6. Subject-object asymmetry in children's comprehension of sentences containing logical words

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
This Chapter is currently unavailable for purchase.

This chapter investigates the influence of syntax, semantics and pragmatics on children’s understanding of sentences containing <i>some </i>and <i>or, </i>showing a subjectobject asymmetry<i>. </i>Chierchia, Crain, Guasti and Thornton (1998) showed that once the scalar implicature is erased (in the prediction mode), children accept that <i>some </i>could mean <i>every </i>(75%)<i>, </i>and <i>or </i>could mean <i>and </i>(nearly 100%)<i>. </i>40 Hebrew-speaking children aged 3–6 were tested using <i>eyzeshehu yeled </i>for<i>some boy </i>and <i>o </i>for <i>or</i>: 22 in the description mode and 18 in the prediction mode. Children accepted the use of inclusive <i>or </i>in the prediction mode (96%) but far less in the description mode (37%). For <i>some, </i>a subject-object asymmetry was found in both modes. In the prediction mode, the implicature was always erased in direct object position, but in subject position the implicature was only erased 40% of the times. Similarly, in the description mode, the scalar implicature was derived in two thirds of the cases in subject position, but in only a third of the cases in object position. This suggests that syntactic position contributes to children’s comprehension of sentences containing logical words and that both the difference between <i>some </i>and <i>or </i>and the subject-object asymmetry stem from specificity, a pragmatic condition which affects reference.


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address