student’s Guide, M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (eds), 7–23. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Di Paolo, M. , Yaeger-Dror, M. & Wassink, A.B
    2011 Analyzing vowels. InSociophonetics. A Student’s Guide, M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (eds), 87–106. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Disner, S.F
    1980 Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America67(1): 253–261. doi: 10.1121/1.383734
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.383734 [Google Scholar]
  64. Docherty, G. & Foulkes, P
    1999 Derby and Newcastle: Instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. InUrban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, P. Foulkes & G.J. Docherty (eds), 47–71. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 2001 Variability in (r) production – instrumental perspectives. Inr-atics: Sociolinguistic, Phonetic and Phonological Characteristics of /r/, H. van de Velde & R. van Hout (eds), 173–184. Brussels: Free University Brussels.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Dósa, A
    1999 Language, dialect, or accent? Some contemporary perceptions of the present status and the potential uses of Scots. Scottish Language18: 69–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Downes, W
    1984 Language and Society. London: Fontana.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Eckert, P
    1989 The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change1(3): 245–267. doi: 10.1017/S095439450000017X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450000017X [Google Scholar]
  69. 2000 Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Eckert, P. & McConnel-Ginet, S
    1999 New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society28(2): 185–201. doi: 10.1017/S0047404599002031
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599002031 [Google Scholar]
  71. Electoral Management Board for Scotland
    2014 Online resource. scotlandreferendum.info (23 October 2014).
  72. Erickson, B
    2003 On the development of English r . InStudies in the History of the English Language, D. Minkova & R. Stockwell (eds), 183–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Esling, J.H
    1978 Voice Quality in Edinburgh – A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Fant, G.M
    1970 Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 1973 Speech Sounds and Features. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Farrar, K. & Jones, M.C
    2002 Introduction. InLanguage Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors, M.C. Jones & E. Esch (eds), 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110892598.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892598.1 [Google Scholar]
  77. Feagin, C
    1990 The dynamics of a sound change in Southern States English: From r-less to r-ful in three generations. InDevelopment and Diversity. Language Variation across Time and Space. A Festschrift for Charles-James N. Bailey, J.A. Edmondson , C. Feagin & P. Mühlhäusler (eds), 129–146. Arlington TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics / University of Texas.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 2002 Entering the community: Fieldwork. InThe Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers , P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds), 20–39. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Fitt, M
    2000 But n Ben A-Go-Go. Edinburgh: Luath Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Foulkes, P
    1997a Rule inversion in a British English dialect – A sociolinguistic investigation of [r]-sandhi in Newcastle upon Tyne. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics4(1): 259–270.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 1997b English [r]-sandhi – a sociolinguistic perspective. Histoire, Epistémologie, Langage19(1): 73–96. doi: 10.3406/hel.1997.2573
     https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.1997.2573 [Google Scholar]
  82. Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G.J
    1999 Urban voices – Overview. InUrban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, P. Foulkes & G.J. Docherty (eds), 1–12. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 2000 Another chapter in the story of /r/: ‘Labiodental’ variants in British English. Journal of Sociolinguistics4: 30–59. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00102
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00102 [Google Scholar]
  84. 2006 The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics34(4): 409–438. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  85. Foulkes, P. , Scobbie, J.M. & Watt, D
    2010 Sociophonetics. InHandbook of Phonetic Sciences, W.J. Hardcastle , J. Laver & F.E. Gibbon (eds), 703–754. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444317251.ch19
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317251.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  86. French, J.P
    1989 Word-final /r/ in a Northern English accent: An interactional account of variable production. Journal of the International Phonetic Society15: 34–43. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300002966
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300002966 [Google Scholar]
  87. Gay, T.J
    1968 Effect of speaking rate on diphthong formant movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America44: 1570–1573. doi: 10.1121/1.1911298
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1911298 [Google Scholar]
  88. Giegerich, H.J
    1992 English Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166126
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166126 [Google Scholar]
  89. Giles, H
