Visit www.benjamins.com

The Great Complement Shift revisited

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The constructionalization of ACC-ing gerundives

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.1.05fan
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.1.05fan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

ARCHER
= A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. Version 3.2 (1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013). Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities.
COLMOBAENG
= Corpus of Late Modern British and American English Prose. For details, see Fanego (2012).
COPC
= Century of Prose Corpus 1680–1780. For details, see Milic (1995).
DOE = Healey, Antonette diPaolo
(ed.) 2008The Dictionary of Old English: A-G on CD-ROM. Fascicle G and Fascicles A to F (with Revisions). Toronto: University of Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
F-LOB = Mair, Christian
(comp) 1999The Freiburg - LOB Corpus of British English. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.
Frown = Mair, Christian
(comp) 1999The Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.
HC
= Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. For details, see Kytö (1996 [1991]).
MED = Kurath, Hans & Sherman M. Kuhn et al.
(eds.) 1952–2001Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
OED
= Oxford English Dictionary 1884–1997 3rd edn. in progress: OED Online , March (2000); Simpson, John A . (ed.).
Altenberg, Bengt
1982The genitive v. the of-construction: A study of syntactic variation in 17th century English. Lund: CWK Gleerup.
Biber, Douglas , Stig Johansson , Geoffrey Leech , Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.
Bolinger, Dwight L
1977Meaning and form. London: Longman.
Brinton, Laurel & Leslie K. Arnovik
2011 [2006]The English language: A linguistic history. Oxford: OUP.
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
Declerck, Renaat
1991A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
De Smet, Hendrik
2008 Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics12. 55–102. doi: 10.1017/S136067430700250X
2009 Analysing reanalysis. Lingua119. 1728–1755. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.001
2010 English ing-clauses and their problems: The structure of grammatical categories. Linguistics48. 1153–1193. doi: 10.1515/ling.2010.038
2012 The course of actualization. Language88. 601–633. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
2013Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: OUP.
2014 Constrained confusion: The gerund/participle distinction in Late Modern English. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English syntax,224–238. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139507226.017
Donner, Morton
1986 The gerund in Middle English. English Studies67. 394–400. doi: 10.1080/00138388608598465
Duffley, Patrick J
2006The English gerund-participle: A comparison with the infinitive. New York, NY: Lang.
Expósito, María Cruz
1996La estructura del sintagma nominal en el inglés de la Cancillería: 1400–1450. Barcelona: Kadle Books.
Fanego, Teresa
1990 Finite complement clauses in Shakespeare’s English, Part 2. Studia Neophilologica62. 129–149. doi: 10.1080/00393279008588047
1992Infinitive complements in Shakespeare’s English. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: Servizo de Publicacións.
1996a The development of gerunds as objects of subject-control verbs in English (1400–1760). Diachronica13. 29–62. doi: 10.1075/dia.13.1.03fan
1996b The gerund in Early Modern English: Evidence from the Helsinki Corpus. Folia Linguistica Historica17. 97–152.
1998 Developments in argument linking in early Modern English gerund phrases. English Language and Linguistics2. 87–119. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000708
2004a On reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change: The rise and development of English verbal gerunds. Diachronica21. 5–55. doi: 10.1075/dia.21.1.03fan
2004b Some strategies for coding sentential subjects in English: From exaptation to grammaticalization. Studies in Language28. 321–361. doi: 10.1075/sl.28.2.03fan
2010 Variation in sentential complements in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century English: A processing-based explanation. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English, 200–220. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511781643.012
2012 COLMOBAENG: A corpus of late Modern British and American English Prose. In Nila Vázquez (ed.), Creation and use of historical English corpora in Spain, 101–117. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Fischer, Olga
1988 The rise of the for NP to V construction: An explanation. In Graham Nixon & John Honey (eds.), An historic tongue: Studies in English linguistics in memory of Barbara Strang, 67–88. London: Routledge.
1989 The origin and spread of the Accusative and Infinitive Construction in English. Folia Linguistica Historica8. 143–217.
Fonteyn, Lauren , Hendrik De Smet & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015 What it means to verbalize: The changing discourse-functions of the English gerund. Journal of English Linguistics43. 36–60. doi: 10.1177/0075424214564365
Garrett, Andrew
2012 The historical syntax problem: Reanalysis and directionality. In Dianne Jones , John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcome, 52–72. Oxford: OUP.
Goldberg, Adele E
1995A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: OUP.
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
Houston, Ann
1989 The English gerund: Syntactic change and discourse function. In Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schriffin (eds.), Language change and variation, 173–196. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.52.10hou
Huddleston, Rodney , Geoffrey K. Pullum et al.
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.
Hundt, Marianne
(ed.) 2014Late Modern English syntax. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139507226
Jack, George B
1988 The origins of the English gerund. NOWELE12. 15–75. doi: 10.1075/nowele.12.02jac
