1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Multiple Determiners and the Structure of DPs

Multiple Determiners and the Structure of DPs

image of Multiple Determiners and the Structure of DPs
GBP
Buy:£80.00 + Taxes

This book is a research monograph that investigates the crosslinguistic distribution of multiple determiners. In some languages, noun phrases permit or even seem to require a double or multiple realization of definite/indefinite markers in certain modification environments. The book develops tools that can be used to keep the different instantiations of the phenomenon apart and argues that a uniform account thereof is not desirable. On the basis of these tools, it advances the proposal that there are different types of multiple occurrences of determiners (and sub-types thereof), some are syntactic, while others are purely morphological. It then puts forth a theoretical proposal that regulates the presence of the different types of multiple determiners across languages. The book will be of interst to researchers and students working on the structure of DP, the syntax of modification and the typology of noun phrases. Languages discussed include Greek, Romanian, Scandinavian, English, dialects of German, Hebrew, Albanian, Chinese, French, and Slovenian.

References

  1. Abney, Steven
    . 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  2. Abraham, Werner
    . 2007. Discourse binding: DP and pronouns in German, Dutch, and English. In Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Contraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89], ElisabethStark, ElizabethLeiss & WernerAbraham (eds), 21–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.89
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.89 [Google Scholar]
  3. . 2013. Dialect as a spoken-only medium: What it means- and what it does not mean. To appear in Linguistische Berichte 19.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elizabeth
    2007. Double definiteness in Old and Modern Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80: 17–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Agouraki, Yorgia
    . 1992. Clitic-left-dislocation and clitic doubling: A unification. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 45–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexiadou, Artemis
    . 2001a. Adjective syntax and noun raising: word order asymmetries in the DP as the result of adjective distribution. Studia Linguistica 55: 217–248. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9582.00080
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00080 [Google Scholar]
  7. . 2001b. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.42
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.42 [Google Scholar]
  8. . 2003a. Subject agreement asymmetries in coordination. In Asymmetrien , ClaudiaMaienborn & ManfredKrifka (eds), 1–23. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. . 2003b. Adjective syntax and (the absence of) noun raising in the DP. Proceedings of the Workshop on Head-movement , UCLA: 1–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Alexiadou, Aretmies
    . 2003c. Double definiteness. In Festschrift in Honour of Christer Platzack. Grammar in Focus, Vol. II, Lars-OlofDelsing, CeciliaFalk, GunlögJosefsson & HalldórSigurdsson , 9–16. Lund: University of Lund.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Alexiadou, Artemis
    . 2007. Some notes on the status of adjectival determiners. In Proceedings of the 3rd Athens Post-graduate Conference in Linguistics (APC-3), Athens , 9–10 April 2005, NikolaosLavidas, Elissavet, Nouchoutidou & MariettaSionti (eds), Athens: University of Athens.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 2010. Reduplication and doubling contrasted: Implications for the structure of the DP and the AP. Linguistica 5: 9–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Alexiadou, Artemis & Ananogstopoulou, Elena
    . 2000. Greek syntax: A principles and parameters perspective. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 169–221. doi: 10.1075/jgl.1.09ale
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.1.09ale [Google Scholar]
  14. Alexiadou, Artemis & Campanini, Cinzia
    . 2012. On the adverbial reading of infrequency adjectives and the structure of DP. In Comparative Germanic Syntax: The State of the Art [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 191], PeterAckema, RhonaAlcorn, CarolineHeycock, DanyJaspers, Jeroen vanCraenenbroeck & GuidoVanden Wyngaerd (eds), 35–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Alexiadou, Artemis & Gengel, Kirsten
    . 2012. NP ellipsis without focus movement/projections: The role of classifiers. In Contrasts and Positions in Information Structure , IvonaKucerova & AdNeeleman (eds), 177–205. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511740084.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511740084.010 [Google Scholar]
  16. Alexiadou, Artemis & Wilder, Chris
    . 1998. Adjectival modification and multiple determiners. In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the DP [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 22], ArtemisAlexiadou & ChrisWilder (eds), 303–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.22
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.22 [Google Scholar]
  17. Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita
    . 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110207491
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491 [Google Scholar]
  18. Alexiadou, Artemis & Stavrou, Melita
    . 1998. Partitives and pseudopartitives in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 19:1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Alexopoulou, Theodora & Folli, Rafaella
    . 2010. Indefinite topics and the syntax of nominals in Italian and Greek. Paper presented at the3rd Mediterranean Syntax Meeting, University of Athens, October 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. . 2011. Topic strategies and the internal structure of nominal arguments in Greek and Italian. Ms, University of Cambridge, and University of Ulser.
