Visit www.benjamins.com

Response to Wärnsby

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.04tro
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.04tro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Aarts, B
(2004) Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language, 28(1), 1–49. doi: 10.1075/sl.28.1.02aar
(2007) In defence of distributional analysis, pace Croft. Studies in Language, 31(2), 431–443. doi: 10.1075/sl.31.2.06aar
Adger, D
(2013) Constructions and grammatical explanation: Comments on Goldberg. Mind and Language, 28(4), 466–478. doi: 10.1111/mila.12027
Bencini, G
(2013) Psycholinguistics. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.379–396). New York: OUP.
Bergs, A. , & Diewald, G
(Eds.) (2009) Contexts and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.9
Boogaart, R
(2009) Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp.213–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.9.09boo
Booij, G
(2010) Construction morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Bybee, J
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.49–69). New York: OUP.
Croft, W
(2007) Beyond Aristotle and gradience: A reply to Aarts. Studies in Language, 31(2), 409–430. doi: 10.1075/sl.31.2.05cro
(2010) Commentary on Cristofaro – What do semantic maps tell us?Linguistic Discovery, 8(1), 53–60. doi: 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.362
(2013) Radical Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.211–232). New York: OUP.
De Smet, H. , Ghesquière, L. , & Van de Velde, F
(Eds.) (2013) On multiple sources in language change. Special issue of Studies in Language, 37(3).
Denison, D. , & Cort, A
(2010)  Better as a verb. In H. Cuyckens , K. Davidse , & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp.349–383). Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110226102.4.349
Eide, K
(2002) Norwegian modals. PhD dissertation. Department of Linguistics, NTNU, Trondheim.
Fischer, O
(2007) Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: OUP.
Fried, M
(2009) Repersenting contextual factors in language change. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp.63–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.9.04fri
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: OUP.
(2013a) Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational templates. Mind and Language, 28(4), 435–365. doi: 10.1111/mila.12026
(2013b) Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.15–31). New York: OUP.
Hilpert, M
(2008) Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.7
(2015) From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward-strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0001
Holmberg, A
(2010) Referring to yourself in self-talk. In C. J-W. Zwart & M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure preserved: Studies in syntax for Jan Koster (pp.185–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.164.21hol
Hudson, R
(2007) Language networks: The new word grammar. Oxford: OUP.
(2010) An introduction to word grammar. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511781964
Kay, P
(2004) Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In G. Ward & L. Horn (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp.675–700). Oxford: Blackwell.
Lambrecht, K
(2001) A framework for the analysis of cleft-constructions. Linguistics, 39, 463–516. doi: 10.1515/ling.2001.021
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Patten, A
(2012) The English IT-cleft: A constructional account and a diachronic investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110279528
Roberts, I
(2010) Grammaticalization, the clausal hierarchy and semantic bleaching. In E.C. Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp.45–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.90.05rob
Sag, I
(2010) English filler-gap constructions. Language, 86(3), 486–545. doi: 10.1353/lan.2010.0002
(2012) Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In H.C Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp.69–202). Stanford: CSLI.
Stefanowitsch, A
(2013) Collostructional analysis. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.290–306). New York: OUP.
Townsend, S
(1992) The Queen and I. London: Methuen.
van der Auwera, J. , & Plungian, V.A
(1998) Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124. doi: 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
van Trijp, R. , & Steels, L
(2012) Multilevel alignment maintains language systematicity. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(3-4). https://www.csl.sony.fr/downloads/papers/2012/vantrijp-12f.pdf. doi: 10.1142/S0219525912500397
Warner, A
(1993) English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511752995
Wärnsby, A
(2002) Modal constructions? Lund Working Papers in Linguistics, 2. Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.04tro
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address