Remote interpreting

References

1. Grice, Herbert Paul
   1975 “Logic and conversation.”InSyntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 225–242. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Heh, Yung-Chung & Qian, Hu
   1997 “Over-the-phone interpretation: A new way of communication between speech communities.”InProceedings of the 38th Annual Conference, Muriel Jerome-O’Keeffe, Muriel (ed.), 51–62. Alexandria, VA: American Translators Association.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Mikkelson, Holly
   2003 “Telephone Interpreting: Boon or Bane?”InSpeaking in Tongues: Language across Contexts and Users, Luis Perez Gonzalez (ed.), 251–269. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Moser-Mercer, Barbara
   2005a “Remote interpreting: Issues of multi-sensory integration in a multilingual task.”Meta50 (2): 727–738. doi: 10.7202/011014ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/011014ar [Google Scholar]
5. Moser-Mercer, Barbara
   2005b “Remote interpreting: The crucial role of presence.”Bulletin Suisse de linguistique appliquée81: 73–97.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Moser-Mercer, Barbara
   2010 “The search for neuro-physiological correlates of expertise in interpreting.”InTranslation and cognition, Erik Angelone & Greg Shreve (eds), 263–287. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ata.xv.15mos
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.15mos [Google Scholar]
7. Mouzourakis, Takis
   2006 “Remote interpreting: A technical perspective on recent experiments.”Interpreting8 (1): 45–66. doi: 10.1075/intp.8.1.04mou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.04mou [Google Scholar]
8. Phelan, Mary
   2001 The interpreter’s resource. Clevedon, Buffalo, Toronto, Sydney: Multilingual Matters.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Sperling, Jessica
   2011 Communicating more for less: Using translation and interpretation technology to serve limited English proficient individuals. Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Institute.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Braun, Sabine
    2003 Kommunikation unter widrigen Umständen? – Fallstudie zu einsprachigen und gedolmetschten Videokonferenzen. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hewitt, William E
    1995 Court interpretation: Model guides for policy and practice in the state courts. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hornberger, John C. , Gibson, Count D., Jr. , Wood, William , Degueldre, Christian , Corso, Irene , Palla, Barbara , Bloch, Daniel A
    1996 “Eliminating language barriers for non-English-speaking patients.”Medical Care34 (8): 845–856. doi: 10.1097/00005650‑199608000‑00011
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199608000-00011 [Google Scholar]

References

1. Grice, Herbert Paul
   1975 “Logic and conversation.”InSyntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 225–242. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Heh, Yung-Chung & Qian, Hu
   1997 “Over-the-phone interpretation: A new way of communication between speech communities.”InProceedings of the 38th Annual Conference, Muriel Jerome-O’Keeffe, Muriel (ed.), 51–62. Alexandria, VA: American Translators Association.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Mikkelson, Holly
   2003 “Telephone Interpreting: Boon or Bane?”InSpeaking in Tongues: Language across Contexts and Users, Luis Perez Gonzalez (ed.), 251–269. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Moser-Mercer, Barbara
   2005a “Remote interpreting: Issues of multi-sensory integration in a multilingual task.”Meta50 (2): 727–738. doi: 10.7202/011014ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/011014ar [Google Scholar]
5. Moser-Mercer, Barbara
   2005b “Remote interpreting: The crucial role of presence.”Bulletin Suisse de linguistique appliquée81: 73–97.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Moser-Mercer, Barbara
   2010 “The search for neuro-physiological correlates of expertise in interpreting.”InTranslation and cognition, Erik Angelone & Greg Shreve (eds), 263–287. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ata.xv.15mos
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.15mos [Google Scholar]
7. Mouzourakis, Takis
   2006 “Remote interpreting: A technical perspective on recent experiments.”Interpreting8 (1): 45–66. doi: 10.1075/intp.8.1.04mou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.04mou [Google Scholar]
8. Phelan, Mary
   2001 The interpreter’s resource. Clevedon, Buffalo, Toronto, Sydney: Multilingual Matters.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Sperling, Jessica
   2011 Communicating more for less: Using translation and interpretation technology to serve limited English proficient individuals. Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Institute.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Braun, Sabine
    2003 Kommunikation unter widrigen Umständen? – Fallstudie zu einsprachigen und gedolmetschten Videokonferenzen. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hewitt, William E
    1995 Court interpretation: Model guides for policy and practice in the state courts. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hornberger, John C. , Gibson, Count D., Jr. , Wood, William , Degueldre, Christian , Corso, Irene , Palla, Barbara , Bloch, Daniel A
    1996 “Eliminating language barriers for non-English-speaking patients.”Medical Care34 (8): 845–856. doi: 10.1097/00005650‑199608000‑00011
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199608000-00011 [Google Scholar]