Scientific Methods for the Humanities

References

1. Aaftink, C.
   2004 Pivotal reading: Reading related to pivotal life experiences. Utrecht University: Unpublished M.A. thesis.
   [Google Scholar]
2. American Psychological Association
   American Psychological Association (1994) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 4th (ed.)Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Andringa, E.
   1986 Perspektivierung und Perspektivenübernahme: Zur Wahrnehmung literarischer Figuren. Spiel, 5, 135–146.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bailey, K. M.
   1990 The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds), Second language teacher education (pp.215–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baker, R. & Wright, H.
   1955 Midwest and its children. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bales, R. & Cohen, S.
   1979 SYMLOG: A system for multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Free Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bandura, A. , Ross, D. & Ross, S. A.
   1963 Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3–11. 10.1037/h0048687
   https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048687 [Google Scholar]
8. Barros, H. S.
   2003 Desfamiliarização ou Preferência? O Estranhamento na Cidade de Deus. Caderno de Letras20, 121–127.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bechtel, R.
   1967 Hodometer research in museums. Museum News, March, 23–5.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bechtel, R. B. & Zeisel, J.
    1987 Observation: The world under a glass. In R. B. Bechtel , R. W. Marans & W. M. Michelson (Eds.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research (pp.11–40). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Berlyne, D. E.
    1971 Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Birdwhistell, R.
    1970 Kinesics in context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bourg, T. , Risden, K. , Thompson, S. & Davis, E. C.
    1993 The effects of an empathy-building strategy on 6th graders’ causal inferencing in narrative text comprehension. Poetics, 22, 117–133. 10.1016/0304‑422X(93)90024‑B
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(93)90024-B [Google Scholar]
14. Bower, G. H.
    1978 Experiments on story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 1, 211–231. 10.1080/01638537809544437
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638537809544437 [Google Scholar]
15. Brace, N. , Kemp, R. & Snelgar, R.
    2003 SPSS for Psychologists; A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. New York, NY: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bronowski, J.
    1976 The Ascent of Man. London: BBC.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cantor, J. , Ziemke, D. & Sparks, G.
    1984 The effect of forewarning on emotional responses to a horror film. Journal of Broadcasting, 28, 21–31. 10.1080/08838158409386512
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158409386512 [Google Scholar]
18. Carp, F. M. & Carp, A.
    1981 The validity, reliability and generalizability of diary data. Experimental Aging Research, 7, 281–296. 10.1080/03610738108259811
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03610738108259811 [Google Scholar]
19. Conrad, F. G. & Schrober, M. F.
    2000 Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(1), 1–28. 10.1086/316757
    https://doi.org/10.1086/316757 [Google Scholar]
20. Cook, Th. & Campbell, D. T.
    1979 Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cousins, N.
    1985 Anatomy of an illness as perceived by the patient: Reflections on healing and regeneration. New York: Bantam Books.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Davis, S. & Andringa, E.
    1995 Narrrative structure and emotional response. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature (pp.50–60). Siegen: Lumis.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dawkins, R.
    2006 The God delusion. London: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Denscombe, M.
    2010 The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Descartes, R.
    1637 [2006] A discourse on the method. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dilthey, W.
    1985 Poetry and experience. Selected works, vol.V. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dilthey, W.
    1994 The hermeneutics of the human sciences. In K. Mueller-Vollmer (Ed.), The hermeneutics reader: texts of the German tradition from the enlightenment to the present. New York, NY: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Earthman, E. A.
    1992 Creating the virtual work: Readers’ processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 351–384.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Field, A.
    2005 Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Flerx, V. C. , Filder, D. S. & Rogers, R. W.
    1976 Sex role stereotypes: Developmental aspects and early intervention. Child Development, 47, 998–1007. 10.2307/1128436
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128436 [Google Scholar]
31. Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R.
    1981 A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. 10.2307/356600
    https://doi.org/10.2307/356600 [Google Scholar]
32. Freud, S.
    1975 The psychopathology of everyday life. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol.5, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Freud, S.
