Visit www.benjamins.com

Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, and Fluid Construction Grammar

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

Commonalities and differences

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.9.1.05mul
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.9.1.05mul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Bildhauer, F.
(2008) Representing information structure in an HPSG grammar of Spanish. Unpublished dissertation, Universität Bremen.
Bildhauer, F. & Cook, P. H.
(2010) German multiple fronting and expected topichood. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Université Paris Diderot (pp.68–79). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Bird, S. & Klein, E.
(1994) Phonological analysis in typed feature systems. Computational Linguistics20(3), 455–491.
Boas, H. C.
(2003) A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(2014) Lexical approaches to argument structure: Two sides of the same coin. Theoretical Linguistics40(1–2), 89–112.
Bouma, G. , Malouf, R. , & Sag, I. A.
(2001) Satisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory19(1), 1–65. doi: 10.1023/A:1006473306778
Bresnan, J.
(2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Brew, C.
(1995) Stochastic HPSG. In S. P. Abney & E. W. Hinrichs (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.83–89). Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.3115/976973.976986
Briscoe, T. J. , & Copestake, A.
(1999) Lexical rules in constraint-based gram- mar. Computational Linguistics25(4), 487–526.
Cappelle, B.
(2006) Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions online1(7), 1–28.
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2008) On phases. In R. Freidin , C. P. Otero , & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp.133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
Copestake, A.
(2002) Implementing typed feature structure grammars. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(2007) Applying robust semantics. InProceedings of the 10th Conference of the Pacific Assocation for Computational Linguistics (PACLING) (pp.1–12).
Crysmann, B.
(2002) Constraint-based co-analysis: Portuguese cliticisation and morphology-syntax interaction in HPSG. Saarbrücken: Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz und Universität des Saarlandes.
(2013) On the locality of complement clause and relative clause extraposition. In G. Webelhuth , M. Sailer , & H. Walker (Eds.), Rightward movement in a comparative perspective (pp.369–396). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/la.200.13cry
De Kuthy, K.
(2002) Discontinuous NPs in German. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Demberg, V. , & Keller, F.
(2008) A psycholinguistically motivated version of TAG. InProceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms TAG+9 (pp.25–32). Tübingen.
Dowty, D. R.
(1989) On the semantic content of the notion ‘thematic role’. In G. Chierchia , B. H. Partee , & R. Turner (Eds.), Properties, types and meaning (pp.69–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2723‑0_3
Engdahl, E. , & Vallduví, E.
(1996) Information packaging in HPSG. In C. Grover & E. Vallduví (Eds.), Edinburgh working papers in cognitive science, Vol. 12: Studies in HPSG, Chapter1 (pp.1–32). Edinburgh: Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.
Flickinger, D. P.
(1987) Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon. Unpublished dissertation. Stanford University.
Gazdar, G.
(1981) Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry12, 155–184.
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
(2014) Fitting a slim dime between the verb template and argument structure construction approaches. Theoretical Linguistics40(1–2), 113–135.
Günther, C. , Maienborn, C. , & Schopp, A.
(1999) The processing of information structure. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (Eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp.18–42). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Originally presented ata conference held in 1994, Schloss Wolfsbrunnen, Germany.
Guzmán Naranjo, M.
(2015) Unifying everything: Integrating quantitative effects into formal models of grammar. InProceedings of the 6th Conference on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics (pp.301–306).
Haider, H.
(2000) OV is more basic than VO. In P. Svenonius (Ed.), The derivation of VO and OV (pp.45–67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/la.31.03hai
(2016) On predicting resultative adjective constructions. Unpublished manuscript. Universität Salzburg.
Höhle, T. N.
(1999) An architecture for phonology. In R. D. Borsley & A. Przepiórkowski (Eds.), Slavic in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp.61–90). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications,.
Jackendoff, R. S.
(2011) What is the human language faculty? Two views. Language87(3), 586–624. doi: 10.1353/lan.2011.0063
Kathol, A.
(2000) Linear syntax. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kathol, A. , & Pollard, C. J.
(1995) Extraposition via complex domain formation. In H. Uszkoreit (Ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.174–180). Cambridge, MA: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.3115/981658.981682
Kayne, R. S.
(1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keller, F.
(1995) Towards an account of extraposition in HPSG. In S. P. Abney & E. W. Hinrichs (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.301–306). Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.3115/976973.977020
Kiefer, B. , Krieger, H.-U. , & Nederhof, M.-J.
