From Romance clitics to case

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.

We reconstruct the notion of dative in terms of a Q(⊆) category, denoting an ‘inclusion’ relation – to be understood roughly as ‘possession’. In the light of this, we reconsider interactions between dative and 1st/2nd person in Romance. In Italian 3rd person clitics have two separate lexicalizations for accusative and dative, 1st/ 2nd person clitics have a single dative-like lexicalization. We construe this phenomenon in terms of split accusativity (DOM), i.e. 1st /2nd person object clitics are embedded as datives, as opposed to 3rd person ones that alternate between dative and accusative. We also suggest a reworking of the Person Case Constraint (PCC) as a constraint on the interpretation of Q(⊆) (i.e. valuing of a Q(⊆) probe). Under it, a 1st/2nd person object clitic must be interpreted as the argument of Q(⊆) (i.e. value it) if present, leaving a dative clitic (i.e. bearing Q(⊆) morphology) without an interpretation. Keywords: case; dative; person; Differential Object Marking; Person Case Constraint


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address