Jespersen, Otto
1909–1949A Modern English grammar on historical principles. 7 vols. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard. Reprinted, London: Allen & Unwin, 1961, 1965, 1970.
Kastovsky, Dieter
1985 Deverbal nouns in Old and Modern English: From stem-formation to word-formation. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics – Historical word-formation, 221–261. Berlin: Mouton.
Killie, Kristin
2006 Internal and external factors in language change: Present participle converbs in English and Norwegian. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen107. 447–469.
Killie, Kristin & Toril Swan
2009 The grammaticalization and subjectification of adverbial -ing clauses (converb clauses) in English. English Language and Linguistics13. 337–363. doi: 10.1017/S1360674309990141
Kisbye, Torben
1971–1972An historical outline of English syntax. Parts I and II. Aarhus: Akademisk Boghandel.
Kohnen, Thomas
2001 The influence of ‘Latinate’ constructions in Early Modern English: Orality and literacy as complementary forces. In Dieter Kastovsky & Arthur Mettinger , (eds.), Language contact in the history of English, 171–194. Frankfurt: Lang.
2004Text, Textsorte, Sprachgeschichte. Englische Partizipial- und Gerundialkonstruktionen 1100 bis 1700. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Kortmann, Bernd
1991Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. London: Routledge.
1995 Adverbial participial clauses in English. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 189–237. Berlin: Mouton.
Kytö, Merja
1996 [1991]Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding conventions and lists of source texts, 3rd edn. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
Langacker, Ronald W
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
Lass, Roger
1992 Phonology and morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. 2: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: CUP.
Los, Bettelou
2005The rise of the to-infinitive. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274765.001.0001
Mair, Christian
1990Infinitival complement clauses in English. A study of syntax in discourse. Cambridge: CUP.
Milic, Louis T
1995 The Century of Prose Corpus: A half-million word historical data base. Computers and the Humanities29. 327–337. doi: 10.1007/BF02279525
Miller, D. Gary
2002Nonfinite structures in theory and change. Oxford: OUP.
Mitchell, Bruce
1985Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198119357.001.0001
Mustanoja, Tauno F
1960A Middle English syntax. Part I: Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Naro, Anthony J
1981 The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language57. 63–98. doi: 10.1353/lan.1981.0020
Noonan, Michael
1985 Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: CUP.
Poutsma, Hendrik
1904A grammar of Late Modern English. Part I: The sentence. Groningen: Noordhoff.
Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Río-Rey, Carmen
2002 Subject control and coreference in Early Modern English free adjuncts and absolutes. English Language and Linguistics6. 309–323. doi: 10.1017/S1360674302000254
Rohdenburg, Günter
1995 On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies76. 367–388. doi: 10.1080/00138389508598980
2006 The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer , Nikolaus Ritt , Herbert Schendl & Dieter Kastovsky (eds.), Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500–2000, 143–166. Frankfurt: Lang.
2014 On the changing status of that-clauses. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English syntax,155–181. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139507226.013
Rudanko, Juhani
1998Change and continuity in the English language: Studies on complementation over the past three hundred years. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
2000Corpora and complementation: Tracing sentential complementation patterns of nouns, adjectives and verbs over the last three centuries. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
2011Changes in complementation in British and American English: Corpus-based studies on non-finite complements in recent English. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Salmon, Vivian
1986 The spelling and punctuation of Shakespeare’s time. In Stanley Wells & Gary Taylor (eds.), William Shakespeare: The complete works. Original-spelling edition, xlii–lvi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Söderlind, Johannes
1951–1958Verb syntax in John Dryden’s prose. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequist.
Swan, Toril
2003 Present participles in the history of English and Norwegian. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen104. 179–195.
Tajima, Matsuji
1985The syntactic development of the gerund in Middle English. Tokyo: Nan’un-do.
1996 The common-/objective-case subject of the gerund in Middle English. NOWELE28/29. 569–578. doi: 10.1075/nowele.28‑29.39taj
Thompson, Sandra A
1983 Grammar and discourse: The English detached participial clause. In Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.), Discourse perspectives on syntax, 43–65. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2010 Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect?In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.90.04tra
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
Van de Velde, Freek , Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
2013 Introduction: On multiple source constructions in language change. Special issue of Studies in Language37(3). 473–489. doi: 10.1075/sl.37.3.01int
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
Visser, Frederikus Theodorus
1963–1973An historical syntax of the English language. 3 parts in 4 vols. Leiden: Brill.
Vosberg, Uwe
2006Die Große Komplementverschiebung: Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.
Warner, Anthony
1982Complementation in Middle English and the methodology of historical syntax. London: Croom Helm.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.1.05fan
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address