  21. Alexopoulou, Theodora & Kolliakou, Dimitra
    . 2002. On linkhood, topicalization and clitic left dislocation. Journal of Linguistics 38: 193–245. doi: 10.1017/S0022226702001445
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001445 [Google Scholar]
  22. Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, Menéndez-Benito, Paula & Schwarz, Florian
    . 2011. Maximize Presupposition and two types of definite competitors. Proceedings of NELS 39: 29–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Anagnostopoulou, Elena
    . 1994. Clitic Dependencies in Modern Greek. PhD dissertation, University of Salzburg.
  24. . 2006. Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , MartinEveraert & Henk vanRiemsdijk (eds), 520–581. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. . 2013. Greek Syntax 2012: State-of-the-art and perspectives. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics , 11–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Andersen, Merete
    . 2006. The Acquisition of Compositional Definiteness in Norwegian. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
  27. Androutsopoulou, Antonia
    . 1996. Licensing of adjectival modification. Proceedings of WCCFL 14: 17–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. . 2001. Adjectival determiners in Albanian and Greek. In Comparative syntax of Balkan languages , Maria-LuisaRivero & AngelikiRalli (eds), 161–199. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Baker, Carl-Lee
    . 2001. English Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Baker, Mark
    . 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord . Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619830
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619830 [Google Scholar]
  31. Bennis, Hans, Corver, Norbert & den Dikken, Marcel
    . 1998. Predication in nominal phrases. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 85–117. doi: 10.1023/A:1009780124314
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009780124314 [Google Scholar]
  32. Beyssade, Claire
    . 2011. Bare nouns in predicate position in French. In Logic and Grammar: Essays Dedicated to Alain Lecomte on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday , SylvainPogodalla, MyriamQuatrini & ChristianRétoré (eds), 1–16. Berlin: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Bobaljik, Jonahtan
    . 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Bolinger, Dwight. L
    . 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18: 1–34. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(67)90018‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6 [Google Scholar]
  35. Bolinger, Dwight
    . 1972. Degree Words . The Hague: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110877786
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786 [Google Scholar]
  36. Börjars, Kersti
    . 1995. Swedish double determination in a European perspective. Nordic Journal of Lingustics 17: 219–252. doi: 10.1017/S0332586500003024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500003024 [Google Scholar]
  37. Borer, Hagit
    . 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages . Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. . 1999. Deconstructing the construct. In Beyond Principles and Parameters , KyleJohnson & IanRoberts (eds), 43–90. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4822‑1_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_3 [Google Scholar]
  39. . 2005. Structuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only . Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Borer, Hagit & Roy, Isabelle
    . 2005. Le nom de l' adjectif. In L' adjectif [Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 34], PatriciaCabredo Hofherr & OraMatushansky (eds), 99–124. Paris: Presses universitaires de Vincennes.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Bouchard, Denis
    . 2002. Adjectives, Number and Interfaces: Why Languages Vary . Amsterdam: North-Holland.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Bresnan, Joan
    . 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 273–249.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Campos, Hector
    , 2005. Noun modification, pseudo-articles, and last resort operations in Arvantovlaxika and in Romanian. Lingua 115: 311–347. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  44. . 2009. Some notes on adjectival articles in Albanian. Lingua 119: 1009–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.014 [Google Scholar]
  45. Campos, Hector & Stavrou, Melita
    . 2004. Polydefinite constructions in Modern Greek and in Aromanian. In Balkan Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 67], OlgaTomic (ed.), 137–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Carlson, Greg
    . 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  47. Cheng, Lisa & Sybesma, Rynt
    . 2009. de as an underspecified classifier: First explorations. Lucong.
