1887

Gesture as “deliberate expressive movement”

This chapter offers an in-depth exploration into one of Adam Kendon‘s core theoretical assumptions: gesture as “deliberate expressive movement.” Gestures are recognized as such because they show certain characteristic features of form, because they have “features of manifest deliberate expressiveness” (Kendon 2004: 13–14, italics in the original). Kendon bases his definition of gestures on their articulatory movement characteristics and on their interactive perception. Following Kendon’s descriptive approach, and by taking the form characteristics of gestures as a theoretical and methodological point of departure, a form-based and linguistic perspective to a grammar of gesture will be outlined. In doing so and by alluding to the study of signs it will be suggested that the study of gestures reveals how linguistic structures may emerge from body movement.

References

  1. Andrén, Mats
    2010Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 Months. Ph.D. dissertation. Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsalou, Lawrence W
    2008 “Grounded Cognition.”The Annual Review of Psychology59: 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartenieff, Irmgard , and Lewis, Dori
    1980Body Movement: Coping with the Environment. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergmann, Kirsten , Aksu, Volkan , and Kopp, Stefan
    2011 “The Relation of Speech and Gestures: Temporal Synchrony Follows Semantic Synchrony.” Workshop on Gesture and Speech in Interaction Proceedings of the 2nd (GeSpIn 2011) .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergmann, Kirsten , Kahl, Sebastian , and Kopp, Stefan
    2013 “Modelling the semantic coordination of speech and gesture under cognitive and linguistic constraints.” In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Intelligent Virtual Agents, Ruth Aylett , Brigitte Krenn , Catherine Pelachaud and Hiroshi Shimodaira (eds), 203–216. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑40415‑3_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_18 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergmann, Kirsten and Kopp, Stefan
    2006 “Verbal or visual: How information is distributed across speech and gesture in spatial dialogue.” In Proceedings of the 110th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue , David Schlangen and Raquel Fernandez (eds), 90–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bressem, Jana
    2012Repetitions in Gesture: Structures, Functions, and Cognitive Aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bressem, Jana , and Müller, Cornelia
    2014a “A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2.), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1575–1591. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014b b“The family of Away gestures: Negation, Refusal and Negative Assessment” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2.), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1592–1604. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bühler, Karl
    2011Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.164 [Google Scholar]
  11. Calbris, Geneviève
    1990The Semiotics of French Gesture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2002 “From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions.”Gesture3: 19–46. doi: 10.1075/gest. 3.1.03cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest. 3.1.03cal [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cienki, Alan
    2012 “Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units (may) abstract from them.” In Cognitive Processes in Language, Krzystzof Kosecki and Janusz Badio (eds), 149–158. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen, Einya , Namir, Lila , and Schlesinger, I.M
    1977A New Dictionary of Sign Language: Employing the Eshkol-Wachmann Movement Notation System. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Condon, Wiliam C. and Ogston, Richard
    1966 “Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns.”Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease143: 338–347. doi: 10.1097/00005053‑196610000‑00005
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196610000-00005 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Jorio, Andrea
    2000Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity. A translation ofLa mimica degli antichi investigate nel gestire napoletano (1832), and with an Introduction and Notes, by Adam Kendon . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fricke, Ellen
    2012Grammatik Multimodal: Wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110218893
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218893 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013 “Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: A multimodal approach.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 202–217. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harrison, Simon
    2009Grammar, Gesture, and Cognition: The Case of Negation in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Michel de Montaigne, Bordeaux 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hostetter, Autumn , and Alibali, Martha
    2007 “Raise your hand if you’re spatial – relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production.”Gesture7: 73–95 doi: 10.1075/gest. 7.1.05hos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest. 7.1.05hos [Google Scholar]
  23. 2008 “Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review15/3: 495–514. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kappelhoff, Hermann , and Müller, Cornelia
