Visit www.benjamins.com

Competition and conflict between communicative norms

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

Is it reasonable to be polite?

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.6.2.05hop
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.6.2.05hop
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Barth, Elsa M. , & Erik C. W. Krabbe
(1982) From Axiom to Dialogue. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110839807
Boghossian, Paul
(2015) Rules, Norms and Principles: A Conceptual Framework, In: M. Araszkiewicz , P. Banaś , T. Gizbert-Studnicki , & K. Płeszka (Eds.): Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following. (pp.3–11), Cham et al.: Springer.
Brown, Penelope
(2001) Politeness and language. In: N. J. Smelser , & P. B. Baltes (Eds.): International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.17, (pp.11620–11624), Oxford: Elsevier Science. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/03044‑8
Brown, Penelope , & Stephen Levinson
(1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and Politeness (pp.56–289), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, George
(1963) The Philosophy of Rhetoric. L. Bitzer (Ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius
(1948) De Oratore, Books I-II. E. W. Sutton (Transl.). Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Clark, Catherine L. , Phillip R. Shaver , & Matthew F. Abrahams
(1999) Strategic behaviors in romantic relationship initiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25, 709–722. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025006006
Dynel, Marta
(2016) Conceptualizing conversational humour as (im)politeness: The case of film talk. Journal of Politeness Research12, 117–147. doi: 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0023
Eelen, Gino
(2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Eemeren, Frans H. van
(2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
van Eemeren, Frans H.
(2015) From ideal model of critical discussion to situated argumentative discourse: the step-by-step development of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse (pp.127–148). Dordrecht et al.: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20955‑5_7
Eemeren, Frans H. van , Garssen, Bart , & Meuffels, Bert
(2007) Convergent operations in empirical ad hominem research. In F. H. van Eemeren , J. A. Blair , C. A. Willard , & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. (pp.367–373). Amsterdam: Sic Sat
(2009) Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. Dordrecht et al.: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑2614‑9
(2012) Effectiveness through reasonableness. Preliminary steps to pragma-dialectical effectiveness research. Argumentation, 26(1), 33–53. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑011‑9234‑7
(2015a) The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse (pp.757–769). Dordrecht et al.: Springer.
(2015b) Effectiveness through reasonableness: a pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse (pp.771–791). Dordrecht et al.: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20955‑5_42
(2015c) The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse (pp.793–811). Dordrecht et al.: Springer.
Eemeren, Frans H. van , & Rob Grootendorst
(2004) A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van , Rob Grootendorst , Sally Jackson , & Scott Jacobs
(1993) Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van , & Peter Houtlosser
(2002a) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren , & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp.131–159). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(2002b) Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren , & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp.13–28). Amsterdam-Newport News: Sic Sat/Vale Press.
(2015a) The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse (pp.111–126). Dordrecht et al.: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20955‑5_6
(2015b) The case of pragma-dialectics. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse (pp.149–180). Dordrecht et al.: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20955‑5_8
(2015c) How to respond to fallacious moves?In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse (pp.631–641). Dordrecht et al.: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20955‑5_33
Eemeren, Frans H. van , Bert Meuffels , & Mariël Verburg
(2000) The (un)reasonableness of the argumentum ad hominem. Language and Social Psychology19, 416–435. doi: 10.1177/0261927X00019004002
Eemeren, Frans H. van , Bart Garssen , Erik C. W. Krabbe , Francisca Snoeck Henkemans , Bart Verheij , & Jean H. M. Wagemans
(2014) Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht et al.: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
Fraser, Bruce
(1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics14, 219–236. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90081‑N
(2005) Whither politeness. In: R. Lakoff , & S. Ide (Eds.), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness (pp.65–83), Amsterdam u. Philadelphia. doi: 10.1075/pbns.139.07fra
Garssen, Bart
(2008) Seemingly unreasonable ad hominem fallacies and legitimate personal attacks. In T. Suzuki , T. Kato , & A. Kubota (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation. (pp.66–69). Tokyo: Japan Debate Association.