  48. Chomsky, Noam
    . 1995. The Minimalist Program . Cambrdige MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. . 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , MichaelKenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Cinque, Guglielmo
    (ed.) 2002. Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures , Vol. 1. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. . 2004. A phrasal movement analysis of the Romanian DP. In Studia Linguistica et Philologica in Honorem D. Irimia , AnnaMaria Minut & EugenMunteanu (eds), 129–142. Iasi: Editura Universitatii 'Al.I. Cuza'.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. . 2010. The Syntax of Adjectives . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Coene, Martine
    . 1994. Adjectival articles. Ms, Antwerp University.
  54. Corbett, Greville
    . 2006. Agreement . Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Cornilescu, Alexandra
    . 1992. Remarks on the determiner system of Rumanian: The demontratives al and cel . Probus 4: 189–260. doi: 10.1515/prbs.1992.4.3.189
     https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1992.4.3.189 [Google Scholar]
  56. . 2005. Modes of semantic combinations: NP/DP-adjectives. Ms, University of Bucharest.
  57. Cornilescu, Alexandra & Nicolae, Alexandru
    . 2011. On the syntax of Romanian definite phrases: Changes in the pattern of definiteness checking. In The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic. Structure, Variation and Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 171], PetraSleeman & HarryPerridon (eds), 193–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Corver, Norbert
    . 1997. Much -support as last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 119–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. . 1998. Predicate movement in pseudo-partitive constructions. In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the DP [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 22], ArtemisAlexiadou & ChrisWilder (eds), 215–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Corver, Norbert & van Koppen, Marjo
    . 2009. Let's focus on noun ellipsis. GAGL48: 3–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Dahl, Östen
    . 2004. Definite articles in Scandinavian: Competing grammaticalization strategies in standard and non-standard varieties. In Dialectology meets Typology , BerndKortmann (ed.), 147–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Danon, Gabi
    . 1996. The Syntax of Determiners in Hebrew. MA thesis, Tel Aviv University.
  63. Delsing, Lars-Olof
    . 1993. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Lund.
  64. den Dikken, Marcel
    . 1998. Predicate inversion in DP. In Posserssors, Predicates and Movement in the DP [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 22], ArtemisAlexiadou & ChrisWilder (eds), 177–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. . 2006. Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion and Copulas . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. den Dikken, Marcel & Singhapreecha, Pornsiri
    . 2004. Complex noun phrases and linkers. Syntax 7: 1–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1368‑0005.2004.00064.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00064.x [Google Scholar]
  67. Dayal, Veneeta
    . 2011. Bare noun phrases. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , ClaudiaMaeinborn , Klaus von Heusinger & PaulPortner (eds), 1087–1108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
    . 1987. A propos de la structure du groupe nominal en roumain. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 12: 123–152.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Beyssade, Claire
    . 2012. Redifining Indefinites . Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3002‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3002-1 [Google Scholar]
  70. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Giurgea, Ion
    . 2006. The suffixation of definite articles in Balkan languages. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 51(1): 73–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Donnellan, Keith
    . 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 75: 281–304. doi: 10.2307/2183143
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2183143 [Google Scholar]
  72. Doron, Edit
    . 1994. The discourse function of appositives. IATL1:53–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. . 2003. Bare singular reference to kinds. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13: 73–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Embick, David
    . 2000. Syntax and categories: Verbs and participles in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 185–230. doi: 10.1162/002438900554343
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554343 [Google Scholar]
  75. Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf
    . 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 185–230. doi: 10.1162/002438900554343
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554343 [Google Scholar]
  76. Enç, Murvet
    . 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Fiengo, Robert
    . 1987. Definiteness, specificity and familiarity. Linguistic Inquiry 18(1): 163–166.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Fischer, Olga
    . 2001. The position of the adjective in Old English from an iconic perspective. In The Motivated Sign [Iconicity in Language and Literature 2], OlgaFischer & MaxNänny (eds), 249–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ill.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.2 [Google Scholar]
