Visit www.benjamins.com

General academic writing and discipline specific academic writing

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25.2.04kal
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25.2.04kal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Buckingham, J. & Nevile, M.
(1997) Comparing the citation choices of experienced academic writers and first year students. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice, (pp.96–107). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Cadman, K.
(1997) Thesis writing for international students: a question of identity?English for Specific Purposes, 16 (1), 3–14. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(96)00029‑4
Chafe, W.
(1985) Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. Olson , N. Torrance & A. Hildyard (Eds) Literacy, language and learning: the nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp.105–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chanock, K.
(1997) Never say ‘I’?: the writer’s voice in essays in the humanities. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.54–63). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Clark, H. H. & Haviland, S. E.
(1977) Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R.O. Freedle (Ed.) Discourse production and comprehension (pp.1–40). New Jersey: Ablex.
Cooper, M. M. & Holzman, M.
(1988) Cohesion, coherence and incoherence. In M. Cooper & M. Holzman (Eds.) Writing as social action (pp.94–108). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
Crompton, P.
(1992) Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (4), 71–287.
Elliott, M.
(1997) The teaching of academic discourse: collaboration between discipline lecturers and academic support staff at RMIT. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.77–87). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Ferguson, G.
(1997) Literacy in the disciplines: giving academics a language to talk about language. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.161–166). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Garner, M.
(1997) Some questions about integrated communication skills programs. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.37–41). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Hallet, R.
(1997) Promoting language skills through collaboration between content lecturers and language specialists. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.88–102). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1989) Some grammatical problems in scientific English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Genre & Systemic Functional Studies, Series5 (6), 13–37.
Halliday M.A.K. & Hasan R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hamp-Lyons, L.
(1991) Writer’s knowledge and our knowledge of the writer. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.). Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp.51–67). New Jersey: Ablex.
Horning, A. S.
(1993) The psycholinguistics of readable writing. New Jersey: Ablex.
Howarth, P.
(1996) How conventional is academic writing?Review of ELT, 6 (1), 192–204.
Ivanic, R. & Simpson, J.
(1992) Who’s who in academic writing?In N. Fairclough (Ed.) Critical language awareness (pp.141–1730.New York: Longman.
Kaldor, S. , Herriman, M. & Rochecouste, J.
(1997) Cross-disciplinary and discipline-specific discourse features in student academic writing. In Z. Golebiowski & H, Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.198–208). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
(1998) Tertiary student writing. A reportfor the collaborative ARC project ‘Framing Student Literacy: Aspects of cross-cultural communication in Australian universities’. Macquarie University, NSW: NCELTR.
Lakoff, G.
(1972) Hedges: a study of meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. InPapers forthe Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, Vol.8. (pp.183–228). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Martin, J.
(1993) Literacy in science: learning to handle texts as technology. In M.A.K. Halliday & J. R. Martin Writing science (pp.166–202). London: Falmer Press.
Skelton, J.
(1997) The representation of truth in academic and medical writing. Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 121–140. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.2.121
Sodowsky, R. E. & Witte, S. P.
(1983) Topical chains in high and low-quality informative texts of college freshman. Paper presented atthe Conference on College Composition and Communication, Detroit.
Silyn-Roberts, H.
(1997) The report and the essay: Are we muddling science and engineering undergraduates by asking them to write in two different genres?In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.240–247). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Swales, J. & Feak. C.B.
(1994) Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills: a course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Vande Kopple, W.
(1986) Given and new information and some aspects of the structures, semantics, and pragmatics of written texts. In C. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Eds.) Studying writing: linguistic approaches (pp.72–111). London: Sage.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25.2.04kal
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address