1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Personalisation in Mass Media Communication

Personalisation in Mass Media Communication

British online news between public and private

image of Personalisation in Mass Media Communication
GBP
Buy:£80.00 + Taxes

It seems to be a truism that today’s news media present the news in a more personal and direct way than print newspapers some twenty-five years ago. However, it is far from obvious, how this can be described linguistically. This study develops a model that integrates and differentiates between the various facets of personalisation from a linguistic point of view. It includes 1) contexts that involve the audience by inviting direct interaction and through the use of visual elements; 2) the focus on private individuals who are personally affected by news events; and 3) the use of communicative immediacy, for instance in the form of direct speech and first and second person pronouns. This model is applied to data from five British online news sites, demonstrating how individual features contribute to personalisation, how different features interact, and what personalisation strategies are used by news sites of different market orientations.

References

  1. Abrams, M. H., and StephenGreenblatt
    (eds). 2000. The Norton Anthology of English Literature . 7th ed. Vol. 2. New York / London: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ágel, Vilmos, and MathildeHennig
    . 2006a. “Praxis des Nähe- und Distanzsprechens”. In Grammatik aus Nähe und Distanz. Theorie und Praxis am Beispiel von Nähetexten 1650–2000 , ed. by VilmosÁgel and MathildeHennig , 33–74. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110944709
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110944709 [Google Scholar]
  3. . 2006b. “Theorie des Nähe- und Distanzsprechens”. In Grammatik aus Nähe und Distanz. Theorie und Praxis am Beispiel von Nähetexten 1650–2000 , ed. by VilmosÁgel and MathildeHennig , 3–31. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110944709
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110944709 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aijmer, Karin
    . 1997. “‘I think’ – an English Modal Particle”. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives , ed. by TorilSwan and OlafJansen Westvik , 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110889932.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allan, Stuart, and EinarThorsen
    . 2011. “Journalism, Public Service and BBC News Online”. In News Online: Transformations and Continuities , ed. by GrahamMeikle and GuyRedden , 20–37. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Alonso Belmonte, Isabel
    . 2009. “Positioning the Reader: A Study on the Use of Interactive Textual Patterns in English Written Newspaper Editorials and Articles of Opinion”. English Text Construction 2 (1): 48–69. doi: 10.1075/etc.2.1.03alo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.2.1.03alo [Google Scholar]
  7. Altman, Douglas G.
    1991. Practical Statistics for Medical Research . London: Chapman & Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Armstrong, Cameron B., and Alan M.Rubin
    . 1989. “Talk Radio as Interpersonal Communication”. Journal of Communication 39 (2): 84–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1989.tb01031.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01031.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Baldry, Anthony P.
    2007. “The Role of Multimodal Concordancers in Multimodal Corpus Linguistics”. In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse , ed. by Terry D. Royce and Wendy L.Bowcher 173–193. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Baldry, Anthony, and Paul J.Thibault
    . 2006. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook with Associated On-line Course . London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bateman, John A.
    2008. Multimodality and Genre. A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bateman, John, JudyDelin, and RenateHenschel
    . 2007. “Mapping the Multimodal Genres of Traditional and Electronic Newspapers”. In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse , ed. by Terry D.Royce and Wendy L.Bowcher 147–172. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Baumgarten, Nicole, and JulianeHouse
    . 2010. “‘I think’ and ‘I don’t know’ in English as Lingua Franca and Native English Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (5): 1184–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.018 [Google Scholar]
  14. Baynham, Mike
    . 1996. “Direct Speech: What’s It Doing in Non-narrative Discourse?” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (1): 61–81. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00074‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00074-3 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bednarek, Monika, and HelenCaple
    . 2012. News Discourse . Continuum Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Beißwenger, Michael
    . 2000. Kommunikation in virtuellen Welten: Sprache, Text und Wirklichkeit. Eine Untersuchung zur Konzeptionalität von Kommunikationsvollzügen und zur textuellen Konstruktion von Welt in synchroner Internet-Kommunikation, exemplifiziert am Beispiel eines Webchats . Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2010. “Chattern unter die Finger geschaut: Formulieren und Revidieren bei der schriftlichen Verbalisierung in synchroner internetbasierter Kommunikation”. In Nähe und Distanz im Kontext variationslinguistischer Forschung , ed. by VilmosÁgel and MathildeHennig , 247–294. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110220872.247
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220872.247 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bell, Allan
    . 1991. The Language of News Media . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bell, Philip
    . 2001. “Content Analysis of Visual Images”. In Handbook of Visual Analysis , ed. by Theo vanLeeuwen and CareyJewitt , 10–34. London: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Benn, Stanley I., and Gerald F.Gaus
    . 1983. “The Public and the Private: Concepts and Action”. In Public and Private in Social Life , ed. by Stanley I.Benn and Gerald F.Gaus 3–27. London: Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Biber, Douglas
    . 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  22. . 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation. A Cross-Linguistic Comparison . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  23. Biber, Douglas, StigJohansson, GeoffreyLeech, SusanConrad, and EdwardFinegan.
    1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Bierig, Jeffrey, and JohnDimmick
    . 1979. “The Late Night Radio Talk Show as Interpersonal Communication”. Journalism Quarterly 56: 92–96. doi: 10.1177/107769907905600114
     https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907905600114 [Google Scholar]
  25. Bingham, Adrian
    . 2009. Family Newspapers? Sex, Private Life and the British Popular Press 1918–1978 . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Bird, Elizabeth S.
    2009. “Tabloidization: What Is It, and Does It Really Matter?” In The Changing Faces of Journalism. Tabloidization, Technology and Truthiness , ed. by BarbieZelizer , 40–50. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Blum, Joachim, and Hans-JürgenBucher
    . 1998. Die Zeitung: Ein Multimedium. Textdesign – Ein Gestaltungskonzept Für Text, Bild Und Grafik . Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Boczkowski, Pablo J.
    2004. Digitizing the News. Innovation in Online Newspapers . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Bös, Birte.
