1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Universals in Second Scholasticism

Universals in Second Scholasticism

A comparative study with focus on the theories of Francisco Suárez S.J. (1548-1617), João Poinsot O.P. (1589-1644) and Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola O.F.M. Conv. (1602-1673)/Bonaventura Belluto O.F.M. Conv. (1600-1676)

image of Universals in Second Scholasticism
GBP
Buy:£88.00 + Taxes
  • Author(s): Daniel Heider 1
  • View Affiliations Hide Affiliations
    Affiliations:
    1 Faculty of Theology, University of South Bohemia, Institute of Philosophy, The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  • Format: PDF
  • Publication Date March 2014
  • e-Book ISBN: 9789027270672
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/bsp.54

This study aims to present a comparative analysis of philosophical theories of universals espoused by the foremost representatives of the three main schools of early modern scholastic thought. The book introduces the doctrines of Francisco Suárez, S.J. (1548–1617), the Thomist John of St. Thomas, O.P. (1589–1644), and the Scotists Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola, O.F.M. Conv. (1602–1673) and Bonaventura Belluto, O.F.M. Conv. (1600–1676). The author examines in detail their mutual doctrinal delineation as well as the conceptualist tenet of the Jesuit Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza (1578–1641), whose thought constitutes an important systematic point of comparison especially with Suárez’s doctrine. The book offers the first comparative elaboration of the issue of universals, in both its metaphysical and its epistemological aspects, in the era of second scholasticism.

Related Topics: Philosophy

References

  1. Opera omnia (28 vols.), ed. by C. Berton , Paris 1856-78.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Disputationes metaphysicae , vols. 25/26, Paris 1866 (reprint: Hildesheim 1965).
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Commentaria ac disputationes in tertiam partem D. Thomae tomus tertius , tomus vigesimus, Paris 1860.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Commentaria ac disputationes in primampartem D. Thomae De Deo uno et trino , tomus primus, Paris 1856.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis “De anima ”, ed. by Salvador Castellote Cubells , 3 vols., Madrid 1992 URL: www.salvadorcastellote.com/investigacion.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Doyle, John P.
    1995, On Beings of Reason. Metaphysical Disputation LIV , transl. from theLatin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 33), Milwaukee, Wisconsin1995.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2004, A Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics (Index locupletissimus in Metaphysicam Aristotelis) , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 40), Milwaukee, Wisconsin2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 2006, On Real Relation. Disputatio Metaphysica XLVII , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 42), Milwaukee, Wisconsin2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gracia, Jorge J. E.
    1982, Francis Suarez on Individuation: Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and Its Principle , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Jorge J. E. Gracia (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 23), Milwaukee, Wisconsin1982.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kronen, John D ., Reedy, Jeremiah D.
    2000, On the Formal Cause of Substance. Metaphysical Disputation XV , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John D. Kronen and Jeremiah D. Reedy (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 36), Milwaukee, Wisconsin2000.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ross, James F.
    1964, On Formal and Universal Unity. Metaphysical Disputation VI , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by James F. Ross (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 15), Milwaukee, Wisconsion1964.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Vollert, Cyril, S. J.
    1947, On the Various Kinds of Distinctions. Metaphysical Disputation VII , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Cyril Vollert (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 4),Milwaukee, Wisconsin1947.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Wells, Norman, J.
    1983, On the Essence of Finite Being as Such, on the Existence of that Essence and Their Distinction. Metaphysical disputation XXXI , transl. and with an introd. by N. J. Wells (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 24), Milwaukee, Wisconsin1983.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cursus theologicus in Summam theologicam d. Thomae (10 vols.), Paris 1883-86.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cursus philosophicus Thomisticus (3 vols.), Turin 1948-50 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 2008).
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Deely, John N.
    1985, Tractatus de signis. The Semiotic of John Poinsot , interpretative arrangement by J. Deely, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London1985.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Glanville, John J ., G. D. Hollenhorst , Y. R. M. Simon
    1949, “Entia Rationis and Second Intentions by John of St. Thomas,” The New Scholasticism 23/4 (1949), 395-413.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Simon, Yves René M ., J. J. Glanville , G. D. Hollenhorst
    1955, The Material Logic of John of St. Thomas. Basic Treatises , Chicago, London1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Wade, Francis C.
    , Outlines of Formal Logic , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Francis C. Wade (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 8), Milwaukee, Wisconsin1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola/Bonaventura Belluto Philosophiae ad mentem Scoti cursus integer (5 vols.), Venice1727.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Aristoteles
    , Metaphysics , Books 1-9, transl. by H. Tredennick , Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1933.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. , On the Soul , with an English transl. by W. S. Hett , Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1936.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. , On Interpretation , ed. and transl. by H. P. Cooke and H. Tredennick , Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1938.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. , Categories , ed. and transl. by H. P. Cooke , H. Tredennick , Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1938.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. , Posterior Analytics , ed. and transl. by H. Tredennick , Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. , The Complete Works of Aristotle , ed. by J. Barnes , transl. by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye, Princeton 1995.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Arriaga, Rodrigo de
    , Cursus philosophicus , Paris 1639 URL: capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/ARRIAGA/Arriaga_Cursus_philosophicus.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Avicenna
    , Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina V-X, ed. by S. Van Riet , Louvain/ Leiden 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus
    , In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta , ed. by S. Brandt , Vienna/ Leipzig 1906.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Complutenses Discalceati,
    Disputationes in Aristotelis dialecticam , Lyons 1668 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 1977).
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Carleton, Thomas Compton
    , Philosophia universa , Antwerp 1649.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Collegium Conimbricense
    , Commentaria in universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagiritae, Coimbra 1606 . URL: capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/CONIMBRICENSES/CONIMBRI-CENSES%201606%20Dialectica,%20vol.%201.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Fabri, Filippo
    , Philosophia naturalis Ioan. Duns Scoti ex quattuor libris Sententiarum et Quodli-betis collecta , Venice 1622.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Fonseca, Petrus
    , Commentaria in libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis (4 vols.), Cologne 1615. URL: capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/FONSECA/FONSECA%20Metaphysica%20vol.%203.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Franciscus Toletus
    , Opera omnia philosophica I-III , Cologne 1615-1616 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 1985).
