Visit www.benjamins.com

Variation, individual differences and second language processing

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

A Processability Theory study

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.14007.dys
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.14007.dys
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Ando, J. , Fukunaga, N. , Kurahashi, J. , Suto, T. , Nakano, T. , & Kage, M.
(1992) A comparative study of the two EFL teaching methods: The communicative and grammatical approach. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 247–256. doi: 10.5926/jjep1953.40.3_247
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2006) Interlanguage development: Main Routes and individual paths. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dörnyei (eds.), Themes in SLA research: AILA Review, 19, 42–68.
Bayley, R. & Preston, D.R.
(2008) Variation and second language grammars. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 1, 285–397. doi: 10.1515/shll‑2008‑1025
Bresnan, J.
(2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Clahsen, H. J. Meisel & M. Pienemann
(1983) Deutsch als Zweitsprache, Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.
Collins Cobuild English Grammar
Collins Cobuild English Grammar (1990) London and Glasgow: Collins.
Crystal, D.
(1998) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics4th Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dąbrowska, E.
(2012) Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 219–253. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
Dörnyei, Z.
(2006) Individual differences in second language acquisition. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dörnyei (eds.), Themes in SLA research. AILA Review, 19, 42–68. doi: 10.1075/aila.19.05dor
Di Biase, B. and Kawaguchi, S.
(2002) Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18, 272–300. doi: 10.1191/0267658302sr204oa
Dyson, B.
(2004) Developmental style in second language processing: A study of inter-learner variation in the acquisition of English as a Second Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney.
(2008) What we can learn from questions: Question development and its implications for language development. Prospect, 23, 16–27.
(2009) Processability Theory and the role of morphology in ESL development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25, 355–376. doi: 10.1177/0267658309104578
(2010) Learner language analytic methods and pedagogical implications. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33.3, 30.1–30.21.
Håkansson, G. Pienemann, Pienemann & Sayehli , S.
(2002) Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing. Second Language Research, 18, 250–273. doi: 10.1191/0267658302sr206oa
Håkansson, G. & Norrby C.
(2010) Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing Second and Foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning, 60, 628–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00569.x
Hansen Edwards, J. G.
(2011) Deletion of /t, d/ and the acquisition of linguistic variation by Second Language Learners of English. Language Learning, 61, 1256–1301. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00672.x
Johnston, M.
(1997) Development and variation in learner language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australian National University, Australia.
Keatinge, D. & Keßler, J-U.
(2009) The acquisitiion of the passive voice in English as a Foreign Language: production and perception. In J-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp.69-94). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kersten, K.
(2009) Profiling child ESL acquisition: Practical and methodological issues. In J-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (ed.), Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Labov, W.
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M.H.
(1991) An introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Longman.
Lenzing, A.
(2013) The development of the grammatical system in early second language acquisition: the multiple constraints hypothesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/palart.3
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mansouri, F.
(2005) Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language: Typological features and their processing implications. In M. Pienemann (ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 117–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.06man
McDonough, K.
(2005) Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103. doi: 10.1017/S0272263105050047
Meisel, J.M.
(1980) Linguistic simplification: A study of immigrant workers' speech and foreigner talk. In S.W. Felix (ed.), Second Language Development: Trends and Issues (pp. 13–40). Tübingen: Narr.
Meisel, J.M. , Clahsen , H. , & Pienemann , M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109–135. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100004137
Phillips, C.
(2012) Individual variation and constraints on language learning. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 281–286. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.08phi
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.15
(ed.) (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30
(2010) A cognitive view of Language Acquisition: Processability Theory and beyond. In Seedhouse P Walsh S and Jenks C (eds.) Conceptualising 'learning' in applied linguistics (pp. 69&88). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2011) Learner variation. In M. Pienemann & J-U Keßler (eds.) Studying Processability Theory (pp. 12&26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/palart.1.02lea
(2015) An outline of Processability Theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning, 65, 123–151. doi: 10.1111/lang.12095
Pienemann, M. , Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi , S.
(2005) Extending Processability Theory. In Pienemann M (ed.) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199&252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.09pie
Pienemann, M. & Johnston, M.
(1987) Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In Nunan, D. (ed.), Applying Second Language Acquisition Research (p. 45&141). Adelaide: National Curriculum Research Centre, Adult Migrant Education Program.
Pienemann, M. & Keßler. J-U.
(ed.) (2011) Studying Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/palart.1
Roberts, L.
(2012) Individual differences in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 62: Suppl. 2, 172–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00711.x
Ryding, K. C.
(2005) A reference grammar for Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486975
Sakai, H.
(2008) An analysis of Japanese university students´ oral performance in English using Processability Theory. System, 36, 534–549. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2008.03.002
Sekerina, I.
(2012) We need an integrated, multiple-predictor model of native language proficiency. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 304–307. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.12sek
Skehan, P.
(1998) Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Tarone, E. & Parrish, B.
(1988) Task-related variation in interlanguage. Language Learning, 38, 21–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1988.tb00400.x
Vainikka, A. & Young Scholten, M.
(2011) The acquisition of German: Introducing organic grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110263848
(2012) The straight and narrow path. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 319–323. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.15vai
van Dijk, M. Verspoor, M. & Lowie, W.
(2011) Variability and DST. In M. Verspoor , K. de Bot & W. Lowie (ed.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/lllt.29.04van
Weinrich, U. Labov, W. & Herzog, M.
(1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium (pp. 95–188). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Yamaguchi, Y.
(2008) The early syntactic development in child L2 acquisition: What happens after “canonical order”?. In J-U. Keßler (ed.), Processability approaches to Second Language development and Second Language learning (pp. 247–268). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
(2009) The development of plural marking and plural agreement in child English L2 Acquisition. In J-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (ed.), Research in Second Language Acquisition: empirical evidence across languages (pp. 9–39). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Zhang Y.
(2005) Processing and formal instruction in the L2 acquisition of five Chinese grammatical morphemes. In M. Pienemann (ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.07zha
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.14007.dys
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address