1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Handbook of Translation Studies
  4. Chapter

Common grounds in Translation and Interpreting (Studies)

image of Common grounds in Translation and Interpreting (Studies)

References

  1. Anderson, R. Bruce W
    1976 “Perspectives on the role of interpreter.”InTranslation. Applications and Research, Richard W. Brislin (ed.), 208–228. New York: Gardner Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelelli, Claudia V
    2004 Medical Interpreting and Cross-cultural Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486616
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486616 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bassnett, Susan & Lefevere, André
    (eds) 1990 Translation, History and Culture. London: Pinter.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Clifford, James & Marcus, George E
    (eds) 1986 Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cronin, Michael
    2002 “The empire talks back: Orality, heteronomy, and the cultural turn in Interpretation Studies.”InTranslation and Power, Maria Tymoczko & Edwin Gentzler (eds), 45–62. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Delisle, Jean & Woodsworth, Judith
    (eds) 1995/2012 Translators Through History. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.101
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.101 [Google Scholar]
  7. Diriker, Ebru
    2008 “Exploring conference interpreting as a social practice: An area for intra-disciplinary cooperation.”InBeyond Descriptive Translation Studies. Investigations in Homage to Gideon Toury, Anthony Pym , Miriam Shlesinger & Daniel Simeoni (eds), 209–220. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.75.17dir
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.75.17dir [Google Scholar]
  8. Dragsted, Barbara & Gorm Hansen, Inge
    2007 “Speaking your translation: Exploiting synergies between translation and interpreting.”InInterpreting Studies and Beyond: A Tribute to Miriam Shlesinger, Franz Pöchhhacker , Arnt Lykke Jakobsen & Inger M. Mees (eds), 251–274. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gambier, Yves
    2004 “Translation Studies: A succession of paradoxes.” In Christina Schäffner (ed.), Translation Research and Interpreting Research. Traditions, Gaps and Synergies,62–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gile, Daniel
    2004 “Translation research versus interpreting research: Kinship, differences and prospects for partnership.” In Christina Schäffner (ed.), Translation Research and Interpreting Research. Traditions, Gaps and Synergies,1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Revised edition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gouadec, Daniel
    2007 Translation as a Profession. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.73
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.73 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grbić, Nadja
    2010 “‘Boundary work’ as a concept for studying professionalization processes in the interpreting field.”TIS5 (1): 109–123. doi: 10.1075/tis.5.1.07grb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.5.1.07grb [Google Scholar]
  14. Hermans, Theo
    1997 “Translation as institution.”InTranslation as Intercultural Communication. Selected Papers From the EST Congress - Prague 1995, Mary Snell-Hornby , Zuzana Jettmarová & Klaus Kaindl (eds), 3–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.20.03her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.20.03her [Google Scholar]
  15. Holmes, James S
    1972/2000 “The name and nature of Translation Studies.”InThe Translation Studies Reader, Lawrence Venuti (ed.), 172–185. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Inghilleri, Moria
    2003 “Habitus, field and discourse. Interpreting as a socially situated activity.”Target15 (2): 243–268. doi: 10.1075/target.15.2.03ing
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.15.2.03ing [Google Scholar]
  17. Kade, Otto
    1968 Zufall und Gesetzmäßigkeit in der Übersetzung. Leipzig: VEB Enzyklopädie.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lung, Rachel
    2009 “Interpreters and the writing of history in China.”Meta54 (2): 201–217. doi: 10.7202/037676ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/037676ar [Google Scholar]
  19. Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
    2010 “On paradigms and cognitive translatology.” In Gregory M. Shreve & Erik Angelone (eds), Translation and Cognition,169–189. doi: 10.1075/ata.xv.10mun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.10mun [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Hagan, Minako & Ashworth, David
    2002 Translation-mediated Communication in a Digital World. Facing the Challenges of Globalization and Localization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Pöchhacker, Franz
    1995 “Simultaneous interpreting. A functionalist perspective.”Hermes14: 31–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 2005 “From operation to action: Process-orientation in Interpreting Studies.”Meta50 (2): 682–695. doi: 10.7202/011011ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/011011ar [Google Scholar]
  23. Riccardi, Alessandra
    2002 “Translation and interpretation.”InTranslation Studies. Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline, Alessandra Riccardi (ed.), 75–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Risku, Hanna
    2012 “Cognitive approaches to translation.”InEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0145
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0145 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rudvin, Mette
    2006 “The cultural turn in community interpreting. A brief analysis of epistemological developments in community interpreting literature in the light of paradigm changes in the humanities.”Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series5: 21–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Salevsky, Heidemarie