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Frassen, Claude
    , Philosophia academica , Venice 1767.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Guillelmus de Ockham
    , Opera Philosophica et Theologica, Scriptum in librum primum Sententiarum Ordinatio , distinctiones II-III, ed. by S. F. Brown , O. F. M ., G. Gál , O. F. M ., St. Bonaventure, New York 1970.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hurtado de Mendoza, Petrus
    , Universa philosophia in unum corpus redacta , Lyons 1624.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ioannes Capreolus
    , Defensiones theologiae divi Thomae Aquinatis , vol. 5, ed. by C. Paban , T. Pégues , Tours 1900-1908. URL: capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/CAPREOLUS/Capreolus_Defensiones_5.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Ioannes Duns Scotus
    , Quaestiones in Quartum Librum Sententiarum (dist. 43-48) , vol. 20, Editionova iuxta editionem Waddingi, Paris 1894.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. , Ordinatio. Liber Primus distinctio tertia , Editio Vaticana III, Civitas Vaticana 1954.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. , Ordinatio. Liber Primus a distinctione vigesima sexta ad quadragesimam octavam , Editio Vaticana VI, Civitas Vaticana 1963.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. , Ordinatio. Liber Secundus a distinctione prima ad tertiam , Editio Vaticana VII, Civitas Vaticana 1973.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. , Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis , libri VI-IX, St. Bonaventure, N. Y 1997.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. , Quaestiones super secundum et tertium De anima , ed. by B. C. Bazán et al . (Opera Philosophica 5), Washington D C., St. Bonaventure, N. Y 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Nicolaus Antonius Hispalensis
    , Bibliotheca Hispana nova sive Hispanorum scriptorum qui ab anno MD. ad MDCLXXXIV floruere notitia , vol. 2, Madrid 1788.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Pasqualigo, Zaccaria
    , Disputationes metaphysicae, pars secunda , Rome 1636.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Petrus Aureoli
    , Commentariorum in secundum, tertium, quartum libros Sententiarum pars secunda II-IV Sent ., Rome 1605.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Pomponazzi, Pietro
    , Tractatus de immortalitate animae (Abhandlung tiber die Unsterblichkeit der Seele) , ed. by B. Mojsisch , Hamburg 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Poncius, Ioannes
    , Integerphilosophiae cursus ad mentem Scoti , prima pars complectens Logicam, Rome 1642.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Porphyrius
    , Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Pars prima: Porphyrii Isagoge et in Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium , ed. by A. Busse , Berlin 1887.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Pavur, Claude, S. J .
    , The Ratio Studiorum: The Official Plan for Jesuit Education , Saint Louis, Missouri 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ribadeneira, Petrus
    , Bibliotheca Scriptorum Societatis Iesu , ed. by P. Alegambe and N. Sotvell , Rome 1676.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Soto, Domingo
    , In Porphyrii Isagogen, Aristotelis Categorias, librosque de Demonstratione commentaria, Venice 1587 (reprint: Frankfurt 1967).
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Spade, Paul Vincent
    (ed. and transl.), Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham , Indianapolis, Indiana 1994.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Thomae de Sutton
    , De natura generis (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: www.corpusthomisticum.org/xpg.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Thomas de Aquino
    , Summa Theologiae (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
     [Google Scholar]
  58. , De ente et essentia (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
     [Google Scholar]
  59. , Quaestio disputata de anima (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
     [Google Scholar]
  60. , Quaestiones disputatae depotentia (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
     [Google Scholar]
  61. , Summa contra Gentiles (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011).URL: www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
     [Google Scholar]
  62. , Quaestiones de quolibet (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona) Thomas de Vio Caietanus, Opuscula omnia, Lyons 1587 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 1995).
     [Google Scholar]
  63. , Summa totius theologiae S. Thomae de Aquino , pars prima, Venice 1588 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 2000).
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Vázquez, Gabriel
    , Commentaria ac disputationes in primam partem S. Thomae , t. 2, Ingolstadt 1609. URL: capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/VAZQUEZ/In%20Primam%20II%20 1609.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Abercrombie, Nigel
    1938, Saint Augustine and French Classical Thought , Oxford 1938.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Abranches, Cassiano Dos Santos
    1956, “A Teoria dos Universais em Pedro da Fonseca,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 12/3 (1956), 291-298.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Aho, Tuomo
    2007, “Suárez on Cognitive Intentions, ” in: Mind, Cognition and Representation: the Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima , ed. by P. J. J. M. Bakker , J. M. M. H. Thijssen (Ashgate Studies in Medieval Philosophy), Aldershot, Hampshire 2007, 179-203.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Åkerlund, Erik
    2009, “Suárez on Forms, Universals and Understanding,” Studia Neoaristotelica 6/2 (2009), 159-182. doi: 10.5840/studneoar2009621
     https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar2009621 [Google Scholar]
  69. Alcorta, José Ignacio
    1949, La teoría de los modos en Suárez , Madrid 1949.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Alejandro, José M.
    1948, La gnoseologia del Doctor Eximio y la acusación nominalista , Santander 1948.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Angelelli, Ignacio
    1998, “Aristotelian-Scholastic Ontology and Predication in the Port-Royal Logic, ” Medioevo. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale 24 (1998), 283-310.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Ariew, Roger
    1992, “Descartes and Scholasticism: the Intellectual Background to Descartes’ Thought, ” in: The Cambridge Companion to Descartes , ed. by J. Cottingham , Cambridge 1992, 58-90. doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521366232.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521366232.003 [Google Scholar]
  73. 1999, Descartes and the Last Scholastics , Ithaca, New York 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Bak, Felix
    1956, “Scoti schola numerosior est omnibus aliis simul sumptis,” Franciscan Studies 16 (1956), 144-165. doi: 10.1353/frc.1956.0016
     https://doi.org/10.1353/frc.1956.0016 [Google Scholar]
  75. Bauer, Emmanuel J.
    1996, Thomistische Metaphysik an der alten Benediktineruniversität Salzburg. Darstellung und Interpretation einer philosophischen Schule des 17./18. Jahrhunderts , Innsbruck/Wien 1996.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Beuchot, Mauricio H.
    1989, “El problema de los universales en Juan de Santo Tomás,” Revista de Filosofia 12 (1989), 33-42.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Bérubé, Camille
    1964, La connaissance de l’individuel au moyen âge , Montréal/Paris 1964.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Blum, Paul Richard
    1998, Philosophenphilosophie und Schulphilosophie: Typen des Philosophierens in der Neuzeit (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 27), Stuttgart 1998.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Boler, John F.
