1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Language Proficiency in Native and Non-native Speakers

Language Proficiency in Native and Non-native Speakers

Theory and research

image of Language Proficiency in Native and Non-native Speakers
GBP
Buy:£28.00 + Taxes
(Purchase for institutional use at £80.00 + taxes by logging in as an institutional administrator)

This book, written for both seasoned and novice researchers, presents a theory of what is called Basic and Higher Language Cognition (BLC and HLC), a theory aimed at making some fundamental issues concerning first and second language learning and bilingualism (more) empirical. The first part of the book provides background for and explication of the theory as well as an agenda for future research, while the second part reports on selected studies of language proficiency in native speakers, as well as non-native speakers, and studies of the relationship between literacy in a first and second language. Conceptual and methodological problems in measuring language proficiency in research on second language acquisition and bilingualism are also discussed. Further, the notion of levels of language proficiency, as rendered by the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), is critically examined, suggesting ways of empirically investigating a number of questions that the CEFR raises but is not capable of answering.

References

  1. Aarnoutse, C.A.J. , & Van Leeuwen, J.F.J
    (1988) Het belang van technisch lezen, woordenschat en ruimtelijke intelligentie voor begrijpend lezen [The importance of decoding, vocabulary, and spatial intelligence for reading comprehension]. Pedagogische Studiën, 65, 49–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrahamsson, N. , & Hyltenstam, K
    (2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00507.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Abutalebi, J. , Cappa, S.F. , & Perani, D
    (2001) The bilingual brain as revealed by functional neuroimaging. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 179–190. doi: 10.1017/S136672890100027X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890100027X [Google Scholar]
  4. Alderson, J.C
    (1984) Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem?In J.C. Alderson & A.H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a Foreign Language (pp. 1–27). London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 2000 Assessing Reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511732935
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732935 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2005) Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. (2007) The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 659–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00627_4.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_4.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Alderson, J.C. , Bastien, S. , & Madrazo, A-M
    (1977) A Comparison of Reading Comprehension in English and Spanish. Research and Development Unit Report 9, mimeo. Mexico City: UNAM.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Alderson, J.C. , & Kremmel, B
    (2013) Re-examining the content validation of a grammar test: The (im)possibility of distinguishing vocabulary and structural knowledge. Language Testing, 30, 535–556. doi: 10.1177/0265532213489568
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213489568 [Google Scholar]
  10. Alexander, P.A. , Schallert, D.L. , & Hare, V.C
    (1991) Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343. doi: 10.3102/00346543061003315
     https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061003315 [Google Scholar]
  11. Anderson, J
    (1980) Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. New York, NY: Freeman.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Andringa, S. , Olsthoorn, N. , Van Beuningen, C. , Schoonen, R. , & Hulstijn, J
    (2012) Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62[Supplement], 49–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00706.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Anglin, J.M
    (1993) Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58. doi: 10.2307/1166112
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1166112 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ardasheva, Y. , Tretter, T.R. , & Kinny, M
    (2012) English language learners and academic achievement: Revisiting the Threshold Hypothesis. Language Learning, 62, 769–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00652.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00652.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Aron, H
    (1978) Comparing reading comprehension in Spanish and English by adult Hispanics entering a two-year college. Paper presented at theThird International Conference on Language Proficiency and Language Dominance Testing, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, September 1978.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Baayen, R.H. , Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L
    (1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bachman, L.F
    (1990a) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (1990b) Constructing measures and measuring constructs. In B. Harley , P. Allen , J. Cummins , & M. Swain (Eds.), The Development of Second Language Proficiency (pp. 26–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524568.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524568.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2009) Generalizability and research use arguments. In K. Ercikan & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Generalizing from Educational Research: Beyond the Quantitative-qualitative Opposition (pp. 127–148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bachman, L.F. , & Cohen, A.D
    (Eds.) (1998) Interfaces between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bachman, L.F. , & Palmer, A.S
    (1982) The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 449–465. doi: 10.2307/3586464
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586464 [Google Scholar]
  22. (1996) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Bae, J. , & Bachman, L.F
    (1998) A latent variable approach to listening and reading: Testing factorial invariance across two groups of children in the Korean/English Two-Way Immersion Program. Language Testing, 15, 380–414.10.1177/026553229801500304
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500304 [Google Scholar]
  24. Baley, R. , & Lucas, C
    (Eds.) (2007) Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619496
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619496 [Google Scholar]
  25. Bartholomew, D.J
    (2004) Measuring Intelligence: Facets and Fallacies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511490019
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490019 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bartning, I. , Martin, M. , & Vedder, I
    (Eds.) Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and Language Testing Research. Eurosla Monographs Series, 1. eurosla.org/monographs/EM01/EM01home.html
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Bates, E. , & MacWhinney, B
    (1989) Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Bates, E. , Dale, P.S. , & Thal, A.D
    (1995) Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The Handbook of Child Language (pp. 96–151). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Battaglia, F.P. , Borensztajn, G. , & Bod, R
    (2012) Structured cognition and neural systems: From rats to language. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1626–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Berman, R
    (2007) Developing linguistic knowledge and language use across adolescence. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Language Development (pp. 347–367). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757833.ch17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757833.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  31. Berman, R.A. , Slobin, D.I. , & Aksu-Koç, A
    (1994) Relating Events in Narrative. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Bernhardt, E. , & Kamil, M.L
    (1995) Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the Linguistic Threshold and the Linguistic Interdependence Hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16, 15–34. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.1.15
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.1.15 [Google Scholar]
  33. Bernhardt, E.B
    (2011) Understanding Advanced Second-language Reading. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Bernstein, B
    (1971) Class, Codes and Control. Vol. 1: Theoretical Studies towards a Sociology of Language. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan. doi: 10.4324/9780203014035
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014035 [Google Scholar]
  35. (1972) Social class, language and socialization. In P.P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context: Selected readings (pp. 157–78). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Berwick, R.C. , Friederici, A.D. , Chomsky, C. , & Bolhuis, J.J
    (2012) Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Bialystok, E
    (1978) A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning, 28, 69–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1978.tb00305.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00305.x [Google Scholar]
  38. (1982) On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics, 3, 181–206. doi: 10.1093/applin/3.3.181
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/3.3.181 [Google Scholar]
  39. (1986) Factors in the growth of linguistic awareness. Child Development, 57, 498–510. doi: 10.2307/1130604
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1130604 [Google Scholar]
  40. (1991) Metalinguistic dimensions of bilingual language proficiency. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children (pp. 113–166). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620652.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620652.008 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2001) Bilingualism in Development: Language, Literacy, and Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511605963
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605963 [Google Scholar]
  42. Bialystok, E. , Luk, G. , Peets, K.F. , & Yang, S
    (2010) Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 525–531. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990423
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990423 [Google Scholar]
  43. Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. , & Finegan, E
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Biber, D. , Reppen, R. , & Conrad, S
