Wh-movement, interpretation, and optionality in Persian
- Author(s): Simin Karimi and Azita H. Taleghani
- Source: Phrasal and Clausal Architecture , pp 167-187
- Publication Date February 2007
We examine the syntactic behavior of wh-arguments and wh-adjuncts in Persian, a wh-in-situ language that exhibits (seemingly) optional wh-movement. We show that the two types of wh-phrases have distinct internal structures that are responsible for their different syntactic behavior. The analysis indicates that wh-movement has an effect on the semantic output of the derivation, and thus wh-scrambling is not a semantically vacuous operation. We finally show that the wh-feature must be in a local Agree relation with a wh-operator in Spec/CP to allow scope marking and sentence typing. This last claim predicts that an intervening polarity item would block the Agree relation, a prediction that is borne out empirically.
-
From This Site
/content/books/9789027292926-la.101.09kardcterms_subject,pub_keyword-contentType:Journal105
/content/books/9789027292926-la.101.09kar
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027292926
Book
false