From nominal to verbal gerunds

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

A referential typology

The full text of this article is not currently available.

Data & Media loading...


Full text loading...


= The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0 (CLMET3.0). For details, see Diller et al. (2011).
= Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd ed. For details, see Kroch & Taylor (2000).
= Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. For details, see Kroch et al. (2004).
= Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. For details, see Kroch et al. (2010).
Ackles, Nancy
1997Historical syntax of the English articles in relation to the count/non-count distinction. Seattle, WA: University of Washington PhD thesis.
Barker, Chris
2005 Possessive weak definites. In Ji-yung Kim , Yury Lander & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, 89–113. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Behrens, Leila
2005 Genericity from a cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistics43(2). 275–344. doi: 10.1515/ling.2005.43.2.275
Bhat, D.N. Shankara
1994The adjectival category. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.24
Brinton, Laurel
1998 Aspectuality and countability: A cross-categorial analogy. English Language and Linguistics2(1). 37–63. doi: 10.1017/S136067430000068X
Davidse, Kristin
1999 The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics10(3). 203–250.
De Smet, Hendrik
2008 Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics12. 55–102. doi: 10.1017/S136067430700250X
2013Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: OUP.
Diller, Hans-Jürgen , Hendrik De Smet & Jukka Tyrkkö
2011 A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts. The European English Messenger19. 21–35.
Donner, Morton
1986 The gerund in Middle English. English Studies67(5). 394–400. doi: 10.1080/00138388608598465
Du Bois , John W
1980 Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In Wallace Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Duffley, Patrick
2014Reclaiming control as a semantic and pragmatic phenomenon. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.251
Emonds, Joseph E
1973 The derived nominals, gerunds, and participles in Chaucer’s English. In Braj B. Kachru & Robert B. Lees (eds.), Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, 185–189. Urbana, Il.: University of Illinois Press.
Fanego, Teresa
1996a The development of gerunds as objects of subject-control verbs in English. Diachronica13(1). 29–62. doi: 10.1075/dia.13.1.03fan
1996b On the historical development of English retrospective verbs. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen97(1). 71–79.
1998 Developments in argument linking in early Modern English gerund phrases. English Language and Linguistics2(1). 87–119. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000708
2004a On reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change: The rise and development of English verbal gerunds. Diachronica21(1). 5–55. doi: 10.1075/dia.21.1.03fan
2004b Some strategies for coding sentential subjects in English: From exaptation to grammaticalization. Studies in Language28(2). 321–361. doi: 10.1075/sl.28.2.03fan
2006 The role of language standardization in the loss of hybrid gerunds in Modern English. In Leiv Egil Breivik , Sandra Halverson & Kari Haugland (eds.), ‘These things write I vnto thee...’: Essays in honour of Bjorg Bækken, 93–110. Oslo: Novus Press.
2007 Drift and the development of sentential complements in British and American English from 1700 to the present day. In Javier Pérez-Guerra , Dolores González-Álvarez , Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso & Esperanza Rama-Martínez (eds.), ‘Of varying language and opposing creed’: New insights into Late Modern English, 161–235. Bern: Lang.
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fischer, Olga
1992 Syntactic change and borrowing: The case of the accusative-and-infinitive construction in English. In Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change, 17–89. Berlin: Mouton.
Fonteyn, Lauren , Hendrik De Smet & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015a What it means to verbalize: The changing discourse functions of the English gerund. Journal of English Linguistics43(1). 36–60. doi: 10.1177/0075424214564365
Fonteyn, Lauren , Liesbet Heyvaert & Charlotte Maekelberghe
2015b How do gerunds conceptualize events? A diachronic study. Cognitive Linguistics26(4). 583–612. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2015‑0061
Givón, Talmy
1990Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. II. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.50
Halliday, Michael A.K
1985An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hawkins, John A
1978Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Helm.
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2008 On the constructional semantics of gerundive nominalizations. Folia Linguistica42(1). 39–82. doi: 10.1515/FLIN.2008.39
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1985 The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 151–186. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.08hop
Houston, Ann
1989 The English gerund: Syntactic change and discourse function. In Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation, 173–196. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.52.10hou
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP
Jack, George B
1988 The origins of the English gerund. Nowele12. 15–75. doi: 10.1075/nowele.12.02jac
Jespersen, Otto
1940A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Vol. 5. London: Allen & Unwin.
Kranich, Svenja
2006 The origin of English gerundial constructions: A case of French influence?. In Andrew J. Johnston , Ferdinand von Mengden & Stefan Thim (eds.), Language and text: Current perspectives on English and German historical linguistics and philology, 179–195. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor
2000Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of middle English, 2nd ed.
Kroch, Anthony , Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs
2004Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English.
Kroch, Anthony , Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani
2010Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English.
Langacker, Ronald W
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.
2009Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110214369
Lyons, John
1999Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Liesbet Heyvaert
. Forthcoming. Indefinite nominal gerunds, or the particularization of a reified event. English Studies.
Malchukov, Andrej L
2004Nominalization, verbalization: Constraining a typology of transcategorial operations. Munich: Lincom Europa.
2006 Constraining nominalization: function/form competition. Linguistics44(5). 973–1009. doi: 10.1515/LING.2006.032
Mari, Alda , Claire Beyssade & Fabio Del Prete
2013Genericity. Oxford: OUP.
Martin, James Robert
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.59
Miller, Gary D
2002Nonfinite structures in theory and change. Oxford: OUP.
Mustanoja, Tauno Frans
1960A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Postal, Paul Martin
1970 On coreferential complement subject deletion. Linguistic Inquiry1(4). 439–500.
Prince, Ellen F
1992 The ZPG letter subjects: Definiteness and information status. In Sandra Thompson & William Mann (eds.), Discourse description diverse analyses of a fundraising text, 295–325. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
Quine, Willard V.O
1960Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Quirk, Randolph S. , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
1991 The noun phrase in early sixteenth-century English: A study based on Sir Thomas Moore’s writing. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 50. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Rissanen, Matti
1999 Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. III, Early Modern English 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: CUP.
Schachter, Paul
1976 A nontransformational account of gerundive nominals in English. Linguistic Inquiry7(2). 205–241.
Sommerer, Lotte
2011Old English se from demonstrative to article: A usage-based study of nominal determination and category emergence. Vienna: University of Vienna PhD thesis.
2012 Investigating article development in Old English: About categorization, gradualness and constructions. Folia Linguistica Historica33. 175–213.
Tabor, Whitney & Elisabeth Closs Traugott
1998 Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Anna Giacolone Ramat & Paul John Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 229–272. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.37.11tab
Tajima, Matsuji
1999 The compound gerund in Early Modern English. In Sheila Embleton , John E. Joseph & Hans-Josef Niederehe (eds.), The emergence of the modern language sciences: Studies on the transition from historical-comparative to structural linguistics in honour of E. F. K. Koerner, 265–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.emls2.23taj
Van de Velde, Freek
2010 The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP. Linguistics48(2). 263–299. doi: 10.1515/ling.2010.009
Visser, Frederick Theodor
1963–1973An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.
Von Heusinger, Klaus
2002 Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Jounral of Semantics19. 245–274. doi: 10.1093/jos/19.3.245
Willemse, Peter
2005Nominal reference-point constructions: Possessive and esphoric NPs in English. Leuven: University of Leuven PhD thesis.
Wurff, van der Wim
1993 Gerunds and their objects in the Modern English period. In Jaap Van Marle (ed.), Historical linguistics 1991, 363–375. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.107.24wur
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address