    1982, “Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition,” in: The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy , ed. by N. Kretzman , A. Kenny and J. Pinborg , Cambridge 1982, 460-478. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521226059.025
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521226059.025 [Google Scholar]
  80. Bolton, Martha B.
    1998, “Universals, essences, and abstract Entities,” in: The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy , vol. 1, ed. by D. Garber , M. Ayers , Cambridge 1998, 178-211.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Bondi, Eugene
    1966, “Predication: A Study Based in the Ars Logica of John of St. Thomas,” The Thomist 30 (1966), 260-294.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Borgo, Martha
    2007, “Universals and the Trinity: Aquinas’s Commentary on Book I of Peter Lombard’s Sentences,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 315-342.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Broadie, Alexander
    1985, The Circle of John Mair. Logic and Logicians in Pre-Reformation Scotland , Oxford 1985.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Buersmeyer, Keith
    1987, “Aquinas on the 'modi significandi’,” The Modern Schoolman 64/2 (1987), 73-95. doi: 10.5840/schoolman198764217
     https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman198764217 [Google Scholar]
  85. Caruso, Ester
    1979, Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza e la rinascita del nominalismo nella Scolastica del Seicento , Florence1979.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Chabada, Michal
    2005, Cognitio intuitiva et abstractiva. Die ontologischen Implikationen der Erkenntnislehre des Johannes Duns Scotus mit Gegentiberstellung zu Aristoteles und I. Kant (Veröffentlichungen der Johannes-Duns-Skotus-Akademie für Franziskanische Geistesgeschichte und Spiritualität Mönchengladbach, Bd. 18)Mönchengladbach 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 2007, Ján Duns Scotus. Vybrané kapitoly z jeho epistemológie a metafyziky , Bratislava 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Costa, Francesco
    1976, Ilp. Bonaventura Belluto O.F.M.Conv. (1603-1676). Il religioso, lo Scotista, lo scrittore , Rome 1976.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 2006, “Dottrina immacolista del P. Bonaventura Belluto (1603-1676),” in: La Sicilia e l’immacolata. Non solo 150 anni , ed. by D. Ciccarelli , M. D. Valenza , Palermo 2006, 169-181.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Cresswell, John R.
    1965, “Duns Scotus on the ’Common Nature’,” in: John Duns Scotus , 1265-1965, ed. by J. K. Ryan and B. M. Bonansea , Washington D C 1965, 122-132.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Cronin, Timothy J.
    1966, Objective Being in Descartes and Suárez (Analecta Gregoriana 154), Rome 1966.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Cross, Richard
    2002, “Gregory of Nyssa on Universals,” Vigiliae Christianae 56/4 (2002), 372-410. doi: 10.1163/157007202320809202
     https://doi.org/10.1163/157007202320809202 [Google Scholar]
  93. 2003a, “Divisibility, Communicability, and Predicability in Duns Scotus’s Theories of the Common Nature,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11/1 (2003), 43-63.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 2003b, “Duns Scotus on Divine Substance and the Trinity,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11/2 (2003), 181-201.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. 2010, “Duns Scotus on the Semantic Content of Cognitive Acts and Species,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 10 (2010), 135-154.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Crowley, Bonaventure M.
    1948, “The Life and Works of Bartholomew Mastrius, O. F. M. Conv. (1602-1673),” Franciscan Studies 8 (1948), 97-152. doi: 10.1353/frc.1948.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1353/frc.1948.0011 [Google Scholar]
  97. Dalbiez, Roland
    1929, “Les sources scolastiques de la théorie cartésienne de l’être objectif : A propos du « Descartes » de M. Gilson,” Revue d’Histoire de la Philosophie 3 (1929), 464-472.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Darós, William R.
    1980, “Significado y conocimiento según Juan de Santo Tomás,” Rivista Rosmiana 74 (1980), 371-391.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Darge, Rolf
    2004, Suúrez’ transzendentale Seinsauslegung und die Metaphysiktradition (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 80), Leiden/Boston 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Deely, John N.
    2008, Descartes & Poinsot. The Crossroads of Signs and Ideas , vol. 2 in the “Postmodernity in Philosophy” Poinsot Trilogy: Contrasting the Way of Signs to the Way of Ideas, Semiotics to Epistemology, Scranton/London 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Degl' Innocenti, Umberto
    1969, “Il principio d’individuazione dei corpi e Giovanni di S. Tommaso,” Aquinas 12 (1969), 59-99.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. De Carvalho, Mário S.
    2007, “The Coimbra Jesuits’ Doctrine on Universals (1577-1606),” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 531-543.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. De Libera, Alain
    1996, La querelle des universaux. De Platon á la fin du Moyen Âge , Paris 1996.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. De Scorraille, Raoul
    1911, François Suarez de la Compagnie de Jésus, d’après ses letters, ses autres écrits inédits et un grand nombre de documents nouveaux , 2 vols., Paris 1911.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. De Vries, Josef
    1949, “Die Erkenntnislehre des Franz Suárez und der Nominalismus,” Scholastik 20-24 (1949), 321-349.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Di Liso, Saverio
    2000, Domingo de Soto: dalla logica alla scienza , Bari 2000.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Di Vona, Piero
    1994, I concetti trascendenti in Sebastián Izquierdo e nella Scolastica del Seicento (Libertà della mente 3), Naples 1994.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Doyle, John P.
    1984, “Prolegomena to a Study of Extrinsic Denomination in the Work of Francis Suarez, S. J.,” Vivarium 22/2 (1984), 121-160. doi: 10.1163/156853484X00079
     https://doi.org/10.1163/156853484X00079 [Google Scholar]
  109. 1987, “Suarez on Truth and Mind-Dependent Beings: Implication for a Unified Semiotic,” in: Semiotics 1983 , ed. by J. Evans and J. N. Deely , New York 1987, 121-133.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 1994, “Poinsot on the Knowability of Beings of Reason,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68/3 (1994), 337-362. doi: 10.5840/acpq199468314
     https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq199468314 [Google Scholar]
  111. 2010, “Francisco Suárez on the Interpretation of Laws,” in: Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez, S. J. (1548-1617) , ed. by V. M. Salas , Leuven 2010, 357-387.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Emery, Gilles
    1993, “Bref catalogue des oeuvres de saint Thomas,” in: Initiation à saint Thomas d’Aquin. Sa personne et son oeuvre , J.-P. Torrell , Paris 1993, 483-525.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Fichter, Joseph H.