    1973 Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics15: 87–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 2009 The process of communication accommodation. InThe New Sociolinguistics Reader, N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (eds), 276–286. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Giles, H. & Coupland
    N 1991 Language: Contexts and Consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Gimson, A.C
    1984 The RP accent. InLanguage in the British Isles, P. Trudgill (ed.), 45–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Golston, C
    2006 Diphthongs. InEncyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,Vol. 3, K. Brown (ed.), 601–603. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00039‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00039-0 [Google Scholar]
  94. Gordeeva, O
    2006 Language Interaction in the Bilingual Acquisition of Sound Structure: A Longitudinal Study of Vowel Quality, Duration and Vocal Effort in Pre-school Children Speaking Scottish English and Russian. PhD dissertation, Queen Margaret University College Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Grant, W
    1914 The Pronunciation of English in Scotland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Gut, U
    2009 Introduction to English Phonetics and Phonology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04390‑7
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04390-7 [Google Scholar]
  97. 2013a Analysing phonetic and phonological variation on the segmental level. InResearch Methods in Language Variation and Change, J. Schlüter & M. Krug (eds), 228–243. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511792519.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.016 [Google Scholar]
  98. 2013b Analysing phonetic and phonological variation on the suprasegmental level. InResearch Methods in Language Variation and Change, J. Schlüter & M. Krug (eds), 244–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511792519.017
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.017 [Google Scholar]
  99. Haddican, B. , Richards, H. , Foulkes, P. & Hughes, V
    2011 Social correlates of changes in mid-vowels in Northern England. Paper given atthe 40th New Ways of Analyzing Variation conference (NWAV40; Georgetown University, 27–30 October 2011).
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Hansen, K. , Carls, U. & Lucko, P
    1996 Die Differenzierung des Englischen in nationale Varianten. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Harrington, J. & Cassidy, S
    1999 Techniques in Speech Acoustics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4657‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4657-9 [Google Scholar]
  102. Hay, J
    2011 Statistical analysis. InSociophonetics. A Student’s Guide, M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (eds), 198–214. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Hay, J. & Drager, K
    2007 Sociophonetics. Annual Review of Anthropology36: 89–103. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120633
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120633 [Google Scholar]
  104. Hay, J. & Jannedy, S
    2006 Modelling sociophonetic variation. Journal of Phonetics34(4): 405–408. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  105. Hay, J. & Sudbury, A
    2005 How rhoticity became /r/-sandhi. Language81(4): 799–823. doi: 10.1353/lan.2005.0175
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0175 [Google Scholar]
  106. Hayes, B
    1983 A grid-based theory of English meter. Linguistic Inquiry14(3): 357–393.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Hensher, D.A. , Rose, J.M. & Greene, W.H
    2005 Applied Choice Analysis. A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610356
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610356 [Google Scholar]
  108. Hindle, D
    1978 Approaches to vowel normalization in the study of natural speech. InLinguistic Variation: Models and Methods, D. Sankoff (ed.), 161–171. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Hinz, T
    2009 Mehrebenenanalyse. InHandbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung, S. Kühl , P. Strodtholz & A. Taffertshofer (eds), 648–667. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑531‑91570‑8_31
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91570-8_31 [Google Scholar]
  110. HLM [Computer program]: see Raudenbush, Bryk, Cheong, Congdon & du Toit 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Holbrook, A. & Fairbanks, G
    1962 Diphthong formants and their movements. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research5: 38–58. doi: 10.1044/jshr.0501.38
     https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.0501.38 [Google Scholar]
  112. Horn, W. & Lehnert, M
    1954 Laut und Leben: Englische Lautgeschichte der neueren Zeit (1400–1950). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Hox, J.J
    2010 [2002] Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Hughes, A. , Trudgill, P. & Watt, D
    2005 English Accents and Dialects. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Jespersen, O
    1949 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. 1: Sounds and Spellings. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Johnson, K
    2003 Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Johnston, P.A
    1984 Variation in the Standard Scottish English of Morningside. English World-Wide4(2): 133–185. doi: 10.1075/eww.4.2.02joh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.4.2.02joh [Google Scholar]
  118. 1997 Regional variation. InThe Edinburgh History of the Scots Language, C. Jones (ed.), 433–513. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 2007 Scots and Scottish English. InLanguage in the British Isles, D. Britain (ed.), 105–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620782.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620782.007 [Google Scholar]