    1993 “The distinctive nature of Interpreting Studies.”Target5 (2): 149–162. doi: 10.1075/target.5.2.03sal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.5.2.03sal [Google Scholar]
  27. Schäffner, Christina
    (ed.) 2004 Translation Research and Interpreting Research. Traditions, Gaps and Synergies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Schjoldager, Anne
    1995 “An exploratory study of translational norms in simultaneous interpreting. Methodological reflections.”Hermes14: 65–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Shlesinger, Miriam
    1989 “Extending the theory of translation to interpretation: Norms as a case in point.”Target1 (1): 111–115. doi: 10.1075/target.1.1.09shl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.1.1.09shl [Google Scholar]
  30. Shlesinger, Miriam & Malkies, Brenda
    2005 “Comparing modalities: cognates as a case in point.”Across Languages and Cultures6 (2): 173–193. doi: 10.1556/Acr.6.2005.2.2
     https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.6.2005.2.2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Shreve, Gregory M. & Angelone, Erik
    2010 “Translation and cognition: Recent developments.”InTranslation and Cognition, Gregory M. Shreve & Erik Angelone (eds), 1–13. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ata.xv.01shr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.01shr [Google Scholar]
  32. Torikai, Kumiko
    2009 Voices of the Invisible Presence. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.83
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.83 [Google Scholar]
  33. Toury, Gideon
    1980 In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Turner, Graham H. & Pollitt, Kyra
    2002 “Community interpreting meets literary translation. English-BSL interpreting in the theatre.”The Translator8 (1): 25–48. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2002.10799115
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2002.10799115 [Google Scholar]
  35. Turner, Graham H
    2006 “Re-thinking the sociology of sign language interpreting and translation: Some challenges posed by deaf practitioners.”InÜbersetzen - Translating - Traduire: Towards a ‘Social Turn’?, Michaela Wolf (ed.), 285–293. Wien: LIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Tymoczko, Maria
    2007 Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Weber, Orest , Singy, Pascal & Guex, Patrice
    2005 “Gender and interpreting in the medical sphere: What is at stake?”InGender, Sex and Translation. The Manipulation of Identities, José Santaemilia (ed.), 137–148. Manchester: St. Jerome.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolf, Michaela
    2011 “Mapping the field: Sociological perspectives on translation.”International Journal of the Sociology of Language207: 1–28. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.2011.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2011.001 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2012 Die vielsprachige Seele Kakaniens. Übersetzen und Dolmetschen in der Habsburgermonarchie 1848 bis 1918. Wien: Böhlau.
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Anderson, R. Bruce W
    1976 “Perspectives on the role of interpreter.”InTranslation. Applications and Research, Richard W. Brislin (ed.), 208–228. New York: Gardner Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelelli, Claudia V
    2004 Medical Interpreting and Cross-cultural Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486616
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486616 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bassnett, Susan & Lefevere, André
    (eds) 1990 Translation, History and Culture. London: Pinter.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Clifford, James & Marcus, George E
    (eds) 1986 Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cronin, Michael
    2002 “The empire talks back: Orality, heteronomy, and the cultural turn in Interpretation Studies.”InTranslation and Power, Maria Tymoczko & Edwin Gentzler (eds), 45–62. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Delisle, Jean & Woodsworth, Judith
    (eds) 1995/2012 Translators Through History. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.101
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.101 [Google Scholar]
  7. Diriker, Ebru
    2008 “Exploring conference interpreting as a social practice: An area for intra-disciplinary cooperation.”InBeyond Descriptive Translation Studies. Investigations in Homage to Gideon Toury, Anthony Pym , Miriam Shlesinger & Daniel Simeoni (eds), 209–220. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.75.17dir
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.75.17dir [Google Scholar]
  8. Dragsted, Barbara & Gorm Hansen, Inge
    2007 “Speaking your translation: Exploiting synergies between translation and interpreting.”InInterpreting Studies and Beyond: A Tribute to Miriam Shlesinger, Franz Pöchhhacker , Arnt Lykke Jakobsen & Inger M. Mees (eds), 251–274. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gambier, Yves
    2004 “Translation Studies: A succession of paradoxes.” In Christina Schäffner (ed.), Translation Research and Interpreting Research. Traditions, Gaps and Synergies,62–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gile, Daniel
    2004 “Translation research versus interpreting research: Kinship, differences and prospects for partnership.” In Christina Schäffner (ed.), Translation Research and Interpreting Research. Traditions, Gaps and Synergies,1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Revised edition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gouadec, Daniel
    2007 Translation as a Profession. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.73
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.73 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grbić, Nadja
    2010 “‘Boundary work’ as a concept for studying professionalization processes in the interpreting field.”TIS5 (1): 109–123. doi: 10.1075/tis.5.1.07grb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.5.1.07grb [Google Scholar]
  14. Hermans, Theo
