Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation

References

1. Beckner, Clay , Richard Blythe , Joan Bybee , Morten H. Christiansen , William Croft , Nick C. Ellis , John Holland , Jinyun Ke , Diane Larsen-Freeman , & Tom Schoenemann
   2009 “Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language learning59 (1): 1–26.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bergs, Alexander
   2005 Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110923223
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110923223 [Google Scholar]
3. Blythe, Richard A. , and William Croft
   2012 “S-curves and the Mechanisms of Propagation in Language Change.” Language88 (2): 269–304. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0027
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0027 [Google Scholar]
4. Brinton, Laurel
   1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907582
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
5. Budts, Sara , and Peter Petré
   2016 “Reading the Intentions of be going to. On the Subjectification of Future Markers.” Folia Linguistica Historica37: 1–32. doi: 10.1515/flih‑2016‑0001
   https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2016-0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Bybee, Joan
   2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
7. Croft, William
   2000 Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Smet, Hendrik
   2016 “How Gradual Change Progresses: The Interaction between Convention and Innovation.” Language Variation and Change28: 83–102. doi: 10.1017/S0954394515000186
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000186 [Google Scholar]
9. De Smet, Hendrik , and Liesbet Heyvaert
   2011 “The Meaning of the English Present Participle.” English Language and Linguistics15 (3): 473–498. doi: 10.1017/S136067431100013X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431100013X [Google Scholar]
10. De Wit, Astrid , and Frank Brisard
    2014 “A Cognitive Grammar Account of the Semantics of the English Present Progressive.” Journal of Linguistics50 (1): 49–90. doi: 10.1017/S0022226713000169
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226713000169 [Google Scholar]
11. Detges, Ulrich , and Richard Waltereit
    2002 “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: A Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft21: 151–195. doi: 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
12. Disney, Steve
    2009 “The Grammaticalisation of be going to .” Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics15: 63–82.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    2004 “The Meanings and Uses of the Progressive Construction in an Early Eighteenth-Century English Network.” InStudies in the History of the English Language II, ed. by Anne Curzan , and Kimberly Emmons , 131–174. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110897661.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110897661.131 [Google Scholar]
14. Fludernik, Monika
    1992 “The Historical Present Tense in English Literature: An Oral pattern and its Literary Adaptation.” Language and Literature17: 77–107.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Garrett, Andrew
    2012 “The Historical Syntax Problem: Reanalysis and Directionality.” InGrammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, ed. by Dianne Jonas et al. , 52–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haspelmath, Martin
    1999 “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?” Linguistics37: 1043–1068. doi: 10.1515/ling.37.6.1043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043 [Google Scholar]
17. Hilpert, Martin
    2008 Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-Based Approach to Language Change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.7 [Google Scholar]
18. Hopper, Paul J. , and Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
19. Jäger, Gerhard , and Anette Rosenbach
    2008 “Priming and Unidirectional Language Change.” Theoretical Linguistics34 (2): 85–113. doi: 10.1515/THLI.2008.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.008 [Google Scholar]
20. Jespersen, Otto
    1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Keller, Rudi
    1994 On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kemenade, Ans van , and Bettelou Los
    2006 “Discourse Adverbs and Clausal Syntax in Old and Middle English.” InThe Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Ans van Kemenade , and Bettelou Los , 224–48. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757048.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch10 [Google Scholar]
23. Killie, Kristin
    2008 “From Locative to Durative to Focalized? The English Progressive and ‘PROG Imperfective Drift’.” InEnglish historical linguistics 2006, vol. 1: Historical syntax and morphology. Selected papers from the fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, ed. by Gotti Maurizio , Marina Dossena , and Richard Dury , 69–88. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.295.07kil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.295.07kil [Google Scholar]
24. Klein, Wolfgang
    1994 Time in Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kranich, Svenja
    2010 The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789042031449
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042031449 [Google Scholar]
26. Krug, Manfred G.
    2000 Emerging English modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 32). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110820980
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820980 [Google Scholar]
27. Mair, Christian
    2004 “Corpus Linguistics and Grammaticalisation Theory: Statistics, Frequencies, and Beyond.” InCorpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English, ed. by Hans Lindquist , and Christian Mair , 121–150. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.13.07mai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.13.07mai [Google Scholar]
28. Meillet, Antoine
    1912 “L’évolution des formes grammaticales [The evolution of grammatical forms].” Scientia12: 130–148.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Michaelis, Laura A.