    (2002) Developing linguistic literacy: Perspectives from corpus linguistics and multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Child Language, 29, 449–488. doi: 10.1017/S0305000902235345
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902235345 [Google Scholar]
  45. Birdsong, D
    (2005) On the limits of attainments in late L2A. Presentation given atthe 2005 Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (2006) Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56(Supplement), 7–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2006.00353.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00353.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Birdsong, D. , & Gertken, L.M
    (2013) In faint praise of folly: A critical review of native/non-native speaker comparisons, with examples from native and bilingual processing of French complex syntax. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4, 107–133. doi: 10.1075/lia.4.2.01bir
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.2.01bir [Google Scholar]
  48. Birren, J.E. , & Schaie, K.W
    (Eds.) 2006 Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (6th ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Bloomfield, L
    (1933) Language. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Bongaerts, T. , van Summeren, C. , Planken, B. , & Schils, E
    (1997) Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–465. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197004026
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197004026 [Google Scholar]
  51. Borensztajn, G. , Zuidema, W. , & Bod, R
    (2009) Children’s grammars grow more abstract with age – Evidence from an automatic procedure for identifying the productive units of language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 175–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2008.01009.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01009.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Borsboom, D
    (2006) The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71, 425–440. doi: 10.1007/s11336‑006‑1447‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1447-6 [Google Scholar]
  53. Borsboom, D. , & Markus, K.A
    (2013) Truth and evidence in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 110–114. doi: 10.1111/jedm.12006
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12006 [Google Scholar]
  54. Borsboom, D. , Mellenbergh, G.J. , & Van Heerden, J
    (2004) The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.111.4.1061
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061 [Google Scholar]
  55. Bossers, B
    (1991) On thresholds, ceilings and short-circuits: The relation between L1 reading, L2 reading and L2 knowledge. AILA Review, 8, 45–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Brindley, G
    (1998) Describing language development? Rating scales and SLA. In L.F. Bachman & A.D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research (pp. 112–140). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Brisbois, J.L
    (1995) Connection between first and second language reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 565–584.10.1080/10862969509547899
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969509547899 [Google Scholar]
  58. Brown, R
    (1958) Words and Things. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Buck, G
    (2001) Assessing Listening. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511732959
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732959 [Google Scholar]
  60. Bybee, J
    (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  61. Byrnes, H
    (2007) Developing national language education policies: Reflections on the CEFR. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 679–685. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00627_10.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_10.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Canale, M. , & Swain, M
    (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47. doi: 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  63. Carey, S.T. , & Cummins, J
    (1979) English and French achievement of grade 5 children from English and mixed French-English home backgrounds attending the Edmonton Separate School System English-French immersion program. Report submitted to the Edmonton Separate School System.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Carrell, P.L
    (1991) Second language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency?Applied Linguistics, 12, 159–179. doi: 10.1093/applin/12.2.159
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.2.159 [Google Scholar]
  65. Carroll, J.B
    (1961/1972) Fundamental considerations in testing for English language proficiency of foreign students. InTesting the English Proficiency of Foreign Students (1961). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Reprinted in Allen, H.B., & Campbell, R.N. (Eds.). 1972. Teaching English as a Second Language: A Book of Readings (pp. 313–320). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. (1981) Consciousness and automatic processes in language learning. Canadian Mondern Language Review, 37, 462–474.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. (1983) Psychometric theory and language testing. In J.W. Oller Jr . (Ed.) (1993) Issues in Language Testing Research (pp. 80–105). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. (1993) Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-analytic Studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511571312
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571312 [Google Scholar]
  69. Carroll, J.B. , & Sapon, S
    (1959) Modern Language Aptitude Test – Form A. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Carson, J.E. , Carrell, P.L. , Silberstein, S. , Kroll, B. , & Kuehn, P.A
    (1990) Reading-writing relationships in a first and second language. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 245–266. doi: 10.2307/3586901
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586901 [Google Scholar]
  71. Cattell, R.B
    (1971) Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (Central Bureau of statistics)
    (2001) Standaard Beroepenclassificatie (Standard classification of professions). Voorburg/Heerlen, Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Chalhoub-Deville, M
    (1997) Theoretical models, assessment frameworks and test construction. Language Testing, 14, 3–22. doi: 10.1177/026553229701400102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229701400102 [Google Scholar]
  74. Chapelle, C.A
    (1998) Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L.F. Bachman & A. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research (pp. 32–70). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Chen, J
    (2011) Language assessment: Its development and future – An interview with Lyle F. Bachman. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 277–290. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2011.591464
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.591464 [Google Scholar]
  76. Chipere, N
    (2001) Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 10, 107–124. doi: 10.1080/09658410108667029
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410108667029 [Google Scholar]
  77. Chomsky, N
    (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. (1968) Language and Mind. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovitch. doi: 10.1037/e400082009‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1037/e400082009-004 [Google Scholar]
  79. (1976) Reflections on Language. London: Temple Smith.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. (2007) Biolinguistic explorations: Design, development, evolution. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09672550601143078
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550601143078 [Google Scholar]
  82. Clarke, M.A
    (1979) Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1979.tb01055.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01055.x [Google Scholar]
  83. Conway, A.R.A. , Jarrold, C. , Kane, M.J. , Miyake, A. , & Towse, J.N
    (2007) Variation in working memory. In A.R.A. Conway , C. Jarrold , M.J. Kane , A. Miyake , & J.N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in Working Memory (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Cook, V.J
    (1991) The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence. Second Language Research, 7, 103–17. doi: 10.1177/026765839100700203
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700203 [Google Scholar]
  85. (2003) Background to the L2 user. In V.J. Cook (Ed.). Portraits of the L2 User (pp. 1–28). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. (Ed.) (2003) Effects of the L2 on the L1. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. (2010) Prolegomena to second language learning. In P. Seedhouse , S. Walsh , & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising Language Learning (pp. 6–22). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. (2012) Multi-competence. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. . (in preparation). Multi-competence premises. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107425965.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107425965.001
  90. Council of Europe
    (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press & Council of Europe.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Craik, F.I.M. , & Salthouse, T.A
    (Eds.) (2008) The Handbook of Aging and Cognition (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Croft, W
    (1995) Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language, 71, 490–532. doi: 10.2307/416218
     https://doi.org/10.2307/416218 [Google Scholar]
  93. Croft, W. , & Cruse, D.A
    (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  94. Cumming, A
    (1989) Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1989.tb00592.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x [Google Scholar]
  95. Cumming, A. & Riazi, A
    (2000) Building models of adult second-language writing instruction. Learning and Instruction, 10, 55–71. doi: 10.1016/S0959‑4752(99)00018‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00018-3 [Google Scholar]
  96. Cummins, J
    (1978) Educational implications of mother tongue maintenance in minority-language groups. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 395–416.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. (1979) Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222–251. doi: 10.3102/00346543049002222
     https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222 [Google Scholar]
