Stance and voice in academic writing

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The “noun + that” construction and disciplinary variation

The full text of this article is not currently available.

Data & Media loading...


Full text loading...


Aktas, R. N. , & Cortes, V.
(2008) Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002
Anthony, L.
(2014) AntConc (Version 3.4.3w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bazerman, C.
(1988) Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press Madison.
Becher, T. , & Trowler, P.
(2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Biber, D. , & Finegan, E.
(1989) Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93
Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. , & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Written and Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.
Burgess, A. , & Ivanič, R.
(2010) Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228–255. doi: 10.1177/0741088310363447
Chafe, W. , & Nichols, J.
(1986) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Orwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Channell, J.
(1994) Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charles, M.
(2006) The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492–518. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml021
(2007) Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the noun “that” pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 203–218. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004
Coxhead, A.
(2000) A new academic word list. Tesol Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. doi: 10.2307/3587951
Dryer, M. S.
(1996) Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(4), 475–523. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00059‑3
Fløttum, K. , Dahl, T. , & Kinn, T.
(2006) Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.148
Flowerdew, J.
(2003) Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00017‑0
(2010) Use of signalling nouns across L1 and L2 writer corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), 36–55. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.15.1.02flo
Francis, G.
(1986) Anaphoric Nouns. Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
Gilbert, G. N. , & Mulkay, M.
(1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (pp.41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Guinda, C. S. , & Hyland, K.
(2012) Introduction: A context-sensitive approach to stance and voice. In K. Hyland & C. Guinda , Sancho (Eds.), Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres (pp.1–11). London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137030825.0006
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1993a) The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (pp.137–146). London: Falmer Press.
(1993b) The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin’s The Origin of the Species . In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (pp.95–116). London: Falmer Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. , & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. , & Martin, J. R.
(1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. , & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
Hinkel, E.
(2004) Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techiniques in Vocabulary & Grammar. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hudson, R.
(2013) The struggle with voice in scientific writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(12), 1580–1580. doi: 10.1021/ed400243b
Hunston, S.
(2000) Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp.176–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K.
(2001) Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207–226. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00012‑0
(2002) Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00035‑8
(2004) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.6719
(2005a) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
(2005b) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. doi: 10.1177/1461445605050365
(2008) Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22. doi: 10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl
(2012) Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. , & Guinda, C. S.
(2012) Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137030825
Hyland, K. , & Tse, P.
(2005) Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1), 39–63. doi: 10.1075/fol.12.1.03hyl
Ivanič, R.
(1991) Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open-and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 93–114. doi: 10.1515/iral.1991.29.2.93
(1998) Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/swll.5
Ivanič, R. , & Camps, D.
(2001) I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1), 3–33. doi: 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00034‑0
Jiang, K. F. , & Hyland, K.
(2015) ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies, 17(5), 529–550. doi: 10.1177/1461445615590719
MAXQDAplus (2012) (Version 11) [Computer software]. Berlin: VERBI GmbH.
Matsuda, P. K. , & Tardy, C. M.
(2007) Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235–249. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
McEnery, T. , & Hardie, A.
(2011) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511981395
Nesi, H. , & Moreton, E.
(2012) EFL/ESL writers and the use of shell nouns. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language (pp.126–145). London: Continuum.
Parkinson, J.
(2013) Representing own and other voices in social science research articles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(2), 199–228. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.18.2.02par
Petrić, B.
(2010) Students’ conceptions of voice in academic writing. In R. Lorés-Sanz , P. Mur-Dueñas & E. Lafuente-Millán (Eds.), Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres (pp.324–336). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Prelli, L. J.
(1989) A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
Ramanathan, V. , & Atkinson, D.
(1999) Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75. doi: 10.1016/S1060‑3743(99)80112‑X
Schmid, H. -J.
(2000) English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110808704
Sinclair, J. M.
(1986) Fictional worlds. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about Text (pp.43–60). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Swales, J. M.
(2004) Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
Tadros, A.
(1993) The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, Description, Discourse (pp.98–114). London: HarperCollins.
Tardy, C. M. , & Matsuda, P. K.
(2009) The construction of author voice by editorial board members. Written Communication, 26(1), 32–52. doi: 10.1177/0741088308327269
Thompson, G. , & Hunston, S.
(2000) Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp.1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, G. , & Ye, Y. Y.
(1991) Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–382. doi: 10.1093/applin/12.4.365
Winter, E. O.
(1982) Towards a Contextual Grammar of English: The Clause and its Place in the Definition of Sentence. London: George Allen & Unwin.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address