Visit www.benjamins.com

Grammatical constructions and cross-text generalizations

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

Empathetic narration as genre

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.7.2.02nik
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.7.2.02nik
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Adamson, S
(1995) From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: Stylisation and (de)subjectivization as processes of language change. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (pp. 195–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.010
Bakhtin, M
(1986) Speech genres and other late essays (Translated by Vern W. McGee ). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bally, C
(1912) Le style indirect libre en francais modern. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift4, 549–56 and 597–606.
Banfield, A
(1982) Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bazerman, C
(1994) Constructing experience. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
Benveniste, E
(1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
Bhatia, V.K
(1993) Analysing genre. Language use in professional settings. London/New York: Longman.
Biber, D. , & Conrad, S
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
Biber, D. , Connor, U. , & Upton, T
(2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.28
Bosseaux, C
(2004)  Translation and narration: A corpus-based study of French translations of two novels by Virginia Woolf . Unpublished PhD thesis, University College London.
Brinton, L
(1995) Non-anaphoric reflexives in free indirect style: Expressing the subjectivity of the non-speaker’. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (pp. 173–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.009
Bybee, J
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
Bybee, J. , & Torres Cacoullos, R
(2009) The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In R.L. Corrigan , E.A. Moravcsik , H. Ouali , & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language, volume 1. Distribution and historical change (pp. 187–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.82.09the
Chafe, W
(1980) The pear stories. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Christidis, A
(1981) ‘Οτι/πως - που: επιλογή δεικτών συμπληρωμάτων στα Νέα Ελληνικά [ Oti/pos –pu: complementizer selection in Modern Greek]. Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα2 (pp.113–177). Θεσσαλονίκη: Αφοι Κυριακίδη.
(1986) Το μόρφημα που σαν αναφορικός δείκτης [The morpheme pu as an anaphoric marker]. Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα7 (pp.135–148). Θεσσαλονίκη: Αφοι Κυριακίδη.
Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary
(1987 [1993]) London: Harper Collins Publishers.
Corbett, J
(2006) Genre and genre analysis. In E.K. Brown & A. Anderson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (pp. 26–32). Boston: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00514‑9
Delveroudi, R. , Tsamadou, I. , & Vassilaki, S
(1993) Contribution à l’ étude de la modalité en Grec Moderne: Le marqueurνα. Linguistique Formelle [Collection ERA 642]. Paris: Université Paris 7.
Eggins, S
(2004) An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum.
Emanatian, M
(1997) The spatialization of judgement. In W.A. Liebert , G. Redeker , & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp.131–147). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.151.11ema
Fillmore, C.J
(1981) Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 143–166). New York: Academic Press.
(1982) Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.
Fludernik, M
(1993) The fictions of language and the languages of fiction: The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London: Routledge.
(2001) New wine in old bottles? Voice, focalization and new writing. New Literary History, 32(3), 619–638. doi: 10.1353/nlh.2001.0033
Fried, M. , & Östman, J.-O
(2004) Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J-O. Őstman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.2.02fri
(2005) Construction grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1752–1778. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.013
Ginzburg, J. , & Kolliakou, D
(1997) Events and facts: A semantics of pu and oti clauses. Greek linguistics ‘95: Proceedings of the 2nd international congress on Greek linguistics, Vol. 2 (pp. 459–470). Graz: W. Neugebauer.
Goldberg, A
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haberlandt, K. , Sandson, J. , & Berian, C
(1980) The episode schema in story processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 635–651. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(80)90331‑X
Halliday, M.A.K. , & Hasan, R
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longmans.
Holton, D. , Mackridge, P. , & Philippaki-Warburton, I
(1997) Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.
Huddleston, R. , & Pullum, G.K
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ji, S
(2002) Identifying episode transitions. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(9), 1257–1271. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00067‑9
Kay, P. , & Fillmore, C.J
(1999) Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language, 75, 1–33. doi: 10.2307/417472
Kleris, C. , & Babiniotis, G
(2005).Γραμματική της Νέας Ελληνικής (A grammar of Modern Greek). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
Kuno, S
(1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuno, S. , & Kaburaki, E
(1977) Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(4), 627–672.
Langacker, R
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1): 5–38. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II, Descriptive application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
(2000) Grammar and conceptualization. [Cognitive Linguistics Research 14]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2001) The English present tense. English Language and Linguistics, 5, 251–272. doi: 10.1017/S1360674301000235
Mackridge, P
(1985) The Modern Greek language: A descriptive analysis of standard Modern Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J.R
(1992) English text. System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.59
(1997) Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions (pp. 3–39). London: Continuum.
Michaelis, L
(2004) Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax. In J-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 45–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.3.04mic
Michaelis, L. , & Lambrecht, K
(1996) Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72(2), 215–247. doi: 10.2307/416650
Miller, C
(1984) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167. doi: 10.1080/00335638409383686
Moser, A
(1994).Ποιόν και απόψεις του ρήματος [Verbal aspect and aktionsart]. [Parousia Journal Monograph Series 30]. Athens: Parousia.
Newman, J. , & Rice, S
(2006) Transitivity schemas of English EAT and DRINK in the BNC. In S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics. Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis (pp. 225–260). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nicholas, N
(1999)  The story of pu. The grammaticalization in space and time of a Modern Greek complementizer . Unpublished Ph. D. thesis. The University of Melbourne.
Nikiforidou, K
(2006) Subjective construal and factual interpretation in sentential complements. In A. Athanasiadou , B. Cornillie , & C. Canakis (Eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity (pp. 347–374). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2010) Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past + now . Language and Literature, 19(3), 265–284. doi: 10.1177/0963947010370253
(2011) Grammar and discourse: A constructional approach to discourse-based conventionality. [Parousia Journal Monograph Series 81]. Athens: Parousia.
(2012) The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends: The past + now in language and literature. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language. A multimodal perspective (pp.177–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.014
Nikiforidou, K. , Marmaridou, S. , & Mikros, G
(2014) What’s in a dialogic construction? A constructional approach to polysemy and the grammar of challenge. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 655–699. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0060
Oshima, D.Y
(2007) Syntactic direction and obviation as empathy-based phenomena: A typological approach. Linguistics, 45, 727–763. doi: 10.1515/LING.2007.022
Östman, J-O
(2005) Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In J-O. Őstman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 121–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.3.06ost
Papadopoulou, I
(1994) The grammaticalization of the Modern Greek sentential complementation system. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Essex.
Short, M
(1996) Exploring the language of poems, plays, and prose. London: Longman.
Steen, F. , & Turner, M
(2013) Multimodal construction grammar. In M. Borkent , B. Dancygier , & J. Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Steen, G
(2011) Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In M. Callies , W. Keller , & A. Lohffer (Eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences (pp. 21–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.30.03ste
Swales, J
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, M
(2014) Audiovisual constructions. Plenary talk, 8th International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG8) , Osnabrück University, Germany.
Van Dijk, T.A
(1981) Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 177–195). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Varlokosta, S
(1994) Factive complements in Modern Greek. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 238–258.
Wilkins, D.P
(1992) Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(2-3), 119–158. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90049‑H
Wright, S
(1995) Subjectivity and experiential syntax. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (pp. 151–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.008
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cf.7.2.02nik
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address