Visit www.benjamins.com

What is this, sarcastic syntax?

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.7.2.01mic
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.7.2.01mic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Arregi, K
(2007) Syntax and semantics of split questions. In J. Camacho , N. Flores Ferrán , L. Sánchez , V. Déprez , & M.J. Cabrera (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) (pp. 15–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.287.03arr
Bai, Y
(2014) A Usage-based study of the just me construction. In A. Stefanowitsch (Ed.), Yearbook of the German cognitive linguistics association, Vol. 2 (pp.126–146). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bakhtin, M
(1986) Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Biber, D
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
Biber, D. , Connor, U. , & Upton, T.A
(2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.28
Camp, E
(2012) Sarcasm, presence and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. Nous, 46, 587–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0068.2010.00822.x
Cieri, C. , Miller, D. , & Walker, K
(2004) The Fisher corpus: A resource for the next generations of speech-to-text. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (pp.69–71), Lisbon.
Clark, H.C. , & Fox Tree, J.E
(2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00017‑3
Clark, H.C. , & Gerrig, R
(1984) On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
Coupland, N
(2007) Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511755064
Davies, M
(2008) The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/coca/.
Fillmore, C.J. , Kay, P. , & O’Connor, M.C
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64, 501–538. doi: 10.2307/414531
Goodwin, M.H
(1996) Shifting frame. In D. Slobin , J. Gerhardt , A. Kyratzis , & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context and language: Essays in honor of Susan Irvin-Tripp (pp.71–83). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Grice, H.P
(1975/1989) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3. Academic press. Reprinted as ch. 2 of Grice 1989, Studies in the way of words (pp. 22-40). Harvard University Press.
Kay, P
(1997) Constructional modus tollens and level of conventionality. In P. Kay , Words and the grammar of context (pp. 171–188). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kay, P. , & Fillmore, C.J
(1999) Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The ‘What’s X doing Y’ construction. Language, 75, 1–33. doi: 10.2307/417472
Kay, P. , & Michaelis, L.A
(2012) Constructional meaning and compositionality. In C. Maienborn , K. von Heusinger , & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An International handbook of natural language meaning, Vol. 3 (pp.2271–2296). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kumon-Nakamura, S. , Glucksberg, S. , & Brown, M
(1995) How about another piece of pie? The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.124.1.3
Lambrecht, K
(1994) Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Lambrecht, K. , & Michaelis, L.A
(1998) Sentence accent in information questions: Default and projection. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 477–544. doi: 10.1023/A:1005327212709
López-Cortina, J
(2007) The Spanish left periphery: Questions and answers. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.
Michaelis, L.A
(2012) Making the case for Construction Grammar. In H. Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 31–69). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Michaelis, L.A. , & Francis, H.S
(2007) Lexical subjects and the conflation strategy. In N. Hedberg & R. Zacharski (Eds.), Topics in the grammar-pragmatics interface: Papers in honor of Jeanette K. Gundel (pp. 19–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.155.04mic
Michaelis, L.A. , & Lambrecht, K
(1996) Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72, 215–247. doi: 10.2307/416650
Morgan, J
(1978) Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 261–280). New York: Academic Press.
Norrick, N
(1992) Wh-Questions with guesses in tag position. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 85–95. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90111‑N
Rampton, B
(1995) Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. New York & London: Longman.
Sag, I.A
(2012) Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In H. Boas & I.A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. 69–202). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Thompson, S.A. , & Hopper, P.J
(2001) Transitivity, clause structure and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 28–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.45.03tho
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cf.7.2.01mic
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address