Stance as participant structure

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality

The full text of this article is not currently available.

Data & Media loading...


Full text loading...


Aikhenvald, A.Y
2004Evidentiality. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.
2015 “Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories.” Linguistic Typology19 (2): 239–277. doi: 10.1515/lingty‑2015‑0008
Aronson, H.I
1991 “Towards a typology of verbal categories.” InNew Vistas in Grammar: Invariance and Variation, ed. by L.R. Waugh and S. Rudy , 111–131. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.49.09aro
Buchstaller, I
2011 “Quotations across generations: A multivariate analysis of speech and thought introducers across 5 decades of Tyneside speech.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory7 (1): 59–92. doi: 10.1515/cllt.2011.004
2014Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Oxford etc.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Coate, H.H.J
1966 “The Rai and the third eye: North-West Australian beliefs.” Oceania37 (2): 93–123. doi: 10.1002/j.1834‑4461.1966.tb01790.x
Cornillie, B
2009 “Evidentiality and epistemic modality. On the close relationship between two different categories.” Functions of Language16 (1): 9–43. doi: 10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor
Diewald, G. and E. Smirnova
2010 “Introduction: Evidentiality in European languages: the lexical-grammatical distinction.” InLinguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by G. Diewald and E. Smirnova , 1–14. Berlin – New York: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110223972
Du Bois, J.W
2007 “The stance triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse, ed. by R. Englebretson , 139–182. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
Evans, N
2006 “View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective constructions.” InProceedings of the thirty-first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by R.T. Cover and Y. Kim , 93–120. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
2012 “Some problems in the typology of quotation: a canonical approach.” InCanonical Morphology and Syntax, ed. by D. Brown , M. Chumakina , and G.G. Corbett , 66–98. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0004
Faller, M
2012 “Evidential scalar implicatures.” Linguistics and Philosophy35: 285–312. doi: 10.1007/s10988‑012‑9119‑8
Fludernik, M
1989 “Jespersen’s shifters: Reflections on deixis and subjectivity in language.” Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft15–16: 97–116.
Goffman, E
1974Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Haßler, G
2002 “Evidentiality and reported speech in Romance languages.” InReported Discourse, A meeting ground for different linguistic domains, ed. by T. Güldemann and M. von Roncador , 143–172. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.52.11has
Horrack, K
2014 “He jumped off the bridge CAUS she told him to: Indirect speech as a means of expressing indirect causation in Wubuy.” InSelected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, ed. by L. Gawne and J. Vaughan ,. 211–230. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.
Irvine, J.T
1996 “Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles.” InNatural Histories of Discourse, ed. by M. Silverstein and G. Urban , 131–159. Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press.
Jakobson, R
1957Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Jespersen, O
1922Language: Its Nature Development and Origin. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
Kockelman, P
2004 “Stance and subjectivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology14 (2): 127–150. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.127
2010Language, Culture, and Mind: Natural Constructions and Social Kinds. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511711893
McGregor, W.B
2007 “A desiderative complement construction in Warrwa.” InLanguage description, history and development, ed. by J. Siegel , J. Lynch and D. Eades , 27–40. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.30.08mcg
2011The Nyulnyul language of Dampier Land, Western Australia, Volume 1 and 2. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Mel’čuk, I
1991 “Toward a universal calculus of inflectional categories: On Roman Jakobson’s trail.” InNew Vistas in Grammar: Invariance and Variation, ed. by L.R. Waugh and S. Rudy , 85–109. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.49.08mel
Nekes, H. and E.A. Worms
1953Australian languages. Freiburg: Anthropos Institut.
Nuyts, J. , P. Byloo and J. Diepeveen
2010 “On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten .” Journal of Pragmatics42: 16–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012
Potts, C
2005The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.
2007a The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics33 (2): 165–198.
2007b Into the conventional-implicature dimension. Philosophy Compass2 (4): 665–679. doi: 10.1111/j.1747‑9991.2007.00089.x
Rumsey, A
1990 Wording, meaning and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist92 (2): 346–361. doi: 10.1525/aa.1990.92.2.02a00060
San Roque, L
2008An introduction to Duna grammar. Ph. D. thesis, The Australian National University.
2010 “Origo seeks ego for open relationship: Some issues of perspective and evidential morphology.” Presentation held at theAustralian National University, 2nd July 2010.
San Roque, L. and H. Bergqvist
(eds.) 2015 Epistemic marking in typological perspective, special issue ofSTUF – Language Typology and Universals68.
San Roque, L. , S. Floyd , and E. Norcliffe
. Forthcoming. “Evidentiality and interrogativity.” Lingua.
San Roque, L. and R. Loughnane
2012 The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology16, 111–167. doi: 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0003
Smith, C.S
2010 “Accounting for subjectivity (point of view).” InText, Time, and Context, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, ed by R.P. Meier , H. Aristar-Dry , and E. Destruel , 371–393. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.
Speas, M
2004 “Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features.” Lingua114: 255–276. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00030‑5
Spronck, S
2012 “Minds divided, speaker attitudes in quotatives.” InQuotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, ed. by I. Buchstaller and I. Van Alphen , 71–116. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.15.07spr
2015 “Refracting views: How to construct complex perspective in reported speech and thought in Ungarinyin.” STUF – Language Typology and Universals68 (2): 165–185. doi: 10.1515/stuf‑2015‑0009
. Forthcoming. “Evidential fictive interaction in Ungarinyin and Russian.” InThe Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction ed. by E. Pascual and S. Sandler . Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vandelanotte, L
2006 “Speech or thought representation and subjectification, or on the need to think twice.” Belgian journal of linguistics20: 137–168. doi: 10.1075/bjl.20.10van
Verstraete, J.-C
2001 “Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system.” Journal of Pragmatics33 (10): 1505–1528. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00029‑7
2005 “Scalar quantity implicatures and the interpretation of modality: Problems in the deontic domain.” Journal of Pragmatics37: 1401–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.003
von Fintel, K. and A.S. Gillies
2008 “CIA leaks.” Philosophical Review117 (1): 77–98. doi: 10.1215/00318108‑2007‑025
Wierzbicka, A
1974 “The function of direct and indirect discourse.” Papers in Linguistics7 (3): 267–307. doi: 10.1080/08351817409370375
Wilkins, D.P
1986 “Particle/clitics for criticism and complaint in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda).” Journal of Pragmatics10: 575–596. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(86)90015‑9
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address