    2011 “Embodied meaning construction: Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture and feature film.”Metaphor in the Social World1 (2): 121–135. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap [Google Scholar]
  25. Kendon, Adam
    1972 “Some relationships between body motion and speech. An analysis of an example.” In Studies in Nonverbal Communication, Aaron Siegman , and Benjamin Pope (eds), 177–210. Elmsford New York: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1980a “Gesticulation and speech. Two aspects of the process of utterance.” In The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, Mary Ritchie Key (ed.), 207–227. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1980b “A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Part I: The formational properties of Enga signs.” Semiotica32: 1–32. “Part II: The semiotic functioning of Enga signs.” Semiotica32: 81–117. “Part III: Aspects of utterance construction.” Semiotica32: 245–313. doi: 10.1515/semi.1980.31.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.31.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1988Sign Languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, Semiotic and Communicative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1990Conducting Interaction. Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2008 “Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. ”Gesture8 (3): 348–366. doi: 10.1075/gest. 8.3.05ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest. 8.3.05ken [Google Scholar]
  32. Kopp, Stefan , Bergmann, Kirsten , and Kahl, Sebastian
    2013 “A spreading-activation model of the semantic coordination of speech and gesture.” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013) , 823–828. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kopp, Stefan , Bergmann, Kirsten , and Wachsmuth, I
    2008 “Multimodal communication from multimodal thinking – towards an integrated model of speech and gesture production.”Semantic Computing2 (1): 115–136. doi: 10.1142/S1793351X08000361
    https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793351X08000361 [Google Scholar]
  34. Laban, Rudolf , and Lawrence, F.C
    1947Effort. London: Macdonald and Evans.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ladewig, Silva H
    2010 “Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern – Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste.”Sprache und Literatur41: 89–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2011 “Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive bases.”CogniTextes6. cognitextes.revues.org/406.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2012Syntactic and Semantic Integration of Gesture into Speech: Structural, Cognitive, and Conceptual Aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, European University Frankfurt (Oder).
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Langacker, Ronald W
    1991Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. ­Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110857733
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lapaire, Jean-Remi
    2006 “Negation, reification and manipulation in a cognitive grammar of substance.” In La Négation, Stéphanie Bonnefille and Sebastian Salbayre (eds), 333–349. Tours: Les Cahiers du GRAAT n 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mandel, Mark
    1977 “Iconic devices in American Sign Language.” In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, Lynn A. Friedman (ed.), 57–107. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. McNeill, David
    1992Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mittelberg, Irene
    2006Metaphor and metonymy in language and gesture: Discoursive evidence for multimodal models of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2013 “The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 702–728. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Morris, Desmond
    1977Manwatching: A Field Guide to Human Behavior. London: Jonathan Cape; New York: Harry Abrams.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Morris, Desmond , Peter Collett , Peter Marsh , and Marie O’Shaughnessy
    1979Gestures: Their Origins and Distribution. London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Müller, Cornelia
    1998aRedebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Verlag Arno Spitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 1998b “Iconicity and gesture.” In Oralité et gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction, Christian Cavé , Isabelle Guaitella and Serge Santi (eds), 321–328. Montréal/Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2004 “Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family?” In The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, Roland Posner and Cornelia Müller (eds), 234–256. Berlin: Weidler Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2009 “Gesture and language.” In The Linguistic Encyclopedia, Kirsten ­Malmkjaer (ed.), 214–217. Abington/ New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2010 “Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive.” Sprache und Gestik. Sonderheft der Zeitschrift Sprache und Literatur41(1): 37–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2013 “Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 202–217. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2014 “Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1687–1702. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Müller, Cornelia , Bressem, Jana , and Ladewig, Silva H
