1887

The expression of inequality in interaction. Power, dominance and status

An introduction

image of The expression of inequality in interaction. Power, dominance and status
  • Affiliations: 1: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University of Hanover; 2: Technische Universität Berlin

References

  1. Bartlett, Tom
    2014Analysing Power in Language. A Practical Guide. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cole, David R. , and Linda J. Graham
    (eds) 2012The Power in/of Language. Oxford: 
Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118343142
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118343142 [Google Scholar]
  3. Fairclough, Norman
    2001Language and Power. 2nd. ed. Harlow: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Grillo, Eric
    (ed.) 2005Power without Domination. Dialogism and the Empowering Property of Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.12 [Google Scholar]
  5. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
    1966 “Lexis as a Linguistic Level”. In In Memory of J. R. Firth, ed. by Charles Ernest Bazell et al. , 148–162. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanks, Patrick
    1996 “Contextual Dependency and Lexical Sets.”International Journal of Corpus Linguistics1: 75–98. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.1.1.06han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.1.1.06han [Google Scholar]
  7. Mooney, Annabelle et al.
    (eds) 2011aLanguage, Society & Power. An Introduction. 3rd ed.London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (eds) 2011bThe Language, Society & Power Reader. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Renkema, Jan
    2003 “On Solving Orwell’s Problem in Governmental Communication. Experi­mental Research into the Structure of Website Information.” In Linguistica e Nuove Professioni. Proceedings of the Pavia-Lugano Conference , ed. by AnnaGiacalone-Ramat , EddoRigotti , and AndreaRocci , 245–263. Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Scotton, Carol M
    1988 “Self-enhancing Codeswitching as Interactional Power.”Language and Communication8: 199–211. doi: 10.1016/0271‑5309(88)90018‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(88)90018-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Simpson, Paul , and AndreaMayr
    2010Language and Power: A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Talmy, Leonard
    1988 “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.”Cognitive Science12: 49–100. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Thimm, Caja , and LenelisKruse
    1991Dominanz, Macht und Status als Elemente sprachlicher Interaktion: ein Literaturbericht. Universität Heidelberg/Mannheim.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomas, Linda , and ShânWareing
    1999Language, Society and Power. London and New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203426968
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426968 [Google Scholar]
  15. Turner, John C
    2005 “Agenda 2005. Explaining the Nature of Power: A Three-process Theory.” European Journal of Social Psychology35: 1–22. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.244
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244 [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Dijk, Teun
    2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.”Discourse & Society17 (2): 359–383. doi: 10.1177/0957926506060250
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar]
  17. Weber, Max
    1962Basic Concepts of Sociology. New York: Kensington Publishing. (Translation and Introduction by H. P. Secher).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wierzbicka, Anna
    2007 “Reasonably well: Natural Semantic Metalanguage as a Tool for the Study of Phraseology and its Cultural Underpinnings.” In Phraseology and Culture in English, ed. by PaulSkandera , 49–78. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197860.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197860.49 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson, Steven R
    2002Seeking and Resisting Compliance: Why People Say What They Do When Trying to Influence Others. Thousand Oaks, CA, London and New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Bartlett, Tom
    2014Analysing Power in Language. A Practical Guide. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cole, David R. , and Linda J. Graham
    (eds) 2012The Power in/of Language. Oxford: 
Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118343142
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118343142 [Google Scholar]
  3. Fairclough, Norman
    2001Language and Power. 2nd. ed. Harlow: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Grillo, Eric
    (ed.) 2005Power without Domination. Dialogism and the Empowering Property of Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.12 [Google Scholar]
  5. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
    1966 “Lexis as a Linguistic Level”. In In Memory of J. R. Firth, ed. by Charles Ernest Bazell et al. , 148–162. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanks, Patrick
    1996 “Contextual Dependency and Lexical Sets.”International Journal of Corpus Linguistics1: 75–98. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.1.1.06han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.1.1.06han [Google Scholar]
  7. Mooney, Annabelle et al.
    (eds) 2011aLanguage, Society & Power. An Introduction. 3rd ed.London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (eds) 2011bThe Language, Society & Power Reader. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Renkema, Jan
    2003 “On Solving Orwell’s Problem in Governmental Communication. Experi­mental Research into the Structure of Website Information.” In Linguistica e Nuove Professioni. Proceedings of the Pavia-Lugano Conference , ed. by AnnaGiacalone-Ramat , EddoRigotti , and AndreaRocci , 245–263. Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Scotton, Carol M
    1988 “Self-enhancing Codeswitching as Interactional Power.”Language and Communication8: 199–211. doi: 10.1016/0271‑5309(88)90018‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(88)90018-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Simpson, Paul , and AndreaMayr
    2010Language and Power: A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Talmy, Leonard
    1988 “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.”Cognitive Science12: 49–100. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Thimm, Caja , and LenelisKruse
    1991Dominanz, Macht und Status als Elemente sprachlicher Interaktion: ein Literaturbericht. Universität Heidelberg/Mannheim.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomas, Linda , and ShânWareing
    1999Language, Society and Power. London and New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203426968
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426968 [Google Scholar]
  15. Turner, John C
    2005 “Agenda 2005. Explaining the Nature of Power: A Three-process Theory.” European Journal of Social Psychology35: 1–22. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.244
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244 [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Dijk, Teun
    2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.”Discourse & Society17 (2): 359–383. doi: 10.1177/0957926506060250
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar]
  17. Weber, Max
    1962Basic Concepts of Sociology. New York: Kensington Publishing. (Translation and Introduction by H. P. Secher).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wierzbicka, Anna
    2007 “Reasonably well: Natural Semantic Metalanguage as a Tool for the Study of Phraseology and its Cultural Underpinnings.” In Phraseology and Culture in English, ed. by PaulSkandera , 49–78. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197860.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197860.49 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson, Steven R
    2002Seeking and Resisting Compliance: Why People Say What They Do When Trying to Influence Others. Thousand Oaks, CA, London and New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027270054-pbns.248.01sch
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027270054
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error