    1940, Man of Spain. Francis Suarez , New York 1940.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Forlivesi, Marco
    1994, “Le edizioni del ’Cursus theologicus’ di Joannes a S. Thoma,” Divus Thomas 97/3 (1994), 9-56.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 2000, “Materiali per una descrizione della disputa e dell’esame di laurea in età moderna,” in: Dalla prima alla seconda Scolastica. Paradigmi e percorsi storiografici , ed. by A. Ghisalberti (Philosophia - Studio Domenicano 28), Bologna 2000, 252-279.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 2002a, “La distinction entre concept formel et concept objectif: Suárez, Pasqualigo, Mastri,” Les Études philosophiques 1 (2002), 3-30. doi: 10.3917/leph.021.0003
     https://doi.org/10.3917/leph.021.0003 [Google Scholar]
  117. 2002b, Scotistarum princeps. Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) e il suo tempo (Fonti e studi francescani 11),Padua 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 2006a, “A Man, an Age, a Book,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , atti del Convegno di studi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602-1673), Meldola - Bertinoro, 20-22 settembre 2002, ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 23-144.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 2006b, “The Nature of Transcendental Being and Its Contraction to Its Inferiors in the Thought of Mastri and Belluto,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi , Padua 2006, 261-337.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 2008, “C’è una filosofia nell’opera di Francisco Suàrez? Il caso della dottrina sul ‘verbum mentis’ tra ‘auctoritates’ e argomenti di ragione,” Rinascimento 48 (2008), 397-450.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Fraile, Guillermo
    1978, Historia de la filosofia III. Del humanismo a la ilustración (siglos XV-XVIII ) (Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos), Madrid 1978.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Freddoso, Alfred J.
    1984, “Review of Suarez on lndividuation, Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and its Principle, transl. with an introd. and glossary by Jorge J. E. Gracia, Milwaukee 1982,“ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (1984), 419-421. URL: www.nd.edu/~afreddos/papers/gracia.htm. doi: 10.2307/2107695
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2107695 [Google Scholar]
  123. Fuetscher, Lorenz
    1933, Akt und Potenz, Eine kritisch-systematische Auseinandersetzung mit dem neueren Thomismus , Innsbruck 1933.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Furton, Edward J.
    1997, “The Constitution of the Object in Immanuel Kant and John Poinsot,” The Review of Metaphysics 51/1 (1997), 55-75.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Galluzzo, Gabrielle
    2003, “Met. Z 13 in the Contemporary Debate and in Aquinas’s Interpretation,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 14 (2003), 159-226.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. 2004, “Aquinas on Common Nature and Universals,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 71/1 (2004), 131-171. doi: 10.2143/RTPM.71.1.504403
     https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.71.1.504403 [Google Scholar]
  127. 2008, “The Problem of Universals and Its History. Some General Considerations,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 19 (2008), 335-369.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 2011, “Two senses of Universal. Avicenna’s Doctrine of Essence and Aquinas’s View on Individuation,” in: The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics , ed. by D. N. Hasse , A. Bertolacci (Scientia Graeco-Arabica 7), Berlin, Boston 2011, 309-338.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Ghisalberti, Alessandro
    2006, “Mastri e la storia della filosofia medievale,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 145-149.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Giacon, Carlo
    1941, Guglielmo di Occam: saggio storico-critico sulla formazione e sulla decadenza della Scolastica , Milan 1941.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 1946, La Seconda Scolastica, Vol. II: Precedenze teoretiche ai problemi giuridici. Toledo, Pereira, Fonseca, Molina, Suarez , Milan 1946.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Gilson, Étienne
    1959, Johannes Duns Scotus. Einführung in die Grundgedanken seiner Lehre , Dusseldorf 1959.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Goris, Wouter
    2009, “Padua 1500 - The Medieval Debate on the First Known Revisited,” in: Der Aristotelismus an den Europäischen Universitäten der Frühen Neuzeit , ed. by R. Darge , E. J. Bauer , G. Frank , Stuttgart 2009, 83-98.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Gracia, Jorge J. E.
    1991, “Suarez’s Conception of Metaphysics: A Step in the Direction of Mentalism?,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65/3 (1991), 287-309. doi: 10.5840/acpq199165319
     https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq199165319 [Google Scholar]
  135. 1992, Philosophy and Its History: Issues in Philosophical Historiography (SUNY Series in Philosophy) Albany, N. Y 1992.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 1993, “Suárez and Metaphysical Mentalism: The Last Visit,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/3 (1993), 349-354. doi: 10.5840/acpq199367311
     https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq199367311 [Google Scholar]
  137. 1994, “Cutting the Gordian Knot of Ontology: Thomas’s Solution to the Problem of Universals,” in: Thomas Aquinas and His Legacy , ed. by D. M. Gallagher (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy Series 28), Washington D C 1994, 16-36.
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Grajewski, Maurice J.
    1944, The Formal Distinction of Duns Scotus. A Study in Metaphysics , Washington D C 1944.
     [Google Scholar]
  139. 1946, “John Ponce, Franciscan Scotist of the Seventeenth Century,” Franciscan Studies 6 (1946), 54-92. doi: 10.1353/frc.1964.0013
     https://doi.org/10.1353/frc.1964.0013 [Google Scholar]
  140. Gredt, Joseph
    1961, Elementa Philosophiae Aristotelico-Thomisticae , 2 vols., Barcelona/Freiburg in Breisgau/Rome/New York 1961.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Guil, Blanes F.
    1956, “Las raices de la doctrina de Juan de santo Tomás acerca del universal lógico,” Estudios filosóficos 5 (1956), 215-232.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Hattab, Helen
    2009, Descartes on Forms and Mechanicism , Cambridge/New York 2009. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511596612
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596612 [Google Scholar]
  143. Heider, Daniel
    2008, “Suárez on Material Substance. Reification of Intrinsic Principles and the Unity of Material Composites,” Organon F 15/4 (2008), 423-438.
     [Google Scholar]
  144. 2009, Kdo byl Frantisek Suárez? Život a dílo “Vynikajícího doktora” (Studijní texty, XLIII)Olomouc 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. 2010a, “Metaphysics of Universals in John Poinsot’s Material Logic,” in: Thomas Aquinas and Thomism Today , ed. by H. K. Bulscú , Budapest 2010, 151-162.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. 2010b, “Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza’s (Mis)interpretation of Aquinas,” in: Francisco Suárez and his Legacy. The Impact of Suárezian Metaphysics and Epistemology on Modern Philosophy , ed. by M. Sgarbi (Metafisica e storia della metafisica 35), Milan 2010, 105-140.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. 2010c, “Bartholomew Mastrius (1602-1673) and John Punch (1599 or 1603-1661) on the Common Nature and Universal Unity,” in: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, vol. 84: Philosophy and Language>, ed. by R. E. Houser , T. Osborne (2010), 145-166.