    1979 On psychopathology. In J. Strachey (Ed, & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol.10, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Freud, S.
    1984 On metapsychology: The theory of psychoanalysis. In J. Strachey (Ed, & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol.11, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Frost, W.
    1969 The development of a technique for TV programme assessment. Journal of the Market Research Society, 11, 25–44.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gadamer, H. G.
    1975 Truth and method. New York, NY: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gerrig, R. J. & Prentice, D. A.
    1991 The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 2¸336–340. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1991.tb00162.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00162.x [Google Scholar]
38. Gibbs, A.
    (n.d.). Focus Groups. RetrievedDecember 28, 2004, (www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU19.html).
    [Google Scholar]
39. Gibson, R. , Aust, C. F. & Zillmann, D.
    2000 Loneliness of adolescents and their choice and enjoyment of love-celebrating versus love-lamenting popular music. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18(1), 43–48. 10.2190/B51G‑8U0W‑N0EQ‑MJUU
    https://doi.org/10.2190/B51G-8U0W-N0EQ-MJUU [Google Scholar]
40. Goss, J. D. & Leinbach, T. R.
    1996 Focus groups as alternative research practice. Area, 28(2), 115–123.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hakemulder, J.
    2000 The moral laboratory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/upal.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.34 [Google Scholar]
42. Harris, S.
    2010 The moral landscape. How science can determine human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hawkes, D. L.
    1990 Communicating your results: A guide for postgraduates. Pontypridd: The Polytechnic of Wales.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hess, R. G. & Lieger, L. H.
    (2004) Creating effective poster presentations. RetrievedJune 6, 2005fromwww.ncsu.edu/project/posters/
    [Google Scholar]
45. Holland, N.
    1975 Five readers reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hunt, M.
    1993 History of psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Iser, W.
    1975 Die Appellstruktur der Texte. In R. Warning (Ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik – Theorie und Praxis (pp.228–52). München: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Iser, W.
    1978 The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kelle, U.
    (Ed.) 1995 Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods and practice. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Kinkade, R. G.
    1974 Thesaurus of psychological index terms. Washington, DC: APA.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kitzinger, J.
    1995 Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302. 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 [Google Scholar]
52. Kreuger, R. A.
    1988 Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lachenmann, J.
    1999 Interviews mit Lesenden. Wirkungen von Literatur auf Musiker und Mediziner. [Interviews with readers. Effects of literature on musicians and physicians]. Unpublished MA-thesis, University of Munich.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Limbert, W. M. & Polzella, D. J.
    1998 Influence of music style on observers’ perception of representational and abstract paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(1), 33–39. 10.2190/V8BL‑GBJK‑TLFP‑R321
    https://doi.org/10.2190/V8BL-GBJK-TLFP-R321 [Google Scholar]
55. Martindale, C.
    1990 The clockwork muse. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Mattos, M. J. & Mendes, M.
    2002 Grupo de Enfoque na Ciência Empírica da Literatura: Atitude dos alunos em relação à literatura. Paper presented at theIII ECEL (Encontro de Ciência Empírica da Literatura) in Rio de Janeiro.
    [Google Scholar]
57. McInerney, D. M.
    2001 Publishing your psychology research: A guide to writing for journals in psychology and related fields. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
58. McNamara, C.
    (n.d.). Basics of Conducting Focus Groups. RetrievedDecember 28, 2004, fromwww.mapnp.org/library/evaluatn/focusgrp.htm
    [Google Scholar]
59. Mendes, M. & Menezes, D.
    2003 The influence of authorial prestige on Brazilian students. Paper Presented at theIV ECEL (Encontro de Ciência Empírica da Literatura) in Rio de Janeiro.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Miall, D. S.
    1990 Readers’ response to narrative: Evaluating, relating, anticipating. Poetics, 19, 323–339. 10.1016/0304‑422X(90)90002‑M
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(90)90002-M [Google Scholar]
61. Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
    1995 Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Morgan, D. L. , Kreuger, R. A. & King, J. A.
