Visit www.benjamins.com

Pronouns vs. definite descriptions*

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.
Abstract

This paper looks at an approach to Principle C in which the disjoint reference effect triggered by definite description arises because there is a preference for using bound pronouns in those cases. Philippe Schlenker has linked this approach to the idea that the NP part of a definite description should be the most minimal relative to a certain communicative goal. On a popular view about what the syntax and semantics of a personal pronoun is, that should have the effect of favoring a pronoun over a definite description. It requires, however, a way of distinguishing bound pronouns from non-bound pronouns, and the paper makes a proposal about how these two kinds of pronouns can be distinguished in the way needed. The resulting view of Principle C is then used to give a reanalysis of “Vehicle Change” effects and explain a puzzle about its acquisition.

References

/content/books/9789027272263-07joh
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address