(2000) Efficient and robust parsing of word hypotheses graphs. In W. Wahlster (Ed.), Verbmobil: Foundations of speech-to-speech translation (pp.280–295). Berlin: Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑04230‑4_20
Koenig, J.-P. , & Michelson, K.
(2010) Argument structure of Oneida kinship terms. International Journal of American Linguistics76(2), 169–205. doi: 10.1086/652265
Konieczny, L.
(1996) Human sentence processing: A semantics-oriented parsing approach. Unpublished dissertation. Universität Freiburg, iIG-Berichte 3/96.
Kuhn, J.
(1995) Information packaging in German: Some motivation from HPSG-based translation. Unpublished manuscript. Universität Stuttgert.
(1996) An underspecified HPSG representation for information structure. In J. Tsuji (Ed.), Proceedings of COLING-96. 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp.670–675). Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.3115/993268.993285
Labelle, M.
(2007) Biolinguistics, the minimalist program, and psycholinguistic reality. Snippets14, 6–7.
Levine, R. D. & Meurers, W. D.
(2006) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: Linguistic approach, formal foundations, and computational realization. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp.237–252). Oxford: Elsevier Science Publisher B. V. (North-Holland), second edition. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/02040‑X
Marslen-Wilson, W.
(1975) Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science189(4198), 226–228. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4198.226
Meurers, W. D.
(2001) On expressing lexical generalizations in HPSG. Nordic Journal of Linguistics24(2), 161–217. doi: 10.1080/033258601753358605
Meurers, W. D. , Penn, G. , & Richter, F.
(2002) A web-based instructional platform for constraint-based grammar formalisms and parsing. In D. Radev & C. Brew (Eds.), Effective tools and methodologies for teaching NLP and CL (pp.18–25). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Müller, S.
(1996) The Babel-system, An HPSG fragment for German, a parser, and a dialogue component. InProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the practical application of prolog (pp.263–277). London.
(1999a) Deutsche Syntax deklarativ: Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar für das Deutsche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. doi: 10.1515/9783110915990
(1999b) Parsing of an HPSG grammar for German: Word order domains and discontinuous constituents. In J. Gippert & P. Olivier (Eds.), Multilinguale Corpora: Codierung, Strukturierung, Analyse. 11. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Linguistische Datenverarbeitung (pp.292–303). Prague: enigma corporation.
(2002) Complex predicates: Verbal complexes, resultative constructions, and particle verbs in German. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(2005a) Resultative constructions: Syntax, world knowledge, and collocational restrictions: Review of Hans C. Boas: A constructional approach to resultatives. Studies in Language29(3), 651–681. doi: 10.1075/sl.29.3.06mul
(2005b) Zur Analyse der scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung. Lin- guistische Berichte203, 297–330.
(2006) Phrasal or lexical constructions?Language82(4), 850–883. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0213
(2007) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
(2013a) The CoreGram project: A brief overview and motivation. In Duchier & Y. Parmentier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on High-level methodologies for grammar engineering (HMGE 2013), Düsseldorf (pp.93–104).
(2013b) Grammatiktheorie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, second edition.
(2015a) The CoreGram project: Theoretical linguistics, theory development and verification. Journal of Language Modelling3(1), 21–86. doi: 10.15398/jlm.v3i1.91
(submitted). German sentence structure: An analysis with special consideration of so-called multiple fronting. Berlin: Language Science Press.
(2016) Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. Berlin: Language Science Press. doi: 10.26530/OAPEN_611693
Müller, S. , & Kasper, W.
(2000) HPSG analysis of German. In W. Wahlster (Ed.), Verbmobil: Foundations of speech-to-speech translation (pp.238–253). Berlin: Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑04230‑4_17
Müller, S. , & Wechsler, S. M.
(2014a) Lexical approaches to argument atructure. Theoretical Linguistics40(1–2), 1–76. doi: 10.1515/tl‑2014‑0001
(2014b) Two sides of the same slim boojum: Further arguments for a lexical approach to argument atructure. Theoretical Linguistics40(1–2), 187–224.
Orgun, C. O.
(1996) Sign-based morphology and phonology. Unpublished dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Paggio, P.
(2005) Representing information structure in a formal grammar of Danish. In T. Washio , A. Sakurai , K. Nakajima , H. Takeda , S. Tojo , & M. Yokoo (Eds.), New frontiers in artificial intelligence: Post-proceedings (pp.93–102). Berlin: Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/11780496
Penn, G.