  98. (1980a) The construct of language proficiency in bilingual education. In J.E. Alatis (Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (GURT) 1980 (pp. 81–103). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. (1980b) The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 175–187. doi: 10.2307/3586312
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586312 [Google Scholar]
  100. (1984) Bilingualism and special eduction: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. (1991a) Interdependence of first- and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children (pp. 70–89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620652.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620652.006 [Google Scholar]
  102. (1991b) Conversational and academic language proficiency in bilingual contexts. AILA Review, 8, 75–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Cummins, J. , & Swain, M
    (1986) Bilingualism in Education. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Cunninham, A.E. , Stanovich, K.E. , & Wilson, M.R
    (1990) Cognitive variation in adult college students differing in reading ability. In T.H. Carr & B.A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its Development, (pp.129–160), San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Cutler, A
    (2012) Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Dąbrowska, E
    (1997) The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 35, 735–766. doi: 10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.735
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.735 [Google Scholar]
  107. (2008a) The later development of an early-emerging system: The curious case of the Polish genitive. Linguistics, 46, 629–650. doi: 10.1515/LING.2008.021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.021 [Google Scholar]
  108. (2008b) The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case infiections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 931–951. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  109. (2010) Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review, 27, 1–23. doi: 10.1515/tlir.2010.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  110. (2012a) Response to the commentaries: Explaining individual differences in linguistic proficiency. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 324–335. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.16dab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.16dab [Google Scholar]
  111. (2012b) Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 219–253. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab [Google Scholar]
  112. Dąbrowska, E. , & Street, J
    (2006) Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native Englisb speakers. Language Sciences, 28, 604–615. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2005.11.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.11.014 [Google Scholar]
  113. Dąbrowska, E. , & Szczerbinski, M
    (2006) Polish children’s productivity with case marking: The role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological coherence. Journal of Child Language, 33, 559–597. doi: 10.1017/S0305000906007471
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007471 [Google Scholar]
  114. Daller, M.H. , Yldiz, C. , & de Jong, N.H
    (2011) Language dominance in Turkish-German bilinguals: Methodological aspects of measurements in structurally different languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 215–236. doi: 10.1177/1367006910381197
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910381197 [Google Scholar]
  115. Dalton-Puffer, C. , Nikula, T. , & Smit, U
    (2010) Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam : John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aals.7
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7 [Google Scholar]
  116. Damico, J.S. , Müller, N. , & Ball, M.J
    (Eds.) (2010) The Handbook of Language and Speech Disorders. Chichester, UK : Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444318975
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318975 [Google Scholar]
  117. Darwin, C
    (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, (1st ed.). London: John Murray.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Davies, A
    (2003) The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. (2011) Does language testing need the native speaker?Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 291–308. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2011.570827
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.570827 [Google Scholar]
  120. Davies, A. , & Elder, C
    (2005) Validity and validation in language testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 795–813). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. De Bot, C.L.J. , Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M
    (2007) A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21. doi: 10.1017/S1366728906002732
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732 [Google Scholar]
  122. De Bot, K. , & Schrauf, R.W
    (Eds.) (2009) Language Development over the Lifespan. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. De Groot, A.M.B
    (2011) Language and Cognition in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. De Jong, J.H.A.L
    (2004) Comparing the Psycholinguistic and the Communicative Paradigm of Language Proficiency. Presentation given atinternational workshop “Psycholinguistic and psychometric aspects of language assessment in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages”. University of Amsterdam, 13–14 February, 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. De Jong, N.H. , Groenhout, R. , Schoonen, R. , & Hulstijn, J.H
    (2013) L2 fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of L2 fluency for L1 behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics. Published online 11 March 2013. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000210
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000210 [Google Scholar]
  126. De Jong, N.H. , Steinel, M.P. , Florijn, A.F. , Schoonen, R. & Hulstijn J.H
    (2012) Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 5–34. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000489
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000489 [Google Scholar]
  127. De Jong, N.H. , Steinel, M.P. , Florijn, A. , Schoonen, R. , & Hulstijn, J.H
    (2013) Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 893–916. doi: 10.1017/S0142716412000069
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000069 [Google Scholar]
  128. De Saussure, F
    (1916) Cours de linguistique générale, edited by C. Bally & A. Sechehaye , with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger . Lausanne: Payot.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Decoo, W
    (2011) Systemization in Foreign Language Teaching: Monitoring Content Progression. New York NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. DeKeyser, R.M
    (2012) Individual differences in native language attainment and their implications for research on second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 260–268. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.03dek
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.03dek [Google Scholar]
  131. Donaldson, M
    (1978) Children’s Minds. Glasgow, UK: Collins.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Dufva, M. , & Voeten, M.J.M
    (1999) Native language literacy and phonological memory as prerequisites for learning English as a foreign language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 329–348. doi: 10.1017/S014271649900301X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271649900301X [Google Scholar]
  133. Dunn, A.L. , & Fox Tree, J.E
    (2009) A quick, gradient bilingual dominance scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 273–289. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990113
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990113 [Google Scholar]
  134. Edelsky, C
    (1982) Writing in a bilingual program: The relation of L1 and L2 texts. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 211–228. doi: 10.2307/3586793
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586793 [Google Scholar]
  135. Ellis, N.C
    (2008) The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 232–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00716.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00716.x [Google Scholar]
  136. (2012) Variable competence. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 264–268. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.04ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.04ell [Google Scholar]
  137. Ellis, N.C. , & Larsen-Freeman, D
    (Eds.) (2006) Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27(4). (special issue). doi: 10.1093/applin/aml028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml028 [Google Scholar]
  138. Ellis, N.C. & Robinson, P
    (2008) An introduction to cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and language instruction. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 30–24). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Ellis, R
    (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172. doi: 10.1017/S0272263105050096
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
  140. Engelen, J
    (2009) First and Second Language Listening Ability in Noise: A Within-subject Comparison. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Escudero, P. , & Sharwood Smith, M
    (2001) Reinventing the native speaker: Or “What you never wanted to know about the native speaker so never dared to ask”. EUROSLA Yearbook, 1, 275–286. doi: 10.1075/eurosla.1.20esc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.1.20esc [Google Scholar]
  142. Evans, N. , & Levinson, S.C
    (2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–448. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  143. Favreau, M. , & Segalowitz, N.S
    (1982) Second language reading in fluent bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 329–341. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400004264
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400004264 [Google Scholar]
  144. Ferreira, F
    (2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0285(03)00005‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7 [Google Scholar]
  145. Ferreira, F. , Henderson, J.M. , Anes, M.D. , Weeks, P.A. , & McFarlane, D.K
    (1996) Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 324–335. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.22.2.324
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.324 [Google Scholar]
  146. Field, A
    (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS, (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Field, J
    (Ed.) (2008) Listening. System, 36(1). (special issue).
