C-agreement or something close to it

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.

In this paper we sketch out an account for an until now undiscussed phenomenon in generative syntax, namely the so-called &#8220;alls-construction&#8221; in Midwestern American English. In this construction, an s-ending is added to <i>all</i> under certain circumstances. We compare and contrast this construction with complementizer agreement in West Germanic. The alls-construction is similar to complementizer agreement in that the s-ending on <i>all</i>, just like the inflection on the complementizer in West Germanic, is sensitive to the agreement features on the embedded subject. Contrasted with complementizer agreement, however, the alls-construction does not allow inflectional morphology to appear on any other constituent than <i>all</i>. Furthermore, inflection on <i>all</i> is only possible when <i>all</i> is introducing an <i>all</i>-pseudo-cleft. We will mainly focus on the construction internal restrictions of the inflection on <i>all</i>. Based on Van Craenenbroeck &amp; Van Koppen (2002), we assert that the alls-construction in Midwestern American English is in structure quite similar to complementizer agreement in West Germanic. We come back to the external restriction on the alls-construction in the final section, where we briefly discuss some issues concerning the pseudo-cleft status of the alls-construction.


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address