Textual dynamism as a heuristic for a delicate semantic description of ellipsis patterns

References

1. Barthes, Roland
   1966 Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits. Communications8: 1–27. doi: 10.3406/comm.1966.1113
   https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1966.1113 [Google Scholar]
2. Barthes, Roland
   1977 Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biber, Douglas , Stig Johansson , Geoffrey Leech , Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
   1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chatman, Seymour
   1969 New ways of analysing narrative structure. Language and Style2: 3–36.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chatman, Seymour
   1978 Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clarke, Ben P
   2012 Do patterns of ellipsis in text support systemic functional linguistics’ ‘context-metafunction hook-up’ hypothesis? A corpus-based approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Cardiff University.
7. Clarke, Ben P
   2016 Cohesion in Systemic Functional Linguistics in the 21st century: A theoretical reflection. InThe Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds). Oxford: Routledge, n.a.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Clarke, Ben P
   . Forthcoming. Further semantics of ellipsis: The increased textual pace construed by consecutive Subject ellipsis. Submitted to Word.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cloran, Carmel
   1994 Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar. Nottingham: Monographs in Systemic Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Daneš, František
    1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organisation of the text. InPapers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). The Hague: Mouton, 106–128.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fawcett, Robin P
    2000 A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.206
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.206 [Google Scholar]
12. Fawcett, Robin P
    2008 Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: An Extension and Simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Firbas, Jan
    1971 On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Sbornik prací filosofické fakulti brnenské university19 (71): 135–144.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Firbas, Jan
    1992 Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597817 [Google Scholar]
15. Firth, John R
    1951 Modes of meaning. Essays and Studies of the English Association4: 123–149.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Genette, Gerard
    1980 Narrative Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Givón, Talmy
    1985 Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. InIconicity in Syntax, John Haiman (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 187–219. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.10giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.10giv [Google Scholar]
18. Gregory, Michael J
    2002 Phasal analysis within communication linguistics: Two contrastive discourses. InRelations and Functions within and around Language, Peter Fries , Michael Cummings , David Lockwood & William Spruiell (eds). London: Continuum, 316–345.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, M.A.K
    1961 Categories of the theory of grammar. Word17: 241–292. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756 [Google Scholar]
20. Halliday, M.A.K
    1967a Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 1. Journal of Linguistics3 (1): 37–81. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700012949
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949 [Google Scholar]
21. Halliday, M.A.K
    1967b Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 2. Journal of Linguistics3 (2): 199–244. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700016613
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613 [Google Scholar]
22. Halliday, M.A.K
    1968 Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 3. Journal of Linguistics4 (2): 179–215. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700001882
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001882 [Google Scholar]
23. Halliday, M.A.K
    1978 Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Halliday, M.A.K
    1979 Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure, and their determination by different semantic functions. InFunction and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays Offered to William Haas, David J. Allerton , Edward Carney & David Holdcroft (eds). London: Cambridge University Press, 57–79.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Halliday, M.A.K
    1985 Systemic background. InSystemic Perspectives on Discourse, James D. Benson & William S. Greaves (eds). Norwood: Ablex, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Halliday, M.A.K
    1993 Systemic theory. InThe Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ron E. Asher (ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 4505–4508.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Halliday, M.A.K
    1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Halliday, M. A. K
    1996 On grammar and grammatics. InFunctional Descriptions: Theory in Practice, Ruqaiya Hasan , Carmel Cloran & David G. Butt (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–38. doi: 10.1075/cilt.121.03hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.121.03hal [Google Scholar]
29. Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1985 Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
    2002 Lexicogrammar in discourse development: Logogenetic patterns of wording. InDiscourse and Language Functions, Guo Huang & Zong Wang (eds). Shanghai: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2–25.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Miller, George A
    1956 The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review63: 81–97. doi: 10.1037/h0043158
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158 [Google Scholar]
33. Noordman, Leo & Wietske Vonk
    1994 Text processing and its relevance for literacy. InFunctional Literacy: Theoretical Issues and Educational Implications, Ludo Verhoeven (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–92. doi: 10.1075/swll.1.07noo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.1.07noo [Google Scholar]
34. Oakes, Michael
    1998 Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Simpson, Paul
    2014 Just what is narrative urgency?Language and Literature23 (1): 3–22. doi: 10.1177/0963947013510650
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947013510650 [Google Scholar]
37. Sinclair, John
    1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Xueyan, Yang
    2013 Modelling ellipsis in EFL classroom discourse. InDeveloping Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application, Fang Yan & Jonathan J. Webster (eds). Sheffield: Equinox, 227–240.
    [Google Scholar]