  120. Jones, C
    1989 A History of English Phonology. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. 1993 Scottish Standard English in the late eighteenth century. Transactions of the Philological Society91(1): 95–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1993.tb01066.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1993.tb01066.x [Google Scholar]
  122. (ed.) 1997 The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. 1997 Phonology. InThe Edinburgh History of the Scots Language, Charles Jones (ed.), 267–334. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 2002 The English Language in Scotland: An Introduction to Scots. East Linton: Tuckwell Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 2006 English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230503403
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503403 [Google Scholar]
  126. Jones, D
    1956 The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Jones, M.C. & Singh, I
    2005 Exploring Language Change. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Kamińska, T.E
    1995 Problems in Scottish English Phonology. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110934724
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110934724 [Google Scholar]
  129. Kay, B
    2006 Scots: The Mither Tongue. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Kerswill, P
    2003 Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. InSocial Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 16], D. Britain & J. Cheshire (eds), 223–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.16.16ker
     https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.16.16ker [Google Scholar]
  131. Kerswill, P. & Williams, A
    2000 Mobility versus social class in dialect levelling: Evidence from new and old towns in England. InDialect and Migration in a Changing Europe, K. Mattheier (ed.), 1–13. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 2002 “Salience” as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. InLanguage Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors, M.C. Jones & E. Esch (eds), 81–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110892598.81
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892598.81 [Google Scholar]
  133. 2005 New towns and koineisation: Linguistic and social correlates. Linguistics43(5): 1023–1048. doi: 10.1515/ling.2005.43.5.1023
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.5.1023 [Google Scholar]
  134. Kohler, K.J
    1964 Aspects of the History of English Pronunciation in Scotland. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Kortmann, B. & Upton, C
    (eds) 2008 Varieties of English, Vol. 1: The British Isles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Krug, M
    2000 Emerging English Modals. A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110820980
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820980 [Google Scholar]
  137. 2001 Frequency, iconicity, categorization: Evidence from emerging modals. InFrequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds), 309–335. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.45.16kru
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.16kru [Google Scholar]
  138. 2003 Frequency as a determinant in grammatical variation and change. InDeterminants of Grammatical Variation in English, G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (eds), 7–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110900019.7
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110900019.7 [Google Scholar]
  139. 2012 The Great Vowel Shift. InHistorical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook, A. Bergs & L. Brinton (eds), 756–776. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Krug, M. & Schützler, O
    2013 Recent change and grammaticalization. InCurrent Change in the English Verb Phrase, B. Aarts , G. Leech , J. Close & J. Smith (eds), 155–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139060998.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060998.008 [Google Scholar]
  141. Kuhl, P.K
    2000 A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science97(22): 11850–11857. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 [Google Scholar]
  142. Labov, W
    1966 The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. 1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  144. 1990 The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change2: 205–254. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500000338
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000338 [Google Scholar]
  145. 1994 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. 2001 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. 2006 [1966] The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618208 [Google Scholar]
  148. Ladefoged, P
    1967 Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. 2003 Phonetic Data Analysis. An Introduction to Fieldwork and Instrumental Techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D.E
    1957 Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America29(1): 98–104. doi: 10.1121/1.1908694
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908694 [Google Scholar]
  151. Lawson, E. , Scobbie, J.M. & Stuart-Smith, J
    2011 The social stratification of tongue shape for postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English. Journal of Sociolinguistics15(2): 256–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00464.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00464.x [Google Scholar]
  152. Lawson, E. , Stuart-Smith, J. & Scobbie, J.M