(2004) Balancing clarity and efficiency in typed feature logic through delaying. In D. Scott (Ed.), Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’04), Main Volume (pp.239–246).
Phillips, C.
(2003) Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry34(1), 37–90. doi: 10.1162/002438903763255922
Pollard, C. J. , & Sag, I. A.
(1987) Information-based syntax and semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(1994) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pullum, G. K. , & Scholz, B. C.
(2001) On the distinction between generative-enumerative and model-theoretic syntactic frameworks. In P. de Groote , G. Morrill , & C. Retor (Eds.), Logical aspects of computational linguistics: 4th International Conference (pp.17–43). Berlin: Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/3‑540‑48199‑0_2
Reape, M.
(1991) Word order variation in Germanic and parsing. DYANA Report Deliverable R1.1.C, University of Edinburgh.
(1994) Domain union and word order variation in German. In J. Nerbonne , K. Netter , & C. J. Pollard (Eds.), German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp.151–198). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(2000) Formalisation and abstraction in linguistic theory II: Toward a radical linearisation theory of German. Unpublished manuscript.
Richter, F.
(2004) A mathematical formalism for linguistic theories with an application in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität.
(2006) A web-based course in grammar formalisms and parsing. URL: milca.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/A4/Course/PDF/gramandpars.pdf, Retrieved on24 November 2011.
Ross, J. R.
(1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph. D.thesis, MIT, reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Sag, I. A.
(1997) English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics33(2), 431–484. doi: 10.1017/S002222679700652X
(2012) Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp.69–202). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Sag, I. A. , & Wasow, T.
(2011) Performance-compatible competence grammar. In R. D. Borsley & K. Börjars (Eds.), Non-transformational syntax: Formal and explicit models of grammar: A guide to current models (pp.359–377). Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781444395037.ch10
Sag, I. A. , Wasow, T. , & Bender, E. M.
(2003) Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, second edition.
Schabes, Y. , Abeillé, A. , & Joshi, A. K.
(1988) Parsing strategies with ‘lexicalized’ grammars: Application to Tree Adjoining Grammars. Technical Report MS-CIS-88-65., University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science. doi: 10.3115/991719.991757
Shieber, S. M. , & Johnson, M.
(1993) Variations on incremental interpretation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research22(2), 287–318.
Steels, L.
(Ed.) (2011) Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/cal.11
(2013) Fluid Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp.153–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steels, L. , & De Beule, J.
(2006) A (very) brief introduction to Fluid Construction Grammar. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding (ScaNaLU 2006) June 8, 2006, New York City. doi: 10.3115/1621459.1621473
Steels, L. , & van Trijp, R.
(2011) How to make construction grammars fluid and robust. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp.301–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/cal.11.16ste
Tanenhaus, M. K. , Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. , Eberhard, K. M. , & Sedivy, J. C.
(1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science268(5217), 1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863
(1996) Using eye movements to study spoken language comprehension: Evidence for visually mediated incremental interpretation. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Information integration in perception and communication (pp.457–478). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
van Trijp, R.
(2011) A design pattern for argument structure constructions. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp.115–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/cal.11.07tri
(2013) A comparison between Fluid Construction Grammar and Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames5(1), 88–116. doi: 10.1075/cf.5.1.04van
(2014) Long-distance dependencies without filler-gaps: A cognitive-functional alternative in Fluid Construction Grammar. Language and Cognition6(2), 242–270. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2014.8
Walther, M.
(1999) Deklarative prosodische Morphologie: Constraint-basierte Analysen und Computermodelle zum Finnischen und Tigrinya. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. doi: 10.1515/9783110911374
Wellens, P. , van Trijp, R. , Beuls, K. , & Steels, L.
(2013) Fluid Construction Grammar for historical and evolutionary linguistics. In M. Butt & S. Hussain (Eds.), Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (System Demonstrations) (pp.127–132). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Wetta, A. C.
(2011) A construction-based cross-linguistic analysis of V2 word order. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Washington (pp.248–268). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Wilcock, G.
(2005) Information structure and minimal recursion semantics. In A. Arppe , L. Carlson , K. Lindén , J. Piitulainen , M. Suominen , M. Vainio , H. Westerlund , & A. Yli-Jyrä (Eds.), Inquiries into words, constraints and contexts: for Kimmo Koskenniemi on his 60th birthday (pp.268–277). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Winkler, S.
(1997) Focus and secondary predication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110815214
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cf.9.1.05mul
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address