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Figueras, N
    (2012) The impact of the CEFR. ELT Journal, 66, 477–485. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccs037
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs037 [Google Scholar]
  149. Fitch, K.L. , & Sanders, R.E
    (Eds.) (2005) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Fitch, W.T. , Hauser, M.D. , & Chomsky, N
    (2005) The evolution of the Language Faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97, 179–210. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  151. Flower, L.S. & Hayes, J.R
    (1981) A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387. doi: 10.2307/356600
     https://doi.org/10.2307/356600 [Google Scholar]
  152. Fraser, C.A
    (2007) Reading rate in L1 Mandarin Chinese and L2 English across five reading tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 372–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00587.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00587.x [Google Scholar]
  153. Fukkink, R.G. , Hulstijn, J. , & Simis, A
    (2005) Does training of second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 54–75. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2005.00265.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00265.x [Google Scholar]
  154. Gauvin, H.S. , & Hulstijn, J.H
    (2010) Exploring a new technique for comparing bilinguals L1 and L2 reading speed. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 84–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Geva, E. , & Ryan, E.B
    (1993) Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second languages. Language Learning, 43, 5–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1993.tb00171.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00171.x [Google Scholar]
  156. Gibson, J.J
    (1941) A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 781–817. doi: 10.1037/h0055307
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055307 [Google Scholar]
  157. Givón, T
    (1999) Generativity and variation: The notion ‘rule of grammar’ revisited. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The Emergence of Language (pp. 81–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. (2001) Syntax, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.syn1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syn1 [Google Scholar]
  159. Gleitman, L.R. , & Gleitman, H
    (1970) Phrase and Paraphrase: Some Innovative Uses of Language. New York, NY: Norton & Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Goldberg, A.E
    (1995) Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. (2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219–224. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  162. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. Goldman-Eisler, F
    (1968) Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Goldschneider, J.M. , & DeKeyser, R.M
    (2001) Explaining the “Natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1–50. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
  165. Goodglass, H. , & Kaplan, E
    (1983) The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia: Lea & Fébiger.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Goodman, K.S
    (1971) Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In P. Pimsleur & T. Quinn (Eds.), The Psychology of Second Language Learning (pp.135–142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Gottfredson, L.S
    (1998) The general intelligence factor. Scientific American Presents, 9, 24–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Grabe, W
    (2009) Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Grabe, W. , & Kaplan, R.B
    (1996) Theory & Practice of Writing. An Applied Linguistic Perspective. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Grabe, W. & Stoller, F.L
    (2011) Teaching and Researching Reading, (2nd ed.). New York NY: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. Graham, S. , Harris, K.R. , & Chorzempa, B.F
    (2002) Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669–686. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.94.4.669
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669 [Google Scholar]
  172. Granena, G. , & Long, M
    (Eds.) (2013) Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.35
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35 [Google Scholar]
  173. Grosjean, F
    (1989) Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain & Language, 36, 3–15. doi: 10.1016/0093‑934X(89)90048‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90048-5 [Google Scholar]
  174. (1998) Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149. doi: 10.1017/S136672899800025X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672899800025X [Google Scholar]
  175. Grosjean, F. , Li, P. , Munte, T.F. , & Rodriguez-Fornells, A
    (2003) Imaging bilinguals: When the neurosciences meet the language sciences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 159–165. doi: 10.1017/S136672890300110X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890300110X [Google Scholar]
  176. Gu, L
    (2014) At the interface between language testing and second language acquisition: Language ability and context of learning. Language Testing, 31, 111–133. doi: 10.1177/0265532212469177
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212469177 [Google Scholar]
  177. Guilford, J.P
    (1971) The Nature of Human Intelligence. London: McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Hacquebord, H
    (1989) Tekstbegrip van Turkse en Nederlandse leerlingen in het voortgezet onderwijs. [Text comprehension in Turkish and Dutch high school students.] Unpublished PhD dissertation, Groningen University.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Halliday, M.A.L. , & Hasan, R
    (1978) Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. Harley, B. , Cummins, J. , Swain, M. , & Allen, P
    (1990) The nature of language proficiency. In B. Harley , P. Allen , J. Cummins , & M. Swain (Eds.), The Development of Second Language Proficiency (pp. 7–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524568.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524568.003 [Google Scholar]
  181. Harrington, M. , & Sawyer, M
    (1992) L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100010457
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010457 [Google Scholar]
  182. Hawkins, J.A. , & Filipović, L
    (2012) Critical Features in L2 English. Specifying the Reference Levels of the Common European Framework. English Profile Studies 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  183. Hayes, J.R
    (2006) New directions in writing theory. In C.A. MacArthur , S. Graham , & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 28–40). New York NY: Guilford.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Hazenberg, S. , & Hulstijn, J.H
    (1996) Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17, 145–163. doi: 10.1093/applin/17.2.145
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.2.145 [Google Scholar]
  185. Hellinger, M. , & Pauwels, A
    (Eds.) (2007) Handbook of Language and Communication: Diversity and Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198539
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198539 [Google Scholar]
  186. Hemphill, L
    (2011) Orality and literacy in sociolinguistics. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 70–82). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511997068.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997068.008 [Google Scholar]
  187. Higgs, T.V. , & Clifford, R
    (1982) The push toward communication. In T.V. Higgs (Ed.), Curriculum, Competence and the Foreign Language Teacher (pp. 243–265). Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. Hoff, E
    (2006) How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26, 55–88. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  189. Hopper, P.J
    (1998) Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (pp. 155–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Hu, L. , & Bentler, P.M
    (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 [Google Scholar]
  191. Hulstijn, J.H
    (1983) Communicative Skills of Young Second Language Learners: Issues in Coding Speech Data from Face-to-face Conversations. Report prepared in the framework of the Development of Bilingual Proficiency Project, for the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. (2007) The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 663–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00627_5.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_5.x [Google Scholar]
  193. (2010a) Measuring second language proficiency. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research (pp. 185–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.27.11hul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.27.11hul [Google Scholar]
  194. (2010b) Linking L2 proficiency to L2 acquisition: Opportunities and challenges of profiling research. In I. Bartning , M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and Language Testing Research (pp.233–238). Eurosla Monographs Series, 1. eurosla.org/monographs/EM01/EM01home.html
     [Google Scholar]
  195. (2011a) Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229–249. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2011.565844
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565844 [Google Scholar]
  196. (2011b) Explanations of associations between L1 and L2 literacy skills. In M.S. Schmid & W. Lowie (Eds.), Modeling Bilingualism: From Structure to Chaos (pp. 85–111). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.43.07hul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.43.07hul [Google Scholar]
  197. Hulstijn, J
    (2011c) Foreign-language syllabus design and the Common European Framework for Languages in revolutionary times: 1971–2001. In M. Simons & J. Colpaert (Eds.), Peer Perspectives on Systemization. A Book Review of Wilfried Decoo’s Systemization in Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 87–96). Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Hulstijn, J.H
    (2012a) The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 422–433. doi: 10.1017/S1366728911000678
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000678 [Google Scholar]
  199. (2012b) Different speakers but same language acquisition device?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 273–276. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.06hul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.06hul [Google Scholar]
  200. (2013) Is the second language acquisition discipline disintegrating?Language Teaching, 46, 511–517. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000620
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000620 [Google Scholar]
  201. . (in press). Implicit and explicit second-language acquisition: The virtues and pitfalls of a two-system view. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.) Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Amsterdam: John Banjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. Hulstijn, J.H. , & Andringa, S
    (2014) The effects of age and level of education on the ability of adult native speakers of Dutch to segment speech into words. In J. Caspers , Y. Chen , W. Heeren , J. Pacilly , N. Schiller , & E. van Zanten (Eds.), Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental Linguistics and Phonetics, 152–164. (pp. 152–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.189.13hul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.189.13hul [Google Scholar]
  203. Hulstijn, J.H. , & Marchena, E
    (1989) Avoidance: Grammatical or semantic causes?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 241–255. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100008123
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008123 [Google Scholar]
  204. Hulstijn, J.H. , Schoonen, R. , de Jong, N.H. , Steinel, M.P. , & Florijn, A.F
    (2012) Linguistic competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Language Testing, 29, 202–220. doi: 10.1177/0265532211419826
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211419826 [Google Scholar]
  205. Hulstijn, J.H. , van Beuningen, C. , Andringa, S. , Olsthoorn, N.M. , & Schoonen, R
    (2012) Speech processing in native speakers as a function of age and level of education: What do adult native speakers have in common?Unpublished research report. Availabe from: [email protected].