    2010a. “Dialogic Quotation Patterns in Historical News Reports”. In The Language of Public and Private Communication in a Historical Perspective , ed. by NicholasBrownlees, Gabriella DelLungo, and JohnDenton , 228–244. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 2010b. “People’s voices. Eine diachrone Betrachtung persönlicher Zitate in der britischen Presse”. In MedienTextKultur. Linguistische Beiträge zur kontrastiven Medienanalyse. , ed. by MartinLuginbühl and StefanHauser , 67–93. Beiträge zur Fremdsprachenvermittlung, Sonderheft 16. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Boyce, Tammy
    . 2006. “Journalism and Expertise”. Journalism Studies 7 (6): 889–906. doi: 10.1080/14616700600980652
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600980652 [Google Scholar]
  32. Bredel, Ursula
    . 2002. “‘You can say ‘you’ to yourself’. Establishing Perspectives with Personal Pronouns”. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse , ed. by Carl F.Graumann and WernerKallmeyer , 167–180. Human Cognitive Processing 9. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Brendel, Elke, JörgMeibauer, and MarkusSteinbach.
    2011a. “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation”. In Understanding Quotation , ed. by ElkeBrendel, JörgMeibauer, and MarkusSteinbach , 1–33. Mouton Series in Pragmatics 7. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110240085.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240085.1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Brendel, Elke, JörgMeibauer, and MarkusSteinbach
    (eds). 2011b. Understanding Quotation . Mouton Series in Pragmatics 7. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110240085
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240085 [Google Scholar]
  35. Brinker
    . 1988. “Thematische Muster und ihre Realisierung in Talkshowgesprächen”. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 16: 26–45. doi: 10.1515/zfgl.1988.16.1.26
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.1988.16.1.26 [Google Scholar]
  36. Brüngel-Dittrich, Melanie.
    2006. Speech Presentation in the British and German Press . Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Bublitz, Wolfram, and ChristianHoffmann.
    2011. “‘Three men using our toilet all day long without flushing – This may be one of the worst Sentences I’ve ever read’: Quoting in CMC”. In Anglistentag 2010 Saarbrücken. Proceedings , ed. by JoachimFrenk and LenaSteveker , 433–447. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Bucher, Hans-Jürgen.
    2007. “Textdesign und Multimodalität. Zur Semantik und Pragmatik medialer Gestaltungsformen”. In Textdesign und Textwirkung in der massenmedialen Kommunikation , ed. by KerstenSven Roth and JürgenSpitzmüller , 49–76. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2010. “Multimodalität – eine Universalie des Medienwandels: Problemstellungen und Theorien der Multimodalitätsforschung”. In Neue Medien – neue Formate: Ausdifferenzierung und Konvergenz in der Medienkommunikation , ed. by Hans-JürgenBucher, ThomasGloning, and KatrinLehnen , 41–79. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 2011. “Multimodales Verstehen oder Rezeption als Interaktion. Theoretische und empirische Grundlagen einer systematischen Analyse der Multimodalität”. In Bildlinguistik. Theorien – Methoden – Fallbeispiele , ed. by HajoDiekmannshenke, MichaelKlemm, and HartmutStöckl , 123–156. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Burger, Harald
    . 1989. “Diskussion ohne Ritual oder: der domestizierte Rezipient”. In Redeshows. Fernsehdiskussionen in der Diskussion , ed. by WernerHolly, PeterKühn, and UlrichPüschel , 116–141. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. . 1991. Das Gespräch in den Massenmedien . Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110856095
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856095 [Google Scholar]
  43. . 2005. Mediensprache eine Einführung in Sprache und Kommunikationsformen der Massenmedien . 3rd ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110899788
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899788 [Google Scholar]
  44. Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa.
    1994. “On Reporting Reporting: The Representation of Speech in Factual and Factional Narratives”. In Advances in Written Text Analysis , ed. by MalcolmCoulthard , 295–308. London/New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203422656
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422656 [Google Scholar]
  45. Calsamiglia, Helena, and CarmenLópez Ferrero.
    2003. “Role and Position of Scientific Voices: Reported Speech in the Media”. Discourse Studies 5 (2): 147–173. doi: 10.1177/1461445603005002308
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005002308 [Google Scholar]
  46. Cappelen, Herman, and ErnieLepore.
    1997. “Varieties of Quotation”. Mind 106 (423): 429–450. doi: 10.1093/mind/106.423.429
     https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/106.423.429 [Google Scholar]
  47. Catenaccio, Paola, ColleenCotter, Mark DeSmedt, GuilianaGarzone, GeertJacobs, FelicitasMacgilchrist, LutgardLams
    , et al. 2011. “Towards a Linguistics of News Production”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (7): 1843–1852. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.022
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.022 [Google Scholar]
  48. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1982. “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature”. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy , ed. by DeborahTannen , 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Chicago Manual of Style. 2010. 16th ed. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Chovanec, Jan
    . 2000. “Interpersonal Aspects of Printed News Discourse”. Doctoral Dissertation, Masaryk University, Faculty of Arts, Department of English and American Studies.
  51. Chung, Deborah Soun.
    2007. “Profits and Perils: Online News Producers’ Perceptions of Interactivity and Uses of Interactive Features”. Convergence 13 (1) (February1): 43–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Claridge, Claudia
    . 2003. ‘Life Is Ruled and Governed by Opinion’: The Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Tracts. Manual of Information . 2nd ed. http://khnt.aksis.uib.no/icame/manuals/LAMPETER/LC-manual.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. . 2007. “Constructing a Corpus from the Web: Message Boards”. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web , ed. by MarianneHundt, NadjaNesselhauf, and CarolinBiewer , 87–108. Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, 59. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. . 2010. “News Discourse”. In Historical Pragmatics , e. by Andreas H.Jucker and IrmaTaavitsainen , 587–620. Handbooks of Pragmatics 8. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Clark, Herbert H., and RichardJ. Gerrig.
    1990. “Quotations as Demonstrations”. Language 66 (4): 764–805. doi: 10.2307/414729
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
  56. Cohen, Stanley, and JockYoung
    , ed. 1973. The Manufacture of News. Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media . London: Constable.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Collins, Daniel E.