  79. . 2004. Developments in the category adjective from Old to Middle English. Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature 19: 1–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. . 2006. On the position of adjectives in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 10: 253–288. doi: 10.1017/S1360674306001924
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306001924 [Google Scholar]
  81. van Gelderen, Elly & Lohndal, Terje
    . 2008. The position of adjectives and double definiteness. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 82: 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Giannakidou, Anastasia
    . 2004. Domain restriction and the arguments of quantificational determiners. Proceedings of SALT 14: 110–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Giannakidou, Anastasia & Stavrou, Melita
    . 1999. Nominalization and ellipsis in the Greek DP. The Linguistic Review 16: 295–331. doi: 10.1515/tlir.1999.16.4.295
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1999.16.4.295 [Google Scholar]
  84. Giusti, Giuliana
    . 1994. Enclitic articles and double definiteness: A comparative analysis of nominal structure in Romance and Germanic. The Linguistic Review 11: 241–255. doi: 10.1515/tlir.1994.11.3‑4.241
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1994.11.3-4.241 [Google Scholar]
  85. . 2002. The functional structure of noun phrases: A bare phrase structure approach. In Functional Structure in DP and IP , GuilgelmoCinque (ed.), 54–99. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Hallab, Amina-Christine
    . 2011. Referenzialität, Prädikation und die Struktur der Nominalphrase. Kontrastierung artikelloser nominer Prädikate und Indefinita in Kopulasätzen im Deutschen . Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
    . 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguisics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, KenHale & Samuel J.Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Hankamer, Jorge & Mikkelsen, Line
    . 2002. A morphological analysis of definite nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Lingusitics 14: 127–175.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. . 2005. When movement must be blocked: A reply to Embick & Noyer. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 85–125. doi: 10.1162/0024389052993664
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993664 [Google Scholar]
  90. Haumann, Dagmar
    . 2010. Adnominal adjectives in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 14: 53–81. doi: 10.1017/S1360674309990347
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674309990347 [Google Scholar]
  91. Hawkins, John
    . 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness . London: Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Heck, Fabian, Müller, Gereon & Trommer, Jochen
    . 2008. A phase based approach to Scandinavian definiteness marking. Proceedings of WCCFL 26: 226–233.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Heim, Irene
    . 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachussetts at Amherst.
  94. Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
    . 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar . Malden MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Hendrick, Randall
    . 1990. Operator movement in NP. In Proceedings of the 9th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , AaronHalpern (ed.), 249–264. Stanford CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Henn-Memmesheimer, Beate
    . 1986. Nonstandardmuster: Ihre Beschreibung in der Syntax und das Problem ihrer Arealität . Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783111708744
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111708744 [Google Scholar]
  97. Heycok, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto
    . 2003. Coordinated bare definites. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 443–469. doi: 10.1162/002438903322247551
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903322247551 [Google Scholar]
  98. Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto
    . 2005. Friends and colleagues: Coordination, plurality, and the structure of DP. Natural Language Semantics 13: 201–270. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑004‑2442‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-004-2442-z [Google Scholar]
  99. Higgins, Francis
    . 1979. The Pseudocleft Construction in English . New York NY: Garland
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Hoekstra, Eric
    . 1993. Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation. In Dialektsyntax, special issue of Linguistische Berichte 5, WernerAbraham & JosephBayer (eds), 161–179. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Horrocks, Geoffrey & Stavrou, Melita
    . 1986. Mia proti prosengisi ke erminia ton epithetikonprosdiorismon sta Nea Ellinika (A first approach and interpretation of adjectival modification in Modern Greek). In Studies in Greek Linguistics. Proceedings of the the 7th annual meeting of the Department of Linguistics , 109–116. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. . 1987. Bounding theory and Greek syntax: Evidence from wh-movement in NP. Journal of Linguistics 23: 79–108. doi: 10.1017/S002222670001104X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670001104X [Google Scholar]