  206. Hulstijn, J.H. , van Gelderen, A. , & Schoonen, R
    (2009) Automatization in second-language acquisition: What does the coefficient of variation tell us?Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 555–582. doi: 10.1017/S0142716409990014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990014 [Google Scholar]
  207. Hulstijn, J.H. , Young, R.F. , Ortega, L. , Bigelow, M. , DeKeyser, R. , Ellis, N.C. , Lantolf, J.P. , Mackey, A. , & Talmy, S
    (2014) Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 361–421. doi: 10.1017/S0272263114000035
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000035 [Google Scholar]
  208. Hunt, K
    (1970) Syntactic maturity in school-children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research into Child Development, 35, 1–61. doi: 10.2307/1165698
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1165698 [Google Scholar]
  209. Hyltenstam, K. , & Abrahamsson, N
    (2003) Maturational constraints in SLA. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 539–599). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Hymes, D
    (1972) On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. Jensen, A.R
    (1998) The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
     [Google Scholar]
  212. Jeon, E.H. , & Yamashita, J
    (2014) L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64, 160–212. doi: 10.1111/lang.12034
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034 [Google Scholar]
  213. Jordan, G
    (2004) Theory Construction in Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins doi: 10.1075/lllt.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.8 [Google Scholar]
  214. Kaplan, E. , Goodglass, H. , & Weintraub, S
    (1983) Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia PA: Lea & Febiger.
     [Google Scholar]
  215. Karmiloff, K. , & Karmiloff-Smith, A
    (2001) Pathways to Language: From Fetus to Adolescent. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. Kelley, T.L
    (1927) Interpretation of Educational Measurements. New York, NY: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. Kerlinger, F.N
    (1979) Behavioral Research: A Conceptual Approach. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. Kim, H. , & Na, D.L
    (1999) Normative data on the Korean version of the Boston Naming Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 127–133. doi: 10.1076/jcen.21.1.127.942
     https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.21.1.127.942 [Google Scholar]
  219. Kline, R.B
    (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, (2nd ed.). New York, NY : The Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. Koda, K
    (1996) L2 word recognition research: A critical review. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 450–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1996.tb05465.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05465.x [Google Scholar]
  221. (2005) Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross-linguistic Approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524841
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524841 [Google Scholar]
  222. (2012) Development of second language reading skills: Cross-linguistic perspectives. In S.M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 310–318). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. Kormos, J
    (2006) Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Kramsch, C
    (Ed.) (2002) Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives. London, UK: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  225. Kramsch, C. , & Whiteside, A
    (2008) Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29, 645–671. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn022
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn022 [Google Scholar]
  226. Krashen, S
    (1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  227. Kroll, J.F. , Bobb, S.C. , & Wodniecka, Z
    (2006) Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 119–135. doi: 10.1017/S1366728906002483
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002483 [Google Scholar]
  228. Kunnan, A.J
    (1998) An introduction to structural equation modelling for language assessment research. Language Testing, 15, 295–332. doi: 10.1177/026553229801500302
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500302 [Google Scholar]
  229. Lado, R
    (1961) Language Testing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  230. Lahmann, C
    (2011) Uniform of Not? An Exploratory Study of Native Language Proficiency. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. Landauer, T , & Dumais, S.T
    (1997) A solution to Plato’s Problem: The Latent Analysis Theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.104.2.211
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211 [Google Scholar]
  232. Langacker, R.W
    (2008) Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 66–88). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. Lantolf, J.P. , & Frawley, W
    (1988) Proficiency: Understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 181–195. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007300
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007300 [Google Scholar]
  234. Lantolf, J.P
    (2011) Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S.M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 57–72). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  235. Larsen-Freeman, D
    (2011) A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  236. Larsen-Freeman, D. , & Cameron, L
    (2008) Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  237. Le Dorze, G. , & Bedard, C
    (1998) Effects of age and education on the lexico-semantic content of connected speech in adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 53–71. doi: 10.1016/S0021‑9924(97)00051‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(97)00051-8 [Google Scholar]
  238. Lee, J.-W. , & Schallert, D.L
    (1997) The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the Threshold Hypothesis in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 713–739. doi: 10.2307/3587757
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587757 [Google Scholar]
  239. Levelt, W.J.M
    (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: Bradford & The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. (2013) A History of Psycholinguistics: The Pre-Chomskyan Era. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  241. Li, D. , Zhang, X , & Wang, G
    (2011) Senior Chinese high school students’ awareness of thematic and taxonomic relations in L1 and L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 444–457. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000416
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000416 [Google Scholar]
  242. Lieven, E
    (2006) Variation in first language acquisition. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, (2nd ed.), (Vol. B; pp. 350–354). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01496‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01496-6 [Google Scholar]
  243. (2009) Developing constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 191–199. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2009.012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.012 [Google Scholar]
  244. Lieven, E. , & Tomasello, M
    (2008) Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 168–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  245. Little, D
    (2007) The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the making of supranational language education policy. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 645–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00627_2.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_2.x [Google Scholar]
  246. Long, M
    (2013) Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment (pp. 3–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.35.01lon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.01lon [Google Scholar]
  247. Long, M.H. , Gor, K. , & Jackson, S
    (2012) Linguistic correlates of second language proficiency: Proof of concept with IRL 2-3 in Russian. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 99–126. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000519
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000519 [Google Scholar]
  248. Luoma, S
    2004 Assessing Speaking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511733017
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733017 [Google Scholar]
  249. MacDonald, M.C. , & Christiansen, M.H
    (2002) Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.109.1.35
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  250. Mackenzie, C
    (2000) Adult spoken discourse: The influences of age and education. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 269–285. doi: 10.1080/136828200247188
     https://doi.org/10.1080/136828200247188 [Google Scholar]
  251. Mackenzie, C. , Brady M. , Norrie J. , & Poedjianto, N.
    (2007) Picture description in neurologically normal adults: Concepts and topic coherence. Aphasiology, 21, 340–354. doi: 10.1080/02687030600911419
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600911419 [Google Scholar]
  252. MacWhinney, B
    (1989) Competition and connectionism. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Processing (pp. 422–457). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. (Ed.) (1999) The Emergence of Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. (2008) A unified model. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 341–371). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  255. (2011) The logic of the Unified Model. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  256. McNamara, T
    (1996) Measuring Second Language Performance. London, UK: Addison-Wesley Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. (2014) 30 Years on – Evolution or revolution?Language Assessment Quarterly, 11, 226–232. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2014.895830
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.895830 [Google Scholar]
  258. Mandler, J
    (2004) The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  259. Meara, P.M. , Olmos, A. , & Juan, C
    (2010) Words as species: An alternative approach to estimating productive vocabulary size. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 222–236.