    2013 “Towards a grammar of gestures: a form-based view.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication ­Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 702–728. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Müller, Cornelia , and Haferland, Harald
    1997 “Gefesselte Hände: Zur Semiose performativer Gesten.”Mitteilungen des Germanistenverbandes3: 29–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Müller, Cornelia , and Ladewig, Silva H
    2014 “Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons.” In Language and the Creative Mind, CSDL volume, Michael Borkent , Barbara Dancygier and Jennifer Hinnel (eds), 295–323. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Müller, Cornelia , Ladewig, Silva H. , and Bressem, Jana
    2013 “Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 55–81. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Müller, Cornelia and Tag, Susanne
    2010 “The dynamics of metaphor. Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction.”Cognitive Semiotics6: 85–119. doi: 10.3726/81610_85
    https://doi.org/10.3726/81610_85 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pulvermüller, F
    1999 “Words in the brain’s language.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences22: 253–336. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X9900182X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9900182X [Google Scholar]
  59. Radden, Günter , Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg , and Peter Siemund
    2007 “Introduction: The construction of meaning in language.” In Aspects of Meaning Construction, Günter Radden , Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg , and Peter Siemund (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Rieser, Hannes , Bergmann, Kirsten , and Kopp, Stefan
    2012 “How do iconic gestures convey visuo-spatial information? Bringing together empirical, theoretical, and simulation studies.” In Gestures in Embodied Communication and Human-Computer Interaction, E. Efthimiou­ and G. Kouroupetroglou (eds), 139–150. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑34182‑3_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34182-3_13 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sowa, Timo
    2005Understanding coverbal iconic gestures in object shape descriptions. Ph.D. dissertation. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Streeck, Jürgen
    1994 “Speech-handling: The metaphorical representation of speech in gestures. A cross-cultural study.” Manuscript. Austin, Texas.
  63. 2008 “Depicting by gesture.”Gesture8 (3): 285–301. doi: 10.1075/gest. 8.3.02str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest. 8.3.02str [Google Scholar]
  64. 2009Gesturecraft: Manufacturing Shared Understanding. Amsterdam/NewYork: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Sweetser, Eve
    1990From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  66. Taub, Sarah F
    2001Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
  67. Teßendorf, Sedinha
    2008 “From everyday action to gestural performance: Metonymic motivations of a pragmatic gesture.” Presentation at the Seventh International Conference on Researching Metaphor (RaAM7) , Cáceres (Spain).
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wilcox, Sherman
    2009 “From symptom to symbol: Routes from gesture to signed language.”Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics7: 89–110. doi: 10.1075/arcl.7.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.04wil [Google Scholar]
  69. Wundt, Wilhelm
    1921Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Erster Band. Die Sprache. Leipzig: Engelmann.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Andrén, Mats
    2010Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 Months. Ph.D. dissertation. Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsalou, Lawrence W
    2008 “Grounded Cognition.”The Annual Review of Psychology59: 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartenieff, Irmgard , and Lewis, Dori
    1980Body Movement: Coping with the Environment. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergmann, Kirsten , Aksu, Volkan , and Kopp, Stefan
    2011 “The Relation of Speech and Gestures: Temporal Synchrony Follows Semantic Synchrony.” Workshop on Gesture and Speech in Interaction Proceedings of the 2nd (GeSpIn 2011) .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergmann, Kirsten , Kahl, Sebastian , and Kopp, Stefan
    2013 “Modelling the semantic coordination of speech and gesture under cognitive and linguistic constraints.” In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Intelligent Virtual Agents, Ruth Aylett , Brigitte Krenn , Catherine Pelachaud and Hiroshi Shimodaira (eds), 203–216. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑40415‑3_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_18 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergmann, Kirsten and Kopp, Stefan
    2006 “Verbal or visual: How information is distributed across speech and gesture in spatial dialogue.” In Proceedings of the 110th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue , David Schlangen and Raquel Fernandez (eds), 90–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bressem, Jana
    2012Repetitions in Gesture: Structures, Functions, and Cognitive Aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bressem, Jana , and Müller, Cornelia
    2014a “A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2.), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1575–1591. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014b b“The family of Away gestures: Negation, Refusal and Negative Assessment” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2.), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1592–1604. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bühler, Karl
