Visit www.benjamins.com

Reading, readability, and textual functions of comprehension questions

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.3.2.07ger
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.3.2.07ger
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Clymer, T. C.
“What is Reading? Some Current Concepts”, in Robinson, H. M. (Ed.) Innovation and Change in Reading Instruction, 67th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago 1968.
Elley, Warwick , B.
1975Assessing the difficulty of Reading Materials: The Noun Frequency Method. Wellington. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Goldsweig, B.
(Assoc. Ed.) “The Lumpy Nose”, inSprint, Scope/Skills Book. New York: Scholastic Book Services 1970.
Halliday, M. A. K.
1977 “Text as Semantic Choice in Social Contexts”. In Dijk, T. van , and Petofi, J. S. , (Eds), Grammar and Descriptions, Berlin: W. de Gruyter, RTTI.
Halliday, M. A. K. , and Hasan, R.
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Lorge, I.
1949 “Reading and readability”. Teacher’s College Record, 51.
McCall, W. A. , and Crabbs, L. M.
1961Standard Test Lessons in Reading. New York: Teachers’ College Press, Teachers’ College, Columbia University.
Progressive Achievement Tests: Reading Comprehension, Form A, Australian Council for Educational Research (in cooperation with the NZCER),Frederick Street, Hawthorn: Victoria 1973.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.3.2.07ger
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address