  103. Ihsane, Tabea & Puskas, Genoveva
    . 2001. Specific is not definite. Generative Grammar in Geneva 2: 39–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Ioannidou, Alexandra & den Dikken, Marcel
    . 2009. P-drop, D-drop, D-spread. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57: 393–408.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S
    . (eds). 1968. Readings in English Transformational Grammar . Waltham MA: Ginn.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Julien, Marit
    . 2005. Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.87
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.87 [Google Scholar]
  107. Kabatek, Johannes & Wall, Albert
    (eds). 2013. New Perspectives in Bare Nouns in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series 141]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.141
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.141 [Google Scholar]
  108. Kallulli, Dalina & Rothmayr, Antonia
    . 2008. The syntax and semantics of indefinite determiner doubling constructions in varieties of German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11(2): 95–136. doi: 10.1007/s10828‑008‑9019‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-008-9019-z [Google Scholar]
  109. Karanassios, Georgios
    . 1992. Syntaxe comparée du group nominal en grec moderne et dans d'autres langues. Doctorat d'Etat, Paris VIII-Vincennes.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Kariaeva, Natalia
    . 2004. Agreement and locality. Ms, Rutgers University.
  111. Katz, Jonah
    . 2008. Romance and restriction. Generals paper, MIT.
  112. Katzir, Roni
    . 2011. Morphosemantic mismatches, structural economy, and licensing. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 45–82. doi: 10.1162/LING_a_00028
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00028 [Google Scholar]
  113. Kayne, Richard
    . 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. . 2004. Some preliminary comparative remarks on French and Italian definite articles. Published in Richard S. Kayne. 2009. Comparisons and Contrast . Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Kolliakou, Dimitra
    . 1999. Non-monotonous anaphora and the syntax of polydefiniteness. In Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics , 121–145. The Hague: Thesus.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. . 2004. Monadic definites and polydefinites: Their form meaning and use. Journal of Linguistics 40: 263–333. doi: 10.1017/S0022226704002531
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002531 [Google Scholar]
  117. Krámsky, Jiri
    . 1972. The Article and the Concept of Definiteness in Language . The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Krifka, Manfred
    . 1989. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen: Studien zur Theoretischen Linguistik . Mu?nchen: Wilhelm Fink.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Kyriakaki, Maria
    . 2011. DETs in the Functional Syntax of Greek Nominals. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
  120. Laca, Brenda & Tasmovski, Lialiane
    . 1994. Le pluriel indéfini de l’attribut métaphorique. Linguisticae Investigationes XVIII(1): 27–48. doi: 10.1075/li.18.1.03lac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/li.18.1.03lac [Google Scholar]
  121. Laenzlinger, Christopher
    . 2005. Some notes on DP-internal movement. Generative Grammar in Geneva 4: 227–260.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Landman, Meredith
    . 2006. Variables in Natural Language. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  123. Larson, Richard
    . 1999. Semantics of adjectival modification. Lectures presented at the LOT Winter School. Amsterdam: LOT<http://semlab5.sbs.sunysb.edu/_rlarson/>
  124. . 2001. Temporal modification in nominals. Paper presented at theInternational Roundtable on the Syntax of Tense and Aspect, Paris, France. <http://semlab5.sbs.sunysb.edu/_rlarson/>
     [Google Scholar]
  125. . In press. On Shell Structure . London: Routledge. doi: 10.1016/0375‑9474(76)90042‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(76)90042-7 [Google Scholar]
  126. Larson, Richard & Maruši?, Franc
    . 2004. Indefinite pronoun structures with APs. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 268–287. doi: 10.1162/002438904323019075
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438904323019075 [Google Scholar]
  127. Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, Dimitra
    . 2009. On Definiteness and the Co-occurrence of the Definite Article with other Quantifiers in Modern Greek. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  128. . 2012. The universal distributive quantifier kathe with the definite article (in Greek). Studies in Greek Linguistics 32: 235–246.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Lekakou, Marika & Szendr?i, Krista
    . 2007. Eliding the noun in close appostion, or Greek polydefinites revisited. UCL Working papers 19: 129–154.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. . 2012. Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners. Journal of Linguistics 48: 107–149. doi: 10.1017/S0022226711000326
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000326 [Google Scholar]
  131. Leu, Thomas
    . 2008. The Internal Syntax of Determiners. PhD dissertation, New York University.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Lindauer, Thomas
    . 1991. Der doppelte Artikel im Sweizerdeutschen. MS, NW Fachhoschule Nordwestschweiz.
