The demise of <i>gog</i> and <i>cock</i> and their phraseologies in dramatic discourse

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.

The use of linguistic forms derived from the lexicon denoting sacred entities is often subject to tabooing behaviour. In the 15th and 16th century phrases like <i>by gogges swete body</i> or <i>by cockes bones</i> allowed speakers to address God without really saying the name; cf. Hock (1991: 295). The religious interjections based on the phonetically corrupt <i>gog</i> and <i>cock</i> are evidenced to have gained currency in the 16th century. In the 17th century all interjections based on religious appellations ceased to appear on stage in accordance with the regulations of the <i>Act to Restrain Abuses of Players </i>and never returned to stage. While, with the loosening grip of censorship, <i>God</i> and <i>Gad</i> interjections are abundant in the drama texts of the 18th and 19th centuries. The present article attempts to explain the reasons for the disappearance of <i>gog</i> and <i>cock</i> interjections in the course of the 17th century. Additionally, the article contains remarks on the socio-pragmatics of <i>gog</i> and <i>cock</i> and their phraseological productivity.


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address