    1998 The focus group kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Morris, D.
    1977 Manwatching: A field guide to human behavior. London: Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Patton, M. Q.
    1990 Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Piaget, J.
    1948 The moral judgment of the child. M. Gabain , (Transl.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Plato F. J. Church
    Plato 1906 The trial and death of Socrates. F. J. Church (Transl.), New York, NY: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Powell, R. A. & Single, H. M.
    1996 Focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 8(5), 499–504. 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499
    https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499 [Google Scholar]
68. Radway, J. A.
    1984 Reading the romance; Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Riessman, C. K.
    1993 Narrative analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F.
    1971 Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York, NY: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Rose, J.
    2001 The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Saris, W. & Stronkhorst, H.
    1984 Causal modelling in nonexperimental research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Schreier, M.
    2001 Qualitative methods in studying text reception. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp.35–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/upal.35.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.35.04sch [Google Scholar]
74. Shaughnessy, J. J. & Zechtmeister, E. B.
    1985 Research methods in psychology. New York: Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Sheets-Johnstone, M.
    1999 The primacy of movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aicr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.14 [Google Scholar]
76. Shklovsky, V.
    (1917/1965) Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. Reis (Eds), Russian Formalist Criticism (pp.3–24). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Sinclair, J. McH
    (Ed.) 1987 Looking up. London: Collins ELT.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Skaife, A. M.
    1967 The role of deviation and complexity in changing musical taste. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Vol.2, pp.25–26.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Slater, A. , Quinn, P. C. , Hayes, R. & Brown, E.
    2000 The role of facial orientation in newborn infants’ preference for attractive faces. Developmental Science, 3(2), 181–185. 10.1111/1467‑7687.00111
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00111 [Google Scholar]
80. Snow, C. P.
    (1959/1993) The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Stern, D.
    2010 Forms of vitality. Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Sternberg, R. J.
    1988 The Psychologist’s Companion: A guide to scientific writing for students and researchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Stolnitz, J.
    1991 On the historical triviality of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 31, 195–202. 10.1093/bjaesthetics/31.3.195
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/31.3.195 [Google Scholar]
84. Van Peer, W.
    2001 Justice in Perspective. In W. Van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds), New perspectives on narrative perspective, (pp.325–38). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Van Peer, W. & Stöger, I.
    2001 Psycho-analysts and day-dreaming. In G. Steen & D. Schram (Eds), The Psychology and Sociology of Literature (pp.185–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/upal.35.12pee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.35.12pee [Google Scholar]
86. Van Peer, W. , Zyngier, S. & Hakemulder, F.
    2007 Foregrounding: Past, present, future. In D. Hoover (Ed.), Prospect and retrospect. Papers from thepoetics and linguistics association international conference, New York, 2004. Amsterdam: Rodopi West. 10.1163/9789401205313_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401205313_002 [Google Scholar]
87. West, R. F. , Stanovich, K. E. & Mitchell, H. R.
    1993 Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(1), 34–50. 10.2307/747815
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747815 [Google Scholar]
88. Windelband, W.
    1894 Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. Straßburg: Straßburger Rektoratsrede.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Zill, N. & Winglee, M.
    1990 Who reads literature?Cabin John, MD: Seven Locks Press.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J.
    1975 Viewer’s moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 572–582. 10.1016/0022‑1031(75)90008‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90008-6 [Google Scholar]
91. Zwaan, R. A.
    1991 Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 20, 139–156. 10.1016/0304‑422X(91)90003‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90003-8 [Google Scholar]
92. Zyngier, S. , Chesnokova, A. , & Viana, V.
    (Eds.) 2007 Acting and connecting: Cultural approaches to language and literature. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Zyngier, S. , van Peer, W. & Hakemulder, J.
    2007 Complexity and foregrounding: in the eye of the beholder?Poetics Today28, 653–682. 10.1215/03335372‑2007‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2007-011 [Google Scholar]