    2008 Articulatory insights into language variation and change: Preliminary findings from an ultrasound study of derhoticization in Scottish English. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics14(2): 99–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Lawson, R
    2009 Sociolinguistic Constructions of Identity among Adolescent Males in Glasgow. PhD dissertation, University of Glasgow.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. (ed.) 2014 Sociolinguistics in Scotland. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137034717
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034717 [Google Scholar]
  155. Lehiste, I. & Peterson, G.E
    1961 Transitions, glides, and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America33(3): 268–277. doi: 10.1121/1.1908638
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908638 [Google Scholar]
  156. Lewis, J.W
    1975 Linking /r/ in the General British pronunciation of English. Journal of the International Phonetic Society5(1): 37–42. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300001195
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300001195 [Google Scholar]
  157. Lindau, M
    1985 The story of /r/. InPhonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged, V. Fromkin (ed.), 157–168. Orlando: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Lindblom, B
    1990 Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. InSpeech Production and Speech Modelling, W.J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (eds), 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2037‑8_16
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16 [Google Scholar]
  159. 1998 Systemic constraints and adaptive change in the formation of sound structure. InApproaches to the Evolution of Language. Social and Cognitive Bases, J.R. Hurford , M. Studdert-Kennedy & C. Knight (eds), 242–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Lloyd, R.J
    1899 Northern English. Phonetics, Grammar, Texts. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Louviere, J.J. , Hensher, D.A. & Swait, J.D
    2000 Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511753831
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831 [Google Scholar]
  162. Luick, K
    1940 Historische Grammatik der Englischen Sprache. Leipzig: Bernhard Tauchnitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. Luke, D.A
    2004 Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412985147
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985147 [Google Scholar]
  164. Lynch, M
    (ed.) 2001 The Oxford Companion to Scottish History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Macafee, C
    1983 Glasgow [Varieties of English around the World T3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.t3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.t3 [Google Scholar]
  166. 2004 Scots and Scottish English. InLegacies of Colonial English, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 59–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. MacAllister, A.H
    1963 A Year’s Course in Speech Training. London: University of London Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Macaulay, R.K.S
    1977 Language, Social Class, and Education. A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Maclagan, M. & Hay, J
    2011 Transcription. InSociophonetics. A Student’s Guide, M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (eds), 36–45. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. MacMahon, M.K.C
    1998 Phonology. InThe Cambridge History of the English Languag, Vol. IV: 1776–1997, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 373–535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. MacQueen, D
    1997 Please drop your R’s at the door Your Grace. English Today13(1): 47–48. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400009470
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400009470 [Google Scholar]
  172. Mair, C
    2006 Twentieth-Century English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486951
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486951 [Google Scholar]
  173. Matthews, B.M
    2001 On Variability and the Acquisition of Vowels in Normally Developing Scottish Children (18–36 Months). PhD dissertation, Queen Margaret University College Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. McArthur, T
    1979 The status of English in and furth of Scotland. InLanguages of Scotland, A.J. Aitken & T. McArthur (eds), 50–67. Edinburgh: Chambers.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. 1998 The English Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. McClure, J.D
    1979 Scots: Its range of uses. InLanguages of Scotland, A.J. Aitken & T. McArthur (eds), 26–48. Edinburgh: Chambers.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. 1981 The synthesisers of Scots. InMinority Languages Today, E. Haugen , J.D. McClure & D. Thomson (eds), 91–99. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. 1988 Why Scots Matters. Edinburgh: The Saltire Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. 1994 English in Scotland. InThe Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. V: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development, R. Burchfield (ed.), 23–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. 1995 The vowels of Scottish English – Formants and features. InStudies in General and English Phonetics: Essays in Honour of Professor J.D. O’Connor, J.W. Lewis (ed.), 367–378. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. McCully, C
    2009 The Sound Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511819650
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819650 [Google Scholar]