     [Google Scholar]
  148. 2011a, “K objektivnímu bytí u Suáreze. Poznámka ke studii Jana Palkosky ‘Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu’,” Studia Neoaristotelica 8/1 (2011), 95-105. doi: 10.5840/studneoar2011815
     https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar2011815 [Google Scholar]
  149. 2011b, “Suárezova teorie poznání a její vztah k tomismu,” Filosofický časopis 59/6 (2011), 865-896.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. 2011c, “Reifikace hylemorfických principů, substanciální jednota člověka a nesmrtelnost lidské duše ve filosofii F. Suáreze,” in: Pojetí člověka v dějinách a současnosti filosofie , ed. By T. Nejeschleba , V. Němec , M. Recinová , Brno 2011, 139-152.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. 2011d, Suárez a jeho metafyzika. Od pojmu jsoucna přes transcendentální jednotu k druhům transcendentální jednoty , Praha 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. 2011e, “The Role of Trinitarian Theology in Universals. Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602-1673) and Bonaventura Belluto (1600-1676),” in: Herausforderung durch Religion? Begegnungen der Philosophie mit Religionen in Mittelalter und Renaissance , ed. by G. Krieger , Würzburg 2011, 268-284.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. 2012a, “John Poinsot (1589-1644) on the Universale Materialiter Sumptum: A Dual View-point,” The Modern Schoolman 89/1-2, Special Issue: “The Variety of Second Scholasticism”, ed. by D. Heider (2012), 47-63. doi: 10.5840/schoolman2012891/25
     https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman2012891/25 [Google Scholar]
  154. 2012b, "Suárez and Javellus on Transcendentals and Divisions of Being,” in: Proceedings of 12th SIEPM-Congress “Universality of Reason - Plurality of Philosophies in the Middle Ages ”, ed. by A. Musco et al ., Palermo 2012, 849-859.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. 2012c, “Úvod do problematiky univerzálií v první a druhé scholastice,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider , D. Svoboda , České Budějovice 2012, 11-31.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. 2012d, “Teorie společné přirozenosti a esence ve druhé scholastice,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider , D. Svoboda , České Budějovice 2012, 208-233.
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Heider, Daniel , et al
    (2012e, “Filip Fabri OFM Conv. († 1630) o společné přirozenosti ve Philosophia naturalis (1602) a kritická odpověd’ Bartoloměje Mastria OFM Conv. († 1673),” in: Františkánský kontext teologického a filosofického myšleni , ed. by P. Hlavácek , Europeana Pragensia 4 - Historia Franciscana 4), Praha 2012, 114-129.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Heider, Daniel
    2013, “Abstraction, Intentionality, & Moderate Realism. The Ontology & Epistemology of Universals in Francisco Suárez & John Poinsot,” in: Hircocervi & Other Metaphysical Wonders . Essays in Honor of John P. Doyle (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 84) , ed. by V. M. Salas , Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2013, 177-211.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Hernández, Miguel C.
    1949, “La intencionalidad en la Filosofía de Franciso Suárez,” in: Actas del Congreso International de filosofia Barcelona 1948 , Madrid 1949, 315-337.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Hickman, Larry
    1980, Modern Theories of Higher Level Predicates: Second Intentions in the Neuzeit , München 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Hoeres, Walter
    1961, “Bewusstsein und Erkenntnisbild bei Suárez,” Scholastik 36 (1961), 192-216.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. Honnefelder, Ludger
    1984, “Natura communis,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 6, ed. by J. Ritter and K. Grunder , Basel 1984, 494-504.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. Heider, Daniel
    1990, Scientia transcendens. Die formale Bestimmung der Seiendheit und Realität in der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit , Hamburg 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Hull, Gordon
    2006, “Hobbes’s Radical Nominalism,” Epoché 11/1 (2006), 201-223. doi: 10.5840/epoche200611119
     https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche200611119 [Google Scholar]
  165. Jansen, Bernhard
    1936, “Zur Philosophie der Scotisten des 17. Jahrhunderts,” Franziskanische Studien 17 (1936), 150-175.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. 2004, Jezuité v přírodnich vědách a ve filosofii 17. a 18. století , Olomouc 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. King, Peter
    1992, “Duns Scotus on the Common Nature and the Individual Differentia,” Philosophical Topics 20/2 (1992), 50-76. doi: 10.5840/philtopics199220215
     https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199220215 [Google Scholar]
  168. 2005, “Duns Scotus on Singular Essences,” Medioevo. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale 30 (2005), 111-137.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Klima, Gyula
    2003, “Natures: the Problem of Universals,” in: The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy , ed. by A. S. McGrade , Cambridge 2003, 196-207. doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521806038.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521806038.009 [Google Scholar]
  170. Knebel, Sven K.
    1999, “The Early Modern Rollback of Merely Extrinsic Denomination,” in: Meeting of the Minds. The Relations between Medieval and Classical Modern European Philosophy , ed. by S. F. Brown , acts of the international colloquium held at Boston CollegeJune 14-16 1996 (Rencontres de philosophie médiévale 7), Turnhout 1999, 317-331.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. 2001a, “Verworrenheit I,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 11, ed. by J. Ritter , K. Gründer , G. Gabriel , Basel 2001, 1014-1017.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. 2001b, “Universalien, I. Antike; Mittelalter,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 11, ed. by  J. Ritter , K. Gründer , G. Gabriel , Basel 2001, 179-187.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. 2011, Suarezismus. Erkenntnistheoretisches aus dem Nachlass des Jesuitengenerals Tirso González de Santalla (1624-1705) , Abhandlung und Edition (Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 51), Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2011. doi: 10.1075/bsp.51
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bsp.51 [Google Scholar]
  174. Kobusch, Theo
    1987, Sein und Sprache. Historische Grundlegung einer Ontologie der Sprache (Studien zur Problemgeschichte der antiken und mittelalterlichen Philosophie 11), Leiden/ New York/Copenhagen/Cologne 1987.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Koláček, Josef
    2006, “Ratio studiorum. Geneze - struktura - hlavní cíle,” Studia Comeniana et historica 75-76 (2006), 19-31.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Kraml, Hans
    1995, “Beobachtungen zum Ursprung der ‘distinctio formalis’,” in: Via Scoti. Methodologica ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti , atti del Congresso Scotistico Internazionale, Roma 9-11. Marzo 1993, vol. 1, ed. by L. Sileo , Rome 1995, 305-318.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. Kraus, Johannes
    1927, Die Lehre des Johannes Duns Skotus O. F. M. von der Natura communis. Ein Beitrag zum Universalienproblem in der Scholastik (Studia Friburgensia), Freiburg (Schweiz) 1927.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Lalla, Sebastian
    2010, “Die Interpretation von ‘De anima’ bei Francisco Suárez,” in: Der Aristotelismus an den Europäischen Universitäten der Frühen Neuzeit , ed. by R. Darge , E. J. Bauer , G. Frank , Stuttgart 2010, 235-248.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Lechner, Matthias
    1911, Die Erkenntnislehre des Suárez , Fulda 1911.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. Leinsle, Ulrich G.