    2001. Reanimated Voices. Speech Reporting in a Historical-Pragmatic Perspective . Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 85. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.85
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.85 [Google Scholar]
  58. Conboy, Martin
    . 2003. “Parochializing the Global. Language and the British Tabloid Press”. In New Media Language , ed. by JeanAitchison and Diana M.Lewis , 45–54. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. . 2006. Tabloid Britain: Constructing a Community Through Language . London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Cotter, Colleen
    . 2010. News Talk. Investigating the Language of Journalism . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511811975
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811975 [Google Scholar]
  61. Coulmas, Florian
    . 1986. “Reported Speech: Some General Issues”. In Direct and Indirect Speech , ed. by FlorianCoulmas , 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110871968.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.1 [Google Scholar]
  62. Crisell, Andrew
    . 1986. Understanding Radio . London/New York: Methuen. doi: 10.4324/9780203300343
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300343 [Google Scholar]
  63. Crittenden, John
    . 1971. “Democratic Functions of the Open Mike Radio Forum”. The Public Opinion Quarterly 35 (2): 200–210. doi: 10.1086/267891
     https://doi.org/10.1086/267891 [Google Scholar]
  64. Crystal, David
    . 2006. Language and the Internet . 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511487002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002 [Google Scholar]
  65. Czarniawska, Barbara
    . 2011. Cyberfactories. How News Agencies Produce News . Cheltenham / Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Derrida, Jacques
    . 1982. “Sending: On Representation”. Translated by PeterCaws and MaryAnn Caws . Social Research 49 (2): 294–326.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Diekmannshenke, Hajo, MichaelKlemm, and HartmutStöckl
    (eds). 2011. Bildlinguistik. Theorien – Methoden – Fallbeispiele . Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Donsbach, Wolfgang
    . 1991. Medienwirkung trotz Selektion. Einflussfaktoren auf die Zuwendung zu Zeitungsinhalten . Köln: Böhlau.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Dürscheid, Christa.
    2003. “Medienkommunikation Im Kontinuum von Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Theoretische und Empirische Probleme”. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 38: 37–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 2004. “Netzsprache – Ein Neuer Mythos”. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 68: 141–157.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 2005. “Medien, Kommunikationsformen, kommunikative Gattungen”. Linguistik online 22 (1). http://www.linguistik-online.de/22_05/duerscheid.html .
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 2007a. “Private, nicht-öffentliche und öffentliche Kommunikation im Internet’. Neue Beiträge zur Germanistik 6 (4): 22–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 2007b. “Schrift – Text – Bild: Ein Brückenschlag”. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35 (3): 269–282. doi: 10.1515/zgl.2007.021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl.2007.021 [Google Scholar]
  74. Enli, Gunn Sara.
    2008. “Redefining Public Service Broadcasting: Multi-Platform Participation”. Convergence 14 (1): 105–120.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Esser, Frank
    . 1999. “‘Tabloidization’ of News. A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism”. European Journal of Communication 14 (3): 291–324. doi: 10.1177/0267323199014003001
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323199014003001 [Google Scholar]
  76. Evert, Stefan
    . 2006. “How Random Is a Corpus? The Library Metaphor”. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und Amerikanistik 54 (2): 177–190.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Fairclough, Norman
    . 1988. “Discourse Representation in Media Discourse”. Sociolinguistics 17: 125–139.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. . 1992. Discourse and Social Change . Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. . 1995. Media Discourse . London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. . 2001. Language and Power . 2nd ed. Language in Social Life. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Ferrarotti, Laura
    . 2009. “The News Presenter and the Television Audience: a Comparative Perspective of the Use of ‘we’ and ‘you’”. In Evaluation and Stance in War News: A Linguistic Analysis of American, British and Italian Television News Reporting of the 2003 Iraqi War , ed. by LouannHaarman and LindaLombardo , 72–96. London/New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Fetzer, Anita, and MarjutJohansson.
    2010. “Cognitive Verbs in Context. A Contrastive Analysis of English and French Argumentative Discourse”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15 (2): 240–266. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.15.2.05fet
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.2.05fet [Google Scholar]
  83. Floyd, Alan
    . 2000. “The Reporting Verbs and Bias in the Press”. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 13: 43–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Forceville, Charles
    . 1999. “Educating the Eye? Kress and van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)”. Language and Literature 8 (2): 163–178. doi: 10.1177/096394709900800204
     https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800204 [Google Scholar]
  85. Fowler, Roger
    . 1991. Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press . London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Franklin, Bob, MartinHamer, MarkHanna, MarieKinsey, and JohnE. Richardson.
    2005. Key Concepts in Jouralism Studies . London: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Frehner, Carmen
    . 2008. Email – SMS – MMS. The Linguistic Creativity of Asynchronous Discourse in the New Media Age . Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication 58. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Fries, Udo
    . 2001. “Text Classes in Early English Newspapers”. European Journal of English Studies 5 (2): 167–180. doi: 10.1076/ejes.5.2.167.7310
     https://doi.org/10.1076/ejes.5.2.167.7310 [Google Scholar]
  89. Galtung, Johan, and MariRuge.
    1973. “Structuring and Selecting News”. In The Manufacture of News. Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media , ed. by StanleyCohen and JockYoung , 62–72. London: Constable.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Gans, Herbert J.
    1979. Deciding What’s News. A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time . New York: Pantheon Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Garaventa, Andreas
    . 1993. Showmaster, Gäste und Publikum. Über das Dialogische in Unterhaltungsshows . Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Garcia, Mario R., and PegieStark.
    1991. Eyes on the News . St. Petersburg, FL: The Poynter Institute for Media Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Garretson, Gregory, and AnnelieÄdel.
    2008. “Who’s Speaking? Evidentiality in US Newspapers During the 2004 Presidential Campaign”. In Corpora and Discourse. The Challenges of Different Settings , ed. by AnnelieÄdel and RandiReppen , 157–187. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Greger, Volker
    . 1998. “Privatisierung Politischer Berichterstattung im Fernsehen? Zur Veränderung der Akteursstruktur in Politischen Informationssendungen von 1986 bis 1994”. In Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen , ed. by KurtImhof and PeterSchulz , 251–282. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Gripsrud, Jostein
    . 1992. “The Aesthetics and Politics of Melodrama”. In Journalism and Popular Culture , ed. by PeterDahlgren and ColinSparks , 84–95. London: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. . 2000. “Tabloidization, Popular Journalism, and Democracy”. In Tabloid Tales. Global Debates over Media Standards , ed. by ColinSparks and JohnTulloch , 285–300. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Grösslinger, Christian, GudrunHeld, and HartmutStöckl
    (eds). 2012. Pressetextsorten jenseits der ‘News’. Medienlinguistische Perspektiven auf journalistische Kreativität . Sprache im Kontext 38. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Gruber, Helmut
    . 2008. “Specific Genre Features of New Mass Media”. In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere , ed. by RuthWodak and VeronikaKoller , 363–382. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Gutzmann, Daniel, and ErikStei.