    1997 “Translation as institution.”InTranslation as Intercultural Communication. Selected Papers From the EST Congress - Prague 1995, Mary Snell-Hornby , Zuzana Jettmarová & Klaus Kaindl (eds), 3–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.20.03her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.20.03her [Google Scholar]
  15. Holmes, James S
    1972/2000 “The name and nature of Translation Studies.”InThe Translation Studies Reader, Lawrence Venuti (ed.), 172–185. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Inghilleri, Moria
    2003 “Habitus, field and discourse. Interpreting as a socially situated activity.”Target15 (2): 243–268. doi: 10.1075/target.15.2.03ing
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.15.2.03ing [Google Scholar]
  17. Kade, Otto
    1968 Zufall und Gesetzmäßigkeit in der Übersetzung. Leipzig: VEB Enzyklopädie.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lung, Rachel
    2009 “Interpreters and the writing of history in China.”Meta54 (2): 201–217. doi: 10.7202/037676ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/037676ar [Google Scholar]
  19. Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
    2010 “On paradigms and cognitive translatology.” In Gregory M. Shreve & Erik Angelone (eds), Translation and Cognition,169–189. doi: 10.1075/ata.xv.10mun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.10mun [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Hagan, Minako & Ashworth, David
    2002 Translation-mediated Communication in a Digital World. Facing the Challenges of Globalization and Localization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Pöchhacker, Franz
    1995 “Simultaneous interpreting. A functionalist perspective.”Hermes14: 31–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 2005 “From operation to action: Process-orientation in Interpreting Studies.”Meta50 (2): 682–695. doi: 10.7202/011011ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/011011ar [Google Scholar]
  23. Riccardi, Alessandra
    2002 “Translation and interpretation.”InTranslation Studies. Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline, Alessandra Riccardi (ed.), 75–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Risku, Hanna
    2012 “Cognitive approaches to translation.”InEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0145
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0145 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rudvin, Mette
    2006 “The cultural turn in community interpreting. A brief analysis of epistemological developments in community interpreting literature in the light of paradigm changes in the humanities.”Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series5: 21–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Salevsky, Heidemarie
    1993 “The distinctive nature of Interpreting Studies.”Target5 (2): 149–162. doi: 10.1075/target.5.2.03sal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.5.2.03sal [Google Scholar]
  27. Schäffner, Christina
    (ed.) 2004 Translation Research and Interpreting Research. Traditions, Gaps and Synergies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Schjoldager, Anne
    1995 “An exploratory study of translational norms in simultaneous interpreting. Methodological reflections.”Hermes14: 65–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Shlesinger, Miriam
    1989 “Extending the theory of translation to interpretation: Norms as a case in point.”Target1 (1): 111–115. doi: 10.1075/target.1.1.09shl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.1.1.09shl [Google Scholar]
  30. Shlesinger, Miriam & Malkies, Brenda
    2005 “Comparing modalities: cognates as a case in point.”Across Languages and Cultures6 (2): 173–193. doi: 10.1556/Acr.6.2005.2.2
     https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.6.2005.2.2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Shreve, Gregory M. & Angelone, Erik
    2010 “Translation and cognition: Recent developments.”InTranslation and Cognition, Gregory M. Shreve & Erik Angelone (eds), 1–13. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ata.xv.01shr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.01shr [Google Scholar]
  32. Torikai, Kumiko
    2009 Voices of the Invisible Presence. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.83
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.83 [Google Scholar]
  33. Toury, Gideon
    1980 In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Turner, Graham H. & Pollitt, Kyra
    2002 “Community interpreting meets literary translation. English-BSL interpreting in the theatre.”The Translator8 (1): 25–48. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2002.10799115
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2002.10799115 [Google Scholar]
  35. Turner, Graham H
    2006 “Re-thinking the sociology of sign language interpreting and translation: Some challenges posed by deaf practitioners.”InÜbersetzen - Translating - Traduire: Towards a ‘Social Turn’?, Michaela Wolf (ed.), 285–293. Wien: LIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Tymoczko, Maria
    2007 Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Weber, Orest , Singy, Pascal & Guex, Patrice
    2005 “Gender and interpreting in the medical sphere: What is at stake?”InGender, Sex and Translation. The Manipulation of Identities, José Santaemilia (ed.), 137–148. Manchester: St. Jerome.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolf, Michaela
    2011 “Mapping the field: Sociological perspectives on translation.”International Journal of the Sociology of Language207: 1–28. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.2011.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2011.001 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2012 Die vielsprachige Seele Kakaniens. Übersetzen und Dolmetschen in der Habsburgermonarchie 1848 bis 1918. Wien: Böhlau.
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027273062-hts.3.comm4
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027273062-hts.3.comm4
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027273062
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error