Goffman, Erving
(1967) On face-work. In: E. Goffman (Ed.), Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior (pp.5–45), New York: Pantheon Books.
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole , & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3 (pp.41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Gu, Yueguo
(1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics3, 237–257. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
Hage, Jaap
(2015) Separating Rules from Normativity, In: M. Araszkiewicz , P. Banaś , T. Gizbert-Studnicki , & K. Płeszka (Eds.): Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following. (pp.13–29), Cham et al.: Springer.
Hall, Jeffrey A.
(2013) The five flirting styles: Use the science of flirting to attract the love you really want. Don Mills, Ontario, CA: Harlequin Nonfiction.
Hall, Jeffrey A. , Steve Carter , Michael J. Cody , & Julie M. Albright
(2010) Individual Differences in the Communication of Romantic Interest: Development of the Flirting Styles Inventory. Communication Quarterly58, 365–393. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2010.524874
Hall, Jeffrey A. , & Chong Xing
(2015) The Verbal and Nonverbal Correlates of the Five Flirting Styles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior39, 41–68. doi: 10.1007/s10919‑014‑0199‑8
Hamblin, Charles
(1970) Fallacies. London: Methuen.
Haugh, Michael
(2011) Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In: B. L. Davies , M. Haugh , & A. J. Merrison (Eds.), Situated Politeness (pp.165–184), London: Continuum.
(2014) (Im)politeness implicatures. Berlin et al: De Gruyter Mouton.
Holmes, Janet , & Stephanie Schnurr
(2005) Politeness, humor and gender in the workplace: Negotiating norms and identifying contestation. Journal of Politeness Research1, 121–149. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.121
Hoppmann, Michael
(2008) Pragmatische Aspekte der Kommunikation: Höflichkeit und Ritualisierung. In U. Fix , A. Gardt , & J. Knape (Eds.), Handbuch der Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (HSK 31.1). Rhetorik und Stilistik. Vol.I. (pp.826–836). Berlin et al: de Gruyter.
Ide, Sachiko
(1982) Japanese sociolinguistics: politeness and women’s language. Lingua57, 49–89. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(82)90009‑2
(1989) Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua12, 7–11. doi: 10.1515/mult.1993.12.1.7
Kant, Immanuel
(2012) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals ( M. Gregor , & J. Timmermann , Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kingwell, Mark
(1993) Is it rational to be polite?The Journal of Philosophy90, 387–404. doi: 10.2307/2940877
Lakoff, Robin
(1973) The logic of politeness: Or, minding your p’s and q’s. In: C. Corum , T. C. Smith-Stark , & A. Weiser (Eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp.292–305).
(1989) The Limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua8, 101–129. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.101
(2004) Language and woman’s place: text and commentaries. Mary Buchholtz (Ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
(2005) The politics of nice. Journal of Politeness Research1, 173–191. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.173
Lakoff, R. , & S. Ide
(2005) Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.139
Leech, Geoffrey N.
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, London.
Leech, G. N.
(2007) Politeness: is there an East-West divide?Journal of Politeness Research3, 167–206. doi: 10.1515/PR.2007.009
Leech, Geoffrey N.
(2014) The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
Locher, Miriam A.
(2004) Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110926552
Locher, Miriam A. , & Richard J. Watts
(2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research1, 9–33. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Maier, Robert
(Ed.) (1989) Norms in Argumentation: Proceedings of the Conference on Norms 1988. Dordrecht: Foris.
Matthews, Jacqueline K. , Jeffrey T. Hancock , & Phillip J. Dunham
(2006) The Roles of Politeness and Humor in the Asymmetry of Affect in Verbal Irony, Discourse Processes41, 3–24. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_2
Mills, Sara
(2003) Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
Quintilian, Marcus Fabius
(2001) The Orator’s Education, Books 6–8. D. A. Russel (Transl.). Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Searle, John R.
(1969) Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Walton, Douglas N. , & Krabbe, Erik C. W.
(1995) Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Watts, Richard J.
(1989) Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behavior. Multilingua8, 131–166. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.131
(1992) Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In: R. J. Watts , S. Ide , & K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. (pp.43–69), Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
(2005) Linguistic politeness research: quo vadis?In: R. J. Watts , S. Ide , & K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. (pp.xi–xlvii), Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199819.1.131
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.6.2.05hop
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address