Dynamicity and dialogue

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

Perspectives from Functional Discourse Grammar

The full text of this article is not currently available.

Data & Media loading...


Full text loading...


Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos
2005 Aspects of the relationship between theories of grammar and theories of processing. Atlantis27: 11–27.
Antony, Louise M
2003 Rabbit-pots and supernovas: On the relevance of psychological data to linguistic theory. InEpistemology of Language, Alex Barber (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 47–68.
Auer, Peter
2009 On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences31: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004
Bakker, Dik
2005 Agreement: More arguments for the dynamic expression model. InMorphosyntactic Expression in Functional Grammar, Casper de Groot & Kees Hengeveld(eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–40. doi: 10.1515/9783110920833.1
Bakker, Dik & Anna Siewierska
2004 Towards a speaker model of Functional Grammar. InA New Architecture for Functional Grammar, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & María de los Ángeles Gómez González (eds). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 325–364. doi: 10.1515/9783110197112.325
Black, Maria
& Shulamuth Chiat 1981 Psycholinguistics without ‘psychological reality’. Linguistics19: 37–61. doi: 10.1515/ling.1981.19.1–2.37
Bock, J. Kathryn
1982 Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review89: 1–47. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.89.1.1
Brazil, David
1995A Grammar of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butler, Christopher S
2007 Notes towards an incremental implementation of the Role and Reference Grammar semantics-to-syntax linking algorithm for English. InStructural-Functional Studies in English Grammar, Mike Hannay & Gerard J. Steen (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 275–307. doi: 10.1075/slcs.83.16but
2013 A reappraisal of the functional enterprise, with particular reference to Functional Discourse Grammar. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses67: 13–42.
Butler, Christopher S. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García
2014Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.157
Cann, Ronnie , Ruth Kempson & Lutz Marten
2005The Dynamics of Language: An Introduction. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Clark, Andy
2013 Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences36 (3): 181–204. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
Clark, Herbert H
1996Using Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
Connolly, John H
2014 The contextual component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model: Structure and interaction. Pragmatics24 (2): 229–248. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.2.03con
Cornish, Francis
2013 On the dual nature of the Functional Discourse Grammar model: Context, the language system/language use distinction, and indexical reference in discourse. Language Sciences38: 83–98. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.02.001
Devitt, Michael
2006Ignorance of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/0199250960.001.0001
Dik, Simon C
1978Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
1990 How to build a natural language user. InWorking with Functional Grammar: Descriptive and Computational Applications, Mike Hannay & Elseline Vester(eds). Dordrecht and Providence RI: Foris, 203–227. doi: 10.1515/9783110859904.203
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Du Bois, John W
2014 Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics25: 359–410. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
Ferreira, Victor S. & J. Kathryn Bock
2006 The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes21: 1011–1029. doi: 10.1080/01690960600824609
Firbas, Jan
1959 More thoughts on the communicative function of the English verb. Sborník Prací FilozofickéFakulty Brněnské UniversityA7: 74–98.
1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
Fortescue, Michael
2004 The complementarity of the process and product interpretations of Functional Grammar. InA New Architecture for Functional Grammar, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & María de los Ángeles Gómez González (eds). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 151–178. doi: 10.1515/9783110197112.151
Giomi, Riccardo
2014 Grammar, context and the hearer: A proposal for an addressee-oriented model of Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics24 (2): 275–296. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.2.05gio
Givón, Talmy
1989Mind, Code, and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greenberg, Joseph H
1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. InUniversals of Grammar, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press, 73–113.
Grice, H. Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. InSyntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds). New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
Halle, Morris , Joan Bresnan & George Miller
(eds) 1981Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hasson, Uri , Asif A. Ghazanfar , Bruno Galantucci , Simon Garrod & Christian Keysers
2012 Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences16 (2): 114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007
Hengeveld, Kees
2005 Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar. InMorphosyntactic Expression in Functional Grammar, Casper de Groot & Kees Hengeveld (eds). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 53–86. doi: 10.1515/9783110920833.53
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
2014 Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics24 (2): 203–227. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.2.02hen
Hohwy, Jakob
2013The Predictive Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001
Kathol, Andreas
2000Linear Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keizer, Evelien
2009 Verb-preposition constructions in FDG. Lingua119: 1186–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.12.007
2014 The active-passive alternation in English. Pragmatics24 (2): 399–423. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.2.10kei
Kempen, Gerard & Karin Harbusch
2002 Performance Grammar: A declarative definition. InComputational Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001, Anton Nijholt , Mariët Theune & Hendrik Hondorp (eds). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 148–162.
Levelt, Willem J.M
1989Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2005 Incremental Functional Grammar and the language of football commentary. InThe Dynamics of Language Use: Functional and Contrastive Perspectives, Christopher S. Butler , María de los Ángeles Gómez-González & Susana Doval-Suárez (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 113–128. doi: 10.1075/pbns.140.11mac
2010 More tiles on the roof: Further thoughts on incremental language production. InLanguage Usage and Language Structure, Kasper Boye & Elizabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 263–293.
2011 The study of semantic alternations in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. InMorphosyntactic Alternations in English: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives, Pilar Guerrero Medina (ed.). London: Equinox, 38–61.
2012 Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences34: 421–432. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.006
2014 The contextual component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics24 (2): 249–273. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.2.04mac
Miller, George A
1962 Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist11: 748–762. doi: 10.1037/h0044708
Nuyts, Jan
1992Aspects of a Cognitive-Pragmatic Theory of Language: On Cognition, Functionalism, and Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.20
O’Grady, Gerard
2012A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London, New York, New Delhi and Sydney: Bloomsbury.
O’Grady, William
2005Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pickering, Martin J. & Victor S. Ferreira
2008 Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin134 (1): 427–459. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.134.3.427
Pickering, Martin J. & Steven Garrod
2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27: 169–226. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
2011 The use of prediction to drive alignment in dialogue. InGrounding Sociality: Neurons, Mind, and Culture, Gün R. Semin & Gerald Echterhoff (eds). New York: Psychology Press, 175–191.
Riley, Michael A. , Michael J. Richardson , Kevin Shockley & Verónica C. Ramenzoni
2011 Interpersonal synergies. Frontiers in Psychology2 (38). (Last accessed on11 June 2015). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038
Sapir, Edward
1933 La réalité psychologique des phonèmes. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique30: 247–265.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1987 Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation. InTalk and Social Organisation, Graham Button & John R.E. Lee (eds). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 70–85.
Sinclair, John McH. & Anna Mauranen
2006 Linear Unit Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.25
Smit, Niels
2010FYI: Theory and Typology of Information Packaging. Zutphen NL: Wöhrmann.
Soames, Scott
1984 Linguistics and psychology. Linguistics and Philosophy7: 155–179. doi: 10.1007/BF00630811
Tanaka, Hiroko
2000 Turn-projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction33: 1–38. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3301_1
Tannen, Deborah
2006Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, Michael
2016 Information structure and production planning. InOxford Handbook on Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinchiro Ishihara (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, n.a.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address