Visit www.benjamins.com

oa Given/New: What do the terms refer to?

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Given/New: What do the terms refer to?

PDF 370.57Kb
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.9.1.02ogr
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.9.1.02ogr
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Baltazani, Mary
2003 Broad focus across sentence types in Greek. Paper presented at the 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH 2003 – INTERSPEECH 2003) , Geneva, Switzerland, 1–4 September 2003. www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_2003 (Last accessed on28 December 2015).
Baumann, Stefan & Martine Grice
2006 The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics38: 1636–1657. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.017
Boersma, Paul & David Weenick
. n.d.Praat doing Phonetics by Computer. Computer programme Version 5.3.52.
Branigan, Holly P. , Martin J. Pickering & Mikihiro Tanaka
2008 Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua118: 172–189. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003
Brazil, David
1997The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, Wallace
1987 Cognitive constraints on information flow. InCoherence and Grounding in Discourse, Russell Tomlin (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 21–51. doi: 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
1994Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Croft, William. S
1995 Intonation units and grammatical structure. Linguistics71: 490–532. doi: 10.1515/ling.1995.33.5.839
Cruttenden, Alan
1997Intonation, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166973
2006 The de-accenting of old information: A cognitive universal?InPragmatic Organisation in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 311–358. doi: 10.1515/9783110892222.311
Daneš, František
1972 Order of elements and sentence intonation. InIntonation, Dwight Bolinger (ed.). London: Penguin, 216–232.
Davidse, Kristin
1987 M. A. K. Halliday’s Functional Grammar and the Prague School. InFunctionalism in Linguistics, René Dirven & Vilém Fried . (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 39–79. doi: 10.1075/llsee.20.04dav
Dryer, Matthew S
2013 Order of subject, object and verb. InThe World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/chapter/81 (Last accessed on9 November 2015).
Firbas, Jan
1974 Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to the problems of functional sentence perspective. InPapers on FSP, František Daneš(ed.). Prague: Academia Press, 11–37. doi: 10.1515/9783111676524.11
1989 Degrees of communicative dynamism and degrees of prosodic prominence weight. Brno Studies in English18: 21–66.
1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
1995 Retrievability span in Functional Sentence Perspective. Brno Studies in English21: 17–45.
Fletcher, Janet , Lesley Stirling , Ilana Muhin & Roger Wales
2002 Intonational rises and dialog acts in the Australian English map task. Language and Speech45 (3): 226–253. doi: 10.1177/00238309020450030201
Geluykens, Ronald
1989 Information structure in English conversation: The Given-New distinction revisited. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics3: 129–147.
Givón, Talmy
1983 Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.3
1990Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.syn2
Gundel, Jeanette , Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski
1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language69 (2): 274–307. doi: 10.2307/416535
Gussenhoven, Carlos
2004 The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511616983
Hajičová, Eva & Peter Sgall
1987 The ordering principle. Journal of Pragmatics11: 435–454. doi: 10.1016/0378–2166(87)90088–9
Halliday, M.A.K
1967Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783111357447
1970A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. & William S. Greaves
2008Intonation in the Grammar of British English. Equinox: London.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2009 Initial I Think: Main or Comment Clause. Discourse and Interaction2 (1): 49–70.
Ladd, D. Robert
2008Intonation Phonology, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808814
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Lehman, Christina
1977 A re-analysis of Given-ness: Stress in discourse. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 13: 316–324.
Loock, Rudy
2013 Extending further and refining Prince’s taxonomy of given/new information: A case study of non-restrictive, relevance-oriented structures. Pragmatics23 (1): 69–91. doi: 10.1075/prag.23.1.04loo
Mathesius, Vilém
1975A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis. The Hague: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110813296
McGregor, William
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Miller, Jim
2006 Focus in the languages of Europe. InPragmatic Organisation of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 121–124. doi: 10.1515/9783110892222.121
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia Hirschberg
1990 The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. InIntentions in Communication, Philip R. Cohen , Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press, 271–311.
Prince, Ellen
1981 Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. InRadical Pragmatics, Peter Cole , (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 223–255.
1992 Subjects, definiteness and information status. InDiscourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text, William. C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 295–325. doi: 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
Svoboda, Aleš
1981 Two chapters on scene. Brno studies in English14: 81–92.
1983 Thematic elements. Brno studies in English32: 49–85.
Taglicht, Joseph
1984Message and Emphasis: On Focus and Scope in English. London: Longman.
Tench, Paul
1996The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.
Vallduvi, Enric
1990 The informational component. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Published 1993. New York: Garland Press.
Weil, Henri
1887The Order of Words in Ancient Languages Compared with that of Modern Languages. Translated by Charles W Super . Boston: Ginn & Co.
Wells, Bill & Sue Peppé
1996 Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn taking in English dialects. InProsody in Conversation, Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–130. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.005
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/etc.9.1.02ogr
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address