Counter-argumentation and modality

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.

Argumentative texts are essentially &#8220;modal texts&#8221;. They respond to the need of an encoder and/or addressee about stating the degree of truth and certainty with respect to some claims.In argumentation, every statement which is presented as a claim always needs an overt or non-overt argument which assures the addressee about the degree of certainty of that statement. The argument supporting a conclusion has the task of stating whether the implicit or triggered claim is true or false.The modal information is delivered by obligatory or optional argumentative categories.Optional counter-argumentative categories introduced by complementizers like <i>although</i>, <i>nevertheless</i>, <i>at least</i>, <i>unless</i> etc., function as super-modal operators questioning the truth-value of a given argumentation. The article is based on Lo Cascio&#8217; s book 2009 and on Lo Cascio&#8217;s article 1995 on argumentation and modality.


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address