    2006, Dilinganae Disputationes. Der Lehrinhalt der gedruckten Disputationen an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Dillingen 1555-1648 , Regensburg 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. Ludwig, Joseph
    1929, Das akausale Zusammenwirken (sympathia) der Seelenvermögen in der Erkenntnislehre des Suarez , München 1929.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. Madeira, João
    2006, Pedro da Fonseca's “Isagoge Philosophica” and the Predicables from Boethius to the Lovanienses , doctoral thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven 2006 URL: [https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/1979/409/5/thesis-docto.pdf].
     [Google Scholar]
  183. Mahieu, León
    1921, François Suarez, sa philosophie et les rapports qu’elle a avec sa théologie , Paris 1921.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Manser, Gallus M.
    1934, “Die Universalienlehre im Lichte von Akt und Potenz,” Divus Thomas 12 (1934), 385-407.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. Maritain, Jacques
    1937, The Degrees of Knowledge , transl. by B. Wall and M. R. Adamson, London 1937.
     [Google Scholar]
  186. Marrone, Francesco
    2008, “Descartes e la tradizione scotista. Gli antecedenti storici della nozione di realitas obiectiva,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 279-302.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. Martins, António M.
    2006, “The Conimbricenses,” in: Intellect et imagination dans la Philosophie Médiévale , actes du XI Congrés International de Philosophie Médiévale de la S.I.E.P.M. (Porto, du 26 au 31 août 2002), ed. by M. C. Pacheco , J. Meirinhos , Turnhout 2006, 101-117.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. Meier-Oeser, Stephan
    1997, Die Spur des Zeichens. Das Zeichen und seine Funktion in der Philosophie des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit , Berlin/New York 1997. doi: 10.1515/9783110803150
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803150 [Google Scholar]
  189. Menn, Stephen
    1997, “Suárez, Nominalism, and Modes,” in: Hispanic Philosophy in the Age of Discovery , ed. by K. White (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 29), Washington D C 1997, 226-256.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Mertz, Donald W.
    2004, “The Nature and Necessity of Composite Simples, e.g., Ontic Predicates,” Metaphysica. International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics 5/1 (2004), 89-133. URL: www.metaphysica.de/texte/mp2004_1-Mertz.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  191. Millett, Benignus
    1968, “Irish Scotists at St. Isidore’s College, Rome, in the Seventeenth Century,” in: De doctrina Ioannis Duns Scoti , vol. IV: Scotismus decursu saeculorum, Rome 1968, 399-419.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. Minges, Parthenius
    1930, Ioannis Duns Scoti doctrina philosophica et theologica quoad res praecipuas proposita et exposita , vol. I: Doctrina philosophica, Theologia fundamentalis, Rome 1930, 67-106.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. Montanari, Antonio
    1883, Gli uomini illustri di Faenza , Faenza 1883.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Mooney, Canice
    1958, “The Writings of Father Luke Wadding, O. F. M.,” Franciscan Studies 18/3-4 (1958), 225-239. doi: 10.1353/frc.1958.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1353/frc.1958.0003 [Google Scholar]
  195. Müller, Hermann J.
    1968, Die Lehre vom verbum mentis in der spanischen Scholastik. Untersuchungen zur historischen Entwicklung und zum Verständnis dieser Lehre bei Toletus, den Conimbricensern und Suarez , Münster 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. Norena, Carlos P.
    1981, “Ockham and Suárez on the Ontological Status of Universal Concepts,” The New Scholasticism 55/3 (1981), 348-362.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. Novák, Lukás
    2006, “Scoti de conceptu entis doctrina a Mastrio retractata et contra Poncium propugnata,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 237-259.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. 2012, “Ponciova syntéza ultrarealismu s nominalismem na pozadí barokně-scotistické teorie obecnin,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider , D. Svoboda , České Budéjovice 2012, 234-257.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. Novák, Lukáš , Dvořák, Petr
    2007, Úvod do logiky aristotelské tradice , České Budějovice 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. Novotný, Daniel D.
    2008, “Forty-Two Years after Suárez. Mastri and Belluto’s Development of the Classical’ Theory of Entia Rationis” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 473-498.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. 2009, “In Defense of Baroque Scholasticism,” Studia Neoaristotelica 6/2 (2009), 209-233. doi: 10.5840/studneoar2009623
     https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar2009623 [Google Scholar]
  202. 2012, “Teorie obecnin Sebastiana Izquierda (1601-1681),” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider , D. Svoboda , České Budéjovice 2012, 258-280.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. O’Brien, Andrew J.
    1964, “Scotus on Essence and Existence,” The New Scholasticism 38/1 (1964), 61-77. doi: 10.5840/newscholas196438155
     https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas196438155 [Google Scholar]
  204. Owens, Joseph
    1957, “The number of Terms in the Suarezian Discussion on Essence and Being,” The Modern Schoolman 34/3 (1957), 147-191. doi: 10.5840/schoolman195734321
     https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman195734321 [Google Scholar]
  205. 1971, “Common nature: A point of comparison between Thomistic and Scotistic metaphysics,” in: Inquiries into Medieval Philosophy. A Collection in Honor of Francis P. Clarke , ed. by J. F. Ross (Contributions in Philosophy 4), Greenwood, Westport 1971, 185-209.
     [Google Scholar]
  206. Pasnau, Robert
    1998, “Aquinas and the Content Fallacy,” The Modern Schoolman 75/4 (1998), 293-314. doi: 10.5840/schoolman199875431
     https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman199875431 [Google Scholar]
  207. 2003, “Cognition,” in: The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus , ed. by T. Williams , Cambridge 2003, 285-311.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. Peccorini, Francisco L.
    1972, “Suárez’s Struggle with the Problem of the One and the Many,” The Thomist 36 (1972), 433-471.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. 1974, “Knowledge of the Singular: Aquinas, Suárez and Recent Interpreters,” The Thomist 38 (1974), 605-655.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Pereira, José
    2007, Suárez. Between Scholasticism & Modernity (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 52), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. Perler, Dominik
    2002, Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter , Frankfurt am Main 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  212. Peroutka, David
    2010, “Imagination, Intellect and Premotion. A Psychological Theory of Domingo Báñez,” Studia Neoaristotelica 7/2 (2010), 107-115. doi: 10.5840/studneoar20107211
     https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20107211 [Google Scholar]
  213. 2012, “Sémantika abstraktnich pojmů v tomismu druhé scholastiky,” Studia Neoaristotelica, Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice , ed. by D. Heider , D. Svoboda , České Budějovice 2012, 193-207.