  133. Lohrmann, Susanne
    . 2010. The Structure of the DP and its Reflex in Scandinavian. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
  134. Longobardi, Guiseppe
    . 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4): 609–665.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Lyons, Chris
    . 1999. Definiteness . Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  136. Manolessou, Io
    . 2000. Greek Noun Phrase Structure: A Study in Syntactic Evolution. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  137. Marchis, Mihalea & Alexiadou, Artemis
    . 2009. On the distribution of adjectives in Romanian: The cel construction. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1], EnochAboh, Elisabethvan der Linden, JosepQuer & PetraSleeman (eds), 161–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  138. . 2013. The syntax of clitics revisited: two types of clitics. Lingua 127: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  139. Marinis, Theo & Panagiotidis, Phoevos
    . 2011. Determiner spreading as referential predication. Studia Linguistica 65: 268–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2011.01186.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2011.01186.x [Google Scholar]
  140. Maruši?, Franc & Žaucer, Rok
    . 2010. A definite article in the AP: Evidence from colloquial Slovenian. Ms, University of Nova Gorica.
  141. Matthewson, Lisa
    . 2001. Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics 9: 145–189. doi: 10.1023/A:1012492911285
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012492911285 [Google Scholar]
  142. Matushanksy, Ora
    . 2006. Why rose is the rose. In Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 6, OlivierBonami and Patricia CabredoHofherr , (eds), 285–308. <http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss6/index_en.html>
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Matushansky, Ora
    . 2008. On the attributive nature of superlatives. Syntax 11: 26–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2008.00101.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00101.x [Google Scholar]
  144. de Mulder, Walter & Carlier, Anne
    . 2011. The grammaticalization of definite articles. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization , HeineBernd & HeikoNarrog (eds), Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Munn, Alan & Schmitt, Cristina
    . 2001. Bare nominals and the norpho-syntax of number. In Current Issues in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the XXIXth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 220], DianaCresti, TerseaSatterfield & ChristinaTortora (eds), 217–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Munn, Alan & Schmitt, Cristian
    . 2005. Number and indefinites. Lingua 115: 821–855. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  147. Ntelitheos, Dimitrios
    . 2004. Syntax of Elliptical and Discontinuous Nominals. MA thesis, UCLA.
  148. Panagiotidis, Phoevos
    . 2000. Demonstative determiners and operators: The case of Greek. Lingua 110: 717–742. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(00)00014‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00014-0 [Google Scholar]
  149. Partee, Barbara
    . 1973. Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 509–534. doi: 10.1007/BF00262953
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262953 [Google Scholar]
  150. . 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 203–300.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Paul, Waltraud
    . 2012. The insubordinate subordinator de in Mandarin Chinese: Second take. Ms, CNRS.