    2011. “How Quotation Marks What People Do with Words”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 1650–2663. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  100. Habscheid, Stephan
    . 2005. “Das Internet - ein Massenmedium?” In Websprache.net. Sprache und Kommunikation im Internet , ed. by TorstenSiever, PeterSchlobinski, and JensRunkehl , 46–66. Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 10. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Hall, Stuart
    . 1973. “The Determinations of News Photographs”. In The Manufacture of News. Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media , ed. by StanleyCohen and JockYoung , 176–190. London: Constable.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Hampton, Mark
    . 2008. “The ‘objectivity’ Ideal and Its Limitations in 20th-century British Journalism”. Journalism Studies 9 (4): 477–493. doi: 10.1080/14616700802113060
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802113060 [Google Scholar]
  103. Harcup, Tony, and DeirdreO’Neill.
    2001. “What Is News? Galtung and Ruge Revisited”. Journalism Studies 2 (2): 261–280. doi: 10.1080/14616700118449
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700118449 [Google Scholar]
  104. Heller, Mária.
    2006. “New ICTs and the Problem of ‘Publicness’”. European Journal of Communication 21 (3): 311–329. doi: 10.1177/0267323106066635
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106066635 [Google Scholar]
  105. Hennig, Mathilde
    . 2010. “Mündliche Fachkommunikation zwischen Nähe und Distanz”. In Nähe und Distanz im Kontext variationslinguistischer Forschung , ed. by VilmosÁgel and MathildeHennig , 295–324. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110220872.295
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220872.295 [Google Scholar]
  106. Hermida, Alfred, and NeilThurman.
    2008. “A Clash of Cultures. The Integration of User-generated Content Within Professional Journalistic Frameworks at British Newspaper Websites”. Journalism Practice 2 (3): 343–356. doi: 10.1080/17512780802054538
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802054538 [Google Scholar]
  107. Herring, Susan C.
    2003. “Media and Language Change: Introduction”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 4 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.1075/jhp.4.1.02her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.4.1.02her [Google Scholar]
  108. 2007. “A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse”. Language@Internet 4. http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Hodge, Bob
    . 1979. “Newspapers and Communities”. In Language and Control , ed. by RogerFowler, BobHodge, GuntherKress, and TonyTrew , 157–174. London / Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Holly, Werner
    . 1997. “Zur Rolle von Sprache in Medien. Semiotische und kommunikationsstrukturelle Grundlagen”. Muttersprache 97 (1): 64–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. . 2008. “Tabloidisation of Political Communication in the Public Sphere”. In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere , ed. by RuthWodak and VeronikaKoller , 317–344. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Hundt, Marianne, and ChristianMair.
    1999. “‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4 (2): 221–242. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
  113. Ikeo, Reiko
    . 2009. “An Elaboration of the Faithfulness Claims in Direct Writing”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 999–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  114. Imhof, Kurt, and PeterSchulz
    (eds). 1998a. Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen . Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Imhof, Kurt, and PeterSchulz.
    1998b. “Einleitung: Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen”. In Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen , ed. by KurtImhof and PeterSchulz , 9–14. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Janoschka, Anja
    . 2004. Web Advertising. New Forms of Communication on the Internet . Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.131
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.131 [Google Scholar]
  117. Jewitt, Carey
    (ed.) 2009. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis . London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Jewitt, Carey, and RumikoOyama.
    2001. “Visual Meaning: a Social Semiotic Approach”. In Handbook of Visual Analysis , ed. by Theovan Leeuwen and CareyJewitt , 134–156. London: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Jucker, Andreas H.
    1992. Social Stylistics. Syntactic Variation in British Newspapers . Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110851151
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851151 [Google Scholar]
  120. 1996. “News Actor Labelling in British Newspapers”. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 16 (3): 373–390. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1996.16.3.373
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1996.16.3.373 [Google Scholar]
  121. 2000. “Adressatenbezug und Formen der interaktiven Kommunikation in den Massenmedien”. In Raum, Zeit, Medium – Sprache und ihre Determinanten. Festschrift für Hans Ramge zum 60. Geburtstag , ed. by GerdRichter, JörgRiecke, and Britt-MarieSchuster , 637–660. London / Boston: Hessische Historische Kommission.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 2003. “Mass Media Communication at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century. Dimensions of Change”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 4 (1): 129–148. doi: 10.1075/jhp.4.1.07juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.4.1.07juc [Google Scholar]
  123. 2006. “‘but ‘tis believed that...’: Speech and Thought Presentation in Early English Newspapers”. In News Discourse in Early Modern Britain. Selected Papers of CHINED 2004 , ed. by NicholasBrownlees , 105–125. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 2010. “‘Audacious, Brilliant!! What a Strike!’: Live Text Commentaries on the Internet as Real-time Narratives”. In Narrative Revisited. Telling a Story in the Age of New Media , ed. by Christian R.Hoffmann , 57–77. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 199. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 2011. “Mass Media”. In Pragmatics in Practice , ed. by Jan-OlaÖstman , 248–263. Handbooks of Pragmatics Highlights 9. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Jucker, Andreas H., and ChristaDürscheid.
    2012. “The Linguistics of Keyboard-to-screen Communication. A New Terminological Framework”. Linguistik Online 56: 35–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Kappas, Arvid, and MarionG. Müller.
    2006. “Bild und Emotion – ein neues Forschungsfeld”. Publizistik 51 (1): 3–23. doi: 10.1007/s11616‑006‑0002‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-006-0002-x [Google Scholar]
  128. Kärkkäinen, Elise.
    2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on ‘I think’ . Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 115. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.115
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115 [Google Scholar]
  129. Karlsson, Michael, and JesperStrömbäck.
    2010. “Freezing the Flow of Online News. Exploring Approaches to the Study of the Liquidity of Online News”. Journalism Studies 11 (1): 2–19. doi: 10.1080/14616700903119784
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700903119784 [Google Scholar]
  130. Katriel, Tamar, and MarceloDascal.
    1989. “Speaker’s Commitment and Involvement in Discourse”. In From Sign to Text. A Semiotic View of Communication , ed. by YishaiTobin , 275–295. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Keppler, Angela
    . 1998. “Das Private ist Politisch. Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Eine Ambivalente Medienstrategie”. In Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen , ed. by KurtImhof and PeterSchulz , 157–164. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Kitagawa, Chisato, and AdrienneLehrer.