     [Google Scholar]
  214. Pessin, Andrew
    2008, “Descartes’ Theory of Ideas,” in: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , Fall 2008 Edition. URL: plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/descartes-ideas/
     [Google Scholar]
  215. Pich, Roberto Hofmeister
    2012, “Alfonso Briceño (1587-1668) and the Controversiae on John Duns Scotus‘s Philosophical Theology: The Case of Infinity,” The Modern Schoolman 89/1-2, Special Issue: “The Variety of Second Scholasticism,” ed. by D. Heider 2012, 65-94. doi: 10.5840/schoolman2012891/26
     https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman2012891/26 [Google Scholar]
  216. Pinborg, Jan 1974, “Zum Begriff der ‘Intentio Secunda’. Radulphus Brito, Hervaeus Natalis und Petrus Aureoli in Diskussion,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge grec et latin 13 (1974), 49-59.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. Pini, Giorgio
    2002, Categories and Logic in Duns Scotus. An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Categories in the late thirteenth century (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 77), Leiden/Boston/Cologne 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. 2004, “Absoluta consideratio naturae: Tommaso d’Aquino e la dottrina avicenniana dell’ essenza,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 15 (2004), 387-438.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. 2007, “Scotus on Universals: A Reconsideration,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 395-409.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. Poppi, Antonio
    1966, “Il contributo dei formalisti padovani al problema delle distinzioni,” in: Problemi e figure della scuola scotista del Santo , ed. by A. Poppi (Pubblicazioni della Provincia dei Frati minori conventuali 5), Padua 1966, 601-790.
     [Google Scholar]
  221. Rasmussen, Douglas B.
    1994, “The Significance for Cognitive Realism of the Thought of John Poinsot,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68/3 (1994), 409-424. doi: 10.5840/acpq199468326
     https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq199468326 [Google Scholar]
  222. Renemann, Michael
    2006, “Mastri on ‘praecisio obiectiva’,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sulpensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 399-414.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. 2010a, “The Mind’s Focus as an Efficient Cause: Francisco Suárez’s Re-interpretation of the Traditional Understanding of the Idea,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84/4 (2010), 693-710. doi: 10.5840/acpq201084450
     https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq201084450 [Google Scholar]
  224. 2010b, Gedanken als Wirkursachen. Francisco Suárez zur geistigen Hervorbringung (Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 49), Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2010. doi: 10.1075/bsp.49
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bsp.49 [Google Scholar]
  225. Rinaldi, Teresa
    1998, Francisco Suarez. Cognitio singularis materialis: De anima (Vestigia 16), Bari 1998.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. Risse, Wilhelm
    1964, Die Logik der Neuzeit , Bd. 1: 1500-1640, Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt 1964.
     [Google Scholar]
  227. Rivera de Ventosa, Enrique
    1982, “Significación de Juan de S. Tomás en la historia del pensamiento,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 38/4 (1982), 581-592.
     [Google Scholar]
  228. Roig Gironella, Juan
    1961, “Para la historia del nominalismo y de la reacción antinominalista de Suárez,” Pensamiento: Revista de investigación e informatión filosófica 17 (1961), 279-310.
     [Google Scholar]
  229. Ross, James F.
    1962, “Suarez on ‘Universals’,” The Journal of Philosophy 59/23 (1962), 736-748. doi: 10.2307/2023155
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2023155 [Google Scholar]
  230. Rozemond, Marleen
    2012, “Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez’s Soul,” in: The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez , ed. by B. Hill & H. Lagerlund , Oxford/New York 2012, 154-172. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583645.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583645.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  231. Rozwadowski, Aleksander
    1937, “De fundamento metaphysico nostrae cognitionis universalis secundum D. Thomam,” in: Acta Pont. Academiae Romanae S. Thomae Aquinatis et Religionis Catholicae , vol. III, Rome 1937, 103-112.
     [Google Scholar]
  232. Saxlová, Tereza
    1997, “Povaha obecného pojmu u Viléma Ockhama. Od teorie představy (fictum) k teorii rozumového aktu (intellectio),” Filosofický časopis 45/2 (1997), 179-203.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. Scapin, Pietro
    1976, La metafisica scotista a Padova dal XV al XVII secolo , in: Storia e cultura al Santo , ed. by A. Poppi (Fonti e studi per la storia del Santo di Padova, vol. III, 1), Vicenza 1976, 485-538.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. Schmitt, Charles B.
    1979, “Filippo Fabri’s ‘Philosophia Naturalis Io. Duns Scoti’ and its Relation to Paduan Aristotelianism,” in: La tradizione scotista veneto-padovana , ed. by C. Bérubé , Padua 1979, 305-312.
     [Google Scholar]
  235. Schmutz, Jacob
    , Scholasticon , URL: www.scholasticon.fr
     [Google Scholar]
  236. 2002, “L’héritage des Subtils. Cartographie du Scotisme de l’âge classique,” Les études philosophiques 1 (2002), 51-81. doi: 10.3917/leph.021.0051
     https://doi.org/10.3917/leph.021.0051 [Google Scholar]
  237. 2007, “Hurtado et son double. La querelle sur les images mentales dans la scholastique moderne,” in: Questions sur l’intentionnalité , ed. by L. Couloubaritsis , A. Mazzú (Recueil, n°17), Brussels 2007, 157-232.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. 2008, “Le petit scotisme du Grand Siécle. Etude doctrinale et documentaire sur la philosophie au Grand Couvent des Cordeliers de Paris, 1517-1771,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 365-472.
     [Google Scholar]
  239. Schobinger, Jean-Pierre
    (ed) 1998, Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, Bd. 1: Allgemeine Themen. Iberische Halbinsel. Italien (Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie), Basel 1998.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. Secada, Jorge
    2012, “Suárez on the Ontology of Relations,” in: InterpretingSuárez. Critical Essays , ed. by D. Schwartz , Cambridge/New York 2012, 62-88.
     [Google Scholar]
  241. Sladeczek, Franz M.
    1926, “Die intellektuelle Erfassung der sinnfälligen Einzeldinge nach der Lehre des hl. Thomas von Aquin,” Scholastik 1/2 (1926), 184-215.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Sousedík, Stanislav
    1983, Valerián Magni (1586-1661). Kapitola z kulturních dějin Čech 17. stoleti , Praha 1983.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. 1998, “Arriagas Universalienlehre,” in: Rodrigo de Arriaga (†1667). Philosoph und Theologe , ed. by T. Saxlová and S. Sousedík , Praha 1998, 41-49.
     [Google Scholar]
  244. 2004, “Pomyslná jsoucna (entia rationis) v aristotelské tradici 17. století,” Filosofický časopis 52/4 (2004), 533-544.
     [Google Scholar]
  245. 2005, “Filosofické dílo pražského františkána Bernarda Sanniga OFM (†1704),” in: Historia Franciscana II , ed. by P. R. Beneš , P. Hlaváček , Kostelni Vydří 2005, 151-163.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. 2006, Identitni teorie predikace , Praha 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  247. 2009, Philosophie der frühen Neuzeit in den böhmischen Ländern , Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. South, James B.