     [Google Scholar]
  260. Meijer, A. , de Groot, H.M. , van Boxtel, P.J. , van Gerven, W.M. , & Jolles, J
    (2008) Are age differences in verbal learning related to interstimulus interval and education?Experimental Aging Research, 34, 323–339. doi: 10.1080/03610730802273910
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730802273910 [Google Scholar]
  261. Meisel, J.M
    (2011) First and Second Language Acquisition: Parallels and Differences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511862694
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511862694 [Google Scholar]
  262. Messick, S
    (1989) Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (pp.13–103). Washington, DC: American Council on Education and National Council on Measurement in Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  263. Mesthrie, R
    (2001) Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  264. Mesthrie, R. , Swann, J. , Deumert, A. , & Leap, W.L
    (2009) Introducing sociolinguistics (2nd Ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  265. Mills, J.A. , & Hemsley, G.D
    (1976) The effect of level of education on judgments of grammatical acceptability. Language and Speech, 19, 324–342.10.1177/002383097601900404
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097601900404 [Google Scholar]
  266. Milton, J
    (2009) Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  267. Mitchell, M
    (2009) Complexity. A Guided Tour. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  268. Montrul, S.A
    (2008) Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.39
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.39 [Google Scholar]
  269. Mulder, K. , & Hulstijn, J.H
    (2011) Linguistic skills of adult native speakers, as a function of age and level of education. Applied Linguistics, 32, 475–494. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr016
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr016 [Google Scholar]
  270. Munby, J
    (1978) Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  271. Nagy, W.E. , & Herman, P.A
    (1987) Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M.G. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 19–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  272. Nation, I.S.P
    (1990) Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York, NY: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  273. Neils, J. , Baris, J. , Carter, C. , Delláira, A. , Nordloh, S. , Weiler, E. , & Wesiger, B
    (1995) Effects of age, education, and living environment on Boston Naming Test performance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1143–1149. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3805.1143
     https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3805.1143 [Google Scholar]
  274. Nippold, M.A
    (2006) Language development in school-age children, adolescents, and adults. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  275. Norris, J.M. , & Ortega, L
    (2012) Assessing learner knowledge. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 573–589). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  276. North, B
    (2007) The CEFR illustrative descriptor scales. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 656–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00627_3.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_3.x [Google Scholar]
  277. North, B. , & Schneider, G
    (1998) Scaling descriptors for language proficiency scales. Language Testing, 15, 217–262. doi: 10.1177/026553229801500204
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500204 [Google Scholar]
  278. O’Grady, W
    (2005) Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  279. (2012) Language acquisition without an acquisition device. Language Teaching, 45, 116–130. doi: 10.1017/S026144481000056X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481000056X [Google Scholar]
  280. OECD
    (2013) OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264204256‑en
     https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en [Google Scholar]
  281. Oller Jr., J.W
    (1981) Language as intelligence?Language Learning, 31, 465–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1981.tb01394.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01394.x [Google Scholar]
  282. (1983a) Evidence for a general language proficiency factor: An expectancy grammar. In J.W. Oller Jr . (Ed.), Issues in Language Testing Research (pp. 3–10). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  283. (1983b) A consensus for the eighties?In J.W. Oller Jr . (Ed.), Issues in Language Testing Research (pp. 351–356). Rowley MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  284. Olson, D.R
    (2003) The cognitive consequences of literacy. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Children’s Literacy (pp. 539–555). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  285. Olson. D.R
    (1977) From utterace to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281. doi: 10.17763/haer.47.3.8840364413869005
     https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.3.8840364413869005 [Google Scholar]
  286. Ortega, L
    (2014) Trying out theories on interlanguage: Description and explanation over 40 years of L2 negation research. In Z. Han & E. Tarone (Eds.). Interlanguage: 40 Years Later (pp. 173–201). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.39.10ch8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.10ch8 [Google Scholar]
  287. Pakulak, E. , & Neville, H.J
    (2010) Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2728–2744. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21393
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21393 [Google Scholar]
  288. Paradis, M
    (2004) A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.18
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.18 [Google Scholar]
  289. Patricacou, A. , Psallida, E. , Pring, T. , & Dipper, L
    (2007) The Boston Naming Test in Greek: Normative data and the effects of age and education on naming. Aphasiology, 21, 1157–1170. doi: 10.1080/02687030600670643
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600670643 [Google Scholar]
  290. Pavlenko, A. , & Blackledge, A
    (2004) New theoretical approaches of the study of negotiation of identity in multilingual contexts. In A. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of Identity in Multilingual Contexts (pp. 1–33). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  291. Pennington, M.C. , & So, S
    (1993) Comparing writing processes and product across two languages: A study of 6 Singaporean university student writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 41–63. doi: 10.1016/1060‑3743(93)90005‑N
     https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(93)90005-N [Google Scholar]
  292. Perfetti, C.A
    (1985) Reading Ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  293. (1999) Comprehending written language: A blueprint for the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of Language (pp. 167–208). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  294. Perkins, K. , Brutten, S.R. , & Pohlmann, J.T
    (1989) First and second reading comprehension. RELC Journal, 20, 1–9. doi: 10.1177/003368828902000201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828902000201 [Google Scholar]
  295. Pichette, F. , Segalowitz, N. , & Connors, K
    (2003) Impact of maintaining L1 reading skills on L2 reading skill development in adults: Evidence from speakers of Serbo-Croatian learning French. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 391–403. doi: 10.1111/1540‑4781.00197
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00197 [Google Scholar]
  296. Pienemann, M
    (2005) Cross-linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30 [Google Scholar]
  297. Pienemann, M. , Keßler, J-U. , & Itani-Adams, Y
    (2011) Comparing processability across languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 128–146. doi: 10.1177/1367006910380037
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910380037 [Google Scholar]
  298. Plomin, R. , & Spinath, F.M
    (2004) Intelligence: genetics, genes, and genomics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 112–129. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.86.1.112
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.112 [Google Scholar]
  299. Popper, K.R
    (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
     [Google Scholar]
  300. Purpura, J.E
    (1998) Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-ability test takers: A structural equation modelling approach. Language Testing, 15, 333–379.10.1177/026553229801500303
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500303 [Google Scholar]
  301. (2008) Assessing communicative language ability: Models and their components. In E. Shohamy & N.H. Hornberger (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, (2nd ed.), Language Testing and Assessment (Vol. 7; pp. 53–68). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  302. Raoofi, S. , Chan, S.-H. , Mukundan, J. , & Rashid, S.M
    (2014) Metacognition and second-foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 7, 36–49. doi: 10.5539/elt.v7n11p39
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n11p39 [Google Scholar]
  303. Raykov, T. , & Marcoulides, G.A
    (2000) A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  304. Rebuschat, P. , & Williams, J
    (Eds.) (2012) Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  305. Reuland, E
    (2012) How linguistic performance may differ accorss speakers?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 287–292. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.09reu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.09reu [Google Scholar]
  306. Roeper, T
    (2012) Empty myth-making. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 293–297. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.10roe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.10roe [Google Scholar]
  307. Rost, M
    (2002) Teaching and Researching Listening. Harlow, UK: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  308. Salthouse, T.A
    (2009) When does age-related cognitive decline begin?Neurobiology of aging, 30, 507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023 [Google Scholar]
  309. Sampson, G
    (2001) Empirical Linguistics. London, UK: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  310. Sasaki, M
    (1993) Relationships among second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 43, 313–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1993.tb00617.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00617.x [Google Scholar]
