Context-dependency of argumentative patterns in discourse

References

1. Andone, C.
   (2016) Argumentative patterns in the political domain: The case of European parliamentary committees of inquiry. Argumentation, 30(1), 45–60.
   [Google Scholar]
2. van Eemeren, F.H.
   (2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
3. van Eemeren, F.H.
   (2016a) Bingo! Promising developments in argumentation theory. In F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory (pp.3–25). Dordrecht etc.: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
4. van Eemeren, F.H.
   (2016b) Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 30(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
5. van Eemeren, F.H. , & Garssen, B.
   (2014) Argumentation by analogy in stereotypical argumentative patterns. In H. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic approaches to argument by analogy (pp.41–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
6. van Eemeren, F.H. , & Grootendorst, R.
   (1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Feteris, E.T.
   (2016) Prototypical argumentative patterns in a legal context: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of decisions. Argumentation, 30(1), 61–79.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Feteris, E.T.
   (2017) The identification of prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions. This issue, 44–58.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Garssen, B.
   (2016) Problem-solving argumentative patterns in plenary debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation, 30(1), 25–43.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Garssen, B.
    (2017) The role of the argument by example in legislative debates of the European Parliament. This issue, 27–43.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Snoeck Henkemans, A.F.
    (2016) Argumentative patterns in over-the-counter medicine advertisements. Argumentation, 30(1), 81–95.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Snoeck Henkemans, A.F.
    (2017) Argumentative patterns using symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements. This issue, 59–75.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Toulmin, S.E.
    (2003) The uses of argument. Updated ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1st ed. 1958).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Wagemans, J.H.M.
    (2016) Argumentative patterns in scientific explanations. Argumentation, 30(1), 97–108.
    [Google Scholar]