On the position of the OE quantifier e<i>all</i> and PDE a<i>ll</i>
This paper, through a study of the corpus of Ælfric’s <i>Catholic Homilies, </i>shows that the quantifier <i>eall </i>in Old English exhibited the same distributional properties as the quantifier <i>all </i>in present-day English: (i) <i>eall </i>can float from a nominative noun phrase (NP) it modifies; (ii) <i>eall </i>can float from an accusative NP when it is followed by a predicative complement; and (iii) the ‘pronoun-quantifier’ order is more frequent than the ‘quantifier-pronoun’ order. The paper also argues that the quantifier <i>eall </i>is base-generated as the head of the Quantifier Phrase (QP) and selects an NP as its complement. The ‘full-NP-quantifier’ order can be derived by adjoining the NP to the QP. However, this operation is not applied to an NP in the argument position, due to the ban on adjunction to arguments. Unlike NPs, pronouns are adjoined to the head of a QP, yielding the ‘pronoun-quantifier’ order more freely.