    2011Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.164 [Google Scholar]
  11. Calbris, Geneviève
    1990The Semiotics of French Gesture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2002 “From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions.”Gesture3: 19–46. doi: 10.1075/gest. 3.1.03cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest. 3.1.03cal [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cienki, Alan
    2012 “Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units (may) abstract from them.” In Cognitive Processes in Language, Krzystzof Kosecki and Janusz Badio (eds), 149–158. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen, Einya , Namir, Lila , and Schlesinger, I.M
    1977A New Dictionary of Sign Language: Employing the Eshkol-Wachmann Movement Notation System. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Condon, Wiliam C. and Ogston, Richard
    1966 “Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns.”Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease143: 338–347. doi: 10.1097/00005053‑196610000‑00005
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196610000-00005 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Jorio, Andrea
    2000Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity. A translation ofLa mimica degli antichi investigate nel gestire napoletano (1832), and with an Introduction and Notes, by Adam Kendon . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fricke, Ellen
    2012Grammatik Multimodal: Wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110218893
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218893 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013 “Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: A multimodal approach.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 202–217. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harrison, Simon
    2009Grammar, Gesture, and Cognition: The Case of Negation in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Michel de Montaigne, Bordeaux 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hostetter, Autumn , and Alibali, Martha
    2007 “Raise your hand if you’re spatial – relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production.”Gesture7: 73–95 doi: 10.1075/gest. 7.1.05hos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest. 7.1.05hos [Google Scholar]
  23. 2008 “Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review15/3: 495–514. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kappelhoff, Hermann , and Müller, Cornelia
    2011 “Embodied meaning construction: Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture and feature film.”Metaphor in the Social World1 (2): 121–135. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap [Google Scholar]
  25. Kendon, Adam
    1972 “Some relationships between body motion and speech. An analysis of an example.” In Studies in Nonverbal Communication, Aaron Siegman , and Benjamin Pope (eds), 177–210. Elmsford New York: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1980a “Gesticulation and speech. Two aspects of the process of utterance.” In The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, Mary Ritchie Key (ed.), 207–227. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1980b “A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Part I: The formational properties of Enga signs.” Semiotica32: 1–32. “Part II: The semiotic functioning of Enga signs.” Semiotica32: 81–117. “Part III: Aspects of utterance construction.” Semiotica32: 245–313. doi: 10.1515/semi.1980.31.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.31.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1988Sign Languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, Semiotic and Communicative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1990Conducting Interaction. Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2008 “Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. ”Gesture8 (3): 348–366. doi: 10.1075/gest. 8.3.05ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest. 8.3.05ken [Google Scholar]
  32. Kopp, Stefan , Bergmann, Kirsten , and Kahl, Sebastian
    2013 “A spreading-activation model of the semantic coordination of speech and gesture.” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013) , 823–828. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kopp, Stefan , Bergmann, Kirsten , and Wachsmuth, I
    2008 “Multimodal communication from multimodal thinking – towards an integrated model of speech and gesture production.”Semantic Computing2 (1): 115–136. doi: 10.1142/S1793351X08000361
    https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793351X08000361 [Google Scholar]
  34. Laban, Rudolf , and Lawrence, F.C
    1947Effort. London: Macdonald and Evans.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ladewig, Silva H
    2010 “Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern – Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste.”Sprache und Literatur41: 89–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2011 “Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive bases.”CogniTextes6. cognitextes.revues.org/406.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2012Syntactic and Semantic Integration of Gesture into Speech: Structural, Cognitive, and Conceptual Aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, European University Frankfurt (Oder).
