The different developments of progressive aspect markers <i>be in the middle/midst of</i> and <i>be in the process of</i> V-<i>ing</i>

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.

In this case study, we reconstruct the grammaticalization paths of <i>middle, midst </i>and <i>process</i>, which led to a set of progressive aspect markers (PAMs) in Present-day English. The three PAMs developed from two different source structures, viz. complex prepositions <i>in the middle/midst of </i>&#43; NP and complex appositive noun phrase <i>the process of</i> &#43; NP. The main theoretical aim of the diachronic reconstruction is to identify and characterize the main mechanisms of change that affected the different structures with these nouns on their grammaticalization trajectories: (i) <i>reanalysis</i> in the sense of functional reparsing of an existing structure; (ii) <i>analogization</i>: the attraction of new functional properties to an existing structure; (iii) <i>neo-analysis by analogy</i>: the creation of a functional structure that is new in the item&#8217;s trajectory of change. We also discuss how these mechanisms of change interact with enabling factors such as metaphor and metonymy, collocational fixation, expansion and reclustering, and discursive functions.


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address