    2003 “Headless Constructions and Coercion by Construction.” InMismatch: Form-Function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar (CSLI publications 115), ed. by Elaine Francis , and Laura A. Michaelis , 259–310. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nesselhauf, Nadja
    2010 “The Development of Future Time Expressions in Late Modern English: Redistribution of Forms or Change in Discourse?” English Language and Linguistics14 (2): 163–186. doi: 10.1017/S1360674310000043
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000043 [Google Scholar]
31. Nevalainen, Terttu , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg , and Heikki Mannila
    2011 “The Diffusion of Language Change in Real-Time: Progressive and Conservative Individuals and the Time Depth of Change.” Language Variation and Change23: 1–43. doi: 10.1017/S0954394510000207
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000207 [Google Scholar]
32. Petré, Peter
    2013 EEBOCorp, version 1.0. Leuven: University of Leuven Linguistics Department.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Petré, Peter
    2014 Constructions and Environments: Copular, Passive and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English (Oxford Studies in the History of English 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
34. Petré, Peter
    2016 “Grammaticalization by Changing Co-Text Frequencies, or why [be Ving] Became the ‘Progressive’.” English Language and Linguistics. 20 (1): 31–54. doi: 10.1017/S1360674315000210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674315000210 [Google Scholar]
35. Petré, Peter
    . Forthcoming for 2017. “The extravagant progressive. An experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [be Ving].” English Language and linguistics21.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Petré, Peter , and Freek Van de Velde
    2014 “Tracing Real-Life Agents’ Individual Progress in Ongoing Grammaticalization.” InHow Grammaticalization Processes Create Grammar (workshop held at EVOLANG10, Vienna, Austria, 14–17 April 2014) Proceedings, ed. by Luc Steels , and Remi van Trijp . (emergent-languages.org/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/proceedings.pdf)
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pickering, Martin J. , and Victor S. Ferreira
    2008 “Structural Priming: A Critical Review.” Psychological Bulletin134 (3): 427–459. (accessed online at:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657366/) doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.134.3.427.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427 [Google Scholar]
38. Pons-Sanz, Sara
    2014 The Language of Early English Literature: from Cædmon to Milton. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena , and Arja Nurmi
    2011 “Grammaticalization and Language Change in the Individual.” InHandbook of Grammaticalisation, ed. by Heiko Narrog , and Bernard Heine , 251–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sankoff, G.
    2006 “Age: Apparent Time and Real Time.” Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Second Edition, Article Number: LALI: 01479. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01479‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01479-6 [Google Scholar]
41. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2008 “‘All that he endeavoured to prove was…’: On the Emergence of Grammatical Constructions in Dialogic Contexts.” InLanguage in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution, ed. by Robin Cooper , and Ruth Kempson , 143–177. London: Kings College.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2010 “Dialogic Contexts as Motivations for Syntactic Change.” InStudies in the History of the English language V. Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches, ed. by Robert A. Cloutier , Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm , and William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. , 11–27. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2012 “On the Persistence of Ambiguous Linguistic Context over Time: Implications for Corpus Research on Micro-Changes”. InCorpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description, ed. by Joybrato Mukherjee , and Magnus Hüber , 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401207713_019
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207713_019 [Google Scholar]
44. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2015 “Toward a Coherent Account of Grammatical Constructionalization.” InDiachronic Construction Grammar, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal , Elena Smirnova , Lotte Sommerer , and Spike Gildea , 51–80. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.18.02tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra [Google Scholar]
45. Traugott, Elizabeth C. , and Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
46. van de Pol, Nikki
    2016 The Development of the Absolute Construction in English: Between Bird’s Eye View and Magnifying Glass. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Westergaard, Marit
    2009 “Word order in Old and Middle English: The Role of Information Structure and First Language Acquisition.” Diachronica26 (1): 65–102. doi: 10.1075/dia.26.1.03wes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.26.1.03wes [Google Scholar]