Attribute agenda setting and information overload

References

1. Bennett, W. L. , Lawrence, R. G. , & Livingston, S.
   (2006) None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 467–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00296.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x [Google Scholar]
2. Berelson, B.
   (1952) Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bowe, B.J., Fahmy, S. , & Wanta, W.
   (2013) Missing religion: Second level agenda setting and Islam in American newspapers. The International Communication Gazette, 75(7), 636–652. doi: 10.1177/1748048513482544
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513482544 [Google Scholar]
4. Chyi, H. I. , & McCombs, M.
   (2004) Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbine school shootings. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 22–35. doi: 10.1177/107769900408100103
   https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100103 [Google Scholar]
5. DiMaggio, P. , Nag, M. & Blei, D.
   (2013) Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41, 570–606. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004 [Google Scholar]
6. DiMaggio, P.
   (2015) Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa). Big Data & Society. doi: 10.1177/2053951715602908
   https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602908 [Google Scholar]
7. Ghanem, S. I.
   (1996) Media coverage of crime and public opinion: An exploration of the second level of agenda setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ghanem, S. I.
   (1997) Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. InM. E. McCombs, D. Shaw & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy (pp.309–330). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Guo, L.
   (2012) The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: A methodological exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 616–631. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.732148
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732148 [Google Scholar]
10. Guo, L. , Chen, Y. , Vu, H. , Wang, Q. , Aksamit, R. , Guzek, D. , Jachimowski, M. & McCombs, M.
    (2014) Coverage of the Iraq War in the United States, Mainland China, Taiwan and Poland. Journalism Studies. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.885198
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.885198 [Google Scholar]
11. Guo, L. & McCombs, M.
    (eds.) (2016) The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Guo, L. , & McCombs, M.
    (2011a) Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects. query Paper presented atthe International Communication Association (ICA) Annual Conference, Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Guo, L. , & McCombs, M.
    (2011b) Toward the third level of agenda setting theory: A network agenda setting model. Paper presented atthe Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Guo, L. , Vargo, C. J. , Pan, Z. , Ding, W. , & Ishwar, P.
    (2016) Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication: Comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modeling. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hasell, A. A. , & McGregor, S. C.
    (2016) Black-box algorithms: Scholarly use of proprietary coding software in communication research. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kim, Y. & Kim, Y.
    (2014) Theoretical and methodological trends of agenda setting theory: A thematic meta-analysis of the last five decades. Working paper, University of Alabama.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kiousis, S.
    (2005) Compelling arguments and attitude strength. Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(2), 3–27. doi: 10.1177/1081180X05276095
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05276095 [Google Scholar]
18. Laver, M. , Benoit, K. , & Garry, J.
    (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311–331. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000698
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000698 [Google Scholar]
19. Lewis, S. C. ; Zamith, R. & Hermida, A.
    (2013) Content analysis in an era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 34–52. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.761702
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761702 [Google Scholar]
20. Littau, J. & Stewart, D. R.
    (2015) “Truthiness” and second-level agenda setting: Satire news and its influence on perceptions of television news credibility. Electronic News, 9(2), 122–136. doi: 10.1177/1931243115581416
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243115581416 [Google Scholar]
21. McCombs, M.
    (2004) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. McCombs, M.
    (2014) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd edition). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. McCombs, M. & Ghanem, S.
    (2001) The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese , O. H. Gandy Jr. & A. E. Grant (Eds), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the worldpp.67–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
24. McCombs, M. , Holbert, L. , Kiousis, S. , & Wanta, W.
    (2011) The news and public opinion: Media effects on civic life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. McCombs, M. , Llamas, J. P. , Lopez-Escobar, E. , & Rey, F.
    (1997) Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. doi: 10.1177/107769909707400404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400404 [Google Scholar]
26. McCombs, M. & Zhu, J.
    (1995) Capacity, diversity and volatility of the public agenda: Trends from 1954 to 1994 Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 495–525. doi: 10.1086/269491
    https://doi.org/10.1086/269491 [Google Scholar]
27. McMillan, S. J.
    (2000) The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 80–98. doi: 10.1177/107769900007700107
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700107 [Google Scholar]
28. Moon, S. J.
    (2011) Attention, attitude, and behavior: Second-level agenda-setting effects as a mediator of media use and political participation. Communication Research, 40(5), 698–719. doi: 10.1177/0093650211423021
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211423021 [Google Scholar]
29. Neuendorf, K.
    (2002) The content analysis guidebook. California: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Riffe, D. , Lacy, S. R. , & Fico, F. G.
    (2005) Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Saldaña, M. & Ardèvol-Abreu, A.
    (2016) From Compelling Arguments to Compelling Associations at the Third Level of Agenda Setting. In L. Guo & M. McCombs (Eds.), The Power of Information Networks: New Directions for Agenda Setting, (pp.104–118). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sheafer, T.
    (2007) How to evaluate It: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 21–39.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sjøvaag, H. , & Stavelin, E.
    (2012) Web media and the quantitative content analysis: Methodological challenges in measuring online news content. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18(2), 215–229.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Son, Y. J. & Weaver, D.
    (2005) Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 U.S. election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 174–197. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh090
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh090 [Google Scholar]
35. Vargo, C. J. , Guo, L. , McCombs, M. , & Shaw, D. L.
    (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64, 296–316. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089 [Google Scholar]
36. Wanta, W. & and Hu, Y.
    (1994) Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(3), 225–240. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/6.3.225
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/6.3.225 [Google Scholar]
37. Yioutas, J. & Segvic, I.
    (2003) Revisiting the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: The convergence of agenda Setting and framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 567–82. doi: 10.1177/107769900308000306
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000306 [Google Scholar]