    1990. “Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns”. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (5): 739–759. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90004‑W
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-W [Google Scholar]
  133. Knieper, Thomas
    . 2006. “Die Flut im Wohnzimmer. Die Tsunami-Berichterstattung als traumatischer Stressor für die bundesdeutsche Bevölkerung”. Publizistik 51 (1): 52–66. doi: 10.1007/s11616‑006‑0005‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-006-0005-7 [Google Scholar]
  134. Koch, Peter
    . 1999. “Court Records and Cartoons. Reflections of Spontaneous Dialogue in Early Romance Texts”. In Historical Dialogue Analysis , ed. by Andreas H.Jucker, GerdFritz, and FranzLebsanft , 399–429. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Koch, Peter, and WulfOesterreicher.
    1985. “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 2011. Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch . 2nd ed. Romanistische Arbeitshefte 31. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110252620
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252620 [Google Scholar]
  137. Kress, Gunther
    . 1986. “Language in the Media: The Construction of the Domains of Public and Private”. Media, Culture & Society 8: 395–419. doi: 10.1177/0163443786008004003
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004003 [Google Scholar]
  138. . 2010. Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication . London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Kress, Gunther R., and Theo vanLeeuwen.
    1996. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design . London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 2001. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication . London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Laberge, Suzanne, and GillianSankoff.
    1979. “Anything ‘you’ Can Do”. Syntax and Semantics 12: 419–440.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Lakoff, Robin Tolmach.
    1982. “Some of My Favorite Writers Are Literate: The Mingling of Oral and Literate Strategies in Written Communication”. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy , ed. by DeborahTannen , 239–260. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Landert, Daniela, and AndreasH. Jucker.
    2011. “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5): 1422–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  144. Landis, Richard J., and GaryG. Koch.
    1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data”. Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  145. Langer, John
    . 1998. Tabloid Television: Popular Journalism and the “Other News” . London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Langlotz, Andreas, and MiriamA. Locher.
    2012. “Ways of Communicating Emotional Stance in Online Disagreements”. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1591–1606. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  147. Langton, Loup
    . 2009. Photojournalism and Today’s News. Creating Visual Reality . Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Lauerbach, Gerda
    . 2010. “Manoeuvring Between the Politica, the Personal and the Private: Talk, Image and Rythm in TV Dialogue”. Discourse & Communication 4 (2): 125–159. doi: 10.1177/1750481310363980
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310363980 [Google Scholar]
  149. Leech, Geoffrey N., and MichaelH. Short.
    1981. Style in Fiction. A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose . English Language Series 13. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Lehmann, Hans Martin, Caren auf dem Keller, and BeniRuef.
    2006. “ZEN Corpus 1.0”. In Corpus-based Studies of Diachronic English , ed. by RobertaFacchinetti and MattiRissanen , 135–155. Linguistic Insights 31. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Leitner, Gerhard
    . 1983. Gesprächsanalyse und Rundfunkkommunikation. Die Struktur englischer phone-ins . Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Linke, Angelika
    . 1985. Gespräche im Fernsehen. Eine diskursanalytische Untersuchung . Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. . 2000. “Informalisierung? Ent-Distanzierung? Familiarisierung? Sprach(gebrauchs)wandel als Indikator soziokultureller Entwicklungen”. Der Deutschunterricht 300: 66–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Ljung, Magnus
    . 2000. “Newspaper Genres and Newspaper English”. In English Media Texts Past and Present , ed. by FriedrichUngerer , 131–149. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Locher, Michael A., and StantonE.F. Wortham.
    1994. “The Cast of the News”. Pragmatics 4 (4): 517–533.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
    . 2009. Television Discourse. Analysing Language in the Media . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Lüders, Marika.
    2008. “Conceptualizing Personal Media”. New Media & Society 10 (5): 683–702. doi: 10.1177/1461444808094352
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808094352 [Google Scholar]
  158. Luginbühl, Martin.
    2012. “‘I felt the glass windows of my parents’ apartment shaking’. Ein intermedialer und interkultureller Vergleich zur Inszenierung von Nähe in Zeitungsberichten und Fernseh-Korrespondentenberichten”. In Pressetextsorten jenseits der “News” , ed. by ChristianGrösslinger, GudrunHeld, and HartmutStöckl , 249–264. Sprache im Kontext 38. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Luginbühl, Martin, ThomasBaumberger, KathrineSchwab, and HaraldBurger.
    2002. Medientexte zwischen Autor und Publikum. Intertextualität in Presse, Radio und Fernsehen . Zürich: Seismo.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Luginbühl, Martin, and DanielPerrin.
    2011. “‘Das, was wir in der Tagesschau den Rausschmeißer nennen’: Altro- und Ethno-Kategorisierungen von Textsorten im Handlungsfeld journalistischer Fernsehnachrichten”. In Textsorten, Handlungsmuster, Oberflächen. Linguistische Typologien der Kommunikation , ed. by StephanHabscheid , 577–596. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Macdonald, Myra
    . 2000. “Rethinking Personalization in Current Affairs Journalism”. In Tabloid Tales. Global Debates over Media Standards , ed. by ColinSparks and JohnTulloch , 251–266. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. MacGregor, Phil
    . 2007. “Tracking the Audience. Metric Data Start a Subtle Revolution”. Journalism Studies 8 (2): 280–298. doi: 10.1080/14616700601148879
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601148879 [Google Scholar]
  163. Machin, David
    . 2009. “Multimodality and Theories of the Visual”. In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis , ed. by CareyJewitt , 181–190. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Mair, Christian, and MarianneHundt.