  182. McKenna, G.E
    1988 Vowel Length in the Standard English of Scotland.M.Litt. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  183. McMahon, A.M.S
    2000 Lexical Phonology and the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486432
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486432 [Google Scholar]
  184. 2002 An Introduction to English Phonology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. McMahon, A.M.S. , Heggarty, P. , McMahon, R. & Maguire, W
    2007 The sound patterns of Englishes: Representing phonetic similarity. English Language and Linguistics11(1): 113–142. doi: 10.1017/S1360674306002139
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306002139 [Google Scholar]
  186. Menzerath, P
    1941 Der Diphthong. Bonn: Ferdinand Dümmlers.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. Meyerhoff, M
    1998 Accommodating your data: The use and abuse of accommodation theory in sociolinguistics. Language and Communication18(3): 205–225. doi: 10.1016/S0271‑5309(98)00006‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00006-8 [Google Scholar]
  188. 2006 Introducing Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  189. Meyerhoff, M. & Niedzielski, N
    2003 The globalisation of vernacular variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics7(4): 534–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2003.00241.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00241.x [Google Scholar]
  190. Miller, J.D
    1989 Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America85(5): 2114–2134. doi: 10.1121/1.397862
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397862 [Google Scholar]
  191. Miller, J
    2008 Scottish English: Morphology and syntax. InVarieties of English, Vol. 1: The British Isles, B. Kortmann & C. Upton (eds), 299–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. Milroy, L
    2002 Introduction: Mobility, contact and language change – Working with contemporary speech communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics6(1): 3–15. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00174
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00174 [Google Scholar]
  193. Milroy, L. & Gordon, M
    2003 Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470758359
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758359 [Google Scholar]
  194. Milroy, L. , Milroy, J. , Docherty, G. , Foulkes, P. & Walshaw, D
    1999 Phonological variation and change in contemporary English: Evidence from Newcastle upon Tyne and Derby. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa8: 35–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  195. Minkova, D. & Stockwell, R
    2003 English vowel shifts and ‘optimal’ diphthongs: Is there a logical link?InOptimality Theory and Language Change, D.E. Holt (ed.), 169–190. Amsterdam: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0195‑3_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0195-3_7 [Google Scholar]
  196. Mompeán-Gonzalez, J. & Mompeán-Guillamón, P
    2009 /r/-liaison in English: An empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics20(4): 733–776. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2009.031
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.031 [Google Scholar]
  197. Murison, D.D
    1979 The historical background. InLanguages of Scotland, A.J. Aitken & T. McArthur (eds), 2–13. Edinburgh: Chambers.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Murray, J.A.H
    1873 The Dialect of the Southern Counties of Scotland. London: Asher.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. National Records of Scotland
    2014 Scotland’s Census 2011. www.scotlandscensus.gov.uk/ (25 July 2014).
     [Google Scholar]
  200. Nearey, T.M
    1978 Phonetic Feature Systems for Vowels. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. 1989 Static, dynamic, and relational factors in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America85(5): 2088–2113. doi: 10.1121/1.397861
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397861 [Google Scholar]
  202. Nearey, T.M. & Assmann, P.F
    1986 Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America80: 1297–1308. doi: 10.1121/1.394433
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.394433 [Google Scholar]
  203. Nelson, G
    2002 Markup Manual for Written Texts. ice-corpora.net/ice/spoken.doc
     [Google Scholar]
  204. Neppert, J.M.H
    1999 Elemente einer Akustischen Phonetik. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. Ohala, J.J
    1989 Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. InLanguage Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes, L.E. Breivik & E.H. Jahr (eds), 173–198. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110853063.173
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853063.173 [Google Scholar]
  206. 1993 The phonetics of sound change. InHistorical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, C. Jones (ed.), 237–278. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  207. Phillips, B.S
    2006 Word frequency and lexical diffusion. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230286610
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286610 [Google Scholar]
  208. Praat [Computer program]: see Boersma & Weenink 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. Pukli, M
    2006 Investigation sociophonétique de l’anglais en Ecosse: Le cas de Ayr. PhD dissertation, Université de Toulouse - Le Mirail.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Raudenbush, S.W. & Bryk, A.S
    2002 [1992] Hierarchical Linear Models. Applications and Data Analysis Methods.Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. Raudenbush, S.W. , Bryk, A.S. , Cheong, Y.F. , Congdon, R.T. & du Toit, M
