1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 28, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study reports on teachers’ attitudes towards their students’ speech varieties of English. A sample of 172 primary, district high and secondary teachers in Western Australian schools was surveyed on their attitudes towards language variation and towards their students’ use of specific English variants. The teachers were found to have generally conservative attitudes, particularly with regard to their students’ use of non-standard features. These features were also associated with falling language standards. The impact of the teacher background factors of gender, age, level of teaching qualification, teaching experience and professional development on attitudes was also considered. However, only teacher qualifications and length of experience were found to be significant and this influence was restricted to attitudes towards language varieties. Such findings have important implications for speakers of non-standard sociolects who would tend to use these features more often. It is of particular concern where teachers associate the use of non-standard varieties with lower academic ability as has been found in other research. The findings suggest that teachers need to understand the relationships between standard and non-standard varieties, written and spoken forms, formal and informal registers, and developmental and non-standard features.

© 2005 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.28.2.04oli
2005-01-01
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.28.2.04oli
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbott-Shim, M. , Lambert, R. , & McCarthy, F.
    (1998) Teacher beliefs and classroom structure as influences on head start classroom quality. Paper presented atthe 4th National Head Start Research Conference, Washington DC July 12-19. Washington, DC: Administration for Children, Youth and Families.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aitchison, J.
    (1981) Language change: progress or decay?Suffolk: Fontana Paperbacks.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Atchinson, J.
    (1998) The endless stairway of language. ARENA, 18, 38–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ammon, V.
    (1989) Aspects of dialect and school in the Federal Republic of Germany. In J. Cheshire , V. Edward , H. Munstermann & B. Welten (Eds.) Dialect and education: some European perspectives (pp.113–138). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbour, S.
    (1987) Dialects and the teaching of a standard language: South West German work. Language in Society, 16, 227–244. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500012276
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012276 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnes, D.
    (1976) From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bex, T.
    (1996) Variety in written English: texts in society and societies in texts. London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  8. (1999) Representations of English in twentieth century Britain: Fowler, Gowers and Partridge. In T. Bex & R. J. Watts (Eds.) Standard English: the widening debate (pp.89–109). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cambourne, B.
    (1990) Beyond the deficit theory: a 1990’s perspective on literacy failure. Australian Journal of Reading, 13(4), 289–299.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron, D.
    (1995) Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Carter, R.
    (1995) Keywords in language and literacy. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203293652
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203293652 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheshire, J.
    (1984) The relationship of language and sex in English. In P. Trud-gill (Ed.) Applied sociolinguistics (pp.33–49).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. (1997) Linguistic variation and social function. In >N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.) Sociolinguistics: a reader and coursebook (Vol.III, pp.185–198). London: Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑25582‑5_16
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_16 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheshire, J. , & Trudgill, P.
    (1989) Dialect and education in the United Kingdom. In J. Cheshire , V. Edwards , H. Munstermann & B. Weltens (Eds.) Dialect and education: some European perspectives (pp.94–109). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Corson, D. J.
    (1981) Social class, the semantic barrier, and access to curricu-lar knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, London.
  16. Corson, D.
    (1983) Social dialect, the semantic barrier, and access to curricular knowledge. Language in Society, 12, 213–222. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500009817
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500009817 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1999) Language policy in schools: a resource for teachers and administrators. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Eagleson, R.
    (1989) Popular and professional attitudes to prestige dialects. In P. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.) Australian English: the language of a new society (pp.151–157). St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Edwards, J. , & Giles, H.
    (1984) Applications of the social psychology of language: sociolinguistics and education. In P. Trudgill (Ed.) Appliedsociolin-guistics (pp.119–158). London: Academic Press Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Eggington, W.
    (1997) The English metaphors we live by. In W. Eggington & H. Wren (Eds.) Language policy: dominant English, pluralist challenges (pp.29–46). Canberra: Language Australia. doi: 10.1075/z.83.06egg
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.83.06egg [Google Scholar]
  21. Eltis, K.
    (1989) Pupils’ speech style and teacher reaction. In P. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.) Australian English: the language for a new society (pp.103–110). St Lucia: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ford, C.
    (1984) The influence of speech variety on teachers’ evaluation of students with comparable academic ability. TESOL Quarterly, 18(1), 25–40. doi: 10.2307/3586333
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586333 [Google Scholar]
  23. Giles, H. , & Coupland, N.
    (1991) Language contexts and consequences. Buckingham: Open University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gordon, J. C. B.
    (1981) Verbal deficit: a critique. London: Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Graff, H.
    (1979) The literacy myth : literacy and social structure in the nineteenth-century city. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hagen, A. M.
    (1989) Dialect, Frisian and education in the Netherlands. In J. Cheshire , V. Edwards , H. Munstermann & B. Weltens (Eds.) Dialect and education: some European perspectives (pp.48–61). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Haig, Y. G.
    (2001) Teacher perceptions of student speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Edith Cowan University, Perth.
  28. Haig, Y. & Oliver, R.
    (2003) Is it a case of mind over matter: influences on teachers’ judgment of students’ speech. Australian Review of Applied Lin-guistics. 26(1), 55–70. doi: 10.1075/aral.26.1.05hai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.26.1.05hai [Google Scholar]
  29. Hamilton-Kelley, B.
    (1994) A measurement of attitudes held by African American and Caucasian preservice teachers toward Black English Vernacular, Standard American English, and dialects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
  30. Hammarström, G.
    (1987) Irritating expressions in Australian English. Language and speech, 30(2), 99–113.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hodge, R. , & Kress, G.
    (1993) Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London: Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hollingworth, B.
    (1989) Education and the vernacular. In J. Cheshire , V. Edwards , H. Munstermann & B. Weltens (Eds.) Dialect and education: some European Perspectives (pp.293–302). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Joseph, J. E.
    (1987) Eloquence and power: the rise of language standards and standard languages. London: Frances Pinter.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Labov, W.
    (1991) The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205–254. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500000338
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000338 [Google Scholar]
  35. Milroy, J. , & Milroy, L.
    (1991) Authority in language: investigating language prescription and standardisation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Münstermann, H.
    (1989) Language attitudes in education. In J. Cheshire , V. Edward , H. Munstermann & B. Welten (Eds.) Dialect and education: some European perspectives (pp.166–182). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Noguchi, R. R.
    (1991) Grammar and the teaching of writing. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Oliver, R. , Haig, Y. , & Rochecouste, J.
    (2003) Oral language assessment and the communicative competence of adolescent students. Perth, WA: CALLR, ECU.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. (2005) Tackling talk: teaching and assessing oral language. Perth, WA: CALLR, ECU.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Palmer, F.
    (1983) Grammar. (2nd Ed) Hamondsworth: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rickford, J. R.
    (1999) African American Vernacular English. Oxford: Black-well.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Skutnabb-Kangas, T.
    (1988) Multilingualism and the education of minority children. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & J. Cummins (Eds.) Minority education: from shame to struggle (pp.9–43). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sturm, J.
    (1989) Language variation and mother tongue education in the Netherlands: Reflections on some old disputes about language and education. In J. Cheshire , V. Edwards , H. Munstermann & B. Weltens (Eds.) Dialect and education: some European perspectives (pp.303–316). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Trudgill, P.
    (1983) On dialect: social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Trudgill, P. , & Giles, H.
    (1976) Sociolinguistics and language value judgements: correctness, adequacy and aesthetics: Linguistics Agency of the University of Trier.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Williams, F.
    (1973) Some recent studies of language attitudes. In R. W. Shuy (Ed.) Some new directions in linguistics (pp.121–149). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.28.2.04oli
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error