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Langacker, Ronald W
    1991Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. ­Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110857733
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lapaire, Jean-Remi
    2006 “Negation, reification and manipulation in a cognitive grammar of substance.” In La Négation, Stéphanie Bonnefille and Sebastian Salbayre (eds), 333–349. Tours: Les Cahiers du GRAAT n 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mandel, Mark
    1977 “Iconic devices in American Sign Language.” In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, Lynn A. Friedman (ed.), 57–107. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. McNeill, David
    1992Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mittelberg, Irene
    2006Metaphor and metonymy in language and gesture: Discoursive evidence for multimodal models of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2013 “The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 702–728. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Morris, Desmond
    1977Manwatching: A Field Guide to Human Behavior. London: Jonathan Cape; New York: Harry Abrams.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Morris, Desmond , Peter Collett , Peter Marsh , and Marie O’Shaughnessy
    1979Gestures: Their Origins and Distribution. London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Müller, Cornelia
    1998aRedebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Verlag Arno Spitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 1998b “Iconicity and gesture.” In Oralité et gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction, Christian Cavé , Isabelle Guaitella and Serge Santi (eds), 321–328. Montréal/Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2004 “Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family?” In The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, Roland Posner and Cornelia Müller (eds), 234–256. Berlin: Weidler Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2009 “Gesture and language.” In The Linguistic Encyclopedia, Kirsten ­Malmkjaer (ed.), 214–217. Abington/ New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2010 “Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive.” Sprache und Gestik. Sonderheft der Zeitschrift Sprache und Literatur41(1): 37–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2013 “Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 202–217. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2014 “Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1687–1702. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Müller, Cornelia , Bressem, Jana , and Ladewig, Silva H
    2013 “Towards a grammar of gestures: a form-based view.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication ­Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 702–728. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Müller, Cornelia , and Haferland, Harald
    1997 “Gefesselte Hände: Zur Semiose performativer Gesten.”Mitteilungen des Germanistenverbandes3: 29–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Müller, Cornelia , and Ladewig, Silva H
    2014 “Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons.” In Language and the Creative Mind, CSDL volume, Michael Borkent , Barbara Dancygier and Jennifer Hinnel (eds), 295–323. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Müller, Cornelia , Ladewig, Silva H. , and Bressem, Jana
    2013 “Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 55–81. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Müller, Cornelia and Tag, Susanne
    2010 “The dynamics of metaphor. Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction.”Cognitive Semiotics6: 85–119. doi: 10.3726/81610_85
    https://doi.org/10.3726/81610_85 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pulvermüller, F
    1999 “Words in the brain’s language.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences22: 253–336. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X9900182X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9900182X [Google Scholar]
  59. Radden, Günter , Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg , and Peter Siemund
    2007 “Introduction: The construction of meaning in language.” In Aspects of Meaning Construction, Günter Radden , Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg , and Peter Siemund (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Rieser, Hannes , Bergmann, Kirsten , and Kopp, Stefan
    2012 “How do iconic gestures convey visuo-spatial information? Bringing together empirical, theoretical, and simulation studies.” In Gestures in Embodied Communication and Human-Computer Interaction, E. Efthimiou­ and G. Kouroupetroglou (eds), 139–150. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑34182‑3_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34182-3_13 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sowa, Timo
    2005Understanding coverbal iconic gestures in object shape descriptions. Ph.D. dissertation. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Streeck, Jürgen
    1994 “Speech-handling: The metaphorical representation of speech in gestures. A cross-cultural study.” Manuscript. Austin, Texas.
  63. 2008 “Depicting by gesture.”Gesture8 (3): 285–301. doi: 10.1075/gest. 8.3.02str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest. 8.3.02str [Google Scholar]
  64. 2009Gesturecraft: Manufacturing Shared Understanding. Amsterdam/NewYork: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Sweetser, Eve
    1990From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  66. Taub, Sarah F
    2001Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
  67. Teßendorf, Sedinha
    2008 “From everyday action to gestural performance: Metonymic motivations of a pragmatic gesture.” Presentation at the Seventh International Conference on Researching Metaphor (RaAM7) , Cáceres (Spain).
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wilcox, Sherman
    2009 “From symptom to symbol: Routes from gesture to signed language.”Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics7: 89–110. doi: 10.1075/arcl.7.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.04wil [Google Scholar]
  69. Wundt, Wilhelm
    1921Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Erster Band. Die Sprache. Leipzig: Engelmann.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027269270-z.188.07mul
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027269270
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error