  311. Sasaki, M. , & Hirose, K
    (1996) Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning, 46, 137–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1996.tb00643.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00643.x [Google Scholar]
  312. Saville, N. , & R. Hawkey
    (2010) The English Profile Programme: The first three years. English Profile Journal, 1, 1–14. doi: 10.1017/S2041536210000061
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S2041536210000061 [Google Scholar]
  313. Schachter, J
    (1990) Communicative competence revisited. In B. Harley , P. Allen , J. Cummins , & M. Swain (Eds.), The Development of Second Language Proficiency (pp. 39–49). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524568.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524568.005 [Google Scholar]
  314. Schmid, M.S
    (2011) Language Attrition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511852046
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511852046 [Google Scholar]
  315. Schmid, M.S. , & Mehotcheva, T
    (2012) Foreign language attrition. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 102–124. doi: 10.1075/dujal.1.1.08sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.1.1.08sch [Google Scholar]
  316. Schmitt, N
    (2008) Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363. doi: 10.1177/1362168808089921
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921 [Google Scholar]
  317. Schneider, W. , & Shiffrin, R.M
    (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing, I: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.84.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  318. Schoonen, R
    (2005) Generalizability of writing scores: An application of structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 22, 1–30. doi: 10.1191/0265532205lt295oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt295oa [Google Scholar]
  319. (2011) How language ability is assessed. In E. Hikel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, (Vol. II; pp. 701–716). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  320. Schoonen, R. , & De Glopper, K
    (1996) Writing performance and knowledge about writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam , H. v. d. Bergh , & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, Models and Methodology in Writing Research (pp. 87–107). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  321. Schoonen, R. , Hulstijn, J. , & Bossers, B
    (1998) Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48, 71–106. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00033
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00033 [Google Scholar]
  322. Schoonen, R. , Snellings, P. , Stevenson, M. , & van Gelderen, A
    (2009) Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in Foreign Language Contexts. Learning, Teaching, and Research (pp. 77–101). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  323. Schoonen, R. , van Gelderen, A. , de Glopper, K. , Hulstijn, J. , Simis, A. , Snellings, P. , & Stevenson, M
    (2003) First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic fluency, linguistic knowledge and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53, 165–202. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00213
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00213 [Google Scholar]
  324. Schoonen, R. , van Gelderen, A. , de Glopper, K. , Hulstijn, J. , Snellings, P. , Simis, A. , & Stevenson, M
    (2002) Linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and retrieval speed in L1, L2 and EFL writing. A structural equation modeling approach. In S. Ransdell & M.-L. Barbier (Eds.), New Directions for Research in L2 Writing (pp. 101–122). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0363‑6_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0363-6_5 [Google Scholar]
  325. Schoonen, R. , van Gelderen, A. , Stoel, R. , Hulstijn, J. & de Glopper, K
    (2011) Modeling the development of L1 and EFL writing proficiency of secondary-school students. Language Learning, 61, 31–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00590.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00590.x [Google Scholar]
  326. Segalowitz, N
    (2000) Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 200–219). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  327. (2010) Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  328. Shiotsu, T. , & Weir, C.J
    (2007) The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension performance. Language Testing, 24, 99–128. doi: 10.1177/0265532207071513
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207071513 [Google Scholar]
  329. Simos, P. , Kasselimis, D. , & Mouzaki, A
    (2011) Age, gender, and education effects on vocabulary measures in Greek. Aphasiology, 25, 475–491. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.512118
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.512118 [Google Scholar]
  330. Sinclair, J
    (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  331. (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  332. Skehan, P
    (1989) Individual Differences in Second-language Learning. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  333. Slobin, D.I
    (1997) The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (Vol. 5; pp. 265–323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  334. Smith, M
    (1941) Measurement of the size of general English vocabulary through the elementary grades and high school. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 24, 311–345.
     [Google Scholar]
  335. Snellings, P. , van Gelderen, A. & de Glopper, K
    (2004) The effect of enhanced lexical retrieval on L2 writing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 175–200. doi: 10.1017/S0142716404001092
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001092 [Google Scholar]
  336. Sparks, R.L. , Patton, J. , Ganschow, L
    (2012) Profiles of more and less successful L2 learners: A cluster analysis study. Language and Individual differences, 22, 463–472. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  337. Sparks, R.L. , Patton, J. , Ganschow, L. , & Humbach, N
    (2009a) Long-term relationships among early first language skills, second language aptitude, second language affect, and later second language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 725–755. doi: 10.1017/S0142716409990099
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990099 [Google Scholar]
  338. (2009b) Long-term crosslinguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 59, 203–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00504.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00504.x [Google Scholar]
  339. Sparks, R.L. , Patton, J. , Ganschow, L. , Humbach, N. , & Javorsky, J
    (2008) Early first-language reading and spelling skills predict later second-language reading and spelling skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 162–174. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.100.1.162
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.162 [Google Scholar]
  340. Spearman, C
    (1927) The Abilities of Man. London, UK: McMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  341. Spolsky, S
    (1989) Conditions for Second Language Learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  342. Stanovich, K.E
    (1991) Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In R. Barr , M.L. Kamil , P.B. Mosenthal , & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2, pp. 418–452). New York, NY: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  343. Sternberg, R.J. , & Grigorenko, E.L
    (Eds.) (2000) The General Factor of Intelligence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  344. Street, J.A. , & Dąbrowska, E
    (2010) More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers?Lingua, 120, 2080–2094. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  345. Street, J. , & Dąbrowska, E
    (2014) Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 97–118. doi: 10.1017/S0142716412000367
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000367 [Google Scholar]
  346. Swain, M
    (1993) Second language testing and second language acquisition: Is there a conflict with traditional psychometrics?Language Testing, 10, 193–207. doi: 10.1177/026553229301000205
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000205 [Google Scholar]
  347. Swain, M. , Lapkin, S. , & Barik, H.C
    (1976) The cloze test as a measure of second language proficiency among young children. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 11, 32–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  348. Taillefer, G.F
    (1996) L2 reading ability: Further insight into the Short-Circuit Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 461–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1996.tb05466.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05466.x [Google Scholar]
  349. Tallberg, I.M
    (2005) The Boston Naming Test in Swedish: Normative data. Brain and Language, 94, 19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  350. Talmy, L
    (2008) Aspects of attention in language. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 27–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  351. Thomas, M
    (1994) Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 44, 307–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01104.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01104.x [Google Scholar]
  352. Thorndike, R.L
    (1973–1974) Reading as reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 135–147. doi: 10.2307/747131
     https://doi.org/10.2307/747131 [Google Scholar]
  353. (1994) g. Intelligence, 19, 145–155. doi: 10.1016/0160‑2896(94)90010‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(94)90010-8 [Google Scholar]
  354. Thurstone, L.L
    (1938) Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  355. Tinbergen, N
    (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1439‑0310.1963.tb01161.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x [Google Scholar]
  356. Tokowicz, N. , Michael, E.B. , & Kroll, J.F
    (2004) The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255–272. doi: 10.1017/S1366728904001634
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001634 [Google Scholar]
  357. Tomasello, M
    (2008) The Origins of Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  358. Towell, R. , & Hawkins, R
    (1994) Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  359. Trapman, M
    . (in preparation, a). Reading comprehension level and development in monolingual and bilingual adolescent low achievers: Roles of linguistic and metacognitive knowledge and fluency.