  152. Penner, Zvi & Schönenberger, Manuela
    . 1995. The distribution of nominal agreement featuers in Swiss German dialects and the strong DP/CP parallelism Hypothesis. In Topics in Swiss Geman Syntax , ZviPenner (ed.), 331–346. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Pereltsvaig, Asya
    . 2006. Head movement in the Hebrew nominals: A reply to Shlonsky. Lingua 116: A1–A40. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  154. Plank, Frans
    . 2003. Double articulation. In Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe , FransPlank (ed.), 337–395. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Potts, Christopher
    . 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures . Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Pysz, Agnieszka
    . 2006. The structural location of adnominal adjectives: Prospects of Old English. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 3: 59–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Ralli, Angela
    . 2013. Compounding in Modern Greek . Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑4960‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4960-3 [Google Scholar]
  158. Ramat, Anna
    . 2008. Areal convergence in grammaticalization processes. In Rethinking Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 76], Maria-JoseLópez-Couso & ElenaSeonane (eds), 129–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Ritter, Elizabeth
    . 1991. The functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and Semantics 26, SusanRothstein (ed.), 37–62. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Rizzi, Luigi
    . 1997. On the fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar , LilianeHaegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  161. Roehrs, Dorian
    . 2009. Demonstratives and Definite Articles as Nominal Auxiliaries [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 140]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.140
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.140 [Google Scholar]
  162. Roodenburg, Jasper
    . 2004. Pour une approche scalaire de la déficience nominale: La position du français dans une théorie des 'noms nus'. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
  163. Rousou, Anna & Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria
    1995. On the interaction of case and definiteness in Modern Greek. In Themes in Greek Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 117], IrenePhilippaki-Warburton, KaterinaNicolaidis & MariaSifianou (eds), 69–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Roy, Isabelle
    . 2006. Non Verbal Predications: a Syntactic Analysis of Copular Sentences. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
  165. Santelmann, Lyn
    . 1993. The distribution of double determiners in Swedish: Den support in D°. Studia Linguistica 42: 154–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1993.tb00844.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1993.tb00844.x [Google Scholar]
  166. Schoorlemmer, Eric
    . 2009. Agreement, Dominance and Doubling. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
  167. Schueler, David
    . 2004. Presuppositional predicates and sentential subject extraposition. Proceedings of WCCFL 23: 101–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Selkirk, Elizabeth
    . 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Formal Syntax , PeterCulicover, ThomasWasow & AdrianAkmajian (eds), 285–316. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Shlonsky, Ur
    . 2004. The form of Semitic noun phrases. Lingua 114: 1465–1526. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.019
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  170. . 2006. Rejoinder to Pereltsvaig’s head movement in Hebrew nominals: a reply to Shlonsky. Lingua 116: 1195–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.02.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  171. Sichel, Ivy
    . 2002. Phrasal movement in Hebrew adjectives and possessives. In Dimensions of movement: From Features to Remants [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 48], ArtemisAlexiadou, ElenaAnagnostopoulou, SjefBarbiers & Hans-MartinGärtner (eds), 297–339. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Siddiqi, Daniel
    . 2006. Minimize Exponence: Economy Effects of a Model of the Morphosyntactic Component of Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
  173. Siloni, Tal
    . 1997. Noun Phrases and Nominalizations . Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8863‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8863-8 [Google Scholar]
  174. . 2002. Adjectival constructs and inalienable constructions. In Themes and Issues in the Syntax of Arabic and Hebrew , JamalOuhalla & UrShlonsky (eds), 161–18. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0351‑3_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0351-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  175. Simpson, Andrew
    . 2001. Definiteness agreement and the Chinese DP. Language and Linguistics 2: 125–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Sio, Joanna
    Ut-seong. 2006. Modification and Reference in the Chinese Nominal. PhD dissertation, LeidenUniversity .
