Visit www.benjamins.com

Modal meaning in Construction Grammar

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.01cap
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.01cap
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Bergs, A
(2010) Expression of futurity in contemporary English: A Construction Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 217–238. doi: 10.1017/S1360674310000067
Biber, D
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
Boogaart, R
(2009) Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp.213–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.9.09boo
Boogaart, R. , & Fortuin, E
. ( 2016) Modality and mood in cognitive linguistics and construction grammars. In J. Nuyts & J. Van der Auwera (Eds.), Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.514–533). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
Cappelle, B. , & Depraetere, I
(2013) Modal verbs from a Construction Grammar perspective. Fifth International AFLiCo Conference, Empirical approaches to multi-modality and to language variation , Université Lille 3, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, 15-17 May 2013.
Cappelle, B. , & De Sutter, G
(2010)  Should vs. ought to: A corpus-based multivariate analysis. Sixth International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG-6) , Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 3-5 September 2010.
De Haan, F
(2012) The relevance of constructions for the interpretation of modal meaning: The case of must . English Studies, 93(6), 700–728. doi: 10.1080/0013838X.2012.700587
Diewald, G
(2006) Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions, SV1(9).
Diewald, G. , & Smirnova, E
(Eds.) (2011a) Modalität und Evidentialität. Fokus 37. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
(2011b) The German evidential constructions and their origins. A corpus based analysis. In T. Mortelmans , J. Mortelmans , & W. De Mulder (Eds.), In the mood for mood (pp.81–100). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi (Cahiers Chronos 23).
Goldberg, A. , & Van der Auwera, J
(2012) This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica, 46, 109–132. doi: 10.1515/flin.2012.4
Hilpert, M
(2008) Germanic future constructions. A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.7
(2013a) Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
(2013b) Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 42, 67–82.
Morgan, J.L
(1977) Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. Technical report No. 52. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17765/ctrstreadtechrepv01977i00052_opt.pdf?seque.
Mortelmans, T
(2000) Konjunktiv II and epistemic modals in German: A division of labour. In A. Foolen & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.191–215). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.178.12mor
Narrog, H
(2012) Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001
Stefanowitsch, A
(2003) A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp.105–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.113.09ste
Van der Auwera, J. , & Plungian, V
(1998) Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124. doi: 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
Wärnsby, A
(2002) Modal constructions? Lund Working Papers in Linguistics, 2. Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.01cap
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address