Exploring and reshaping learners’ beliefs about the usefulness of corrective feedback

References

1. Alanen, R
   (2003) A sociocultural approach to young language learners’ belief about language learning. In P. Kalaja & A.M.F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp.55–85). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑4751‑0_3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_3 [Google Scholar]
2. Alanen, R
   (2013) Noticing and mediation: A sociocultural perspective. In J.M. Bergsleithner , S.N. Frota , & J.K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp.315–325). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aljaafreh, A. , & Lantolf, J.P
   (1994) Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1994.tb02064.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x [Google Scholar]
4. Amrhein, H.R. , & Nassaji, H
   (2010) Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why?Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquee, 13(2), 95–127. Retrieved fromhttps://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19886/21712
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aro, M
   (2009) Speakers and doers: Polyphony and agency in children’s beliefs about language learning (Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland). Retrieved fromhttps://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/19882
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ashwell, T
   (2000) Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–257. doi: 10.1016/S1060‑3743(00)00027‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8 [Google Scholar]
7. Bakhtin, M
   (1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bakhtin, M
   (1986) Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barcelos, A.M.F
   (2003) Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In P. Kalaja & A.M.F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp.7–33). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑4751‑0_1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_1 [Google Scholar]
10. Barcelos, A.M.F. , & Kalaja, P
    (2013) Beliefs in second language acquisition: Teacher. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. New York: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bråten, I
    (1991a) Vygotsky as precursor to metacognitive theory: I. The concept of metacognition and its roots. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35(3), 179–192. doi: 10.1080/0031383910350302
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383910350302 [Google Scholar]
12. Bråten, I
    (1991b) Vygotsky as precursor to metacognitive theory: II. Vygotsky as metacognitivist. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35(4), 305–320. doi: 10.1080/0031383910350406
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383910350406 [Google Scholar]
13. Brown, A.V
    (2009) Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00827.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x [Google Scholar]
14. Cole, M
    (1996) Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cornillie, F. , Clarebout, G. , & Desmet, P
    (2012) Between learning and playing? Exploring learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback in an immersive game for English pragmatics. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 24(03), 257–278. doi: 10.1017/S0958344012000146
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000146 [Google Scholar]
16. Diab, R.L
    (2005) Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about responding to ESL writing: A case study. TESL Canada Journal, 23(1), 28–43. Retrieved fromwww.teslcanadajournal.ca/index.php/tesl/article/view/76 doi: 10.18806/tesl.v23i1.76
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v23i1.76 [Google Scholar]
17. Dufva, H
    (2003) Beliefs in dialogue: A Bakhtinian view. In P. Kalaja & A.M.F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp.131–151). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑4751‑0_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_6 [Google Scholar]
18. Dufva, H
    (2004) The contribution of the Bakhtin Circle to the psychology of language. In M. Nenonen (Ed.), Papers from the 30th Finnish Conference of Linguistics (pp.21–26). Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goldman-Eisler, F
    (1961) A comparative study of two hesitation phenomena. Language and Speech, 4(1), 18–26. doi: 10.1177/002383096100400102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096100400102 [Google Scholar]
20. Hedgcock, J. , & Lefkowitz, N
    (1994) Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39(1), 141–163. doi: 10.1016/1060‑3743(94)90012‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 [Google Scholar]
21. Heift, T
    (2002) Learner control and error correction in ICALL: Browsers, peekers, and adamants. Calico Journal, 19(2), 295–313. Retrieved fromwww.jstor.org/stable/24149363
    [Google Scholar]
22. Horwitz, E.K
    (1985) Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1985.tb01811.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1985.tb01811.x [Google Scholar]
23. Hyland, F
    (2003) Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230. doi: 10.1016/S0346‑251X(03)00021‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6 [Google Scholar]
24. Kalaja, P. , & Barcelos, A.M.F
    (2013) Beliefs in second language acquisition: Learner. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. New York: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kern, R.G
    (1995) Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 71–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1995.tb00770.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1995.tb00770.x [Google Scholar]
26. Kozulin, A
    (1998) Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Leki, I
    (1991) The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1991.tb00464.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x [Google Scholar]
28. Leontjev, D
    (2014) The effect of automated adaptive corrective feedback: L2 English questions. APPLES: Journal of applied language studies, 8(2), 43–66. Retrieved fromapples.jyu.fi/ArticleFile/download/459
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mercer, S
    (2011) Language learner self-concept: Complexity, continuity and change. System, 39(3), 335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.006 [Google Scholar]
30. Nation, I.S.P
    (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 [Google Scholar]
31. Plonsky, L. , & Mills, S.V
    (2006) An exploratory study of differing perceptions of error correction between a teacher and students: Bridging the gap. Applied Language Learning, 16(1), 55–74. Retrieved fromwww.dliflc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/all16one.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
32. Poehner, M.E
    (2008) Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Poehner, M.E , & Lantolf, J.P
    (2013) Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during Computerized Dynamic Assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323–342. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482935
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935 [Google Scholar]
34. Pujolà, J
    (2001) Did CALL feedback feed back? Researching learners’ use of feedback. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 13(1), 79–98. doi: 10.1017/S0958344001000817
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344001000817 [Google Scholar]
35. Põhikooli riiklik õppekava õigusakt: Lisa 1 [Basic School National Curriculum Act: Annex 1]
    (2010) Pub. L. No. RT I 2010, 6, 22. Retrieved fromhttps://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/1281/2201/0017/13275423.pdf
36. Saito, H
    (1994) Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46–69. Retrieved fromwww.teslcanadajournal.ca/index.php/tesl/article/view/633 doi: 10.18806/tesl.v11i2.633
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v11i2.633 [Google Scholar]
37. Sato, M
    (2013) Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611–633. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12035.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x [Google Scholar]
38. Schulz, R.A
    (2001) Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258. doi: 10.1111/0026‑7902.00107
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107 [Google Scholar]
39. Teo, A
    (2012) Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 10–20. Retrieved fromllt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/action.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
40. Thouësny, S
    (2011) Dynamically assessing written language: To what extent do learners of French language accept mediation?In S. Thouësny & L. Bradley (Eds.), Second language teaching and learning with technology: Views of emergent researchers (pp.169–188). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Vasilyeva, E. , Puuronen, S. , Pechenizkiy, M. , & Rasanen, P
    (2007) Feedback adaptation in web-based learning systems. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 17(4-5), 337–357. doi: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2007.015046
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2007.015046 [Google Scholar]
42. Vygotsky, L.S
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wenden, A
    (1987) Metacognition: An expanded view of the cognitive abilities of L2 learners. Language Learning, 37(4), 573–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1987.tb00585.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00585.x [Google Scholar]
44. Wertsch, J.V
    (1991) A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick , J.M. Levine , & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.85–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10096‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-004 [Google Scholar]
45. Wertsch, J.V
    (1998) Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Yoshida, R
    (2010) How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom?The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 293–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01022.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01022.x [Google Scholar]