    1997. “The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress”. In Anglistentag1996. Proceedings , ed. by HansSauer and UweBöker , 71–82. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Manovich, Lev
    . 2001. The Language of New Media . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Mayes, Patricia
    . 1990. “Quotation in Spoken English”. Studies in Language 14 (2): 325–363. doi: 10.1075/sl.14.2.04may
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.2.04may [Google Scholar]
  167. McCullough, David
    . 1992. Truman . New York: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. McQuail, Denis
    . 1987. Mass Communication Theory. An Introduction . 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Mininni, Giuseppe
    . 1990. “Le ‘Talk-show’ comme forme de la communication de masse”. Rassegna italiana di linguistica applicata 22–23: 29–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Montgomery, Martin
    . 1986. “DJ Talk”. Media, Culture & Society 8 (4): 421–440. doi: 10.1177/0163443786008004004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004004 [Google Scholar]
  171. . 2007. The Discourse of Broadcast News. A Linguistic Approach . London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. . 2010. “Rituals of Personal Experience in Television News Interviews”. Discourse & Communication 4 (2): 185–211. doi: 10.1177/1750481310364322
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310364322 [Google Scholar]
  173. Müller, Marion G., and ArvidKappas.
    2011. “Visual Emotions – Emotional Visuals. Emotions, Pathos Formulae, and Their Relevance for Communication Research”. In The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media , ed. by KatrinDöveling, Christianvon Scheve, and Elly A.Konijn , 310–331. Routledge International Handbooks. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. Nacey, Susan
    . 2012. “Scare Quotes in Norwegian L2 English and British English”. In English Corpus Linguistics: Looking Back Moving Forward. Papers from the 30th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 30) , ed. by SebastianHoffmann, PaulRayson, and GeoffreyLeech , 117–130. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela
    . 2011. “Im/polite Reader Responses on British Online News Sites”. Journal of Politeness Research 7 (2): 187–214.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. . 2013. “Impoliteness in Cyberspace: Personally Abusive Reader Responses in Online News Media”. Doctoral Dissertation, Zurich: University of Zurich.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. Niblock, Sarah
    . 2008. “Features”. In Pulling Newspapers Apart: Analysing Print Journalism , ed. by BobFranklin , 48–57. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. O’Keeffe, Anne.
    2006. Investigating Media Discourse . London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Ochs, Elinor
    . 1986. “From Feelings to Grammar: A Samoan Case Study”. In Language Socialization Across Cultures , ed. by Bambi B.Schieffelin and ElinorOchs , 251–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. Page, Norman
    . 1988. Speech in the English Novel . 2nd ed. Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. Paterson, Chris, and DavidDomingo
    , ed. 2008. Making Online News: The Ethnography of New Media Production . New York: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. Petersen, Thomas
    . 2006. “Lasswells Frage und Hovlands Problem. Feldexperimente zur Wirkung potenziell emotionalisierender Bildelemente in der Medienberichterstattung”. Publizistik 51 (1): 39–51. doi: 10.1007/s11616‑006‑0004‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-006-0004-8 [Google Scholar]
  183. Posner, Roland
    . 2003. “Kultursemiotik”. In Konzepte der Kulturwissenschaften , ed. by AnsgarNünning and VeraNünning , 39–72. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Prentice, Sheryl, and AndrewHardie.
    2009. “Empowerment and Disempowerment in the Glencairn Uprising. A Corpus-based Critical Analysis of Early Modern English News Discourse”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10 (1): 23–55. doi: 10.1075/jhp.10.1.03pre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.1.03pre [Google Scholar]
  185. Puschmann, Cornelius
    . 2010. “‘Thank you for thinking we could’. Use and Function of Interpersonal Pronouns in Corporate Web Logs”. In Approaches to Syntactic Variation and Genre , ed. by HeidrunDorgeloh and AnjaWanner , 167–194. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110226485.1.167
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226485.1.167 [Google Scholar]
  186. Quandt, Thorsten
    . 2008. “(No) News on the World Wide Web? A Comparative Content Analysis of Online News in Europe and the United States”. Journalism Studies 9 (5): 717–738. doi: 10.1080/14616700802207664
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802207664 [Google Scholar]
  187. Quirk, Randolph, SidneyGreenbaum, GeoffreyLeech, and JanSvartvik.
    1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. Rademann, Tobias
    . 1999. “Newspapers on the Internet”. In English Via Various Media , ed. by Hans-JürgenDiller, ErwinOtto, and GertStratmann , 251–269. Anglistik & Englischunterricht 62. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  189. Ross, Dieter
    . 1998. “Die Regression des Politischen: Die Massenmedien Privatisieren die Öffentlichkeit”. In Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen , ed. by KurtImhof and PeterSchulz , 149–156. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Royce, Terry D., and WendyL. Bowcher
    , ed. 2009. New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  191. Sanders, Jos
    é. 2010. “Intertwined Voices: Journalists’ Modes of Representing Source Information in Journalistic Subgenres”. English Text Construction 3 (2): 226–249. doi: 10.1075/etc.3.2.06san
     https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.2.06san [Google Scholar]
  192. Santini, Marina
    . 2010. “Review of John Bateman. 2008. Multimodality and Genre. A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan”. Linguist List 21 (1606). http://linguistlist.org/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=2623234 .
     [Google Scholar]
  193. Scannell, Paddy
    . 2005. “The Meaning of Broadcasting in the Digital Era”. In Cultural Dilemmas in Public Service Broadcasting , ed. by GregoryFerrell Lowe and PerJauert , 129–142. Goteborg: Nordicom.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Scheufele, Bertram
    . 2001. “Visuelles Medien-Framing und Framing-Effekte. Zur Analyse visueller Kommunikation aus der Framing Perspektive”. In Kommunkation visuell. Das Bild als Forschungsgegenstand – Grundlagen und Perspektiven , ed. by ThomasKnieper and Marion G.Müller , 144–158. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  195. Schlobinski, Peter
    . 2006. “Die Bedeutung digitalisierter Kommunikation für Sprach- und Kommunikationsgemeinschaften”. In Von *hdl* bis *cul8r*. Sprache und Kommunikation in den Neuen Medien , ed. by PeterSchlobinski , 26–37. Thema Deutsch 7. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. Schmitt, Christine
    . 1998. “Nachrichtenproduktion im Internet. Eine Untersuchung von MSNBC Interactive”. In Nachrichtenproduktion im Mediensystem. Von den Sport- und Bilderdiensten bis zum Internet , ed. by JürgenWilke , 293–330. Köln: Böhlau.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. Schmitz, Ulrich
    . 2007. “Sehlesen. Text-Bild-Gestalten in massenmedialer Kommunikation”. In Textdesign und Textwirkung in der massenmedialen Kommunikation , ed. by KerstenSven Roth and JürgenSpitzmüller , 93–108. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Schneider, Kristina
    . 1999. “Exploring the Roots of Popular English News Writing: A Preliminary Report on a Corpus-based Project”. In English Via Various Media , ed. by Hans-JürgenDiller, ErwinOtto, and GertStratmann , 201–222. Anglistik & Englischunterricht 62. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. . 2000. “Popular and Quality Papers in the Rostock Historical Newspaper Corpus”. In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Papers from the Twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20) , ed. by ChristianMair and MarianneHundt , 321–337. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. . 2002. “The Development of Popular Journalism in England from 1700 to the Present. Corpus Compilation and Selective Stylistic Analysis”. Doctoral Dissertation, Rostock: Unversität Rostock.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. Schröder, Thomas.