    2011 HLM 7: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood IL: Scientific Software International.
     [Google Scholar]
  212. Roach, P. , Setter, J. & Esling, J
    (eds) 2011 Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. Robinson, M
    (ed.) 1985 Concise Scots Dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  214. Romaine, S
    1975 Linguistic Variability in the Speech of some Edinburgh Schoolchildren. M.Litt. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
  215. 1978 Postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English: Sound change in progress?InSociolinguistic Patterns in British English, P. Trudgill (ed.), 144–157. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. 1980 Stylistic variation and evaluative reactions to speech: Problems in the investigation of linguistic attitudes in Scotland. Language and Speech23(3): 213–232.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. 1982 The English Language in Scotland. InEnglish as a World Language, R.W. Bailey & M. Görlach (eds), 56–83. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. Sánchez Miret, F
    1998 Some reflections on the notion of diphthong. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics34: 27–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. Schilling-Estes, N
    1998 Investigating “self-conscious” speech: The performance register in Ocracoke English. Language in Society27(1): 53–83. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500019722
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019722 [Google Scholar]
  220. 2002 Investigating stylistic variation. InThe Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers , P. Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 375–401. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  221. Schlüter, J
    2005 Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219265
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219265 [Google Scholar]
  222. 2012 Early Modern English: Phonology. InHistorical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook, Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds), 589–604. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. Schmitt, H
    2009 Sprache und Identität in Schottland. Eine qualitative Makrostudie zur Rolle des Tiefland-Schottischen (Scots). Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Schützler, O
    2009 Unstable close-mid vowels in modern Scottish English. InNew Trends and Methodologies in Applied English Language Research. Diachronic, Diatopic and Contrastive Studies, C. Prado-Alonso , L. Gómez-García , I. Pastor-Gómez & D. Tizón-Couto (eds), 153–182. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  225. 2010a Which way do Scottish monophthongs go? Charting vowel variation in Scottish Standard English. InIssues in Accents of English, 2: Variability and Norm, E. Waniek-Klimczak (ed.), 133–145. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. 2010b Variable Scottish English consonants: The cases of /ʍ/ and non-prevocalic /r/. Research in Language8: 5–21. doi: 10.2478/v10015‑010‑0010‑9
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-010-0010-9 [Google Scholar]
  227. 2010c Exploring acoustic correlates of diphthong perception. Paper given atthe 43rd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE2010; Vilnius, 2–5 September 2010).
     [Google Scholar]
  228. 2011a Charting vowel spaces in Edinburgh middle-class speech. English World-Wide32(1): 24–45. doi: 10.1075/eww.32.1.02sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.32.1.02sch [Google Scholar]
  229. 2011b Statistical approaches to hierarchical data in sociophonetics: The case of variable rhoticity in Scottish Standard English. InProceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research, C. Cummins , C.-H. Elder , T. Godard , M. Macleod , E. Schmidt & G. Walkden (eds), 148–158. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  230. 2012 Regional (in-)variability of vowel space organisation in Scottish Standard English. InNew Trends and Methodologies in Applied English Language Research, II: Studies in Variation, Meaning and Learning, D. Tizón-Couto , B. Tizón-Couto , I. Pastor-Gómez & P. Rodríguez-Puente (eds), 183–204. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. 2013 The sociophonology and sociophonetics of Scottish Standard English (r). InLanguage Variation – European Perspectives IV [Studies in Language Variation 14], P. Auer , J. Caro & G. Kaufmann (eds), 215–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/silv.14.14sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.14.14sch [Google Scholar]
  232. 2014 Vowel variation in Scottish Standard English: Accent-internal differentiation or anglicisation?InSociolinguistics in Scotland, R. Lawson (ed.), 129–152. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137034717.0015
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034717.0015 [Google Scholar]
  233. Scobbie, J.M
    2006 (R) as a variable. InEncyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Vol. 10, K. Brown (ed.), 337–344. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/04711‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04711-8 [Google Scholar]
  234. Scobbie, J.M. , Hewlett, N. & Turk, A
    1999 Standard English in Edinburgh and Glasgow: The Scottish Vowel Length Rule revealed. In P. Foulkes & G.J. Docherty (eds), 230–245. Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  235. Snijders, T. & Bosker, R
    1999 Multilevel Analysis. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  236. Speitel, H.H. & Johnston, P.A
    1983 A Sociolinguistic Investigation of Edinburgh Speech. [ESRC end of grant report C/00/23/0023/1] London: Economic and Social Research Council.
     [Google Scholar]
  237. Stevens, K.N
    1997 Articulatory-acoustic-auditory relationships. InThe Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, W.J. Hardcastle & J. Laver (eds), 462–506. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. Strange, W
    1989 Evolving theories of vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America85(5): 2081–2087. doi: 10.1121/1.397860
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397860 [Google Scholar]
  239. Stuart-Smith, J
    2003 The phonology of modern Urban Scots. InThe Edinburgh Companion to Scots, J. Corbett , J. Derrick McClure & J. Stuart-Smith (eds), 110–137. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. 2007 A sociophonetic investigation of postvocalic /r/ in Glaswegian adolescents. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences . 1449–1452.
