Visit www.benjamins.com

Short-circuited interpretations of modal verb constructions

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

Some evidence from The Simpsons

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.02cap
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.02cap
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Aijmer, K
(1996) Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Boas, H
(2003) A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Boogaart, R. , & Fortuin, E
. (to appear 2016) Modality and mood in cognitive linguistics and construction grammars. In J. Van der Auwera & J. Nuyts (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boyd, J.K. , & Goldberg, A.E
(2011) Learning what NOT to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 87(1), 55–83. doi: 10.1353/lan.2011.0012
Brown, P. , & Levinson, S.C
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
Cappelle, B
(2014) Conventional combinations in pockets of productivity: English resultatives and Dutch ditransitives expressing excess. In R. Boogaart , T. Colleman , & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp.251–282). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (to appear). What’s pragmatics doing outside constructions?In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.) Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line. Amsterdam: Springer.
Carston, R
(2009) The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication. International Review of Pragmatics, 1, 35–62. doi: 10.1163/187731009X455839
Chapman, S
(2011) Pragmatics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davies, M
(2008) The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. corpus.byu.edu/coca/
Declerck, R. , & Reed, S
(2001) Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110851748
Depraetere, I. , & Reed, S
(2008) Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility in English. Paper presented at ISLE 1 , Freiburg, 8-11 October 2008.
(2011) Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility. English Language and Linguistics, 15(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1017/S1360674310000262
Depraetere, I
(2010) Some observations on the meaning of modals. In B. Cappelle & N. Wada (Eds.), Distinctions in English grammar, Offered to Renaat Declerck (pp.72–91). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
(2014) Modals and lexically-regulated saturation. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 160–177. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.003
Depraetere, I. , & Salkie, R
. (to appear). Saturation, free pragmatic enrichment, completion and expansion: A view from linguistics. In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.) Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line. Amsterdam: Springer.
Fillmore, C.J. , Kay, P. , & O’Connor, M.C
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64, 501–538. doi: 10.2307/414531
Fillmore, C.J. , Lee-Goldman, R. , & Rhodes, R
(2012) The FrameNet constructicon. In I.A. Sag & H.C. Boas (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp.283–299). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, D. , & Lakoff, G
(1971) Conversational postulates. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 63–84. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Green, G.M
(2012) Pragmatics and natural language understanding (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grice, H.P
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics3 (pp.41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Gries, S. Th. , & Stefanowitsch, A
(2004) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 31–61. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.1.02gri
Groefsema, M
(1995)  Can, may, must and should. A relevance theoretic account. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 53–79. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700000566
Hilpert, M
(2008) Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.7
(2014) Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Jackendoff, R
(1997) Twisting the night away. Language, 73(3), 534–559. doi: 10.2307/415883
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Leech, G
(2014) The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
Levinson, S.C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGregor, B
(2015) Linguistics: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury.
Michaelis, L. , & Lambrecht, K
(1996) Toward a construction-based model of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72, 215–247. doi: 10.2307/416650
Mitchell, K
(2009) Semantic ascent, deixis, intersubjectivty and modality. In R. Salkie , P. Busuttil , & J. Van der Auwera (Eds.), Modality in English: Theory and description (pp.55–78). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110213331.55
Morgan, J.L
(1977) Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. Technical report No. 52, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17765/ctrstreadtechrepv01977i00052_opt.pdf?seque.
Palmer, F.R
(1990) Modality and the English modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Papafragou, A
(2000) Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Perek, F
(2015) Argument structure in usage-based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.17
Schmid, H.-J. , & Küchenhoff, H
(2013) Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(3), 531–577. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0018
Searle, J
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Sinclair, J
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D. , & Wilson, D
(1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Stefanowitsch, A. , & Gries, S. Th
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
Verstraete, J.-C. , D’Hertefelt, S. , & Van Linden, A
(2012) A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language, 36, 123–153. doi: 10.1075/sl.36.1.04ver
Watts, R.J
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
Wright, G.H. von
(1951) An essay in modal logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Zwicky, A.M. , & Sadock, J.M
(1975) Ambiguity tests and how to tail them. In J.P. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics4 (pp.1–36). New York: Academic Press.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.02cap
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address