Visit www.benjamins.com

Phasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.9.1.08bar
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.9.1.08bar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Andersen, Thomas Hestbaek , Morten Boeris , Eva Maagerø & Elise Seip Tønnessen
2015Social Semiotics: Key Figures, New Directions. London and New York: Routledge.
Arús Hita, Jorge
2007 On the aboutness of theme. InProceedings of the 30th International AEDEAN Conference, María Losada , Pilar Ron , Sonia Hernández & Jorge Casanova (eds). Huelva: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Huelva. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235345776_On_the_aboutness_of_Theme (Last accessed on29 December 2015).
Bartlett, Tom
2015 Multiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of Mode. InEssays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan: Society in Language, Language in Society, Wendy Bowcher & Jennifer Yameng Liang (eds). London and New York: Palgrave, 166–183.
Berry, Margaret
1996 What is Theme? A(nother) personal view. InMeaning and Form: Systemic Functional Perspectives, Robin P. Fawcett , Margaret Berry , Christopher Butler & Guowen W. Huang (eds). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1–64.
Caffarel, Alice , James R. Martin & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
(eds) 2004Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.253
2004a Foreword. In Caffarel , et al , Language Typology: A Functional Perspective,xi–xiii. doi: 10.1075/cilt.253
2004b Introduction. In Caffarel , et al , Language Typology: A Functional Perspective,1–76. doi: 10.1075/cilt.253.03caf
Cloran, Carmel
2010 Rhetorical unit analysis and Bakhtin’s chronotope. Functions of Language17 (1): 9–70. doi: 10.1075/fol.17.1.02clo
1994Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 6). University of Nottingham.
Daneš, František
1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. InPapers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). The Hague: Mouton, 106–128.
Fawcett, Robin P
2003The many types of ‘Theme’ in English: Their semantic systems and functional syntax. Unpublished mimeo. www.isfla.org/Systemics/Print/Papers.html (Last accessed on30 December 2015).
Firbas, Jan
1992aFunctional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
1992b On some basic problems of functional sentence perspective. InAdvances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds). London: Pinter, 167–188.
Fries, Peter
1995 Themes, methods of development, and texts. InOn Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective, Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter Fries (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 317–360. doi: 10.1075/cilt.118.10fri
2008 The textual metafunction as a site for the discussion of the goals of linguistics and techniques of linguistic analysis. InText Type and Structure, Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds). London and Oakville: Equinox, 8–44.
Gregory, Michael
1988 Generic situation and register: A functional view of communication. InLinguistics in a Systemic Perspective, James D. Benson , Michael Cummings & William Greaves (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 301–329. doi: 10.1075/cilt.39.12gre
Halliday, M.A.K
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K & Ruqayia Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London and New York: Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Jonathan J. Webster
2014Text Linguistics: The How and Why of Meaning. Sheffield and Bristol: Equinox.
Langacker, Ronald W
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
MacDonald, Flora
2009Còco is Crùbagan. Cocoa and Crabs. A Hebridean Childhood. South Lochs: Islands Books Trust.
Mackenzie, Lachlan J
2009 Aspects of the interpersonal grammar of Gaelic. Linguistics47 (4): 885–911. doi: 10.1515/LING.2009.031
MacLean, Iain
2009Cogadh Ruairidh. Dingwall: Sandstone Press.
Mann, William C. , Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen & Sandra Thompson
1992 Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. InDiscourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 39–78. doi: 10.1075/pbns.16.04man
Mathesius, Vilém
1964 On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English. InA Prague School Reader in Linguistics, Josef Vachek (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 59–67.
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: the Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.
Tannen, Deborah
1993 What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. InFraming in Discourse, Deborah Tannen (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 14–56.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/etc.9.1.08bar
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address