     [Google Scholar]
  241. 2008 Scottish English: Phonology. InVarieties of English, Vol.1: The British Isles, B. Kortmann & C. Upton (eds), 48–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Stuart-Smith, J. , Timmins, C. & Tweedie, F
    2007 ‘Talkin’ Jockney’? Variation and change in Glaswegian accent. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(2): 221–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00319.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00319.x [Google Scholar]
  243. Sudbury, A. & Hay, J
    2002 The fall and rise of /r/: Rhoticity and /r/-sandhi in Early New Zealand English. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics8(3): 281–295.
     [Google Scholar]
  244. Thakerar, J.N. , Giles, H. & Cheshire, J
    1982 Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. InAdvances in the Social Psychology of Language, C. Fraser & K.R. Scherer (eds), 205–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  245. Thomas, A.R
    1994 English in Wales. InThe Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. V: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development, R. Burchfield (ed.), 94–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. Thomas, E.R
    2001 An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  247. 2011 Sociophonetics. An Introduction. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. Thomason, S.G
    2001 Language Contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.1016/b0‑08‑043076‑7/03032‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/03032-1 [Google Scholar]
  249. Traunmüller, H
    1990 Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America88(1): 97–100. doi: 10.1121/1.399849
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399849 [Google Scholar]
  250. Trudgill, P
    1986 Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  251. 1998 World Englishes: Convergence or divergence?InThe Major Varieties of English. Papers from MAVEN 97, H. Lindquist , S. Klintborg , M. Levin & M. Estling (eds), 29–34. Växjö: Acta Wexionensia.
     [Google Scholar]
  252. 2000 Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. 2002 Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. 2003 A Glossary of Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  255. 2004 The dialect of East Anglia: Phonology. InA Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, E.W. Schneider , K. Burridge , B. Kortmann , R. Mesthrie & C. Upton (eds), 163–177. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  256. Trudgill, P. & Hannah, J
    2002 International English. A guide to the Varieties of Standard English. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. University of Edinburgh, The
    2014 Annual Review 2012 – 2013. Available online: www.ed.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.131938!/fileManager/annual-review-2012-2013.pdf (25 July 2014).
     [Google Scholar]
  258. University of Glasgow, The
    2014 Annual Review 2012–2013. Available online: www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_344126_en.pdf (25 July 2014).
     [Google Scholar]
  259. Walker, J
    1791 A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary.London: Sold by G.G.J. & J. Robinson; and T. Cadell.
     [Google Scholar]
  260. Ward, I.C
    1939 The Phonetics of English. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  261. Watt, D. & Fabricius, A
    2002 Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers’ vowel spaces in the F1–F2 plane. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics9: 159–173.
     [Google Scholar]
  262. Watt, D. , Fabricius, A. & Kendall, T
    2011 More on vowels. InSociophonetics. A Student’s Guide, M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (eds), 107–118. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  263. Weinreich, U. , Labov, W. & Herzog, M.I
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InDirections for Historical Linguistics, W.P. Lehman & Y. Malkiel (eds), 95–188. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  264. Wells, J.C
    1982 Accents of English, 3 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611759
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611759 [Google Scholar]
  265. Wen, C.-H. & Koppelmann, F.S
    2001 The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research-B35(7): 627–641. doi: 10.1016/S0191‑2615(00)00045‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00045-X [Google Scholar]
  266. Williams, I.F
    1912 Phonetics for Scottish Students: The Sounds of Polite Scottish Described and Compared with those of Polite English. Glasgow: James Maclehose and Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  267. Zettersten, A
    1974 A Critical Facsimile Edition of Thomas Batchelor: ‘An Orthoëpical Analysis of the English Language’ and ‘An Orthoëpical Analysis of the Dialect of Bedfordshire’ (1809).Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.
     [Google Scholar]
  268. Zipf, G.K
    1929 Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology15: 1–95. doi: 10.2307/310585
     https://doi.org/10.2307/310585 [Google Scholar]
  269. Zwicker, E
    1961 Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America33(2): 248 doi: 10.1121/1.1908630
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908630 [Google Scholar]
  270. Zwicker, E. & Fastl, H
    1999 Psychoacoustics. Facts and Models. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑09562‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09562-1 [Google Scholar]
  271. Zwicker, E. & Terhardt, E
    1980 Analytical expressions for critical-band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68: 1523–1525. doi: 10.1121/1.385079
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385079 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027268587
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027268587
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027268587
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027268587
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error