Visit www.benjamins.com

Chopping down the syntax tree

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

What constructions can do instead

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.30.02van
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.30.02van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Bod, Rens
2009 “Constructions at Work or at Rest?.” Cognitive Linguistics20 (1): 129–134. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2009.006
Bybee, Joan and Clay Beckner
2010 “Usage-Based Theory.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog , 827–855. Oxford: OUP.
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicaco: University of Chicaco Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1956 “Three models for the description of language.” IRE Transactions on Information Theory2: 113–124. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813
1977 “On WH-Movement.” InFormal Syntax, ed. by Peter W. Culicover , Thomas Wasow , and Adrian Akmajian . San Francisco/London: Academic Press.
Croft, William
1998 “Event Structure in Argument Linking.” InThe Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, ed. by Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder , 21–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
2003 “Lexical Rules vs. Constructions: A False Dichotomy.” InMotivation in Language Studies: Studies in Honour of Günter Radden, ed. by Hubert Cuyckens , Thomas Berg , René Dirven , and Klaus-Uwe Panther , 49–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.243.07cro
Dabrowska, Ewa
2008 “Questions With Long-Distance Dependencies: A Usage-Based Perspective.” Cognitive Linguistics19 (3): 391–425. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2008.015
Dabrowska, Ewa , Caroline Rowland , and Anna Theakston
2009 “The Acquisition of Questions with Long-Distance Dependencies.” Cognitive Linguistics20: 571597. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2009.025
Dik, Simon C.
1997The Theory ofFunctional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure ofthe Clause. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1975 “Against Checklist Theories of Meaning.” InProceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Cathy Cogen , 123–131. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
1988 “The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”.” InProceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35–55. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Gazdar, Gerald
1981 “Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure.” Linguistic Inquiry12: 155–184.
Gibson, Edward
1998 “Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies.” Cognition68: 1–76. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(98)00034‑1
2000 “The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-Based Theory of Linguistic Complexity.” InImage, Language, Brain, ed. by Yasushi Miyashita , Alec P. Marantz , and Wayne O’Neil , 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres.
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago UP.
Goldberg, Adele E. and Alex Del Giudice
2005 “Subject-Auxiliary Inversion: A Natural Category.” The Linguistic Review2: 411–428.
Grice, Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan , 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Hawkins, J.A.
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
Joshi, Aravind
1985 “How much context-sensitivity is necessary for characterizing structural descriptions.” InNatural Language Processing: Theoretical, Computational, and Psychological Perspectives, ed. by David R. Dowty , Lauri Karttunen , and Arnold M. Zwicky , 206–250. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597855.007
Kaplan, Ronald M. and Annie Zaenen
1995 “Long-Distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure, and Functional Uncertainty.” InFormal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, ed. by Mary Dalrymple , Ronald M. Kaplan , John T. Maxwell III , and Annie Zaenen , 137–165. Stanford: Stanford University.
Kay, Martin
1979 “Functional Grammar.” InProceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 142–158. Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Mannning, Christopher D. and Hinrich Schütze
1999Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Penn, Gerald
2012 “Computational Linguistics.” InThe Philosophy ofLinguistics, ed. by Tim Fernando Ruth Kempson and Nicholas Asher , 143–174. Amsterdam: North Holland. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑444‑51747‑0.50005‑6
Perek, Florent
2015Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar, Volume 17 of Constructional Approaches to Language. John Benjamins: John Benjamins.
Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag
1994Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago/Stanford: University of Chicago Press/CSLI Publications.
Rijkhoff, Jan
1992The Noun Phrase: A Typological Study of its Form and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sag, Ivan A.
2010 “English Filler-Gap Constructions.” Language86 (3): 486–545. doi: 10.1353/lan.2010.0002
Sag, Ivan A. and Thomas Wasow
2011 “Performance-Compatible Competence Grammar.” InNon-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, ed. by Robert D. Borsley and Kersti Börjars , 359–377. Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444395037.ch10
Sag, Ivan A. , Thomas Wasow , and Emily M. Bender
2003Syntactic Theory. A Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Steels, Luc
(ed) 2011Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.11
. To appear. “The Basics of Fluid Construction Grammar.” Constructions and Frames.
van Trijp, Remi
2011 “A Design Pattern for Argument Structure Constructions.” InDesign Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar, ed. by Luc Steels . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.11.07tri
2015 “Cognitive vs. Generative Construction Grammar: The Case of Coercion and Argument Structure.” Cognitive Linguistics26: 613–632. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0074
van Trijp, Remi and Luc Steels
2012 “Multilevel Alignment Maintains Language Systematicity.” Advances in Complex Systems15 (3–4).
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford: OUP.
Wellens, Pieter
2011 “Organizing Constructions in Networks.” InDesign Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar, ed. by Luc Steels , 181–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.11.10wel
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.30.02van
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address