    2010. “Die Bilder-Zeitung: Wie ein Textmedium zu einem Medium der visuellen Kommunikation wird”. In Neue Medien – neue Formate: Ausdifferenzierung und Konvergenz in der Medienkommunikation , ed. by Hans-JürgenBucher, ThomasGloning, and KatrinLehnen , 169–188. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. Schudson, Michael
    . 2003. The Sociology of News . Contemporary Societies. New York / London: W. W. Norton & Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. Schuelke, Gertrude L.
    1958. “‘Slipping’ in Indirect Discourse”. American Speech 33 (2): 90–98. doi: 10.2307/453177
     https://doi.org/10.2307/453177 [Google Scholar]
  204. Schultz, Tanjev
    . 1999. “Interactive Options in Online Journalism: A Content Analysis of 100 U.S. Newspapers”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5 (1).
     [Google Scholar]
  205. . 2000. “Mass Media and the Concept of Interactivity: An Exploratory Study of Online Forums and Reader Email”. Media, Culture & Society 22 (2): 205–221. doi: 10.1177/016344300022002005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022002005 [Google Scholar]
  206. Selting, Margret
    . 1985. “Levels of Style-shifting. Exemplified in the Interaction Strategies of a Moderator in a Listener Participation Programme”. Journal of Pragmatics 9 (2–3): 179–197. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90024‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90024-4 [Google Scholar]
  207. Short, Michael
    . 1988. “Speech Presentation, the Novel and the Press”. In The Taming of the Text. Explorations in Language, Literature and Culture , ed. by WillieVan Peer , 61–81. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. Short, Mick, ElenaSemino, and MartinWynne.
    2002. “Revisiting the Notion of Faithfulness in Discourse Presentation Using a Corpus Approach”. Language and Literature 11 (4): 325–355. doi: 10.1177/096394700201100403
     https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700201100403 [Google Scholar]
  209. Short, Mick, MartinWynne, and ElenaSemino.
    1999. “Reading Reports: Discourse Presentation in a Corpus of Narratives, with Special Reference to News Reports”. In English Via Various Media , ed. by Hans-JürgenDiller, ErwinOtto, and GertStratmann , 39–65. Anglistik & Englischunterricht 62. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Sieber, Peter
    . 1998. Parlando in Texten. zur Veränderung kommunikativer Grundmuster in der Schriftlichkeit . Germanistische Linguistik 191. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110940800
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110940800 [Google Scholar]
  211. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
    . 1986. “Investigating Readability in Qualities and Tabloids”. In Aspects of Style in British Newspapers , ed. by Anne-MarieSimon-Vandenbergen , 10–43. Gent: Studia Germanica Gandensia.
     [Google Scholar]
  212. Simonelli, Giorgio, and PaoloTaggi.
    1985. I fantasmi del dialogo. Il telefono nella radio e nella televisione . Roma: Bulzoni.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. Slembrouck, Stefaan
    . 1986. “Towards a Description of Speech Presentation and Speech Reportage in Newspaper Language”. In Aspects of Style in British Newspapers , ed. by Anne-MarieSimon-Vandenbergen , 44–115. Gent: Studia Germanica Gandensia.
     [Google Scholar]
  214. Söll, Ludwig.
    1974. Gesprochenes und Geschriebenes Französisch . Grundlagen der Romanistik 6. Berlin: Schmidt.
     [Google Scholar]
  215. Stark Adam, Pegie, SaraQuinn, and RickEdmonds.
    2007. Eyetracking the News. A Study of Print and Online Reading . St. Petersburg, FL: The Poynter Institute for Media Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. Stenvall, Maija
    . 2008. “On Emotions and the Journalistic Ideals of Factuality and objectivity – Tools for Analysis”. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (9) (September): 1569–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.017 [Google Scholar]
  217. Stewart, Graham
    . 2005. The History of The Times . VolumeVII1981–2002. The Murdoch Years. London: HarperCollins.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. Stöckl, Hartmut.