    2001a, “Suárez and the Problem of External Sensation,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10/2 (2001), 217-240. doi: 10.1017/S1057060801010088
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1057060801010088 [Google Scholar]
  249. 2001b, “Francisco Suárez on Imagination,” Vivarium 39/1 (2001), 119-158. doi: 10.1163/15685340152882552
     https://doi.org/10.1163/15685340152882552 [Google Scholar]
  250. 2002, “Singular and Universal in Suárez’s Account of Cognition,” Review of Metaphysics 55/4 (2002), 785-823.
     [Google Scholar]
  251. 2012, “Suárez, Immortality, and the Soul’s Dependence on the Body," in: The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez , ed. by B. Hill , H. Lagerlund , Oxford/New York 2012, 121-136. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583645.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583645.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  252. Spruit, Leen
    1995, Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge, vol. II: Renaissance Controversies, Later Scholasticism, and the Elimination of the Intelligibile Species in Modern Philosophy (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 49), Leiden/New York/Cologne 1995. doi: 10.1163/9789004247000
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004247000 [Google Scholar]
  253. 2008, “Renaissance Views of Active Perception,” in: Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy , ed. by S. Knuuttila , P. Kärkkäinen (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 6), Dordrecht 2008, 203-224. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑6125‑7_13
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6125-7_13 [Google Scholar]
  254. Stone, Martin W. F.
    2009, “Punch’s Riposte: The Irish Contribution to Early Modern Scotism from Maurice O’Fihely O. F. M. Conv. to Anthony Rourke O. F. M. Obs.,” in: The Irish Contribution to European Scholastic Thought , ed. by J. McEvoy , M. Dunne , Dublin 2009, 137-191.
     [Google Scholar]
  255. Svoboda, David
    2012a, “Absolutně uvažovaná přirozenost. Petr Fonseca a jeho významní středověcí předchůdci,” Studia theologica 50/4 (2012), 102-126.
     [Google Scholar]
  256. 2012b, “Koncepce univerzálií Dominika de Soto O. P.,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider , D. Svoboda , České Budějovice 2012, 172-192.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. 2012c, Metafyzické myšlení Tomáse Akvinského , Praha 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  258. 2012d, “The Ratio of Unity: Positive or Negative? The case of Thomas Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86/1 (2012), 47-70. doi: 10.5840/acpq_2012_3
     https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq_2012_3 [Google Scholar]
  259. Teixidor, Alois
    1912, “De universalibus iuxta Doctorem Eximium Franciscum Suarez,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 25/4 (1912), 445-461.
     [Google Scholar]
  260. Tropia, Anna
    2010, “Suárez as a Scotist: the Portrait of the Doctor Eximius in Losada’s Commentary on the Soul,” in: Francisco Suárez and his Legacy. The Impact of Suárezian Metaphysics and Epistemology on Modern Philosophy , ed. by M. Sgarbi (Metafisica e storia della metafisica 35), Milan 2010, 89-101.
     [Google Scholar]
  261. Tyn, Thomas M.
    1988, “L’essere nel pensiero di Giovanni di San Tommaso O. P.,” in: Giovanni di San Tommaso nel IV centenario della sua nascita (1589). Il suo pensiero filosofico, teologico e mistico - atti del convegno di studio della Societá Internazionale S. Tommaso d’Aquino (SITA)>, Roma 25-28 novembre 1988, Rome 1988, 21-55.
     [Google Scholar]
  262. Tweedale, Martin M.
    1984, “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Views on Universals,” Phronesis 29/3 (1984), 279-303. doi: 10.1163/156852884X00058
     https://doi.org/10.1163/156852884X00058 [Google Scholar]
  263. 1999a, Scotus vs. Ockham - A Medieval Dispute over Universals. Vol. II: Commentary (Studies in the History of Philosophy, volume 50 B), Lewiston, N. Y 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  264. 1999b, “Locke on Universals: the Fruit of Ockham’s Dilemma?,” in: Meeting of the Minds. The Relations between Medieval and Classical Modern European Philosophy, acts of the international colloquium held at Boston College June 14-16 1996, ed. by S. F. Brown (Rencontres de philosophie médiévale 7), Turnhout 1999, 235-244.
     [Google Scholar]
  265. Uedelhofen, Matthias
    1916, Die Logik Petrus Fonsecas , Bonn 1916.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. Van der Lecq, Ria
    2000, “Domingo de Soto on Universals and the Ontology of Intentions,” in: Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain, acts of the 12th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, held at the University of Navarre (Pamplona, 26-30 May 1997), ed. by I. Angelleli , P. Pérez-Ilzarbe (Philosophische Texte und Studien 54), Hildesheim 2000, 309-325.
     [Google Scholar]
  267. Wells, Norman J.
    1962, “Suarez, Historian and Critic of the Modal Distinction between Essential Being and Existential Being,” The New Scholasticism 36/4 (1962), 419-444. doi: 10.5840/newscholas19623641
     https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas19623641 [Google Scholar]
  268. 1993a, “Descartes’ Idea and Its Sources,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/4 (1993), 513-535. doi: 10.5840/acpq19936741
     https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq19936741 [Google Scholar]
  269. 1993b, “Esse Cognitum and Suárez Revisited,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/3 (1993), 339-348. doi: 10.5840/acpq199367320
     https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq199367320 [Google Scholar]
  270. 2007, “Mastrius on Esse Cognitum ,” in: Laudemus viros gloriosos : Essays in Honor of Armand Maurer, CSB., ed. by R. E. Houser (Thomistic Studies), Notre Dame, Indiana 2007, 327-361.
     [Google Scholar]
  271. Winance, Eleuthére
    1985, “Echo de la querelle du psychologisme et de l’antipsychologisme dans l Ars Logica de Jean Poinsot,” Semiotica 56-3/4 (1985), 225-259.
     [Google Scholar]
  272. Wippel, John F.
    2000, The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas. From Finite Being to Uncreated Being (Monographs of the Society for Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy 1), Washington D C 2000.
     [Google Scholar]
  273. Wöhler, Hans-Ulrich
    , ed 1992, Texte zum Universalienstreit. Vom Ausgang der Antike bis zur Frühscholastik , Bd. 1, Berlin 1992. doi: 10.1524/9783050067599
     https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050067599 [Google Scholar]
  274. Wolter, Allan B.
    1946, The Transcendentals and their Function in the Metaphysics of Duns Scotus (Franciscan Institute Publications, Philosophy Series 3), Washington D C 1946.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027270672
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027270672
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027270672
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027270672
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error