  360. . (in preparation, b). Components of writing proficiency level and writing development of low-achieving adolescents; the roles of linguistic knowledge, fluency and metacognitive knowledge.
  361. Trapman, M. , van Gelderen, A. , van Steensel, R. , van Schooten, E. , & Hulstijn, J
    (2014) Linguistic knowledge, fluency and metacognitive knowledge as components of reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Differences between monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, Special Issue, S3–S21. DOI:10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2012.01539.x
     https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01539.x [Google Scholar]
  362. Treffers-Daller, J
    (2011) Operationalizing and measuring language dominance. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 147–163. doi: 10.1177/1367006910381186
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910381186 [Google Scholar]
  363. Trim, J
    (2012) The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages and its background: A case study of cultural politics and educational influences. In M. Byram , & L. Parmenter (Eds.), The Common European Framework of Reference: The Globalisation of Language Education Policy (pp. 14–33). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  364. Trout, J.D
    (1999) Measurement. In W.H. Newton-Smith (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science (pp. 265–276). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  365. Turner, J
    (1998) Assessing speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 192–207. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500003548
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003548 [Google Scholar]
  366. Ullman, M.T
    (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  367. Umbel, V.M. , & Oller, D.K
    (1994) Developmental changes in receptive vocabulary in Hispanic bilingual school children. Language Learning, 44, 221–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01101.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01101.x [Google Scholar]
  368. Uzawa, K
    (1996) Second language learners’ processes of L1 writing, L2 writing, and translation from L1 into L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 271–294. doi: 10.1016/S1060‑3743(96)90005‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90005-3 [Google Scholar]
  369. Van Boxtel, S. , Bongaerts, T. , & Coppen, P.-A
    (2005) Native-like attainment of dummy subjects in Dutch and the role of the L1. IRAL, 43, 355–380. doi: 10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.355
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.355 [Google Scholar]
  370. Van der Elst, W. , van Boxtel, M.P. , van Breukelen, G.J. , & Jolles, J
    (2005) Rey’s verbal learning test: Normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24–81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 290–302. doi: 10.1017/S1355617705050344
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617705050344 [Google Scholar]
  371. Van der Maas, H.L.J. , Dolan, C.V. , Grasman, R.P.P.P. , Wicherts, J.M. , Huizinga, H.M. , & Raijmakers, M.E.J
    (2006) A dynamic model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.113.4.842
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842 [Google Scholar]
  372. Van Ek, J.A
    (1976) The Threshold Level for Modern Language Learning in Schools. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
     [Google Scholar]
  373. Van Gelderen, A. & Oostdam, R.J
    (2005) Effects of fluency training on the application of linguistic operations in writing. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5(2), 215–240. doi: 10.1007/s10674‑005‑0332‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10674-005-0332-z [Google Scholar]
  374. Van Gelderen, A. , Schoonen, R. , de Glopper, K. , Hulstijn, J. , Simis, A. , Snellings, P. , & Stevenson, M
    (2004) Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first- and second-language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 19–30. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.96.1.19
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  375. Van Gelderen, A. , Schoonen, R. , de Glopper, K. , Hulstijn, J. , Snellings, P. , Simis, A. & Stevenson, M
    (2003) Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and processing speed in L3, L2 and L1 reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 7–25. doi: 10.1177/13670069030070010201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070010201 [Google Scholar]
  376. Van Gelderen, A. , Schoonen, R. , Stoel, R.D. , de Glopper, K. , & Hulstijn, J
    (2007) Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2: A longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 477–491. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.99.3.477
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.477 [Google Scholar]
  377. Van Steensel, R. , Oostdam, R. , van Gelderen, A. , & van Schooten, E
    . (under revision). The role of word decoding, vocabulary knowledge, and metacognitive knowledge in mono- and bilingual low achieving adolescents’ reading comprehension.
  378. Vandergrift, L
    (2007) Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210. doi: 10.1017/S0261444807004338
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338 [Google Scholar]
  379. VanPatten, B. , & Williams, J
    (2007) Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams , Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  380. Van der Elst, W. , van Boxtel, M.P.J. , van Breukelen, G.J.P. , & Jolles, J
    (2005) Ray’s verbal learning test: Normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24–81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 290–302. doi: 10.1017/S1355617705050344
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617705050344 [Google Scholar]
  381. Verhoeven, L.T
    (1994) Transfer in bilingual development: The linguistic Interdependence Hypothesis revisited. Language Learning, 44, 381–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01112.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01112.x [Google Scholar]
  382. Vermeer, A
    (2001) Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234. doi: 10.1017/S0142716401002041
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716401002041 [Google Scholar]
  383. Vollmer, H.J
    (1983) The structure of foreign language competence. In A. Hughes & D. Porter (Eds.), Current Developments in Language Testing (pp. 3–30). London, UK: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  384. Von Studnitz, R.E. , & Green, D.W
    (2002a) Interlingual homograph interference in German-English bilinguals: Its modulation and locus of control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S1366728902000111
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902000111 [Google Scholar]
  385. Wardhaugh, R
    (2010) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, (8th ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  386. Weigle, S.C
    (2002) Assessing Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511732997
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997 [Google Scholar]
  387. Wells, G
    (1986) Variation in child language. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language Acquisition (pp. 109–139). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620683.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620683.008 [Google Scholar]
  388. White, L
    (2003) Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambrdige University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815065
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065 [Google Scholar]
  389. Widdowson, H.G
    (1978) Teaching English as Communication. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  390. Wray, A
    (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  391. Wright, H.H. , & Capilouto, G.J
    (2009) Manipulating task instructions to change narrative discourse performance. Aphasiology, 23, 1295–1308. doi: 10.1080/02687030902826844
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902826844 [Google Scholar]
  392. Wright, H.H. , Koutsoftas, A.D. , Capilouto, G.J. , & Fergadiotis, G
    . (in press). Global coherence in younger and older adults: Influence of cognitive processes and discrouse type. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition: A Journal on Normal and Dysfunctional Development. First view online. DOI:10.1080/13825585.2013.794894
     https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13825585.2013.794894 [Google Scholar]
  393. Yamashita, J
    (2002) Mutual compensation between L1 reading ability and L2 language proficiency in L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 81–95. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9817.00160
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00160 [Google Scholar]
  394. Zechmeister, E.B. , D’Anna, C. , Hall, J.W. , Paus, C.H. , & Smith, J. A
    (1993) Metacognitive and other knowledge about the mental lexicon: Do we know how many words we know?Applied Linguistics, 14, 188–206. doi: 10.1093/applin/14.2.188
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.188 [Google Scholar]
  395. Zipf, G.K
    (1935) The Psycho-biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027269027
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027269027
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027269027
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027269027
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error