  177. Sioupi, Athina
    . 2001. On the semantic nature of bare singular NPs in Greek. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Greek Linguistics , Sorbonne, Paris, 13–15 September, Vol. ΙΙ231–234.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Sportiche, Dominique
    . 1998. Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure . New York NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Sproat, Richard & Shih, Chilin
    . 1988. Prenominal adjectival ordering in English and Mandarin. Proceeding of NELS 12: 465–489.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. Stark, Elizabeth, Leiss, Elizabeth & Abraham, Werner
    (eds). 2007. Nominal Determination: Typology, Context Contraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.89
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.89 [Google Scholar]
  181. Stavrou, Melita
    . 1995. Epexegesis vs. apposition. Scientific Yearbook of the Classics Dept . Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. . 1996. Adjectives in Modern Greek: An instance of predication or an old issue revisited. Journal of Linguistics 32: 79–112. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700000773
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700000773 [Google Scholar]
  183. Stavrou, Melita & Terzi, Arhonto
    . 2008. Types of numerical nouns. Proceedings of WCCFL 26: 429–437.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Stockwell, Robert, Schacter, Paul & Partee, Barbara
    (eds). 1973. The Major Syntactic Structures of English . New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. de Swart, Henriette, Winter, Yoad & Zwarts, Joost
    . 2007. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 195–222. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑006‑9007‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9007-4 [Google Scholar]
  186. Tat, Deniz
    . 2011. APs as reduced relatives: The case of bir in (some) varieties of Turkic. MIT Working papers 62.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. Tredinnick, Victoria
    . 1992. Movement in the Modern Greek noun phrase. Penn Review of Lingistics 17: 194–207.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. Trips, Carola
    . 2012. The position proper of the adjective in Middle English: A result of language contact?Ms, University of Mannheim.
  189. Trommer, Jochen
    . 2002. The post-syntactic morphology of the Albanian preposed article: Evidence for distributed morphology. Balkanistica 15: 349–363.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Troseth, Erika
    . 2009. Degree inversion and negative intensifier inversion in the English DP. The Linguistic Review 26: 37–65. doi: 10.1515/tlir.2009.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2009.002 [Google Scholar]
  191. Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria & Stavrakaki, Stavroula
    . 1999. The effects of a morpho-syntactic deficit in the determiner system: The case of a Greek SLI child. Lingua 108: 31–85. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(98)00041‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00041-2 [Google Scholar]
  192. Tsakali, Vina
    . 2008. Similarities in the interpretation of doubling constuctions. Paper presented at the2008 Meeting of the Department of Linguistics of the University of Thessaloniki.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. Turano, Giuseppina
    . 2002. On modifiers preceded by the article in Albanian DPs. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 169–215.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Vangsnes, Oystein
    . 1999. The Identification of Functional Architecture. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.
  195. . 2007. On the morpho-syntax of Scandinavian adjectives. Paper presented at the Universität Stuttgart.
  196. Velegrakis, Nikolaos
    . 2011. The Syntax of Greek Polydefinites. PhD dissertation, University College London.
  197. Villalba, Xavier
    . 2007. True and spurious articles in Germanic and Romance. Cuadernos de Liguistica derl I.U.I. Ortega y Gasset 14: 121–134.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Vos, Hinderika Margaretha
    . 1999. A Grammar of Partitive Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Tilburg.
  199. de Vries, Mark
    . 2002. The Syntax of Relativization. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
  200. Vulchanova, Mila & Giusti, Guiliana
    . 1998. Fragments of Balkan nominal structure. In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the DP [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 22], ArtemisAlexiadou & ChrisWilder (eds), 333–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. Woisetschlaeger, Erich
    . 1983. On the question of definiteness in an old man’s book. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 137–154.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. Wood, Johanna
    . 2002. Much about such. Studia Linguistica 59: 91–115. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9582.00088
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00088 [Google Scholar]
  203. Wood, Johanna & Vikner, Sten
    . 2011. Noun phrase structure and movement. In The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, Variation and Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 171], PetraSleeman & HarryPerridon (eds), 89–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  204. Wood, Johanna
    . & Vikner, Sten . 2013. What's to the left of the indefinite article? -Et sådan et spørgsmål er svært at svare på. In Gode ord er bedre end guld. Festskrift til Henrik Jørgensen , SimonBorchmann, IngerSchoonderbeek Hansen, TinaThode Hougaard, OleTogeby & PeterWidell (eds), 515–540. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. Zamparelli, Roberto
    . 1993. Layers in the Determiner Phrase. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
  206. . 2000. Definite and bare kind-denoting noun phrases. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000: Selected Papers from Going Romance 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 232], ClaireBeyssade, ReinekeBok-Bennema, FrankDrijkoningen & PaolaMonachesi (eds), 305–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027270696
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027270696
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027270696
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027270696
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error