    2004a. Die Sprache im Bild – Das Bild in der Sprache. Zur Verknüpfung von Sprache und Bild im massenmedialen Text. Konzepte – Theorien – Analysemethoden . Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 3. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110201994
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110201994 [Google Scholar]
  219. 2004b. “In Between Modes. Language and Image in Printed Media”. In Perspectives on Multimodality , ed. by EijaVentola, CassilyCharles, and MartinKaltenbacher , 9–30. Document Design Companion Series 6. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. Stöckl, Hartmut, and ChristianGrösslinger
    , ed. 2010. Mediale Transkodierungen – Metamorphosen zwischen Sprache, Bild und Ton . Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  221. Storrer, Angelika
    . 2009. “Rhetorisch-stilistische Eigenschaften der Sprache des Internets”. In Rhetoric and Stylistics / Rhetorik Und Stilistik. An International Handbook of Historical and Systematic Research / Ein Internationales Handbuch Historischer und Systematischer Forschung. Part 2 , ed. by UllaFix, AndreasGardt, and JoachimKnape , 2211–2226. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 31. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  222. Tannen, Deborah
    . 1982. “The Oral/literate Continuum in Discourse”. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy , ed. by DeborahTannen , 1–16. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. . 1986. “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative”. In Direct and Indirect Speech , ed. by FlorianCoulmas , 311–332. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Thomassen, Lasse
    . 2007. “Beyond Representation?” Parliamentary Affairs 60 (1): 111–126. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsl051
     https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsl051 [Google Scholar]
  225. Thurman, Neil
    . 2008. “Forums for Citizen Journalists? Adoption of User Generated Content Initiatives by Online News Media”. New Media & Society 10 (1): 139–157. doi: 10.1177/1461444807085325
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807085325 [Google Scholar]
  226. Troesser, Michael
    . 1983. “Rundfunkmoderation bei Beteiligungssendungen – im Spannungsfeld zwischen Offenheit und Kontrolle”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 40: 70–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  227. Tuchman, Gaye
    . 1978. Making News. A Study in the Construction of Reality . New York: The Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  228. Tuomarla, Ulla
    . 2000. La citation mode d’emploi: Sur le fonctionnement discursif du discours rapporte direct . Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
     [Google Scholar]
  229. Tuor, Nadine
    . 2009. Online-Netzwerke. Eine Kommunikationstheoretische, Sozialpsychologische und Soziolinguistische Analyse . Networx 55. Hannover / Zürich: Mediensprache. http://www.mediensprache.net/de/networx/docs/networx-55.asp .
     [Google Scholar]
  230. Turner, Graeme
    . 2010. Ordinary People and the Media. The Demotic Turn . Theory, Culture & Society. London: SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. Turow, Joseph
    . 1974. “Talk Show Radio as Interpersonal Communication”. Journal of Broadcasting 18 (2): 171–180. doi: 10.1080/08838157409363732
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08838157409363732 [Google Scholar]
  232. Valdeón, Roberto A.
    2006. “The Discursive Construction of anti-European Sentiment in the Times.co.uk Texts”. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 19: 405–431.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. van der Wurff, Richard.
    2005. “Print and Online Newspapers in Europe. Introduction”. In Print and Online Newspapers in Europe. A Comparative Analysis in 16 Countries , ed. by Richardvan der Wurff and EdmundLauf , 1–12. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1988a. News Analysis. Case Studies of International and National News in the Press . Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  235. 1988b. News as Discourse . Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  236. Van Hout, Tom, and GeertJacobs.
    2008. “News Production Theory and Practice: Fieldwork Notes on Power, Interaction and Agency”. Pragmatics 18 (1): 59–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  237. van Leeuwen, Theo
    . 1996. “The Representation of Social Actors”. In Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis , ed. by CarmenRosa Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and MalcolmCoulthard , 32–70. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. Vandelanotte, Lieven
    . 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English. A Cognitive-Functional Approach . Topics in English Linguistics 65. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110215373
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215373 [Google Scholar]
  239. Ventola, Eija
    . 2005. “Multimodality, Multimediality and Multiliteracies: A New Era for the Press and Using the Press”. In Pressetextsorten Im Vergleich – Contrasting Text Types in the Press , ed. by Hartmut E. H.Lenk and AndrewChesterman , 351–387. Germanistische Linguistik Monographien 17. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. Ventola, Eija, CassilyCharles, and MartinKaltenbacher
    , ed. 2004. Perspectives on Multimodality . Document Design Companion Series 6. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ddcs.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.6 [Google Scholar]
  241. Wagner, Jörg.
    2002. Mensch-Computer-Interaktion. Sprachwissenschaftliche Aspekte . Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Wales, Katie
    . 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-day English . Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. Wardle, Claire
    . 2006. “‘It Could Happen to You’. The Move Towards ‘personal’ and ‘societal’ Narratives in Newspaper Coverage of Child Murder, 1930–2000”. Journalism Studies 7 (4): 515–533. doi: 10.1080/14616700600757951
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600757951 [Google Scholar]
  244. . 2007. “Monsters and Angels. Visual Press Coverage of Child Murders in the USA and UK, 1993–2000”. Journalism 8 (3): 263–284. doi: 10.1177/1464884907076461
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884907076461 [Google Scholar]
  245. . 2008. “Crime Reporting”. In Pulling Newspapers Apart: Analysing Print Journalism , ed. by BobFranklin , 144–152. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. Wardle, Claire, and AndrewWilliams.
    2008. User Generated Content. Understanding Its Impact Upon Contributors, Non-contributors and BBC News . Cardiff: Cardiff School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/knowledgeexchange/cardiffone.pdf .
     [Google Scholar]
  247. Waugh, Linda R.
    1995. “Reported Speech in Journalistic Discourse”. Text 15 (1): 129–173.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. Wehner, Josef
    . 1998. “Öffentliche Meinung und Person – Zur Darstellung der Politik in den Medien”. In Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen , ed. by KurtImhof and PeterSchulz , 318–331. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. Weintraub, Jeff
    . 1997. “The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction”. In Public and Private in Thought and Practice. Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy , ed. by JeffWeintraub and KrishanKumar , 1–42. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  250. Weiss, Ralph
    . 2002. “Vom gewandelten Sinn für das Private”. In Privatheit im Öffentlichen Raum. Medienhandeln zwischen Individualisierung und Entgrenzung , ed. by RalphWeiss and JoGroebel , 27–87. Schriftenreihe Medienforschung Der Landesanstalt Für Rundfunk Nordrhein-Westfalen (43). Opladen: Leske + Budrich. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑11146‑7_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11146-7_2 [Google Scholar]
  251. Westin, Ingrid
    . 2002. Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials . Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 44. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  252. Wiener, Morton, and AlbertMehrabian.
    1968. Language Within Language: Immediacy, a Channel in Verbal Communication . New York: Appleton, Century & Crofts.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. Wodarczyk, Matylda.
    2007. Pragmatic Aspects of Reported Speech. The Case of Early Modern English Courtroom Discourse . Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. Wolf, Claudia Maria.
    2006. Bildsprache und Medienbilder. Die visuelle Darstellungslogik von Nachrichtenmagazinen . Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
     [Google Scholar]
  255. Xekalakis, Elefteria
    . 1999. “Newspapers Through the Times. Foreign Reports from the 18th to the 20th Centuries”. Doctoral Dissertation, Zurich: University of Zurich.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027270832
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027270832
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027270832
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027270832
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error