Conditionals and mental space set-up

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.

Recent studies of conditionals in English have cited putative evidence from German word order in support of the functional distinction between content and speech-act conditionals (Dancygier &amp; Sweetser, 2005; Declerck &amp; Reed, 2001) while counterexamples have largely been ignored. The present study takes a closer look at the syntactic marker in question, namely integrative and non-integrative word order in <i>wenn</i> &#8216;if&#8217;-initial conditionals. The findings raise doubts about the hypothesized correlation of the construction&#8217;s syntactic form and the cognitive domain in which it is interpreted. In this paper I explore how clausal integration interacts with mental space construction in conditional speech acts and show that integration does not mark content or predictive conditionality. Rather, clausal integration signals that the <i>if</i>-clause (<i>P</i>) is the sole space where the apodosis (<i>Q</i>) holds and that in all other spaces, ~ <i>Q</i> would take <i>Q</i>&#8217;s place. From the perspective of Construction Grammar (CG), the form-function mapping of syntactic integration and contrastivity observed in the German data provides a window on functional distinctions which may exist but are not formally marked in other languages.


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address